HomeMy WebLinkAbout1866 . „ ~
t' • ~
_ ~
- IPl THE CIRCUIT COURT Ol~ THE NTNETEENTH
JUDTCIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIAA, IN AND FOR
31~ ~ . sT. LuczE coux~rx.
- CASE N0. 7J~-2~6 CA
ST.EVE LTNN and TILLIE E. ~
~ STEIIJMAN,
Ylaintiffs~ ~
~ vs. ~ - .
- - GLADYS MeCARTg JACOBSEN
~ndi~?iduallq and as Administra~or
af the Estate of B, K.. MaCarty,~~ - . -
~ deaeased, . ~
~ . Defendant. : ~ .
- - - _ .
~ FINAL JUDGMENT -
The above-entitled matter a~me on regularly for tr~~l
before ~the ~ Court, sitting ~+rl.thout a jury, on May 27, 1975, both :
~ ~ parties being present and represented by counsel.
- The_Court, having heard the testimony and having
_ exainined_the evidence offered by respective parties, makes the
. following findings o~ fact,-via: . - .
~ - This is an action for spsci~ic parfor,aance of a eontract -
. - involv~ng the sale of realt~, ~,he primary.issue relating ~o.
. whather a valid, legallg.enforceable contract was entered into
. bp and between ~he parties. _ ~ _ ~
The contract introduaed into evidence by Plaintiffs _
= bears the signature of the Defeiidant, GLADXS McCARTF JAC~BSEN,--
: and two attesting witness~s:' The genuineness of-Defendantis .
~ signature on thi~ Gontract is clearly es~ablish~d by the evidence
~ and with~. the undisputed testimony moreover establ~.shing ~hat her
signature had been wi~t.nessed b~ two witnesses who afs'ixed thei~ -
_
_ _ _ - - - - _
, - - - signatures in her _presence. - - - . -
= It is, ther~for~, the finding of the Court that~the ~
evidence conclusivQly establishes the authenticity of the con-
~ ~ tract introduced by the Plaintiffs and that such contraclt was
: . dt~1q executed in aceordance with the _ formal ~ requa~rements of this -
- State regarding contracts for the sale of realty,
- ~ ~ _ .
- t.
f . - . - - ~ ~ ~
, .
-
- - -
1 F _ . . _ - - ~ . . ' ' _ . . .::'3'