HomeMy WebLinkAbout0965 J
5901'71 ~'~~~ui1 ~o~K ~ Minu ~ ~
. BooK 3 ~ Par,F a~~
1 N Tt iE C I R(~1 I7' CQllt'I' 01~ '111E: N I iVHT~.F.MI l
JIJI)ICIAl. CIRQII'l' Of' I~I.ORIDA, IN MO Fdt
C~.E(~ pBFE aOUMY C I V I L ACT I ON t
CA.SF. NO.: 80 aS7 C.~1
~
4
'I1ICMAS ,1. ICAFfI.f-R, F
Plaintiff,
.
VS. ~ ~ q
t-~
I.YKF.S BRQI~[f~RS~ II~. , IWt7FORD ~ o
y_ ~ .
ACCIQINf AM) IImHrWITY CCAtPAM' ,o~,~ w n i
ancl SYLVF.SI'~R YQII~ , r, ~ ,T
~ . :n o
~ • n ~
l~fenciants/Thi rti c ~ ; _ °c 'n+° ~
Party Plaintiffs, + . ~c c~
0~ ~ ~~p
VS. C ~ ~
~
-~n+ ~ a
S"fA'I'Ii 01~ I~tARIDA, DEPNt'IMI'NI' ~
Ol~ 'IRANSI'ORTATION,
Third Party I~efendants.
' / ~
-
r•r~i. cc~r .~ui?cTUxr
"il l I S CAUSE came on t o hc hca rcl be fo re me , t hc unde rs i~ecl
J~xlge, upon the lkfenclants' 1~iotion 7'0 "1'ax Costs anci the Ca~rt havin~;
' considereci argument of counsel for the respective parties, having
~onsiclerecl the eviJence presentecl and bein~ otherr?ise fully aciviseci
If
~ in the prcmises, it is herchy
f
~
~ Olu)F1t17) and /V~IUlX~17) that thc [lefcrxfants, 1.Y1~(:.~ EiK(711[I:RS,
~ I IV(:. , t4\li7'F=qt1) AC(:DI1:1`T AM) IN11I3~n1I1Y CCb11':1hY arx~ SYI VI:SI'l1t 1"Ul1N(~,
~ clo hav_e ancl recover from the Plaintiff, 'fIKI?tAS 1CNlI.IIt, the sum of '
~
s2414.35, for costs in the above referenceJ cause, for w~hich sum let
executian issue.
~ : : IX3Nt: and ORUIRI~ in chambcrs at Stuart , ~t..~rtin Camty,
~ ~=o''ida,~tbis _ 3 p~h c~ay of ~ ~v~r , 198I .
~ . . , _e_
yf y.,
~ , ' ~i . , : / . . ~
s . / ` /y ,
j f~ ~lITE ~F~,~A ~
` - ~ y E~bUNTIf
~ , t , ~,-i:EitTIFY THAT THISIS ~t
• A~~RU~Ah~~?C4RRFCT COPYOF 1)WIGffT 1.. GEIGIR ~Z 23 I~ 32 €
,~14~,bttta'N
; - ~~iF BETTS, JR., CLERK CIRC~IIT COUftT JUi1(~Ii crt t c~kc ; r ~
S(.Ll~"~E fG~~' ~
r BY D.c. 5901'71 R~~r`~ rt i-~~~ 4
q [~A1 ~ ~ Z' ( • f 9 g~ • Clt'rK t!n"C'u'iT f:~ :
~ _ ~ ~ ~
~
copies furnislied counsel a~~ P14~E ~
3
~ . '
i