HomeMy WebLinkAbout2160 1
i
i! . i
i
' 1
i
(
i
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF Tl~
~ NZNETEENTH JUAxCI:AL CIRCUIT OF ~
~ FLORIDA, ST. LUCIE COUNTY
i~ RONALD L. ~PETRUCCI, '74~-591 CA
~
I Plaintiff,
VJ
•
_ ~
PE TSUR, TNC., et al ~
f ,
Defendants ~ j
a
_ ~
ORDER O~ ACCOUNTING ~
_ i
The cause having~com~ bef ore the Court for trial the ~
j~ 20th day of May, 1975, upon ~Ctte Complaint, Answer and Counter- ~ -
~
_ i~.ciaim, and Answer to Counterclaim and it appearing from the ~
~ ~
~
testimony and evidence presented as follows: ~ ~
. f t
- ~ i~ 1. That there was adequa_te consideration for the ~ f
~y - issuance of cap~.tal stock of Petsu~, Inc. , a ~
i; _ - ~
st - -
~ New York Corporation, to the Plaintiff Ronald :
li ' l ~
i;
L. Petrucci, which said considerataon was com- ~ ~
_ prised of promotional activities and ~ervices
. - _ ;
~i . rendered by the Plaintiff which brought about ; ~
- ~
~3 the creation of Petsur, Inc., and acquisition y s
t' ~ by the corporation of the franchise, Buning The ~
i~ _ - i ;
:
- Florist of Fort Pierce, Florida; contribution of_~ ~
- ~ _ ~
- money toward the cost of the corporation; assump-;
~i . _ . :
i ~
,r tion of corporate indebtedness by personal guar- s
~ ~
_ antee; and cantribution of $3,C00.00 working j i
.
. capital to the cc~rporation. _ ~
i
' I
~ i
2. That the Plaintiff, Ronald L. Petrucci, and the ; 4
~ ~
De~fendant, Charles Surber, each have a fifty per- ~ ~
~
~ ~cent ovmership of Petsur j Inc. , which entitles ; ~
l~ - . _ - - 4 ~
- _
each to fifty (50) percant of the profits and '
. ;
i' makes each responsible for.equal capital contri- ~ ~
. 4;
}j f '
, bution to the corporatzon. ( ~
. i
_ 3. That the parties are disposed-t4 make a good ~
~ 3 ~ i
f aith attempt to arrive at a fair and equitable
~
• { . - . - . ~ ~
,
F' ~
_f( accounting. ~ ~
.
: . ~ ~
II ' i; i ~
i ~
- 4 ~
. ~ eoo~c+~~ ~~cE~~~ 1 - ~
_
~
i~
.
~
. . _ . _ _ j _