HomeMy WebLinkAbout0986 :
~ ...r
set the case for jury trial), and record activity by the trial ~
court on September 21, 1978 (i.e., the order setting the case
Eor trial). We find such record activity to be sufficient to
prevent dismissal under Rule 1.420(e). The one year period pre-
scribed_ by Rule 1.420(e) is to be measured by calculating the
time between the date of the' last record activity and the date
~
oE the filing of the motion to dismiss. Ace Delivery Service,
Inc. v. Pickett, 274 So.2d 15 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1973); Shalabey,
supra. Thus, because there was record activity within the year _
prior to the filing of the appellant's motion to dismiss, the
trial court correctly denied the motion. Industrial Trucks of
Florida v. Gonzalez, 351 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977).
The final judgment is affirmed.
~
. 7
+
[
~
~
E
4
i
i
I
~t ~ ~
4 .
~
~
!
!
3
[
fq
[ -
t .
f ~ ~ NpV 12 ~M ~ 09
~ , PECORDEO .
~ ft.CC ~ ~I~Y.FIA. .
SI. LUCIf. CO~+
i?GG£.R PG~7RA5
CIERK CIRGtl11 CQUi~T ~
~:ri.;..;~,lo~;;:'._.~~~ -
~ . ~
. 54'~841
BERA^3EK and HERSF.Y, JJ. , concur. -
3orOK cJ?t~i1 P~SE ~~t7•,