Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-036i ORDINANCE 13-036 2 FILE NO.: TCP - 320134609 3 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE 5 COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO 6 RESOLVE THE RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE ISSUE IN THE AGRICULTURAL 7 AREAS OF WESTERN ST. LUCIE COUNTY; REVISING POLICIES 1.1.1.2, 1.1.2.2., 8 1.1.2.3, 1.1.4.11, 1.1.7.1, 1.4.1.3, 1.4.1.5 AND 6.1.8.5; PROVIDING FINDINGS; 9 PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; 10 PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE FLORIDA 11 DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE FLORIDA 12 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 13 DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION. 14 15 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the 16 testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following 17 determinations: 18 19 1. St. Lucie County has initiated amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Plan to 20 resolve the residential open space issue in the agricultural areas of western St. Lucie 21 County consistent Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; and 22 23 2. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County as the governing body of St. 24 Lucie County having jurisdiction over this application pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida 25 Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider amendments to the adopted 26 Comprehensive Plan of St. Lucie County; and 27 28 3. On April 18, 2013, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission/Local 29 Planning Agency held a public hearing, of which due notice was published in the St. 30 Lucie News Tribune, and recommended to the Board of County Commissioners that 31 the petition for an amendment to the text of the Comprehensive Plan be approved; and 32 33 4. On May 21, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida 34 held the first of two required public hearing, of which due notice was placed in the St. 35 Lucie News Tribune and approved transmittal to the Department of Economic 36 Opportunity division of Community Planning; and 37 38 5. On August 6, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida 39 held a public hearing, of which due notice was placed in the St. Lucie News Tribune, 40 and deemed the adoption of the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to be in the 41 best interests of the citizens and residents of the County. 42 43 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie 44 County, Florida: 45 46 47 JOSEPH E. SMITH, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT 48 SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE # 3867550 08/20!2013 a1 11:20 AM OR BOOK 3550 PAGE 2566 - 2572 Doc Type: ORDN RECORDING: $61.00 File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 2 •1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 A. ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS The Board of County Commissioners does hereby adopt the text amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, attached here as Exhibit A. B. FINDING OF CONSISTENCY The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, specifically determines that the approval of this amendment to the adopted Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and policies contained in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and provides for the recognition that impacts of this approval on the public facilities of St. Lucie County will not occur until such time as a Final Development Order for development on this property is issued. C. CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The St. Lucie County Planning and Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause this change to be made to the text of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this Ordinance. D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS Special acts of the Florida Legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County Ordinances and County Resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby superseded by this Ordinance to the extent of such conflict. E. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. If this Ordinance or any provisions thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstance. F. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall be applicable as stated in Paragraphs A, B and C. G. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. H. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY The Planning and Development Services Director shall send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Economic Opportunity Bureau of Community Planning Caldwell Building 107 East Madison Street, MSC 160 Tallahassee, FL 32399. File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 3 •1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect thirty-one (31) days after adoption. If the Ordinance is challenged within thirty (30) days after adoption, the Ordinance shall not be effective until the State Land Planning Agency or Administration Commission respectively issues a final order finding the adopted amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statutes. J. ADOPTION After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Tod Mowery, Chairman AYE Frannie Hutchinson, Vice-Chair AYE Chris Dzadovsky, Commissioner AYE Paula Lewis, Commissioner AYE Kim Johnson, Commissioner AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of August, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ~'~d i BY Chairman A' APPROVED AS TO FORM ANDrGORRECTNESS County At~,brn File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Exhibit "A" Text Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in st~il~b and underline format. Policy 1.1.1.2 -The County's land use categories shall be described as follows: A. Agricultural-5 (AG-5) The AG-5 land use designation is intended for those areas of the County outside of the planned urban service area which are associated with agricultural and agricultural-related activities. These areas are recognized for first being appropriate for the production of citrus, cash crops, or ranching activities. These areas are acknowledged as potentially suitable for limited residential development under the following criteria: • All residential development must be in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Code. • All residential development proposals in excess of ei~#t forty-five (45) units must be approved through the Planned Development (PD) process as provided in the Land Development Code. • Any activity other that crop or food product related production, including combinations of properties/uses, in excess of 200 acres should identify appropriate mechanisms for funding the operation and maintenance of necessary infrastructure. Any utility infrastructure shall be consistent with the Infrastructure Element. • Residential densities are set at a maximum of .20 units per gross acre (one (1) unit per 5 gross acres). B. Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5) The AG-2.5 land use designation is intended for those areas of the County outside of the planned urban service area which are associated with agricultural and agricultural-related activities. These areas are recognized for first being appropriate for the production of citrus, cash crops, or ranching activities. These areas are acknowledged as potentially suitable for limited residential development under the following criteria: • All residential development must be in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Code. • All residential development proposals in excess of eig#t forty-five (45) units must be approved through the Planned Development (PD) process as provided in the Land Development Code. • Any activity other that crop or food product related production, including combinations of properties/uses, in excess of 200 acres should identify appropriate mechanisms for funding the operation and maintenance of necessary infrastructure. Any utility infrastructure shall be consistent with the Infrastructure Element. • Residential densities are set at a maximum of .40 units per gross acre (one (1) unit per 2.5 gross acres). File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 5 ~1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Policy 1.1.2.2. - Any application or petition to divide a lot or parcel of record as of January 9, 1990, in the AG-2.5 or AG-5 future land use categories, into more than e}g~t forty-five (45) lots, parcels or tracts, shall be approved only through the planned development process consistent with the other Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Plan, ~~^~^+ ,., +h.,~e ine~~nno~ ~~ihoro Oho If two or more lots, parcels or tracts or combinations of lots, parcels or tracts and portions of lots, parcels or tracts which are contiguous to other lots, parcels or tracts under single or common ownership interest and were of record on January 1, 1990, the lands involved shall be considered to be an undivided parcel for the purposes of this Policy, provided, however, that lots, parcels or tracts separated by an ingress/egress, access or roadway easement that was of record on January 1, 1990, but not specifically excluding any easement limited to utilities, drainage or other non-access purpose, shall not be considered an undivided parcel for the purpose of this Policy. Policy 1.1.2.3. - For any planned development project within the AG-5 and AG-2.5 future land use categories, the PUD may encompass one or more non-contiguous properties. All of the properties that are included within the PUD shall be considered together for purposes of calculating the maximum allowable density and shall be governed by a single authorizing resolution. File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 6 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Any planned development project developed within the AG-5 and AG-2.5 future land use categories in excess of 400 units shall be required to employ proven innovative planning techniques to reduce the cost of providing public services to the proposed development. Such techniques may include, but are not limited to, providing for a mix of uses consistent with the scope and scale of the development and paving appropriate impact fees or assessments to offset the cost of providing public services. Policy 1.1.4.11 -Calculate gross residential density on lands that lie above the mean high water elevation and provide for the ability to transfer a~e~-sister residential density from wetland and other sensitive or unique environmental habitats to upland areas on contiguous property or non-contiguous property. Policy 1.1.7.1 -Continue to encourage the use of planned development techniques to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive areas, through the County's Land Development Code which shall include: a. Minimum acreage requirements necessary to support a viable mixed use community providing sufficient design flexibility to allow innovation and creativity in all forms of planned unit developments; b. Minimum open space ratios of 35 percent in all planned developments and including assurances that such areas will remain as open space to protect existing native habitat, to provide for minimum setback needs from adjacent uses, and to provide active and passive recreational as well as visual amenities; c. Provisions ensuring the long term preservation of remaining open spaces; d. A mixed use district combining residential, commercial, recreational, educational, and other income producing uses providing significant functional and physical integration among uses; e. Minimum standards for the provision of on-site shopping, job opportunities and internal trip capture; and, f. Specific requirements to provide efficient, centralized infrastructure (potable water and sanitary sewer). Include specific restrictions on the use of septic tanks, individual wells, and package plants in planned unit developments. g. Development consistent with the Towns, Villages and Countryside Element and the Transfer of Development Rights Program outlined under Objective 11.1.7. Policy 1.4.1.3 -Consider amending the Land Development Code to ~e ~n~~~~~h~+h,~~~f~rY1 La~~ c+~Twh;;h~T „^~~~a allow the transfer of development rights ~ among other planning and development tools, to be considered for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 1.4.1.5 -Consider including strategies in the Land Development Code for agricultural lands to h° ^^^°;,~°~°,~ ;^ +h° ~n~°^+°.^ ~ ,^,~ c+,,,~., include targeting agricultural industries and activities that • support bio-fuel production, • promote agri-tourism, eco-tourism, • promote/support local food marketing and branding, and • promote mass stormwater farming, storage and treatment;_ File No.: TCP-320134609 Page 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ~ nrmm~+° inn°n+iv°o fnr nl~ ~c+°r°r+ r•°v°Innm°n+ nnr• Policy 6.1.8.5 - ~~^°^+ ~~ nrnvirl°r! fnr in Dnlirv 1 1 7 '~ of +h° Ci ~+i ~r° I ~n,J I I~° CI°m°n+ °AII lands within development sites proposed as conservation and open space areas shall be maintained h°'^~ in ci^nl° num°rchin by n hnm°n~~,n°rc nccnnin+inn nr n+h°r °n+i+., one or more legal entities approved by the County Attorney that will be responsible for the perpetual maintenance of the conservation or open space area. ~ i+ili~°,J +n m°°+ +h° minima ~m In+ ~i~° r°ni air°m°n+~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT O STATE ------, RICK-SCOTT Governor August 26, 2013 Honorable Joseph E. Smith Clerk of the Circuit Court St. Lucie County 2.300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Attention: Ms. Kelly Phelan, Executive Recording Secretary Dear Mr. Smith: KEN DETZNER Secretary of State SEP 0 3 2013 COUNTY ATTORNEY Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated August 23, 2013 and certified copy of St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 13-036, which was filed in this office on August 26, 2013. Sincerely, Liz Cloud Program Administrator LC/elr R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida Telephone: (850) 245-6270 • Facsimile: (850) 488-9879 ~~~~~~ C ~,; 1 32399-0250