Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0202 i ' 1 ii~ity anci the flction of i~iirlie~d r:urx~nty ought } i~ ' ~ tv l~ Iaic~ e~ rest uti~c;t:remoniously ~3lli; ~ll~?~IA[il~~~ j by the concept of stric;t liab°.lity in r:ort, " i , I agree ~viti~ tlie c~t~ot~d partioit of the disscnt~ng opinion c?f + ~ jtidge NEa~,er ici Mattes anci dissent fron~ the portion~of t-he maj~~ity cpiil- ion ~vhich states ehaC plain~iff~' theory as to strict liability sho~sld ~e - stricken. I would hold tha~ cc~unt one of p~aintiffs' compl.aint stated a : ~ ; ; _ valid rlaim for. relief under th~: aoctrine of stt ict liability in torr ;~s well . t_ f - - as uiider ti-~e th~ory c~f implied warranty. . i ~ } _ ~ _ - ' i ; • - _ i e_ - . ' _ ' . ' . 3~ . i _ ~ _ f , _ ~ ~ - , ~ _ _ . ~ ~ - - _ , ~ - E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ . ~ . i . - _ - ~ t . . ' i ~ _ _ , _ _ - ' , . e . 1 , ' ~ . . " . . - . . ' ~ ' . ' I . i . ~ . . . , - . " . ~ i.. . _ • a . ~ - ~ ( - . . . . - - - _ ~ - i t. . _ . . ' - _ ~ . . . . . . . ~ . . ~ ; r . ' ~ . . . ' . - ~ . . } . t E j ~ 4 ;I~ ~ . . - . . ~ . . ~ . . - ' . - > i . - . - . ' - ` . . - ' ' _ - ~ . . f ~ . ' . • " - . . . . I ' ' ' _ ~ . ~ , _ . - . - . - F. . . . , ~ ' • - _ ~ ~ ~ - . . ~ 4 . " _ . ' • ~ _ ~ ~ - . , " , - • V~~,~1~ ~~L ~ ~ . . . ' - - . '