HomeMy WebLinkAbout2519 ' r~ - ~.021A08
SI`11~'i OF FLORIDA
• C~Ci~17 OF ST . LUQE
CASE N0.• CEB 89-218
RE: VI(7LATICN OF PORT ST. LUQE CTIY CQTE SEGTION Paragraph 102 .4 , Standard Buildin~
Code 87- 32 , 5- 204 (b) ~ . . . ' .
Violation Adc3ress: 217 NN' Virgo Street, Port~ St. Lucie, -Florida ~
Lien Agai.nst: Miquel ~olivar, owner, Lot 23, Block 342, Section 25, as recorded in plat
Book , page , public records of St. Lucie Coi.mty.
~ie Code Fnfarce~it Board has heard testimany at the Code Enfarc~ment Violation Hear3ng
held the 8th day~ of ~OVII~~ER , 19 89 , and. based vn the evidence, the Code
IIzforcemen~arcT ~nters e o~ c~wu~g IN~dF-~AGT, C'~1Q~ISIONS~ OF LAW, AND ~RDEFt. .
~FII~IDINGS 'OF•~FAGT •
That biiquel ~blivar, owner, 217 MV Virgo Street, Port St. Lucie, Florida, is in
violation of section Paragraph 102.4, Standard Building Code F, 87-32, 5-204(b),
.:onstruction of (~S residence uncompleted, excessive length of grass and weeds,
construction debris.
R;u~ t' - n 10 21 A 0 8 i '
DCUGLAS D;~CON ~O aJAN ~J PIZ •23~~/
r'e_ S:. Luc~.e C-•_~:. ; .~rl l
t ~ 'r.,,~ , Clerx ~~f C: • :t _
Fi~~t =.4~ R~ t: ~'F;
j ~ 3~' OC~I~T~JSIUNS~.QF~.IAW ~OUGLAS i:'~XGN
- L-~ L_ S1 LUt;~~ ':t):'N i Y_
~
: . .
The CODE IIvFORCFi~~M' BOARD has jurisdiction in the applicability of the aforementioned
code violation, the alledged violator committed the violation and an order af enforce-
ment is warranted. If the order of enforcement is not complied ~~rith by December 1,
1389, a fine of up to $250.00 per day shall be ir?~osed,
.
; If is the Orde~' ot thiS~ Board- that ~~ti uel olivar ~ ~ shall
~ c.amiply with 5ectionParagra h 102.~4 Std. Bld . Code~ 87-~? 5-204~0~~ o~ t- e City
~ of Port~~St. Luci.e, ori y Decerrber ~1~ 1~89 ~ , j~~~~.q .
~ doES not camQ y wi time speci-fi e, . s 1 pay a' e
o per y or each day the violati.on contiriues to exist.
~ If ~ riiquel~ Volivar ~ daes not cca~ly wit-hin the
` time sper:iiieri, a cerarie copy o ' r er s e recorded in the public recards of
~ tize Of~ce of the. Cler~.c of the C.ircuit Court iri ~d r~r St. Ia.icie, and arice recvrded shall
~ co~sti.tute a. lim against. tIie proPertY uPan w~ich the vi.olaticn esisrs, if o~wned by the
~ violator, or if th~ violatur d~es not aan the land~ upon any~ real ar perscnal ProP~'Y
E owned bp the violatoz.
. . _ . . .
~~~P1Y~S, ~ ~h uel ~o~l
iva_~r~ sha11 not:i.fy I;icensin
Inves'ti~ ator~ Salema~ , ` ty~$icia.Tw~ sFiall. insspect prvperty and no oar
~ . oanp ce..
~ Sh~uld~ a. di:..?~pvt~. a~ise. ccnceming ccz~~Ziance, either~ PartY~maY request. ~a~. fi~~~s hear~ng
~ befare. the Board.
-XYlE AHD 0~:. Z'HIS'
..gy
y. og November , 19 89
' ~'fATE OF FIARIDA ~ ~
A ~OIJNTY OF ST. LUCIE , ~
~~fore me person~7.ly appeared ' ~ •
~ , ~ , re;~resentiii~
~ • who being duly sworn, depoaes
-::Zd 38~yS t at•,. e•'8 oYg`~t eme s true and correct without any deduction for or on
~ ~_ccount of .ar~'~ind~betedii~5"s_ or liability of any nature •nrhatsoever, ~nd the applicant
~ ~:as COmplied YJ~th- i~1,1.~f~d~rS1, state and local laws, rules IIild regulKtions relating to
~ :he oecupatiqn . ' ' • ' • • ~ ~ / ~ ~i
~ ~~+'s~~t;,'l'`S'A0~1 :a~d`subs~~ribed before me this ~(Q ~ dsy of ~ j ~~19 4~
: ..~r ~ . ~ . . -
E ~ r -
I" _ NOT~RY Ri~gIIC STl4T'E c~f fLOR~OA
~ot81'V c` f1Y COY'~1~~Stt~ El(G. JAN 4,1993 U R 6!„~ ~
~~o ~~oK PNGE 519
d
~ ~ ~ ~
~ "a~'~`r~~~~
~ .