HomeMy WebLinkAbout195151~009
IN THE CI RCUIT COURT OF THE ~~I NETEENTii
JIiDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA I~ AND FOR
ST. J,UCIE COUNTY
WILLIAM A. `PIMKO, etc., et al.,
CAS~: i10: 7~~-55$ CA
Plaintiffs
vs.
LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY
COtrIPANY, etc . , et al. ,
Uef enuarits
ORDER
TNIS CA[;SE came before ti~e Court on the Plaintiffs' t4otion
for Protective Order and the Court having read the Motion, heard
the arguments of counsel and being otherwise £ully advised in the
~reinises, it is iiereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs' Motion F'or Pro-
teci.ive Order is GRAN~ED and, it is further
ORUER~:D A;JU AUJ~DGEU the Uefendants may take tne depositions
of tne Plaintiffs oi~ Marcti 17, 1981 or tRe morning of March
ld, lytsl or at sucn other ti:ne as is agreeable to all counsel,
in tne State uf Oliio, in tne County of Bellmont, the Plaintiffs'
residence.
UUNE AivU URD~R~:G tnis
COPIES F(iRi~ISIIED ^!O:
Charle~ C. Powers, ~:sq.. ~
~3radforu ~. Jetterson, ~sy.
Morgan S. Bragg, Esq.
~
~ ~,
.~
; day ot ~-{~/~~P!l , 1981.
, . ~
l~
~
.~ ~~ ,~,- ~~
~ ---~-"
L/ CIitC `i' COl3RT J GE
;
1931 ;~~. -'~ P„ 3~ : ~
•,: ~ ..
.~:,_ ,.
;~: ~~: ~ ~.~ ~
~/
51'70U9
~ ~
~
~
~ ~ ~_ _ _
'=~~r ~ ~~ ~. ._ ,_ ~~: .~
g!t~'~J~O Pa6f~~
,
~
_ ,--
..s ~~~