HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Tests ederal Phone:954-784-2941
E-Fax: 954-784-7875
`Ongineering admin@fed-eng.com
www.fed-eng.com
Woesting, Inc.. _- t 1 3370 NE 5th Avenue Oakland Park,Florida 33334
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Date: July 31, 2020
Address: 5350 Slash Pine Trail, Fort Pierce, FL 34951 Order#: 20CMT2337
Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest Permit#�_
Material Type: Clayey Brown Sand with Shell & Rock Tech:�'`��`OE�
Company: Groza Builders, Inc.
Address: 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Compaction Req.: 95%
Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist DryProctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF PCF %
1 SE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 9.8 117.8 118.0 10.0 99.8% Yes
2 lCenter of Building Pad 12" 1 FL 12.3 1 114.1 118.0 10.0 1 96.7% Yes
3 NW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 10.8 120.3 118.0 10.0 101.9% Yes
4 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 12.0 114.3 118.0 10.0 96.9% Yes
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse.Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity:
Le end for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3= 1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by:
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith LeBlanc
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal Ena ntp
nngi%�esting``'Irt ` 4
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certlflcate•flf ASthorizatlb�.45471 _`Y,
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clier�Fs{aid authori�atign„forMapblioatriori.aftat�rrients,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines the dQgree ohcomp�chuil o the'tested layer of material
only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying soil material �eluw the proposed structure Tr .results do
not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required to cern that the uridcrl in' soN wIll supe orf;the ro.os6;;;structure
P 9 9 9 9 certify �Y. 9 _ .- .rP�.v ?rn- �-;
without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend that soil borings e perfcrined cca ovalea(q.t�ie�st�itabil!Fv cf'ih2..underlying
soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms,retesting must be perforin�d�tkj�ys
PAGE 1 of 2
1! J
s
R:
> L
t
[ S >
Compacted Soils Method-®6933 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project
on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In
no way,shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client
prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material.
FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not
include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure
without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the
tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we
recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil
conditions.
Environmental analysis. of the soil materials is notrpart of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
-required, we can provide a proposal for performing-an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for
determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and
98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other
areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing
excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-
tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending
our written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
Dederal Phone:954-784-2941
E-Fax: 954-784-7875
engineering admin@fed-eng.com
www.fed-eng.com
@Oesting, Inc.
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Date: August 5, 2020
Address: 5350 Slash Pine Trail, Fort Pierce, FL 34951 Order#: 20CMT2390
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: 2OrX - ( o*s',
Material Type: Clayey Brown Sand with Shell & Rock Tech: MH
Company: Groza Builders, Inc.
Address: ' 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Compaction Req.: 95%
Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF PCF %
1 NW Corner of Pad 12" 2L 15.6 112.2 118.0 10.0 95.1% Yes
2 NE Corner of Pad 12" 2L 7.9 1 120.1 118.0 10.0 101.8% Yes
3 SE Corner of Pad 12" 2L 10.4 121.4 118.0 10.0 102.9% Yes
4 SW Corner of Pad 12" 2L 16.8 112.3 118.0 10.0 1 95.2% Yes
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side,(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: / `x
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3= 1st,2nd,3rd Lift ,M1 ,: Submitted by:
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P E }, ti's' `4� {�'f� u
LeBlanc, ala �
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal Englneerft Z T
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida Reg-
TOP
eg TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate of`Authorzatlon#54�7i?:�,:��,?` h R
As a mutual protectibh'to clients,'the public and'ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients `and authorl2at+on'for.puhiication of stafements
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines the de`g ee G4cempact+on e,terte�ik yer-of inatend
only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying soil mate rials below ttieprop Bey structure The ms,lts`o
not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required to certify that the u4 rly+ng�soil�vnll support the proposed sPscfpre:' '
without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend that soil borings-be performed tc'Pv3+uate liSu+-tat�'iP�i cUthe,u%:te f(0ng'
soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms,retesting must be perfor�med`Ot�tV s work. (""o
& 1
yrs t1'_
PAGE 1 of 2J = � �r s3AF r`
:ion,. �? fi yk�+jlE+n
i 1
l
r
Compacted Soils Method D-6932 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project
on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of.the tested layer of material only. In
,.no way..'shbil a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client
prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material.
FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not
include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure
without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the
tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we
recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil
conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required;we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The-scope-of services_is for--
determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and
98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other
areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing
excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-
tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending
our written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2of2
Opederal Phone:954-784-2941
E-Fax: 954-784-7875
�nglneering admin@fed-eng.com
www.fed
% esting, -eng.com
WInca= .. ..
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: ' Proposed Residence Date: September 1, 2020
Address: 5350 Slash Pine Trail, Fort Pierce, FL 34951 Order#: _20CMT2712
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#:C�'200k- 00,%---
Material Type: Clayey Brown Sand'with Shell & Rock Tech: C-i
Company: Groza Builders,_Inc.
Address: 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Compaction Req.: 95%
Port St.1.Lucie, FL 34953 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF PCF %
1 NW Corner of Pad' 12" FL 10.9. 103.2 118.0 10.0 87.5%o No
2 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 13.6 98.9 118.0.. 10.0 83.8%o No
3 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.2 105.6 118.0 10.0 89.5% No
4 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.7 .104.9 118.0 10.0 88.9% No
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 -
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer *Notified client of failures.
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification of Soil BearingrCapacity.
- r
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,'2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by:
SL=Springiine FL=Final Lift _l Keith LeBlancaP� =
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal Engtneeting&jTesting Ince;
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida R9394
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate`G Autfaonzation# 71 dr y� V
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients and'Taui}ionzatagHSoF�?ibhcation of�staleEnent
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines th6,dgreye,f-'-pacUori of the tested laNe��f,rpaterial
only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materiarb the p�apo`sed stwcturecTe results do
not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlyq,6 ors uia s!!�pi rt� iegprQFu�2d structure
without settlement.if no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend that soil borings be performed fo,Ev uOe��}iE�mf�bil f ttie underlying
soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms,retesting must be performed ofs Nb[ �/t, '� u''.
PAGE 1 of 2
r
Compacted Solis Method ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project
on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In
no way shall a cpmpaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client
prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material.
FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not
include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure
without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the
tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the .proposed structure, we
recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil
conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials.-The scope-of services is for
determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and
98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other
areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing
excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-
tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all:reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending
our written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
`fit.'�`�`�p". 4.i.: . •
`/ l,,a,_r: .>;yl.�l��•`t,�` x.41
L'' Page 2 of 2