Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0196 * S ~ . { t f 7 ~ - - T . ~ ~in~l manuf~act~~:~c:,~ b~~ l~ir~~tone ai~ei ii~c~r~x~rated by t'UI"~l ltlC() the 19fi8 _ Ford c~•ucl: which I~ord sold as i~~ ~nvn produ~.~ would require fi similar ruli~i~; as t~ Che sufficie~l~,y of the com~lainr agafnst each uf these ~ . . - ~ ~ , c~efendants. . ~ ~ A ll~~nt~ contend ttn t the trial wurt erred in di~missin ~ PP~ g ~ ~ e~~ch of tt~e five c;ounts of the coniplaint. V~(c will coi~sider~each count~ - se~~ ra tely. . : _ - - ~ _ In cot~nt one plaintiffs seek to rew:r~~ on ttle conventional . _ 2 ~ ~Il~'UI'}~ of br~ac1~ ~f imp1iFd ~varrant}? a~ wc~l ~~s t1ie theor}~ of strict ~ _ ~ ~ Iiability. ~ 1?4'c~ f~r?d the co:~nt sufficient u?~der an irnp~ic~d war~r~nty ~ tl~et>?-y, l~ is alle e~ in d~is count tl~at b z~asoi~ of im~ro r desi n _ ~ Y t P~ g ~ . _ ~ - ~ . ~ - oz• manufacture by defcndan~s Forr~ and l~ixesr.one ~ne ~v~ieel and rim - t . assembly w~s nUt safe for it~ in~ended iise and irtherently danKerous ~ . - ~ . - c to ~rsons in the ~icir,i.ty of iCs pr.obaUly ~~se. 1'he dr;sign defects - ~ ~ _ - - ~ _ ~ _ relied on a?-e spe: if~ed in the pleading; and catisal connection between . ~ tl~~ s~x.~::ified d~sit~n defects and the expiasi~~n of ~he rim off the - ~ ? _ , ~~!~eel resu'ting in plaintiffs' i.njury is assertpd. ~ ~ - - - ~ _ - - ~ i VVe find that ~he allegations c~f c~unt otY~ set fortl~ a - f ~ - . ~ , _ sufficient _.?airr~ fo~- reiief for breaci~ of itnplied warranty iviihin the rule = _ _ - , - - .s coiitained_in ~he Restatement of Tvrts ~4~hich has been approved in ; _ . - _ , _ ~ 4. . - _ ; - ~ _ Appellee ro~d contends that Florid~ cases un imp'ied warra~ity ' ' prior to. adopti~r~ ~f ~l~e ~mnibus L:niform Commercial C~de wtiich be- . ~ c:ame 4ffective January 1, 196~, are no ~or~g~r relevant sinee the i - L':11fOT"ili CoTnmcT•ciGl Cocle ~3re-en~~itecl this area ~vherc: ~?FpJ;cablc~, i V4'e disagree witt~ this contention anc~ approve t~`~e ie«~ expr°ssed itz ; -~he case of I=ord Motor Co. v. Pitp-n~n, 227 So. 2ci 24~ (Fla. App. I969), _ _ tha t the implied w~rranty doctrine develope~ in Floricia pxior to . ~ adoptia~i of the Uniform C;~~~mercial G~de is still ~-iable. _ ' s= _ . f. - f _ j . - --3- - ~ - _ r. " ~ - f` . - _ . . _ _ _ . - _ . . _ _ 1 . - . . ~ _ ~ ~j ~ ~ - ' ~ . . . " _ . . _ - . . - . ~ ~ , ~ E. _ (t _ i' - . ' _ ' _ _ , . ' ~i . . _ . ~ . ' . _ ' . - . Y - ' t f ' " i . ' - _ _ _ . - ~ _ - _ : _ ~ s~~K 239 ~~~~~E - - ~ , .