HomeMy WebLinkAbout0632 r
. r
/
~l ~
~~~~~f~
~ ~ IN T~IE CTRCUIT COURT FOR
ST. LUCI~ COUNTY, FLURIDA _ -
- N0. 75-40 CP ~
W. K. COXF and DJRIS H. COXE,
his wifa, - ~
Plainti,ffs ~
vs . .
EXECUTIVE COFtPCaRATIODT OF FL(7,~IDA,
sometimes k.nown as EX~:CU~I: ~i~E ~ - ~
_ CORPORA,TION, ~ Florida corporation,`=` -
et a1, _ . - ~ .
Defendants ~ ~ . 1
: ~ ~
- FINAL JUDGMEL~ZT ~
_ _ This cause ca e ~
m on for fina~. hearing the~ day of _
, 1975, on plaintiffs' complaint, answer and cross-
claim of defendant BERT SAUL GONSULTING ENGINEER, INC., and cQpy
- of Claim of Lien of defendant, ROBERT L. k'kiITMAN marked "Ori-
- - ginal Defensive Pleading", and it appearing to the Cour~ from thp
record that a default had been entered against the ~efendant
E~ECUTIVE CORPORATION OF FLC?RIDA, sometimes known as F~KECUTIVE -
~ CORPORATION, a Florida c~rporatior,, and the Court having received -
evidence, both oral and documenta.;-y, and the cause having been.
- submi±ted to tr,e Court, a:~d the Gourt being fully advised iri the
_ premises, the Court finds the facts as follows:
The material sZlEgations contained in the plaintiffs' '
complaint ha4,~e been _proven by competent evidence; that p].ainti~fs -
have expended $40.00 to bring the abstract of tit~.e on sui~ject
pragerty current immediateiy~pra.or to filing th~ foreciosure;
that plaintiffs have also expended-thP sum of $242.93 in payment
of the 1.974 real.property taxes on subject property to keep the ~
: same from gaing delinquent,.the cost of both o~ which they are
. entitled to recover, and plaintiffs are furt~er entitled to--re-
_ LAW OFFICES .
- ~ _ . ~ wr~z~s, eirrarv ~ v?•~~ES p ~ ~ ~ :
~ P. o. eox ~ 84~4 ~rt~t7 PACi -
; . _ FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 384D0 ~
•_,ti,-.,_-- - _ . ' . . -