HomeMy WebLinkAbout0921 . . .
~~Q+7~7~
,:t, .
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE _
~ N~~pETEEMTH JUDICIAI. CIItCUIT
, tN ANO FOR INDIAN RIYER
COllMTY. STATE 4F f60RIDA
~ ~ CASE N0. 86-6i2 CA-03
assl4t
THE MONORA6LE l. B. YOCELIE
K~VIN S. OOTY,
I Pl a~i nti tt, ~ _ ~ (
~
vs. <<n~, n;:*~r-~
- T. J,~ ~3r~' -
KEN Mc00lIALO S~ORTIIlB 6000S, ~:,rn ~
INC.,, a Ftorid~ corporatio~; '<~r N."
and, KENN'ETH M. McDONAlO, ~h~ ! ~c
individu~lly, ~ o~~ ~ i~~y'i".
- ` ; r~ ' po't'
Defend~?nts. / ~ a~ $
FINA! JUD6MENT
Thi s cause ha~vi ng caa~e on for tri al before the court
(non-~ury) and the court havi ng taken th~ testia~ony, recel vtd
evi dence and 'heard the argun~ent of counsel , and bei ng otherMl se
' fu 11y advi sed 1 n the pre~i ses, and i t appeari ng that :
3 Thi s court h~s 3uri sdicti on over the parti es to an~
~
sub~ect natter ot this action. ~
0 2. The plaintifi has stated a caus~ of ~ction for fees
f.._ .
incurred tor the perlod during and between Ausust of 1985 .
i ~
~ through Decesber of 1986 in the ar~ount at t9,431.00 and for
i
~ costs~ ncurred for the saa~e peri od i n the a~~ount of t716.71.
~ , . °r
1'~et't',~
It Is Therefore,
OROERED ANQ ADJU06E0 that:
1. The plai nti if shai l be and the sa?me hereby i s award-
ed ~oney da~ages a9a9nst the defendants, 3ointly and severally,
i n Lhe aa~ount of 59,43~.00 (for a?ttorneys' fees i ncurred Augu~t
1985 through 0e~e~ber 1986). Mith pre-~udg~ent interest thereon
~
in the a~ount of E1,384.38; costs a~dvanced in the a~ount of tff:
t626.21 to ether r1 th.. ~~e-~u.Qg~eflt i nterest thereon 1 n the N~i
9 _
a~ount of ~88.21, pXe~,~ud~+~~nt inl~srest awarded i n ac~ordance
ri th Ar9onaut Insuran~ Co. ~r~. NsY.- Plu~bi ng Co. , 474 So.2d 212
~y ~.~..,.q ..r -
vi . .
~ ; . . . : ;:-~=it .
~ . , ~ . ~ - _
' ~ ~ '1 '
,.,~P .
~~Y r ' ~Z ~ ~
,,s J ~t ~ i-~
y ~~-~tY\ . - .
.
~
- " 1ti. _
~~.----:e:. tac-~.~~>
, _ . " s~~`~;~
Y
' ..a.-... s t._ ~ ~':.1~~.~.~-i.