HomeMy WebLinkAbout0964 greater, toqether with the loss of use of the car from the date
~of~th~ repossession until the juxy verdict is rendered, and
interest thereon. Of course, Johnson would not be entitled ~o
both the value oE the car and th~°palance of the payments due on
- the palicy as that would tesult in a double recovery. If
interest is to be awarded, the plaintiff shoul~d glead it and the
jury should assess it. Finally, there is no entitlement to.
damages for "long dxslance telephone calls."
~ ~ ~laving resolved the question of damages raised ~y
~ appe.llant's second point, we reverse the judgment appealed fr~m
and cemand khe cause for a new trial. ` ~
;
; ~ .
~ -
,f . .
~
~ -
; ~ .
~
~ .
~ -
j
_ _ _ ~
. ~
i
. . . - ~ ' ~~L~ 17~`I ~V ~1~ V f~o
F~~ ~n ~~r Fcc~rnrc
. 5~. LtlCIF CGUr ~ s'. ~ t•a. ~
ItC'G`~R f'01; ~~,5
cir~:t eiaru~t ~~c~~ t -
_ - . - . - ~
~ sss~ss
r~~.
. -
-
{
, - - ~
.
. , - - ~
- - ~
~ ~ ~
- - . -
- ~
_ HERS~:Y, J., and OWEN, WILLIRM C., JR., (Retired~ Associate ~
Judge, concur. ~
- 0~c~~ r~ ~
~ ~ - - ~ BO~KJt7~ PAGE ~c,~
. . _4_ . ~