HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-010
ORDINANCE NO. 08-010
AN ORDINANCE OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. ADOPTING
AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATING TO
TOWNS. VILLAGES AND COUNTRYSIDE (TVC) ELEMENT. WHICH
AMENDMENTS SHALL APPLY TO PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
WITHIN THE AREA DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT" A" HERETO. WHICH
AMENDMENTS ARE ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "B"; PROVIDING FOR
TRANSMITTAL TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS AND OTHER AGENCIES AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS. the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs ("DCA" or "Department"), is
the state land planning agency and has the authority to administer and enforce the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS. St. Lucie County ("County") is a local government with the duty to adopt comprehensive
plan amendments that are "in compliance;" and
WHEREAS. the Plan Amendment adopted text amendments to the Future Land Use,
Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Intergovernmental Coordination, and Capital Improvement
Elements of the Comprehensive Plan, adopted four future land-use map amendments, and created the
Towns, Villages and Countryside Element; and
WHEREAS. Petitioners (Brown, et, al.) own properties within the area that is the subject of the
TVC Amendments, and are the Petitioners in the above-styled cases; and
WHEREAS. the County adopted the TVC Amendments by Ordinance Nos. 06-019 and 07-037 on
May 16, 2006 and June 5, 2007, respectively; and
WHEREAS. DCA issued its Cumulative Notice of Intent dated July 19, 2007 finding the TVC
Amendments "in compliance"; and
WHEREAS. pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, Petitioners filed an amended petition
challenging the TVC Amendments ("Petition"); and
WHEREAS, the County and DCA dispute the allegations in the Petition regarding the TVC
Amendments; and
WHEREAS. the Petitioners have agreed that if the County adopts the amendments attached as
Exhibit "B", the Petitioners will dismiss their Petition challenging the TVC amendments.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
confirmed.
Recitals Adopted. Each of the above stated recitals is hereby adopted and
EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
SAINT LUCIE COUNTY
FILE # 318379503/21/2008 at 12:27 PM
OR BOOK 2952 PAGE 926 - 939 Doc Type: ORDN
RECORDING: $12050
Section 2. Adoption of Towns. Villages and Countryside Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
The Board hereby adopts the Towns, Villages and Countryside Comprehensive Plan Amendments, attached
as Exhibit "B" hereto, which amendments shall apply to that property generally located in the Towns,
Villages and Countryside comprehensive plan element boundary as more specifically depicted in Exhibit "A"
hereto.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable and
if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses,
and phrases of this Ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this
Ordinance shall stand notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 4. Transmittal. The County Growth Management Director is hereby directed to
ensure that this Ordinance and all necessary supporting data and analysis and other relevant documents
are forwarded within 10 working days to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council and other agencies in accordance with Rule 9J -011(5), Florida Administrative Code.
Section 5. Effective Dote. The effective date of the comprehensive plan amendments shall
be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission
finding the amendments in compliance with Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes, whichever is applicable.
If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may
nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which
resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Community Planning,
Plan Processing Team. An Adopted amendment whose effective date is delayed by law shall be considered
part of the adopted plan until determined to be not in compliance by final order of the Administration
Commission. Then, it shall no longer be part of the adopted plan unless the Board adopts a resolution
affirming its effectiveness in the manner provided by law.
After motion and second, on second hearing and adoption, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairman Joseph E. Smith
Vice Chair Paula A. Lewis
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Chris Craft
Commissioner Charles Grande
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2008.
BY:
~n
CJ (j) .....
. 2
~~ C c
::J .
i Ul .
I ;
-'
::J . _ III lJ
CD -1
Cfl < Z
0
CJ n ;:::¡.
~ m -:::;
CD
-..-, ( ) n
CJ ~ :J 0
....J C
---- '. ( )
~, "" ~ :J
::J :J ........
OJ ,...,.. '<
CO CD
0 ........
C C
:J Q..
0.. '<
III »
~ -¡
(])
ill
-J/
.... ~t.·i"'~
Q)~
I c'?-:
I
0
0
--J
(J"¡
S
(õ (J"¡
(f)
N
N
U1
W
$: '~ '~
ill ~
U "
U ". Í"-
m ~ ,,\
U ~~ f;
ill "
m " \'c¡'
Q. ~ "-
$: § ~\ì
ill ..,
'< f~
_.J:>. ::¡ 1 ¿'
N ~ I~-~ .' .
0 ~ 1,r
0 .., V
--J
þ-z
t::'"v hI h,t lID 1\
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-:2845GM
February] 9, :2008
Proposed Changes to TYC Element
[Proposed changes are indicated by strikethrough for deleted text and underline for added text.]
Mixed-Use Business District: An area that due to its location has the development potential
to specialize in terms of accommodating significant business functions. A Mixed-Use
Business District should include a variety of uses and is encouraged to provide a place for
large offices that may be too intense for the Neighborhood. as well as for regional
commercial uses, tarrreted industry, higher education/research facilities, other office uses.
and residential uses. Land located within the Mixed-Use Business District may also develop
pursuant to the density and intensity established by the Transferable Development Value
Map (Figure 3-3) and otherwise in accordance with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of
the TYe.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.1.2: Adopted Special Area Plans. Adopted Special Area Plans include the
following:
I) North St. Lucie County Special Area Plan. The settlement strategies generated during
the charrette process for the Special Area Plan for North 81. Lucie County (NSLC) are
outlined in the North S1. Lucie County Charrette Master Plan Report that is included as
data and analysis supporting the creation and implementation of the Towns, Villages and
Countryside (TVC) Element and future land use designation.
a) North St. Lucie County Special Area Plan General Location Map. Figure 3-1
depicts the area included in the NSLC Special Area Plan.
b) North St. Lucie County Towns, Villages and Countryside Map. Figure 3-2
depicts the area in the NSLC Special Area Plan that has a future land use designation
ofTVC.
c) North St. Lucie County Maximum Allowable Development Program.
Development within the NSLC Special Area Plan that has a future land use
designation ofTVC is limited by the amount set forth in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1
North St. Lucie County
Maximum Allowable Development Program
Use Amount Permitted
Residential Dwelling Units 37,500 units
Commercial/Retail Uses 5,000,000 square feet
Industrial Uses 464 acres
The maximum development amounts in the above table apply only within the area that has
the TVe land usc designation. as depicted on Figure 3-2. Fm example. and without
limitation of the foregoing statement. the retail uses depicted outside the area of the Tye
EXHIBIT
i "!) il
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-2845GM
February 19,2008
land use desiŒnation on FiŒure 3-13. North St. Lucie General Retail Development Plan,
both to the east and the west of the TYC land use designation area. are not limited bv the
Maximum Allowable Development .Program as set forth in this Policv 3. ] .1.2( c). This
shall not be deemed to limit or modify provisions of this Comprehensive Plan as they may
apply outside the area that has the TYC land use designation.
d) Within 90 days following the County's approval of anv final development order
allowing a commercial/retail use by which the total amount of commercial/retail
(including office) use approved for development within the area subiect to the TYC
land use designation equals or exceeds 3,500.000 square feet of building area. the
County shall initiate a special review process by which it shall consider whether a
Plan amendment is appropriate that would increase the maximum of 5.000.000
square feet of commercial/retail uses. including any appropriate regional commercial
lIse. permitted within such area as set forth in Policy 3.1.] .2(c) Table 3-1. Maximum
Allowable Development Program.
~à1 North S1. Lucie County Transferable Development Value (TDV) Map. Figure
3-3 establishes the TDY Map for NSLC.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.2.4: Expedited review process. The County shall establish an expedited
process for rezoning and development review within six months of the effectiye date
adoption of the TYC Element. Since the TVC Element provides incentives for large-scale
settlement plans, and does not provide incentives for piecemeal development, the
expectation is for an assemblage of coordinated development plans that may result in
numerous projects meeting the threshold for Development of Regional Impact (DRI) review
process. The County will work with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to
reduce Council's DRI review process to ninety days for projects that propose to build in
accordance with an approved Special Area Plan and the TVC Goals, Objectives and
Policies. A development proposal that meets the threshold for DRI review, but does not
propose to build in accordance with an approved Special Area Plan or in accordance with
the TVC Goals, Objectives and Policies, is not eligible for the TVC expedited review
process.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.10: Accessory Units [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.8 - No text changes]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.11: Adequate School Sites and Capacity [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.9 - No text
changes]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.12: Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.10 - No text
changes]
*
*
*
*
*
*
2
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-2845GM
February 19,2008
Policy 3.1.4.13: Provider of Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer [Renumbered from Policy
3.1.4.11 - No text changes to text as amended by Ordinance 07-037]
* * * * * *
Policy 3.1.4.14: Construction of Infrastructure [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.12 - No text
changes to text as amended by Ordinance 07-037]
* * * * * *
Policy 3.1.4.15: Levels of Service Standards [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.13 - No text
changes to text as amended by Ordinance 07-037]
* * * * * *
Policy 3.1.4.16: Availability of Facilities [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.14 - No text changes to
text as amended by Ordinance 07-03]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.17: Funding Public Facility Improvements [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.15 - No
text changes to text as amended by Ordinance 07-03]
* * * * * *
Policy 3.1.4.18 Site Plan Approval Requirements [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.12 - No text
changes]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.19 Phased Development Approach [Renumbered from Policy 3.1.4.13 - No text
changes]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.4.l420 Monitoring the TVC. The County shall monitor the implementation of the TVC
on an ongoing basis. Within four twe years of the effective date of adoption of the TV C Element,
the County, working in conjunction with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and a
committee of ten local residents and property owners in the TVC area. will evaluate the
performance of the goals, objectives and policies as well as the land development regulations,
including the Transfer of Development Rights program, and management of the Open Space. Each
member of the Board of County Commissioners shall appoint two members of such committee. of
which at least one shall be an owner of property within the TVC area. Such evaluation process will
include. without limitation, specific evaluation of the following components ofTVC:
a) Workforce housing supply and demand;
b) Retail, commercial. and industrial supplv and demand to meet local and regional economic
development needs. including the amount of existing and approved retail. commercial. and
industrial uses in the TVC and the continued appropriateness of the commercial
development cap in Table 3c 1 :
3
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-284501\11
February 19,2008
c) TDR supply and demand;
d) Water and wastewater capital improvements. supply. demand. and anv adjustments
necessary to the capital improvements schedule. to the extent not already addressed in the
County's annual updates of the schedule and the utilities master plans of utility providers in
the TVC area:
e) Transportation impacts and progress towards implementing the Future Street Network Plan
depicted on Figure 3-15, and any adiustments necessary to the capital improvements
schedule. to the extent not already addressed in the County's annual updates of the schedule;
f) Effectiye coordination with other goyernment and legislative agencies. such as MPO.
SFWMD. FPFWMD. FDOT. DEP. City of Fort Pierce. Ft. Pierce Utility Authority. and
Indian River County:
g) The adoption and implementation of special assessment districts pursuant to Policy 3.1.9.16:
h) Potential options to meet the Countryside and Open Space Requirements beyond those
options contained in the TVC that maintain the purposes behind the Countryside and Open
Space Requirements:
i) Experience with administration. management.· and maintenance of Open Space and
Countryside areas; and
j) Patterns of development OCCUrrIng within TVC. and the need for possible alternative
patterns.
Based on this evaluation. the County will adopt appropriate modifications to the TVC Element
to resolve any issues related to implementation these or other components of the plan.
Subsequent evaluations shall occur no less than eyery four years. This policy shall not prohibit
any party from initiating any other Plan amendment.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.6.7: Management and Coordination of the Flow Way System. St. Lucie County will
coordinate with SFWMD and FPFWD to create, within six months of adoption the effective date of
the TVC Element, an institutional structure to facilitate the implementation of a surface water and
storm water management system that a) maintains adopted leyel of service standards; b) is
coordinated with landowners to achieye connectiyity oyer time; c) is financially feasible; d) is
coordinated with the plans of the SFWMD, FPFWD and other stakeholder agencies; and e)
increases water quality prior to discharge into the Indian River Lagoon.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834G!v! and 06-2845GM
February 19, 2008
Policy 3.1.7.7: TDR Credit Matrix. Density transferred from appropriate Sending Sites
may be eligible to receive a multiplier to the transferable development rights of the property.
The value of the multiplier is weighted based on the desired public benefit and to encourage
sustainable development patterns. The multiplier shall be established through analysis in
each Special Area Plan.
1. North St. Lucie County.
Table 3-4
North St. Lucie County Credit Matrix
Transfer Condition Multiplier
From Countryside in a Village located Outside the USB 1.25
to an Eligible Receiving Site located Outside the USB
From Countryside in a Town located Outside of the USB to an Eligible 1.5
Receiving Site located Outside the USB
From the Countryside of a Town or Village located on Contiguous 1.75
Property both Inside and Outside ofthe USB to the Net Developable Area
From Countryside located Inside the USB 1.75
to an Eligible Receiving Site located Inside the USB
From Countryside Outside the USB 2
to Eligible Receiving Site Inside the USB
From a Parcel Less than 500 ac. in size located Outside of the USB to an 2
Eligible Receiving Site
From Targeted Industry Site to an Eligible Receiving Site 2.5
From Higher Education Site to an Eligible Receiving Site 2.5
From Agricu ltural Research & Education Facilities to an Eligible 2.5
Receiving Site.
From Created Natural Habitat in the Countryside 2.5
to an Eligible Receiving Site
From Environmentally Significant Land 2.5
to an Eligible Receiving Site
From Countryside to a Workforce Housing Unit 2.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Policy 3.1.9.17: Transportation Concurrency. Transportation infrastructure shall be in place or
committed through an appropriate capital improvements program and scheduled to be in place
within three years from the approval of the building permit or its functional equivalent that results
in traffic generation. The Capital Improvements Element shall specify the timcframc and
responsible party, whether the County, developer, or otherwise, for funding of such transportation
5
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-2845Glvl
February 19,2008
infrastructure. However, a project that meets the requirements of the TVC Element may, as
required by Section 163.3180(16), Florida Statutes, for transportation facilities or facility segments
specifically identified for funding in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements in the Capital
Improvements Element, choose to satisfy transportation concurrency requirements by contributing
or paying proportionate fair-share mitigation. For transportation facilities or facility segments not
specifically identified for funding in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements, the County may
at its discretion accept proportionate :;hare or proportionate fair-share mitigation to satisfy
transportation concurrency as authorized in Section 163.3180(12) and Section 163.3180(16),
Florida Statutes. A development of regional impact that meets the requirements of the TVC
Element and Section 163.3180(12), Florida Statutes, may satisfy transportation concurrencv
requirements by paying a proportionate-share contribution for local and regional Iv significant traffic
impacts as provided in Section 163.3180(12). In all cases, mitigation for development impacts to
facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System made pursuant to Section 163.3180(16) shall require
the concurrence of the Florida Department of Transportation. Any development or development
phase that has satisfied transportation concurrency by paying or contributing a proportionate share
or proportionate fair share pursuant to this policy, computed in accordance with Section
163.3180(12)( e), F .S., shall be deemed to have fully mitigated its impacts on transportation
facilities. The County shall adopt an ordinance containing the methodology for assessing
proportionate fair share mitigation options. At a minimum, such ordinance shall be consistent with
the requirements of Sections 162.3180(12) and 163.3180(16), Florida Statutes.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-283401',11 and 06-284501',11
February 19, 2008
[Policy 3.1.8.2 Accommodation of Retail Uses]
No text changes. Renumber Policy 3.1.8.2(1 )(b), Retail Uses and Transportation Network, as
Policy 3.1.8.2(1)(c) to correct a typographical error in policy as originally adopted by Ordinance 06-
019. Amend Figure 3-13, General Retail Development Plan, as shown on the attached copy of
Figure 3-13.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7
The map identifies the approximate location, type and scale of new retail/workplace uses located Jt key inter-
sections of the future transportation network. Tlle intent of this map is to sllO\v the generJl vicinity Jnd
major roads or intersections where the proposed use is appropriate. While these locations arc not precisely
site specific, the proposed uses should be provided within a 1/4 mile radius of the area indicated on the map,
Location of these land uses support the transportation concunency strategy for the overall area. Not provid-
ing for these uses within a 1/4 mile radius of specified an:as and along the proposed corridors will require a
review of the overall transportation network and concurrency strategy for the TVC area,
~
E3
U
'"
~
.~.-¡¥
:gU:'
í{/
ZJS::::/--:' "\\1
/' -',1/---'''- I
.. .. I
,
'I
II
frj
~
····10
1¡:: .'
;g ,.i__._..~ '_'~4.."
If' :
It ,-- '. ~
1,) If'
Q) rl~·-l!'-·--I-:- r-
,§-~rì K\ings Hwy. r}--:g 1
. .------>\Ö-;~=::!=::=:=:~::Tvcbl;~=-~:i·-.::;:c:,;=iC~::;:~--::..=:::..:.::
,,__._.1 tr-..................................-.....A.....,.1I.......-.... I; ..;2 ~ ;
4 I MU ¡
, 'õj I.
-__L... ~Eme~sJ~-R-~¡EL- !-..---- -}Z ~ i:
-- fn ·u.... H ';:J~ ,:_..It.. .-u~-~·,·KII...\.<,. "-=----:=>I-~:::-.....:..:.:.:===-_=_-:::;:::,- ;.~;'; è/} ~:
· ' G ¡.... d.i lr \ /,/",,~!U- ~ ~
1 ; j a ZI: II ! It--,-,,:J~, ~~ ~ 0 _·_·j-t::~i.,:····__···-
--''''-T-t~-.._.. . '·"~!,.I : ~I '§ ~ I g ~ .
; .....¡ (/) I ! . . '/1 ¡: U -;_d_ -- n________ ------r'
::::=_-pcc==: .=...2~9cßl}.~tOE=~~~"..=L~¡'\. ~.T;j e I T
· '! ! ì .
· ¡¡¡. .' ...¡ , +.
· ./õ-1:-....-,---· .'.~,;....c.,.'.
---i---- --..,.......::::1--------// I I~- J '\~~f''';
',' š :'Koblegard Rd. .L ", ,c., ..~' I'
~ '" I ' . ~'Ò- . .,,~ I
: 'a "E: ,..._.---¡ \..< ," '~.'" I
O~ u'" \ ----- \,Ü\., !
~ // " , ~
U L.<-', 'r'.'.... ( ,/' t
~ 111 :
.~ j I' ¡
;:.. '1), "II ~,
~,.". -"", _..,'~ ....;a~...,JJ
C/l a, . ~
>, ~-~.,_.) "
~ ~ 1. ~I
..f ~ :. ð:3 .........1'-...-.. ........ ....... ._c4!..Jí .........,.'
. ~j ................,..____.......".-~.. I
:r: '15
ilU
,1-0
r: g
..c
__;T"~
¡ ':"d
..I "D·,
( I'v,
-~,z
'II
,
....
~
¡:¡
U
v
::;
Ví
.-"', -
¡ ,¡.:J
-'S
-I v
" '-
'_'.. ,0.00__0..."
'--'0 ~
.....¡ICIl
- l=i--,-·..
¡
~
..' .."'..........,...·..·1··.··..·..·..
z.
-<
.....¡
~
f-
Z
¡,;¡
-
~
i:..
0
...J
¡,;¡
;;..
¡,;¡
Cl
.....¡
-<
f-
'..l
~ ë2
.-
, .....¡
~ ¿
C,I
... ¡,;¡
- z.
-
OJ] ¡,;¡
í.;:;.. Q
t
z.
::;¡
0
U
¡,;¡
-
V
::;¡
..J
...
:J:¡
...
0::
0
Z
St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan
3-37
TVC Element
February Í'l, 200S
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-2845GM
February] 9, 2008
[Polic)' 3.1.9.3, Future Street Network Plan]
No text changes. Amend Figure 3-15, North St. Lucie County Future Street Nenvork Plan - 2030,
as shown on the attached copy of Figure 3-15.
8
Figure 3-15
NORTH ST. LUCIE COU"TY FUTuRE STREET NETWORK PLA" - 2030
( .,., i
'The map identities tbe approximate location, type and scale of the proposed street network of the future
transportation network. The intent of this map is to sbow the general vicinity 0 f major roads and i nter-
sections. These locations are not precisely site specific. The proposed slreet network supports the trans-
portation concurrency strategy for the overall area. Not providing for this network will require a review
--of the overall transportation network and conCUlTency strategy for the TVC area.
'.,' ,. II
J I;
, .1
!i
.,
Ii
ì¡
I!
i'
['1f¡
. e,
.·.··1
~l l'
c:)." t¡
E~o..,!
.. ..-¡;:~ 4~/
'% / ..rst I
~t ~ /# ~
~C~~:· // ./'
t...~..........-+·.+.. .......t. A...·. ...~ ..~..~ 'A~~ v-SO\,\'S-;¡ ;
í!~ ~ ~o\-\\' 0 :'
~ ,. ~c'" ~ I ~
~ ~}Y ..~~~lH+_'''' ...~ii
;~ r ..-..-......".................. ~ 1 :i E
~ fir::
-i; ~~
~ ì; '"0
"" 1\6
~ 'I'G:
Z ¿¡\
¡
TaylgTI2airyßcl·. .
i
I
...1___...
Emerson Ave.
J
,:.__n__-m
..
..
Seminolc·~d.
',r--:
~ .1 --~.
."" I"
~I t:
Johnston Rd.
r"
........ ......'............... ..............................................
..Se1l1il1gJe)3.~I.
.",
co
o
~
1
-d
-0
C<:
~.
1/).
.
on
o
on
~L
J¡
'"
'"
13
r
Emerson Ave.
on
co
.D
<l)
VJ
v,
<l)
>-
>-.--*.
co
~
;:
<l)
Z
~
J¡
Rus leis
Roa
~
'"
b1l
<l)
Z
o
~
tŽit
..::;: I Russak!s Rd.
-~~ -..- --~-
<",i
,
t
43r9L Johnston Rd.
:::: .. ---.--..';::
w ~
~ ~
<l) <l)
;:
v
Z
?:
v
Z
58t. Koblegard Rd.
.",
~
. '._.-...--_m___.^; g
:5
Citrus Highwav
L
,
/~
../' ..
// /'
.'t'. "
S1. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan
3-40
.""
..::: ¡'
c:ll
,
CI) Keen Rd. ,
::: I""·....-+...............Olt·.~............-..-...
.....I ,: ~
~
~,
..
. ....._...~
¡
·
~
·
·
"
·
·
·
·
.....:t.i
Vl'..i
-
_.....-.."->-
il,
.
'"
-d
e>::
<l)
v
Õ
...-.-......... .cL.
~
.,
~I
,1
·
-I
j,
~
~
l
.-
I;
_ Pr()p{)s<,(~ _'-lollt" road." I
- F)"opos('(/ -!-{oncnwJI 1
TVC Elcmcl11
February ?l. 2008
Remedial Amendments for Case Nos. 06-2834GM and 06-2845GM
February 19.2008
Proposed Transportation Amendments to Capital Improvements Element
[Proposed changes are indicated by strikethrough for deleted text and underline for added text.]
lPolicy 11.1.1.29]
No changes to text of policy as adopted by Ordinance 07-037. Amend Table 11-13, North St. Lucie
County Special Area Plan, Long-Term Transportation Improvements Program, as follows:
Table 11-13
North St.. LucÎe County Special Area Plan
Lana-Term Trans ortation Caoitallmorovements Proaram'
Roadway From To 1m oroyement Year Cost Phase Fundina Source
Koblegard Rd. COllnty Line Taylor DairY Rd. Construct 2-lan" road 2015 $7.240,000 Construction Impoc! Fees ¡ Dev. Agreements j
Specl<'ll [)1~t iC:I(:"ì
King's Highway Indrio Rd. US-1 2 t04 2015 523,000,000 Construction Impact Fees i Dcv Agreements ¡
Sper.;idl Dlt~hiCI(,",¡
KlDg's Highway Angle Rd Indllo [«I 2104 2015 527,00D,000 Construction ImODel Fees / De\'. Aqreemc·nts/
SrmrJ;:;¡1 015In(:1(::'1
1-95 North Flyover KobJegard Rd New 'C" Rd. Construcl 2-lane flyover 2015 513.770,000 Construction Impacl Fee'So J Dev. Agrcemenls I
Spe0310is.lrIC1ZS,)
New E-W Russo Road Koblegard Rd Sernino!e Rd Construr;t 2-lane road 2015 $2.000.000 Constructiun lmpacl Fees l Dcv. Agreements ¡
~~peclal Olstnc1('!,)
New E·W Sebastian Rd Johnslon Rd Emerson Ave, Construcl2-lane lOad 2015 $2.320.000 COIlSlructíon lrnpacl Fees I Oev, Anr8-8UlI3111S!
SpeOJI Drs\tlct(5-ì
New E·W Tobias Rd. Johnston Rd. Seminole Rd. Construct 2-lan8 road 2015 52.320,000 Construcllon lmpacl FI~es 10.8V AD mem Rn t:, j
Spec(3lDlstrïc1(s'¡
Johnston Rd.llmmokolee County Line Kinll'ò Highwa'{ 2 to 4 2015 510,070,000 Construction Impac1 Fees l U-HV AgrAHftlH1115 i
Rd Spec'ol DIs¡,ict(s)
New Rus"",kis Rd. Indno Rd. Johnston Rd. Construct 2-ìane road 2015 $370,000 ConstructIon I¡nO<'lCl FeèB" 0.8'1, Agr8Ament!'. i
SPêCI~1 DiSlflCHs)
New SemInole Rd. lndrio Rd. New Sebastian Construct 2-lanc road 2015 5370.000 ConstructIon Irnp<H.:l Fl'l"':-ì { Clftv Agn'lHHlHI,tl'.1
Rd, SP':OClill Dis.uicH5)
SR 614 Indno Rd, 195 CllrLlS HIghway Construct 4-lane road 2015 S 13.000,000 Constrllctlon Ifnpuc:¡ Fee':',;,I Dev Agleemel1t5!
Spec~al DlstficHs.ì
New TrBn:;it Line (Indrio Emerson Ave. 1-95 Extend TCe Bus ServIce 2015 $900,00D Fully Impact F~~s I [)ev¡Í'gr~m~nts I
Rd.) Operational SDec~al DistfIC1(:J}
25th Sl. SW Johnston Rd Kobelgard Ave, Construct 4-land road 2020 51,230,000 Com:.tructlOn Impact Fees I Dev AgreBHHmts i
Spec1C:l1 Distnc1(3¡
New E-W Road (Inmmkolae Johnston Rd t::merson Ave. Construct 2~lane road 202U $520.000 Construction In'pacl Fee'e.! Dev. Agrtl-€1l1ents I
Rd.) Speetal Distl'íclí~,
Emerson Ave, Indno Rd Angle Rd, Construct 2-lane road 2020 S, ,BOO,OOO Constructlon Impacl rees I Dev AgreBl1lents t
Specí-al Dì5tncHs.}
New E-W "A" Road Koblegard Rd. Taylor Dairy Rd. Construcl 2-tane road 2020 53,450,000 Construction Impact Fe-e~ I Dev. Agre-ements. f
S¡)ecial nrSlricl(;;..'}
New N·S -C" Road IndriD Rd. County Line Construct 2-lane road 2020 $12,000,000 Cùnstrucliort lrnpuct Fees / D{,)v. /I.grc-cmcnts i
SpeCial Oif.lric:l(sl
New N-S "C" Rood Angle Rd. Indno Construct 2-lanc road 203U 520,37G,000 Construclion Imp::<çl F-l:t~S" O~V AgH¡~mQ!1t~ ¡
SpØCt.,r Di,:,.trk:1(':'.)
New Citrus Highway Inddo Rd. CO'lIlty Line Construct 4-lane lOad 2030 S6,970,000 COfls.trucÜOIl IrnpaCl Fee~,' DBV A~llH.JnllJnts f
Speoal Dlstnc1!s)
New Citrus Highway ¡rldnc Rd, Gc.dwin Rd. Construct 4·tono road 2030 $21,8BO,000 ConstructlDn Irnpt"lcl FHP.:-l l Dev AgIH€HlMllh'.1
Sped,)) DisUìd{s)
New E-W "E" Road Construct 2·lane nyover ~ TBD Construction hnµilct F tH3~ lOûv Aglll1';IHHnt:; ¡'
New "C" Rd. Citrus Highway 2030 Spct.i31 Dir.Hict(t.)
New [.W "0" Road Construct ¿-lane f1yover -2115{i TOO ConstructIon Impacl Fee~, I [lev Agreement~ i
New "C" Hd. CItrus Highway ~ Sµ2c,al OlslnCl(3¡
New "c" Rd Construct 2·lane tlyover -w&\l TSO ConstructIon !mp'JCl rcc~ I Dcv, /\grccmcnt~ ¡
1·95 South Flyover Koblegard Rd, £.,030 5reclal {)I~lrir.:l(f,'
FL Tll1npike Construct interctlänge -2%1J- TBO COI1BtrLlctíüfl FOOT & Spcclai Dlstirctl Dcv
1~95 / Turnpike lnterct1ange InHnokolee Rd. 2n~0 Ar:¡re~ments·
9