HomeMy WebLinkAbout2447 r
/
\
. ;
~ ' ~
i
•
~
• 102139? ~
I\ THE CIRCCIT COC'RT OE THr
~IIETEE\TH Jl'DICIAL CIRCCIT I~
A'~D FOR ST. Lt'CIE COC'~TY,
FLORIDA.
CASE :~0. 73-456 FR
I~ RL: THE '~1~RRIAGE OE
~~'ILLIS RAE '~ETTLES
Forr.ier Husband , ,
c~
and _
f~ATHLEE~ ~1ILLER NETTLES,
,
Forr~er ~~'ife. - ~
~
~RDER O\ :~90TIOti TO DISSOLVE WRIT OF GAR'~ISHMfi.4T c~
.
This hatter was heard on the Forner Husband's ~lotion and
?,r:iended :~lotion to Dissol~~e Hrite of Garnishment. The Court has
considered the pleadings, testinony, other evidence, record and ~
argunents of counsel.
It is thereupon,
ORDERED AtiD ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The '~lotion and Ar:iended Motion are denied, Cooper v.
Coo er, 546 So. ?d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 19891; ~arovided, however,
the Continuing Writ of Garnishment should be modified.
Hereafter, the garnishment amount shall equal 25~ of the Form~r
Husband's earnings after deduccing withholding for income tax,
social securit~• and current rhild support of $90.~0 per w~eek
(said support is being deducted pursuant to a separate Incor~e
Deduction Order).
2. Counsel for the Fort~er Wife shall prepar-e a Second
boaK674 F~~~2447
~ ~ ~
°°`~"~~W~~~~~~'~