Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0946 . . . duplfoation. Thero are other exampi~a. ~uah as soaaa haaringe. - , : re~rearch and other aaattere. ~Nowevex, the+ Conrti doee »ot feel the duplioatio~ i~ to the eame ex~e~t as opined by tbe `~xpert - ~itnese for P2a~int3~~f. . Accordingly, th,~ Court finds~the time reaROnable exp~nded by the attorney for th~ Da~endant ~n this aaoe to~be 10:75 houre. ~ ` , The next step for the Ccurt is to detercaine the~.~ reaaonable - hourly~ rate due to Defenda~t'e: afitorney fox this ty~e of - : : ,litigation. - The Court har ooneidered all of ths crfteria -for thii~ ia~ae ~s eet torth in ow and the~ tes~imany o~ tbe = . . witneeaer. It finds a re~eonable rate for : Defendant' e attorney to _ be $150.00 per hour. ~ Baeed upon'the fcregoi~g, the lodestar result ih th3.e caee is $1,6I2.50.~ ~ When , a prevai.ling party' e csoun~ael i• employed on a contingency basis, Rot~+e at ,1151 requries the tri.al court to ~ coraeider a ao~tingency riak #a~tor in aMarding attorneys fees. , iqhile the Court does ~ot have a problem W~th Defendant's coune~l handling thia case on a contingenvy baeia, it is concerned ~about - the fact that the arrange~ent wag not reduced to writing. Rule~ 4- 1.5(1) and t2I of the rules Regulating. The Florida Bar require all contingec?t fee aontracte to be in writing. ~ 8owever, under the "PREAMHLSt 8cope" of the Rulee, i~ appeare alear to Lhe Court that they are not to be~ utilized by . - oppoeing partiee ae a defen$e in caees sucb se thie. T~erefore.~ ~ thig Court ghould consider the c+~ntingency risk faetor 8nd it f~els ,a a~ultiplier of 2,0 to be reseonable. ~ - It ie thereupc~n ' ~ , - ORDER~D AND AD.70DGED that Defendante, RAYMOND B. TI[~M and - SDZRNNB TIMM, hi~ wife, do have and recover frora P~aintiff, THE _ ATT~AIQTI8 BUILDYNG B. COND(HrlINItIM A884CIATION,, INC. , as reasonabie _ attorney• ~ee~ fn th3e ina~ter the sum of $3,225.00 !or which let . ` 800K PA~E ~'~Q _ ~ _ Y w4~~.~nC~+ _ ~w~~k .•~k _ _ . , - . . ~ _ 1