HomeMy WebLinkAbout1415i
516'~51
IN ~ CII~11T ~ITRT IId Ai~D P+OiIt ST. IxICIE OGII~Tl'Y, E7~O~IIaA
JFIi~~ E. H~4d~IIF~E~
- , Plaintiff,
BOWFi~ Il~1C.
a F],~aricia ao~po~aticn,
Defer~dant,
B1~[~IIEE Ai~ AS90C?1~'FS, Il~. ,
a Floarida vo~po~atian,
TtLil~ci Party Defendant.
JF.E~ E. B1~J~,
Plaintiff,
-vs-
BC~1J B~i'~~3i~S, IIaC. ,
a Flarida oo~poraticn,
Ueferldatit.
BI~UG~AIIEE Al~ AS90CIA1£S, INC.,
a Florida oo~poaration,
Plaintiff,
BC~i BRU-I'E~, II~IC. ,
a Flo~ida oocporaticn,
Defendant.
s
.
.
.
.
.
:
:
.
.
:
.
.
:
,
:
.
.
.
:
:
.
.
:
:
.-
:
:
.
:
.
.
.
CA~E ND. 76-1229-CA
CASE PA. 77-100-C~
~ NO. 77-325-CA
Zhis matter havir~g ~ rn fos hearirig t~on Defendant's Motirn to Strik~e
Para9x'a~h nunber 7 of Catuit II reiating to ~xmitive aama~es, r~ticn to nismiss
p~uiitive aamag~es, ana rso~ticn to caitinue, a~d the court having t~eare argu~nts
of vourvsel aond otheiwise beinq fully advised in the prani.ses , it is herevy
O[tL~3t'ED and AD-7L~C~D
1. That the ad dam~n porctirn of Camt II referring to p~mitive
damages is hereby stridcen a~xi dismis.ged based upan the failure of the alLega-
tiar~ of Camt II to state a cause of actirn far~ p~mi.tive dana4es ~c7er Flari.da
].aa. Plaintiff is granted leave of oourt to file acresxied pl~eac3irgs rn o~r befone
- 1 -
E
s
~~~~ ,. ~
x.,+-~~..**..:~-~a~,+.'~~ .„~~-„~K~. ._ ..~_. . - -,
g,~N~( ~D PA~ ~~5
~,
_
i
~
_ ~
.. ... ..r-.;3 ~