Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0198 . , ~i • ~ { . i turn t~~ c;vunt nvc~ ~f the c~n~plainc which alleges negligence ~ ~ F ~~n th:: pai~[ of c3efenci~~lts Fc~rcl ~~nd Firc;srvnc. 'Chis cot~r~ ~~lle~es that ~ • 1 5 . these ~efend~nts negligenCly dE3SI~;ile(Z ~IIE: ICIC~:Il7~T 11IT1 at1C~ ~~~heel and ~ Yleglig~ntlv ~ailcd to test thc wheel a~sembly with the result t~zat the ; wl~eel ~ssembly ~vas inherently unsafe, ilegligently failed to investigatc ~ si~nilar explosions of si.milar wheels and rims sQ as to c~c~ ~rope~ re - search and corzect the =:.auses thereof; negli~ently failecl ~to w~rn users - ~ f f of Yhe dangerous propen~ities of tihe wheel ~ssembly of w~hich they kr.e:w ~ - - i i ~ ~r shbuld have knou~n; and that as a result thereof plaintiffs were injured . - - ~ . . - whcn t~~e rim pulled a~rt an:1 exploded off tl~e wheel ~~:hile plaintiffs ~ ; - - . . - _ # wet-c rr~ou~~ti.rig a ti_rG on the wheel ass~m~ly which ha~ Y~e~n ~iegligently ~ - clcsigned and m~nufactured by defendan~s F~~i•d and I~irestoi~e, ~'4'e find ; ' :.r ~ - . i~' ~1 e11Ce ~ that cour~t n~a suff~~:ientl} ~tatc.c~ a claij.~ for. r..~~~f ~,~s~.d upon g ~ ~ _ ~ - . ~ - ; of deferidants I~ord and Hiresto~e ~i~d the tria~ couxt err~d in dismi~~ing - ~ • ; this count as to defe:~dai~t l;or~. _ - - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ Cc~unt three agair5t 5w~rise c-lai,i?s damag~~ for violati~~n of , ~ ~ ~ i ~the L;nifur•m `wmci~ercidl t,ode ~~~arranty section (§f~7~. 2-3I4, l~lorida . ' . . - ~ ~ . ~ Statutes 1967). It is all;:ged ir. ri~is count thar ~unrise cc~ntz~acted wir_h ~ - ; 'i'he Coodyear 1'ii•e Store to cl~artg~ certain tires froin an oId trucn to ~ ~ the n~w 1968 Nord truck previously referred to ~nd that plaintiffis, : . empioyees of Tlie Goodyear Tire Store, wel-e in~ured whei~ the~outside ~ ; : dual rim o~i the 1~368 Ford r_ruck puilea apart and explodeci as ~re~~ious = ~ 1 _ . Iy described. This count is insufficien~ for th° reason that tt-~ere was no safe alleged on the part ~f .~~,ll~'li-ise so as to invQke the [:nif~~rm ~ C~mrnc:rcial C,ode, ~~rticle 2, warr_anty provisic~ns for ihe benefit of ; ~ . ~ _ . - f - plaintiffs. The d~livery of the i968 I~ord truc}: to plaintiffs' em~loyer ~ ; i . f~r the purpo~e ~f ha~lirig the tires charged was noC a~al~ but a_ - t - - . - - ~ _ . - _ - . _ - _ . ~ . _ - ~ ~ - ~ " ~ - ~ . - - ~ - ' t _ ` i - ~ I ~ E - t` - ~ _ t. ~ . ~ f _ ~ . _ - _ F - - _ p~~c}~ ~ ~ - . ~UDi(~.J~ PAGf ta~7 . ~ ; _ - _ ~ - - • ~ ~ .