Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test O ederal Phone:954-784-2941 E-Fax: 954-784-7875 Ongineering admin@fed-eng.com www.fed-eng.com ®Vesting, Inc. . .. . . Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Date: May 15, 2020 Address: 12445 Lear Place, Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 Order M 20CMT1520 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: - Material Type: Light Brown Sand with Shell & Clay Tech: MH Company: Groza Builders, Inc. Address: 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Compaction Req.: 95% Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist DryProctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 NW Corner of Pad 12" 1 L 8.9 108.8 110.0 11.0 98.9% Yes 2 NE Corner of Pad 12" 1 L 6.4 109.1 110.0 11.0 99.2% Yes 3 SE Corner of Pad 12" 1L 8.1 107.4 110.0 11.0 97.6% Yes 4 SW Comer of Pad 12" 1 L 7.9 108.1 110.0 11.0 98.3% Yes 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 1 1 1 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2 for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and Is not a verification of Soil Beari ' a &V8 ' t Legend for Elevation: No94 1 = PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by: * . f SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith LeBlanc,P.Er S x SG=Subgrade . BG=Below Grade Federal Engineering$9StingAInc. BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida Reg.No.59394, F 4ORID.." TOP=Top of Pipe FG=.Finished Grade Certificate of AuthorizatioM*16NArL As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for pilblirvIoptctfwatements, j conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure.The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test Is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms,retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 u ' ©ederal Phone:954.784.2941 E-Fax: 954-7847875 ®ngineering admin@fed-eng.com www.fed-eng.com & ® esting, Inc. _ 7 3370A SQ PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST DATE SAMPLED: 5/15/2020 DATE TESTED: 5/16/2020 SAMPLE#: 20CMT1520 CLIENT: Groza Builders, Inc. ADDRESS: 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 PROJECT: Proposed Residence LOCATION: 12445 Lear Place, Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 SAMPLED FROM: Stockpile at North End of Pad MATERIAL-#: N/A MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Light Brown Sand with Shell&Clay SAMPLED BY: MH TESTED BY: Si TIN#: 132378081-000 SPECIFICATION GOVERNING: ASTM D-1557 LAB NO: 104035 RESULTS OF TEST: The following compaction test was conducted in accordance with the Standard Methods of Moisture Density Relations of soil using a 10 Ib.Hammer and an 18"drop as per the above specified method. MOISTURE% WET DENSITY(PCF) DRY DENSITY(PCF) 8.7 116.1 106.8 10.0 120.2 109.3 11.3 122.3 109.9 12.7 120.9 107.3 110.5 Optimum Moisture (Percentage) 110.0 - 11.0 % 109.5 Maximum Dry Density(lbs./cu. Ft.) :109.0 110.0 PCF ';i 108.5 -- a, ;►�1111///� 108.0 Respectfully Submitted, JOHN `4�e 107.5 •d� ks�,�G'� i 107.0 — - Keith LeBlanc, P.E. 106.5 Federal Engineerirg�'estin SOF 8 9 10 11 12 13 Florida Reg. ORI No 593�J� �'•'O �s •� DP• Moisture(%) Certificate of Authoriz' 4 - - i .. -- -- I MOR A i cy MIAMHAN PF •v ADDXOved LAGO'awy ®�®!� Phone:954-784-2941 0 ederal E-Fax: 954-784.7875 OQ ngineering admin@fed-eng.com www.fed-eng.com ®Vesting, Inc. .. = • Organic Content Test(AASHTO T-267) Date: Friday,May 15,2020 Job Order Number 20CMT1520 Groza Builders, Inc. 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 RE: ' Geotechnical Services Proposed Residence 12445 Lear Place Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 RESULT OF TESTS Location: Stockpile at North End of Pad Sampled By: MH Reported To: Client Sample Description: Light Brown Sand with Shell&Clay Crucible Crucible Weight Crucible Weight Organic +Material +Material Weight Before Burn After BumContent (grams) (% by Weight) (grams) (grams) IF22.99 58.32 57.62T- 1.98 Tested By: SJ (TIN#J32378081-000) Checked By: KL Respectfully Sub itlt III////1i////� Keith Le131ac�'P.FNo.59*4A-�jp Federal Efig*W�ermg&*Testing, h*. Florida Regi tiorF$�►1�mt;f4 `�/ Certificate co 701NAL EN a aci v MIAM FD -^^� Ap;ovnU Laboratory ��O n D ederal Phone:954-784.2941 E-Fax: 954.784.7875 0- 111,nglneering admin@fed-eng.com www.fed-eng.com esting, Inc. . . No.200 Wash Sieve Analysis Date: Friday,May 15,2020 Job Order Number 20CMT 1520 Groza Builders,Inc. 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 RE: Geotechnical Services Proposed Residence 12445 Lear Place Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 RESULT OF TESTS Location: Stockpile at North End of Pad Sampled By: MH Reported To: Client Sample Description: Light Brown Sand with Shell &Clay Weight: 446.07 g Cumulative Wt. Cumulative% Cumulative % Sieve Size Retained(g) Passing Retained #200 399.00 1.0.6% 89.4% Pan ---- ---- ---- Tested By: SJ (TIN#J32378081-000) Checked By: KL j ROHM C /ii i Respectfully S bm' - F ° 394 Keith LeBlanc,P4 Federal Engineer;'&&T@T%,0Fnc. Florida Registrati4�' ►• ip P,%����•�� Certificate of Auth77 WT"eqMMUMMIMEMOR dry' �5- G���� u .-. •' AM, MIAM ApGMTQ RtOgm[bvx} aCl FD SP^`� AD�rovCd LaDO�ato�y �/��_ , Pederal Phone:954-784.2941 E-Fax: 954-784-7875 O ng i neer)ng admin@fed-eng.com (9, www.fed-eng.com koesting, .Inc: Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Date: May 19, 2020 Address: 12445 Lear Place, Port St. Lucie, FL 34987 Order#: 20CMT1551 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: - Material Type: ,Light Brown Sand with Shell & Clay Tech: MH Company: Groza Builders, Inc. Address: 511 SW Port St: Lucie Blvd. Compaction Req.: 95% Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 'Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density,' Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 SW Corner of Pad 12" 2L 15.6 108.4 110.0 11.0 98.5% Yes - 2 SE Corner of Pad 12" 2L 1 20.4 110.6 110.0 1 11.0 100.5% Yes 3 NW Corner of Pad 12" 2L 16.9 107.9 110.0 11.0 98.1% Yes 4 NE Corner of Pad 12" 2L 24.3- .'109.9 110.0 11.0 99.9% Yes 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 • t 12 13 ! i 14 11 s Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer .�`�y JOH //, i This Is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification of Soil B i ap -, 177 Legend for Elevation: 9 �•"2 PR=Proofroll 1',2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by'. 394 n - ll SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith LeBlanc,P.fr.p SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal EngineerAp'&Issog,t v 4 BC=Basecwurse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida Reg.No.59vip ` ,ORI D A . �� TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate of Authoriidti� �-CC-' �� As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients,and author izatio�i/�pj alro�o�S(At�ments, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines the degree of compaction o7 h4.-" Iri r of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure.The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitabilityof the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms,retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted ScUs Method D-6938 Ws 6aimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. (FET)has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side:The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client, prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12"of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. phis density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of.the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site.roust be re-compacted and re- tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2