HomeMy WebLinkAbout0199 ~ -
. bUil~~nert f~~T• ti~t~t~~~~i ix~r.eftt, l~~~ift~rn~ C:aiz~~l~~i~~ial (:~xl~~, t~rticlc.~ 2.,
salc~ wai-ra?~ties usually t~~avc ~lc~t b::~~~~ r~~~;arcled a5 ~ire~:tXy applicabl~~
t~ bailments of chattei lease tra+zsacta~ns, l~.t cc~ut'ts 'i?1 son~e cas~~s
E
t~a~~e applied s~l~s war~-anties by~ unalo~y [o chatCel lc~asc; transactions. -
Tt~e l~~ilP~~:nt involved i~3 the case suU judice was not similar to a:~aie
a~~cj we s~:e na i•~ason t~ extend Uniform C:ommercial Cocie warra~i-
~ ~ tie;s to thi~ typ~ of I~~ilmcnc. We affirm tl~e action of the trial court - -
~ ~
- - in dismissing co~a?~t tnree of the r.orr~plai.nt.
~ Count foux- is u negli~ence co;2nt againsc ciefendant Sunrise -
<< whi~h reitet-ates the fac.tu~l situation ~set foi•th in cou~~t L'hr~e aild
r -
E:
~ ~?leges several alegligent ac[s and otni~sions on the pai•t Qf defendailt -
. .
~ - -
r Sunrise, includi~~g a1l.egaziat~s ihat Sunrise negligently intermingled ~
; .
_ 6. 0 inch riris with 6. 5 inch riryzs on rhe 1~6R Ford truck and ordered . -
; - 90t~ x 20 tires inst~illed ther~n a~lthougf~ ~unrise k~~ew ~r should 'nave
~ - -
_ _ - known thae tires~of this size were not suitable for n~outiting on 6.0
~ - -
~ inch rims aud that Sunrise neglige~ztly failed to ~va~-n plainciffs af ch~ _
= dan~Gr intier~nt in mounting 900 x 20 tires on the 6. 0 inch rims on _
~ th~ truck. Causal connectian bet~ve~n the negligence charge~ and the
_ injury pla~ntiffs is asserted. ~'Ve fii~d that count four sufficient~y
. .
k . sta*eci a cau~~ o€ ~~c;tion in iie~;l;gei~ce agai~~st :lefendani Sunrise and ' '
_ .
` that dismi~sal of caant fo~.:r by the tzial court ti~l~s er.ror. _
- - In coun~ f~~~e plaintiffs base thei.r-c~,~ir~: a~aiiist Ford and
_ _ _ .
I ~ ~ - -
; -
` ~ Tl~e ~ype of l~ai:r~er*_ ~~aitl~ whirh we a~-e cor~cei-ne~ hei-~ h~s becn
classifit:c~ as a~iilment locario op~ris re~ciei~cii, oi- i~ii-ir:~ of ~;~oz-k a~-
laboi- u~oi~ a thi~j~. S Am. Jur. ~i~, E3ailr.ients § S at 919 and § I55 at - ~
~ ~ 1048. - _ .
_ b. Florida has applied the L'niforn? Commercial ~cx~e, ~rticle 2, ~
war.ranty provisions by analogy to a chattel lease bailr,~ent ~rhere ic_ _
~ - ~~as allegec~ ti~at rhe less~e. relied on the lcssar`s skill er judgmenr ;
to furnish a svitabie chattel, ~V. E, johnso~i r~quip!nen~ ~o, v. _
- L nite~i ~'~irli~~es, Inc. ~ 238 So, Zd 98 la. 1970). ;
. . _6_ - _ - ~
€ - ~ : - ;
_ -
_ ~
- .
. . - ,
~ - - ~ -
; . .
z -
i: . . . _ . . . .
~ - _ ~ - ~0~~~9 ~.99 ;
€ .
_ _ .
3 "
~ ,