No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIndependent inspection letter i i Dear Mr. Welch,, Thank you for contacting our offices re: independent 3rd party test data for Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation, our standard product for insulating the CMU walls of new buildings. The attached product submittal sheet provides an overview of all the relevant performance characteristics of Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation. The performance characteristics usually of interest to building officials are: 1) Thermal Performance per ASTM C 518 (R/inch), and 2) Surface Burning Characteristics per ASTM E 84 (Flame Spread, Smoke Developed). 1) Thermal Performance per ASTM C 518 (R/inch). Unlike some of our competitors, whose R/inch claims reflect a single test result, our R-4.6/inch claim reflects the composite of test results obtained over 15 years since we opened for business. Consistent with FTC Rule 460 we test per ASTM C 518 at 75 degrees F mean temperature. The a few reports of testing that have contributed to our thermal performance claim are attached. 2) Surface Burning Characteristics per ASTM E 84. Building codes require foam plastic insulation protected by 1" thick concrete to have Class B surface burning characteristics e.g. Flame Spread 75 or less, Smoke Developed 450 or less. In fact all known brands of aminoplast masonry foam insulation available in the US are Class A materials; thus, exceed this code requirement. Section 2603.3 of the Florida Building Code reads as follows: "Unless otherwise indicated in this section, foam plastic insulation and foam plastic cores of manufactured assemblies shall have a flame spread index of not more than 75 and a smoke-developed index of not more than 450 where tested in the maximum thickness intended for use in accordance with ASTM E 84 or UL 723. Loose fill-type foam plastic insulation shall be tested as board stock for the flame spread and smoke-developed indexes." Section 2603.3 lists specific exceptions of which #4 is specific to injected masonry foam insulation, and reads, as follows: "Foam plastic insulation greater than 4 inches (102 mm) in thickness shall have a maximum flame spread index of 75 and a smoke-developed index of 450 where tested at a minimum thickness of 4 inches (102 mm), provided the end use is approved in accordance with Section 2603.10 using the thickness and density intended for use." If the St. Lucie County building official either has questions or requires additional information, please feel free to call or email. Regards, Director,Technical Services 61FOAM, Inc. P.O.Box 10939 Knoxville,TN 37393 Cell:(434) 546.3632 Email:bob4foam@msn.com Web:www.cfifoam.com i COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPOW ' '} Post Office Box 985-1215 South Hamilton Street-Dalton,Georgia 30722 Telephone(70%278-3935 Q Facsimile(706)278-3936 i Standard.Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials ASIM E 84-01 3.5-inch Core Foam(Sample B) Report Number 02-08067 Test Number 3360-I587 August 6,2002 Core Foam,Inc Knoxville,Tennessee The ASTM E 84 furnace operated by Commercial Testing Company is recognized by the United States. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NISI), through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)for compliance with Title IS of the.Code of Federal Regulations, Part 285. These criteria encompass the requirements of ISQAEC Guide 25 and the relevant requirements of ISO 9002 (ANSI/ASQC Q921987). i Commercial.Testing Company (Auumr&M Signature) This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirely/to gain Product acceptance fmm did constituted authorities.77w test results presented in this report aapppply only to the samples tested and are not neceasariiy inrlicatiue of apparent identical or similar materials. Sample se7echon and dentiftcatiot: were provided by the client. A sampling plan, Y described in the referenced test procedure, was not neeessarif� follower. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, shalt not be used under any circumstance m advertisin-e to the eneral blit~ I TESTED TO BE SURE© Since 1974 I ' i INTRODUCTION This report'is a presentation of results.of a surface flammability test on a material submitted by Core Foam,Inc-,Knoxville,Tennessee. The test was conducted in accordance with the ASTM International fire test response standard H 84-01, Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, sometimes referred to as the Steiner tunnel test. This test is applicable to exposed surfaces such as walls and ceilings. The test is conducted with the specimen in the ceiling position with the surface to be evaluated exposed face down to the ignition source. The method, which is similar to NFPA No. 255 and UL.No. 723, is an American National (ANSI)Standard and has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense for listing in the DoD .Index of Specifications and Standards. This standard is used to measure and describe the response of materials,products,or assemblies to heat and flame-under controlled conditions,"but does not by itself incorporate all factors required for fire- hazard or fire-risk assessment of materials,products,or assemblies under actual fire conditions. PURPOSE The purpose of the testis to provide the comparative measurements of surface flame spread and smoke development of materials with that of select grade red oak and reinforced cement board under specific fire exposure conditions. The test exposes a nominal 24foot long by 20-inch wide test specimen to a controlled air flow and flaming fire adjusted to spread the flange-along.the entire length of a red oak specimen in 5.50 minutes.During the]A-minute test duration,flamespread over the specimen surface and density of the resulting smoke are measured and recorded.Test results are calculated relative to red oak,which has an arbitrary rating of 100,and reinforced cement board,which has a rating of 0. The test results are expressed as Flame Spread Index and Smoke Developed,Index_The Flame Spread Index is defined in ASTM E 176 as"a number or classification indicating a comparative measure derived from observations made during;the progress of the boundary of a zone of flame under defined test conditions." The Smoke Developed Index, a term specific to ASTM E 84, is defined as"a number or classification indicating a comparative measure derived from smoke obscuration data collected during the test for surface burning characteristics."There is not necessarily a relationship between the two measurements. The method does not provide for measurement of heat transmission through the surface tested, the effect of aggravated flame spread behavior of an assembly resulting from the proximity of combustible 'walls and ceilings, or classifying a material as noncombustible solely by means of a Flame Spread Index The zero reference and other parameters critical to furnace operation are verified on the day of the test by conducting a 10=muaute test using 1/4-inch thick reinforced cement board. Periodic tests .using NOFMA certified 23/32-inch select grade red oak flooring provide data for the 100 reference. TEST SAMPLE The test sample,.selected by the client,was identified as 3.54nch Core Foam(Sample B),,a white color foam in place insulation having a.thickness of 3.5 inches.The material was conditioned to equilibrium in an atmosphere with the temperature maintained at 71 ±.2°F and the relative humidity at 50 ± 5 percent..For testing, three lengths of the material,each measuring 2 feet wide by 8 feet in length,were placed over a 2-inch hexagonal wire mesh supported by 1/4--inch diameter steel rods spanning the ledges of the tunnel furnace at 24-4nch intervals.This method of auxiliary sample support is described in Appendix Xl of the E 84 standard,Guide to Mounting Methods,Sections X1.12.2 and X1.12.3. ASTl1A E 84 TEST DATA Client_ Core Foam, Inc. Test Number. 3360-1587 Material Tested: 3.S'Core Foam (Sample B) Date. August 6 2002 Test Results: -rime to Ignition = 00.08 minutes Maximum Flamespread Distance = 04.76 feet Time to Maximum Spread = 00.72 minutes Flame Spread Index = 25 Smoke Developed Index = 200 20 1a 16 14 ,mm 12 10 m n a 6 2 b 0 Time,minutes 100 90 80 I 70 m 60 o i c 60 m 40 L ~ 30 10 0 Time,minutes I i �I i TEST RESULTS • The test results, calculated on the basisof observed flame propagation and the integrated area under the recorded smoke density curve, are presented below_The Flame Spread Index obtained in E 84 is rounded to the nearest number divisible by five.Smoke Developed Indices are rounded to the nearest number divisible by five unless the Index is greater than 200.In that case,the Smoke Developed Index is rounded to,the nearest 50 points. Flame spread and smoke development data are presented graphically in the computer print--out at the end of this report Test S ecimen . Flame Spread Index Smoke Developed Index Reinforced Cement Board 0 0 Red Oak Flooring 100 100 3.5-inch Core Foam fSam Ie B) 25 ZQQ OBSERVATIONS Specimen ignition over the burners occurred'at 0.08 minute. Surface flame spread was observed to a maxunum distance of 4.76 feet beyond the zero point at 0.72 minute.The maximum temperature recorded during the test-was 510°F. .CLASSIFICATION The Flame Spread Index and Smoke Developed Index values obtained by the ASTM E 84 test are frequently used by code officials and regulatory agencies in the acceptance of interior finish materials for various applications.The most widely accepted classification system is described in the National Fire Protection Association publication NFPA 101 Lo�!Safely Code,where: Class 0 - 25 Flame Spread Index 0-450 Smoke Developed.lndex s B 26 — 75 Flame Spread Index 0—450 Smoke Developed Index Class C 76 — 200 Flame Spread Index 0—450 Smoke Developed Index Class A,B,and C correspond to Type 1,If,and III respectively in other codes such as SBCCI,BOCA,and ICBO.They do not.preclude a material being otherwise classified by the authority of jurisdiction. I i I I CHAPTER 26 ,.. , . PLASTIC SECTION 2601 SECTION 2603 t. GENERAL FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION 2601.1 Scope. These provisions shall govern the materials. 2603.1 General.The provisions of'this section shall govern the design.application.coast uc[ion and installation ol IP 'lomn plan- requirements and uses ooffoam plastic insulation in buildings tic.foam plastic insulation.plastic veneer,interiorplastic finish and structures. ;. and trim and light-transmitting plastics. See Chapter i4 for 2603.2 Labeling and identification.Packages and containers 3 requirements for exterior wall finish and trim, of foam Mastic insulation and loans Mastic insulation'coni o- , 1 f P rents delivered to the job site shall bear the label of an approved SECTION 2602 agencv showing the manufacturer's name,the product�lisling, DEFINITIONS Pruchrct identification and intbrmation sufficient to determine that thee end use will comply with the code requireniegts. .i 2602.1 General.The following words and terms shall,for the - .� purposes of this chapter and his used elsewhere in this code, 2(iO3.3 Surfdice-ice characteristics Unless otherwise have the meanings shown herein. indicated in this section,foam plastic insulation and foam plan lie Corey of manufactured assemblies shall li.ave a flame spread FOAi\1 PLASTIC INSULATION.A plastic that is intention index of not more than 75;md a.smoke-d�\eluhc�l indc�of not ally expanded by the use of a foaming agent to produce a more than lit) .where tested in the maximum thickness a. reduced-density plastic containing voids consisting of open or intended for use in accordance with ASTIM E 94. Loose closed celIsdistributed throughout the plastic for thermal inset- fill-type fount plastic insulation shall be tested as board stock " fatin�'l of-acoustical purposes and that has a density less th.ul 20 for-the flame spread index and smoke-developed index. pounds per cubic foot(pct)(320 ke/ni'). t LIGHT-DIFFUSING SYSTEM. Coms[ruction consistin4e in Exceptions: + whole or in part of lenses, panels, grids or battles made with . Smoke-developed index for interior trim as provided light-transmitting plastics positioned below independently for in Section 2604.2. mounted electrical light sources,skyligh[s or li�,ht-transntittin� I In cold storage buildings.ice plants,food plants,foul plastic cool'Panels. Lenses, panels, grids and bafflesthat are processing rooms and similar areas. foam plastic part of an electrical fixture shall not be considered as it insulation where felted in a thickness oC4 inches(I 02 light-diffusing system. nun)shall be permitted in at thickness up to 10 inches L1GI r-I'RANSN'11TT1NG PLASTIC ROOK' PANELS, (3i4 rum)+\'here the building is equipped throughout Structural plastic panels other than skylights that are fastened With an automatic lire sprinkler system in accordance to strticnn•al members.or panels or sheathing and that are used with Section 903.3.I.I. The approved automatic �, sninkler system shall be provided in both the room as light-transmitting media in the plane ol'the roof. 1 I LIGHT-TRANS iI"I'TiNG PLASTIC 1�'.-kl,1, PANIILS. and that part of the building in which the room is located. Plastic materials that are fastened to structural members,or to structural panels or sheathing. and that are used as light-trans- 3. Foam plastic insulation that is a part ul a Class A,B or twitting media in exterior walls. 0 rool covering assemble provided the assembly �. witi the foam plastic insulation satisfactorily passes PLASTIC, APPROVED. Any thermoplastic, thermosetting Ft1 4450 or U1. 1256. The smoke-developed;index or reinforced thermosetting plastic material that conforms to shall not be.limited [of-roof aPPlicatioils. combustibility classificalions specified in the section applica- j hie to the application and Plastic type. •1.. Foam plastic insulation treater than 4 inches (102 film)Itl Q11CkneSS$1►;Ill 1►ave a maximum flame spt'ead PLASTIC GLAZING.Plastic materials that are dazed of set index of 7i and a smoke-developed index of 450 in frame or sash and not held by mechanical fasteners that pass \where tested at it minimums thickness of inched(102 through the "lazinv. material. nun),provided the end use is approved in accordance REINFORCED PLASTIC, GLASS FIBER. Plastic rein- with Section 2603.9 using the thickness and density j forced with glass fiber having not less than 20 percent of glass intended for use. fibers by weight. S. Fi-tme spread and snsoke-developed indexes fur,foam THEI0IOPLAS"rIC\,IATElZIAL.A plastic material that is plastic interior signs in covered mall buildings Pro capable of bein g repeatedly softened by increase of ienipera- vided the signs comply \+rah Section i02.1 i. cure and hardened by decrease of temperature. '603.4 Thermal barrier. Except as provided for in Sections I 'I'llEWNIOSETTING ai1ATERIAL.A plastic material that is 2603.4.1 and 2603.9.loans plastic shall be separated from the capable of being changed into a substantially nonrelorniable interiorofa building by unapproved tliernsal barrierolO.i-inch product when cured. (12.7 nun) ��ypsum wallboard or equivalent thermal barrier 507 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE° i I * it CHAPTER 8 INTERIOR FINISHES H � T, M I 1,• 1 11,w w SECTION 801 FLA11L51 RLr1D.The propa�ationufl'I:one ovcrasurt'acc. GENERAL FLAIME' SPREAD IND1.X. A comparative mca,ure. '80 1 1 Scope.Provisions of*this chapter shall govern the use of expresscd as it (Ii file nsionless nuntbet% derived I'ront visual — materials usccf as interior finishes,n im and decorative materi- measurements of*the spread ol'llamte versus tittle fur a material _= . fib ais tested in accordance with ASTM E.N4. t 80L1.1 Interior finishes.These provisions shall limit the IN'rrKIOIt FINISH.Interior finish includeS interiorwalf and allowable flantt spreao and Smoke development based on c•eilin" finish and interior floor finish. Joel and occup;utcy classification. INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH.The exposed floor Surfaces of r, Exceptions: buildings including coverings applied over a finished floor or Materials having ;t thickness IcSs than 0.036 inch Stair, includim_ risers. g' (0.9 nun)applied directly to the surface of watllS or INTrRIOR Wr1L1.AND CEILING FINISH.'1'hc exposed ceilings. interior SurfaceS of buildim-s. including but not limited to: r� p fixed or movable walls and pat uuonS:toilet count x ivacy t u ti- _. Exposed portions of structural members comply- I ' I: ' ' in_with the reyuirentents I'or buildings ofType IV tionS;columns;ceilings:and interior wainscoting,p;tncling or I construction in Section 602.4 Shall not be Subject other finish applied structurally of- for•decoration. acoustical to interior finish requirements. cort•ection,Stn•face insulation,structural fit'eresistanceorsinti- k lar purposes, but not including if } 80LI?Decorative materials and trim. Decorative matc- rtals and trim shall be restricted by combustibility and the SNIOKI;-DEVELOPED INDEX. A comparative measure• Millie propagation performance criteria of NFPA 701, in expressed as a dimensionless number.derived from nteatSure- accordance with Section R06• rnents of smoke ubscuration versus time litra nutteria(tesWd in accordance with ASTM H 84. 801.1.3 Applicability. For buildings in flood hazard areas as established in Section 1612.3, interior finishes,trim and TRIM. Picture molds,chairrctils,basebowrcls, handrails,door- .decorative materials below the design flood elevation Shall and window frames and similar decorative or protective utale- ,be flood-d;unagc-rcSistant materials. rialS used in fixed applications. • 801 ?Application. Combustible materials shall be permitted to be used as finish for walls.ceilings,floors uncl other interior Surfaces of buildings, SECTION 8Q3 f WALL AND CEILING FINISHES ,t 801.2.1 Win(IMI's. Show windows in (he exterior walls of 803.1 General.Interior wall andcei)in� finishes shall he clas- Z the first story above grade shall be permitted to be of wood Silied in accordance with ASTM F lid. Such, it -h ltu'iot' ImiSh t c or of unprotected nnrtl 15;unim ' tn;ttcrials shall be grouped in th% I'ollowin classes in arcor tFt 801.2.2 Foam plastics. fo;tin plastics shall not be used as dance with their flame spread and smoke devclopccf indexes. •c i, interior•finish or trim except as provided in Section 2603.9 Class A:Flame spread 0-25;Snunce-developed 0- 50. r or_604.This section Shall apply both to exposed foam )];IS- tics and to foam plastics used in conjunction with a textile of Cliiss li .Flame Spread 26-75.smoke-developed-0-150. _ # vinyl facing ur cover. Class C. Flame spread 76-200;smoke developed 0- I50. i% Exception: Materials, other than textiles. tested in accor- ' SECTION 802 cl:utce will' Section 803.2. - DEFINITIONS 803.2. Interior wall or ceiling tinishcs other than textiles. R= Seevices P.O. Box.2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test:July 13,2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number. 7404 Specimen Number: 1337050705-4 R&D Test Number. RD05I 824TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation,• 1 inch sample Multitemperature Test Method:_ASTM C 518."Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen, k, in. units W/m.K.The themtal resistivity,R value per inch, in U.S.customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 1.063 inches Specimen density: 0.72 Ib/fe Cold plate temperature: 16.41 deg F ! Hot plate temperature: 53.67 deg F Average specimen temperature: 35.04 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2256 Btu.in/fl-.hr.°F Thermal resistivity(R-per-inch): 4.433 ff.hr.°F/Btu.in. Thermal resistance of specimen: 4.71 W.lir.°F/Btu Notes:Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time for test( ours)? 2.9 Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested This test conforms to AST1vt Test Method C 5 18 except for the report requirements.The report includes summary data but a full complement of data is available upon request_ I i R&D Sere c'ms P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: July 05.2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7398 Specimen.Number: 13370507054 R&D Test Number: RD051823TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: 1 inch sample "Pest Method: ASTM C 518 "Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus" Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k, in units W/m.K .The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 1.062 inches Specimen density: 0.72 lb1W Cold plate temperature: 55.44 deg F Hot plate temperature : 95.04 deg F Average specimen temperature: 75.24 deg F I Apparent (hernial conductivity: 0.2394 But in/W.Itr°F Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.177 ft''.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 4.44. ft=.hr.°FIBtu i Notes:Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No i Length of time for test.(hours)? 2.5 Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested'Ibis test conforms to ASTM Test Method C S 13 except for the report requirements.The report includes summary data but a frill complement of data is available upon request. I R&D Services P.O. Box 2400 . Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 93.1-372-8871. Fax 931.-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: July 13.2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7404 Specimen Number. 1337050705-4 I R&D Test Number: R.D051825TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: 1 inch sample Multitemperature Test Method: ASTM C 518."Test Method for Steady State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for:.CoreFoanr Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C. 57 8. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k in' units R'/ni.K .The thermal resistivity,R-value per inch , in U.S.customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933-and k. }-neat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches a inches Specimen thickness: 1.06') inches Specimen density: 0.72 lb/ft' Cold plate temperature: 91.40 del; F Hot plate temperature: 128.66 deg F Average specimen temperature: 110.03 deg F i Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2777 Btu.in/ffi.hr.°F Thennal resistivity( R-per-inch): 3.601 W.hr.°F/Btu.in .Thermal resistance of specimen: 3.83 W.1rr.°F/Btu � I Notes: Calibration factor used for manual-calculation? NA EMF NA j Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Ex cessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 3.0 Reviewed By: Date: `Pest results reported apply,only to the specimen tested this test conforms to ASTNI Test Method C 519 except for the report requircments.Pic report iitcltdes summary data but a full complement of dnia is available upon request. i R&D Services. P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502=2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test:July 12,2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7401 Specimen Number: 1337050705-3 R&D Test Number: RD051826TR Description of test specimen:CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: Retest Test Method: ASTM C 518 "Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Neat Flow Meter Apparatus." . Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen ,k, in units W/m.K.The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S.customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. Meat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 3.750 inches Specimen density: 0.96 lbIW Cold plate temperature: 55.26 deg F j Hot plate temperature': 94.86 deg F Average specimen temperature: 75.06 deg F I Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2375 Btu_in/ft.hr.°F Thermal resistivity(R per-inch): 4.211 W.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 15.8 ft2.hr,°F/Btu I Notes:Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 62 ` -v I Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested This test conforms to ASTM Test Method C>19 except for the report requirements.The report includes summary data but a full complement of data is available upon request. R&D Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3 896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of'rest:July 05,2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number 7397 Specimen Number: 1337050614-1 R&D Test Number. RD051787TR Description of test specimen:_CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: 1 inch sample cut from box of foam Test Method: ASTM C 518,"Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this-report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with. ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen.k, in units W/m.K. The thermal resistivity,R-value per inch, in U.S.customary_units is the reciprocal of the product.of 6.933 and k. - Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thielmess: 1.102 inches Specimen density: 0.53 Ib/ft' Cold plate temperature: 55.44' deg F Hot plate temperature: 95.04 deg F Average specimen temperature: 7524 deg F, Apparent thermal conductivity: '0.2530 Btu.in/fe.hr.°F Thermal resistivity(R-per-inch): 3.953 W.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 435- W.hr.°FBtu Notes:Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA . Edge guards or`cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time-for test(hours)? 2.9 Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested This test conforms to ASTM Test Method C 518 except for the report requirements.The report includes summary data but a full complement of data is available upon request_ i i i • R&D. Services P.O.-Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: June 28.2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7395 Specimen Number: 1337050614-2 R&D Test Number: RD051788TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoltn Masonry Foam Insulation: 3.25 inch sample cut from box of foam Test Method: ASTM C 518,"Test Method for Steadv-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518. The test.results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k, hi units %V/m.K. The thermal resistivity,R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. I Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 3.250 inches Specimen density: 0.54 lb/W I Cold plate temperature: 55.44 deg F Hot plate temperature : 95.04 deg F Average specimen temperature: 75.24 deg F i Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2756 Btu.in/W.hr.0F Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 3.629 W.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance:of specimen: 11.8 W.hr.°F/Btu Notes:Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA. Edge a Lards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 4.5 p p Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested 11is test conforms to ASTM Test Mcthod C 518 except for the report requircmcnts.The report includes summary data but a frill complement of data is available upon request. i • S rrvice Test Report Thermal.Resistance Measurements on Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation Manufactured at the cfi Foam, Inc. Facility on July 06,2006. Prepared For: i Mr. Richard Porter cfi Foam, Inc. P.O. Box 10393 Knoxville, TN 37939 R_&'D Services, Inc. I 13.0. Box 2400 f Cookeville,-Tennessee 38502-2400 Report:RD07363 i Reviewed Ronald S. Graves Vice president August 15, 2007 4 The test results in this report apply only to the specimens tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,without written approval of R& D .Services,inc. This report utust not be used by the Client to clahn prodtict endorsement by R Rc D Services, Inc.,NVLAP or any agency of the U.S.Government. l R&D a Service Page 1 of I P.O. Box 2400. Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 93 l-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report .Date of Test: August 08.2007 Date of Manufacture: July 06. 2006 i FIFM File Number: 07-7774 Specimen Number: 1337070801-10 Test Number: RD072318TR Description of test specimen: cfi Foam, Inc. : Core Foam Masonry.Foam Insulation Test Method: ASTM C 5M04. "Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: cfi Foam. Inc. /Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518-04. Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen.thickness: 1.400 inches Specimen density: 1.17' Ib/ft' Cold plate temperature: 16.47 deg F �. 1-lot plate temperature: 53.76 deg F Average specimen temperature: 35.11 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2087 Btu.in/li'.hr.°F Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.791 ft'.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of'specimen: 6.71 ft2.hr.OF/13tu i f Notes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge.guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate'? No Length of time for test'(hours)? 6.30 The precision.of this test is estimated to be 2.5%(Section 10.3, ASTM C 518-04) L fi1 Reviewed By: Date: The results in this report apply only to the specimen tested. This test conforms to ASTM Test Method C 518-04 except for the report requirements. The report includes summary data but a full complement of data is available upon request. R&D Pa.,e l of 1 �- Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: August 08- 09.2007 Date of Manufacture: JuIv 06. 2006 i HFM File Number: 07-7774 Specimen Number: 133707080 1-10 Test Number: RD072320TR Description of-test specimen: cfi Foam, Inc.: Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation. i ,Test Method:_ASTM.0 518-04. "Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: eft Foam, Inc:/ Richard Porter The results in this report.were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518-04. Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 1.400 inches Specimen density: 1.17 Ib/ft' Cold plate temperature: 91.44 deg F Hot plate temperature: 128.70 deg F Average specimen temperature: 110.07 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2415 Btu.in/ft'.hr.°F Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.141 ft-'.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 5.80 ft2.hr.°F/Btu Notes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 6.17 The precision of this test is estimated to be 2.5%(Section 10.3. ASTM C 518-04) Reviewed By: Date: The results in this report apply only to the specimen tested. This test conforms to ASTM Test Method C 513-04 except for the report requirements. The report includes summary data but a full.complement of data is available upon request. i i f R&D Pale I of I Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931.372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal ResistanceTest Report Date of Test: August 08, 2007 Date of Manufacture: Julv 06. 2006 HFM File Number: 07-7774 Specimen Number: 1337070801-10 Test Number: RD072319TR Description of test specimen: cfi Foam, Inc.; Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation Test Method: ASTM C 518-04,."Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: cfi Foam, Inc./ Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance Nvith ASTM C 51 8-04. Heat flow meter:_ 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 1.400 inches Specimen density: 1.17 Ib/ft' Cold plate temperature: 55.47 deg F I Hot plate temperature: 95.07 deg F j Average specimen temperature: 75.27 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0,2261 Btu.in/ft'.hr.°F Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.423 ft'.hr.°F/Btu.iii Thermal resistance of specimen: 6.19 It'.hr°F/Btu Notes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA Edge guards or cabinet,temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Lenoth of time for test(hours)? 6.23 The precision of this test is estimated to be 2.5%(Section 10.3, ASTM C 518-04) Reviewed By: Date: The results in this report apply only to the specimen tested. This test conforms to ASTM Test Method C 5.18-04 except for the report requirements. The report includes summary data but a full complement of data is available upon request. U R&® Services sr Test Report Thermal Resistance Measurements on Masonry Foam Insulation Provided by CoreFoam on July 5, 2005 Prepared For: Mr. Richard Porter CoreFoam P.O. Box 10393 Knoxville, TN 37939 R & D Services, Inc. - I P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Report: RD05289 Reviewed by. � ;•.�2�,� � ,_��.,,.. , Ronald S. Graves Vice President Au(,itst 02, 2005 i Test results reported apply only to the specimens tested. This report shall.not be reproduced.except in Full,without written approval orR&f) ' services,Inc. This report must not be used by the Client to claim product endorsement by R K U Services.Inc.,NVI.AP or any a_sency orthe U.S.Government. i f i I DR Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: July 05. 2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7398 Specimen Number: 1337050705-4 R&D Test Number: RD051823TR Description of test specimen: Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation, I inch sample Test Met.hod:_As,rM C. 518. `West Method for Steadv-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/ Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter-built and operated in accordance with ASTIVf C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k, in units W/nt.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per indh , in U.S. custontaly units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. Fleat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 1.062 inches Specimen density. 0.72 Ib/lt' Cold plate temperatul•c: 55.44 deg 1' Hot plate temperature : 95.04 deg F Average specimen temperature: 75.24 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2394 Btu.in/ft'.11 1 Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.177 ft'.hr.°l'/Btu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 4.44 ft`.hr.°F/Btu Notes: Calibration factor Used for manual calculation? NA 1 MP NA Cd�ge`guards or cabinet tentporaturc satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No 1_ength of time for.(test(hours)? 2.5 Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apple oni to the specimen tested rilis.test conforms to ASTiIM Test vietho(I C 518 except for the report requirements."Cite report includes Summary data but a lull complement of data is available upon request. I� C` R&D Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report !i Date-of'I'est: ,luly 12, 2005 Date of 1-lanufacture: ti/a Fox Number: 7401 Specimen Number: 1337050705-3 R&D Test Number: RD051826TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: Retest Test. Method:ASTM C 518.`'Test Method for Steady-:State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means ol. the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation/ Richard.Porter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTNI C.51.8. The test results in a value lift the apporent thermal conductivity of'the test specimen , k. in units W/m.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal ofthe product of6.933 and k. Heat flow nicter: I! by 12 inclies x inches Specimen thickness: 3.750 inches Specimen density: 0.96 lb/f'13 Cold plate temperature: 5 5.2 6 de- F I-lot plate temperature : 94.86 deb I' Avermw specimen temperature: 75.06 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2375 Qtu.in/ft':hr."1= .Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.)1 1 ft'.hr."FBtu.ill Thermal resistance of specimen: 15.8 112.1ir."F/13tu Notes: Calibration factor used for manual Calculation? NA EMF NA L"-dge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes 'I xcessivc moisture 611 cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 6.2 Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimen tested This test con fionns to AS NI Test Method C 518 except for the report requirenients,The report includes summary data but a bill complement of data is available upon request. 1� I R -` Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871. F'ax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report. Date of Test: .luiv 13, 2005 Date of Manufiacture: n/a Fox Number: 7404 Specinlen.Number: 1337050705-4 R&D Test Number: RD051824TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoani Masonry Foam Insulation: I inch sample Multitemperature i "test Method: ASTM C 518."'rest Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Nleans of the Heat Flow Meter AbijaratLls." Report prepared for: Core'Foan1 Masonry Foa111 111SU1at1011/Richard Porter The results in this report vverc obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 51 S. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k,, in units w/n1.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal of the product ol'6.933 and k. 1 Heat 11ow meter: 12 by 12 inches x Inches Specimen thickness: 1.063 inches Specimen density: 0.72 Ib/i:t' Cold plate temperature: 16.41 deg F Flot Mate temperature: 53.67 deo P Average specimen temperature: 35.04 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2256 l3tu.in/ft2.hr.°F, Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 4.433 ft2.hr.T/l3tu.in Thermal resistance of shecifnew 4.71 ft'-.hr.T/Btu Notes: Calibration factor used 101-111allLtal calCUlatlon? NA EM1= NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory'? Yes Excessive Moisttire on,cold plate? No Lem�lth of time for test(I ours)'? 2.9 Reviewed By: Date: Test resuits reported apply only to the specimen tested This test conforms to f1S'r\.1 Test Method C 518 except Ibr the report rcquirements.'I'hc report inciti des summay data but a lull complement ot'tlata is available upon request. I I R Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871. Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: July 13. 2005 Date of Nlanufaeturc: n/a Fox Number: 7404 Specimen Number: 1337050705-4 R&D'test Number: IZD05 1825TR Description of test specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation. I inch sample Multitemperature Test Method: AS'TM C 518. ""hest Method for Steadv-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of , the Fleet Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared for: Coref oam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Porter The results in this report were obtained with it heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with . ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal COndUCtiVit)'of the test specimen , k , in units \fit/m.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. Heat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches j Specimen thickness: 1.063 inches Specimen density: 0.72 Ib/fi Cold plate temperature: 91.40 deg F I lot plate temperature : 128.66 deg F Average specimen temperature: 1,10.03 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2777 B[u.in/ft'.hr.`h "I'herinal resistivity( R-per-inch): 3.601 JV.hr.T/Btu.in 1 Thermal resistance of specimen: 3.83 ft-7.hr.'F/13tu Motes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMF NA j Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on cold plate? No Length of time fir test(hours)? 3.0 —Z- 1 )( Reviewed By: Date: Kest results reported apply ably to the specimen tested This test conrorms to i\STNI Test Method C 51 s except li)r the report } requirements.The report ineludes summary data.but a bill complement ol'data is available upon request_ I R&D MIA -Services , Test Report Selected Measurements on Low Density Masonry. Foam Samples Supplied by CoreFoam on June 16, 2005 Prepared For: Mr. Richard Porter CoreFoam P.O. Box 10393 Knoxville, lN 37939 i R & D Services, Inc. P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Report: RD05284 I I Reviewed by:`Y e� t�,�.� fJ Z,,� Ronald S. Graves Vice President August 01, 2005 I Test results reported apply only'to.the specimens tested. This report shall not be reproduced.except in frill.without written approval of R S D Services,Inc. this report must nut he used by the Client to claim productendorsentcnt by R I)Services.Inc:,NVLAP or am•agency ofthe U.S.Government. I I i i RW . Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931.-372-8871 Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: June M. 2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7395 Specimen Number: 1337050614-2 R&D Test Number: RD051788TR Description oftest specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam insulation; 3.25 inch sample cut from box of f6ai.n 'Pest Method: ASTM C 518. "Test Method for Steady-State'fhermal Transmission Properties by Means of'. the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." Report prepared-for: CorePoam Masonry Foam Insulation/Richard Potter The results in this report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTtNI C 51.8. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the test specimen , k, in twits %V/m.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units is the reciprocal of the product of 6.933 and k. I-feat flow meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen thickness: 3.250 inches Specimen density: 0.54 lb/ft' Cold plate temperature: 55.44 deg F Hot plate temperature: 95.04 deg 1= Average specimen temperature: 75'.24 deg F Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2756 Btu.in/1't-.hr."}= Thermal resistivity( R-per-inch): 3.629 ft-'.hr.°F/Btu.in Thermal resistance of'specimen: 11.8 ft'-.hr.°F/Btu Notes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation'? NA EMF NA i Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on;cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours)? 4.5 �__zn; Reviewed By: Date: Test results reported apple only to the specimen tested This test conforms to AST,ti4 Pest Method C 518 except liar the report requirements.The report includes sunnnan�data but a lull complement of data is available upon request. �f f I ' AM R&D W Services P.O. Box 2400 Cookeville, Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone 931-372-8871. Fax 931-525-3896 Thermal Resistance Test Report Date of Test: Jul\,05.'2005 Date of Manufacture: n/a Fox Number: 7397 Specimen Number: 1337050614-1 R&D Test Number: RD051787TR Description oftest specimen: CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation: I inch sample cut from box of foam Test Method: ASTM C 518."'test Method for Steady-State Thermal "Transmission Properties b.v Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus." j Report prepared ior: Core Foam Masonry Foam Insulation/ Richard Porter The results in this-report were obtained with a heat-flow meter built and operated in accordance with ASTM C 518. The test results in a value for the apparent thermal conductivity of the.test specimen , k , in units %I/m.K . The thermal resistivity, R-value per inch , in U.S. customary units-is the reciprocal ol'the product of 6.933 and k. "Heat now meter: 12 by 12 inches x inches Specimen.thickness: 1.102 it clies Specimen density: 0.53 Ib/It' -Cold plate temperature: 55.44 deg.F Hot plate temperature : 9").04 deg F Average specimen temperature: 75.24 deg F { Apparent thermal conductivity: 0.2530 Btu.in/ft-.hr.0F l Thermal resistivity(R-per-inch): . 3.953 ft2.11r.°F/13tu.in Thermal resistance of specimen: 4.35 ft'.hr.°F/Btu Notes: Calibration factor used for manual calculation? NA EMI' NA Edge guards or cabinet temperature satisfactory? Yes Excessive moisture on.cold plate? No Length of time for test(hours `? 2.9 n _ I Revie\ved I3y: Date: "test results reported apply only to the specimen tested'I'his test conlbrnis to AS't;Nt"test Method C 5 14 except for the report requirements.The report includes summary data but a bill complement of data is available upon request. ;. R&D Services wavy N.O. Box 2400 Cookeville,Tennessee 38502-2400 Phone: 931-372-8871 Fax: 931-525-3896 Compressive Strength Test Report R&D rest iniber: RD051789CS Date of Test.June 29.2005 Specimen: 1337050614-1 Date of Manufacture:n/a Report prepared for: Corefoarn Masonry foam Insulation/Richard Porter 1't-1— Measurements Ior compressive strength of a foam sample supplied by CoreFoam Masonry Foam Insulation. Specimen Preparation: Samples were cut into rectangles having al nominal dimension of 3 in X 3 in x I in. Specimens were conditioned at 69.8�/-3.61F and 50+'-5 %RH. Five specimens were tested. Test Method: ASTM,D 162 1-00-"Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties ol'Rigid Cellular Plastics-.. Procedure A Procedure: This report presents the results ofphysical tests conducted on a 6 foam samples and supplied by CoreFoam on June 14, 2005. Testing was completed on June 29,2005. "resting was completed using an Instron Universal Testing Machine, Model 4400R. Samples were measured to within I%. Samples were compressed to IP/o,and stress was reported at 10%compression. Observations: . 1! I Sample Maximum Load Displacement at Load(ri? 10%, SUcss.�i lU°% f (Ibt) Max.Load(in) deformation(I131) deformation or yield i 1 5.235 0.124 4.91 0.546 i 2 5.423 0.126 5.18 0.576 i 3 5.799 0.123 5.69 0.632 t i 4 5.718 0.127 5.64 0.626 i 5 4.966 0.127 4.86 0.540 6 5.154 0.128. 4.97 0.552 Average 5382 0.126 5.21 0.579 Standard Deviation 0.327 0.0019 0.370 0.041 ' (1 Reviewed By: i , Date: Test results reported apply only to the specimens tested. i ;n. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Building and Code Regulations Division BUILDING PERMIT SUB-CONTRACTOR SUMMARY will be using the following sub-contractors for the (Company/Individual Name) project located at (Street address or Property Tax ID#) It is understood that if there is any change of status regarding the participation of any of the sub-contractors listed below;I wt i huned'Wely advise the A41foiag and,caning DeoarCment of St.Lucie County. St. Lucie County/ Trade Name of Company/Contractor State of Florida License Number GG f ( I Electrical Plumbing Irt 4 �(J 6-1, �D�6-� 2 2 2 0 � � IIVAC/ Mechanical Roofing © G06.3S`�C?i✓�«tJ Q 3 ° Z� Gas I OFFICE USE ONLY: PERMIT ISSUE DATE: NUMBER: __F Revised 07/29/2014 'I PERMIT# ISSUE DATE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Building & Code Compliance Division BUILDING PERMIT SUB-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT have agreed to be (Company Name/Individual Name) the t,. �-��.�G Sub-contractor for 00-0 COL) (Type of Trade) (Primary Contractor) For the project located at 7-3 Z Z -g 00 — (00 Q Z -®Q® ` :5 (Project Street Address or Property Tax ID#) It is understood that,if there is any change of status regarding our participation with the above mentioned project,the Building and Code Regulation Division of St.Lucie County will be advised pursuant to the filing of a Change of Sub-contractor notice. L CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE(Qualifier) SUB-CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE( ifier) hwt�6'ko ©�e(� J he-car Pnelhcl�ry��_' PRINT NAME PRINT NAME Er b© OZ-) t � COUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBERCOUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBER y State of Florida,County of J 1 �• State of Florida,County of 11—� —No cv�k The foregoing instrument was signed before me this day of The foregoing instrument was signedd before me this 4 day of !4IPT- .20 I by /VJi? ) n,x G1bT-�(�T. L("v) // E�Cv�c 20�a by who is personally(mown_or has produced a who is personally(mown for has produced a as identification. as identifies L;. u o STAMP ;,bS a o ofary Public Sigatreof �taryPabfi f W y Ll Print Name of Notary Public N n Print Name of Notary Public ��o,Lty Pue�o, N i Ry P bAV1Es�`V'Rflo�da tD �' '3 :• Commission 4 FF 184524 ��;° My Comm.Expires Dec 18,2018 z m ` • SUP Bo(Ided through National Notary Assn. o a-y Revised 11/162016 i� s o a 0 PERMIT# ISSUE DATE _ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -hy Building & Code Compliance Division X till BUILDING PERMIT SUB-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT Hypoluxo Plumbing, Inc have agreed to be (Company Name/Individual Name) the Plumbing Sub-contractor for f:)� Cts-� `-4� j�l (Type of Trade) (Primary Contractor) For the project located at -2 YZ 2 - 000 -000 Z — 000 — (Project Street Address or Property Tax ID#) It is understood that, if there is any change of status regarding our participation with the above mentioned project, the Building and Code Regulation Division of S.t. Lucie County will be advised pursuant to the filing of a Change of Sub-contractor notice. CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE(Qualifier) SUB-CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE(Qualifier) Ronnie Burkhalter PRINT NAME PRINT NAME - ASV 5 21272 COUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBER COUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBER ��l e State of Florida,County of ( Palm Beach� I `- State of Florida,County of ' The foregoing instrument was signed before me this day of The foregoing instrument was signed before me this`�-+�'�Q day of (L 20il by Ma -Vp,I( tc 4;r£LLA yic 20"C'by Ronnie Burkhalter who is personally known_or has produced a4J LI Cf'�5r� who is personally knownl\��// or has produced a as identification. as identification. \) - tAiSfi � STAMP y Pubfly r Signature of Notary Public UJ�L'C�I- �4���1 U' �nc � Dolores A Price W l� o Print Name of Notary Public " Print Name of Notary Public 00 � GZ q �ti;:l j DOLORES A.PRICE Commission#FF 943625 Expires February 19,2020 Owd d Thtu Tmy Fein Insurmiro WGM5 T019 Revised 11/16/2016 3 1~p � > s� PERMIT# ISSUE DATE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Building & Code Compliance Division fl - BUILDING PERMIT SUB-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT have agreed to be (Company Name/InSividnal+.Name) the VCO Sub-contractor for Doe— (Type of Trade) (Primary Contractor) For the project located at Z 2 — on o Do O 2 — oc 0 .:.Vioject Stredt Address or Property Tax ID#) It is understood that, if there is any change of status regarding our participation with the above mentioned I project,the Building and Code Regulation Division of St. Lucie County will be advised pursuant to the filing of a Change of Sub-contractor notice. CONTRACTOR'SIGNATURE(Quaitfrer) SMCIONfRACTOT2'SIGNATM(Qualitiery a QZ� (��� "L'-U LiC,i o PRINT NAME PRINT NAME COUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBER COUNTY CERTIFICATION NUMBER /' State of Florida,County of "J 1� e'l State Of Moeida,County of The foregoing instrument was signed before me this r 5 day of The foregoing instrument was signed before me this 1.3 day of ,20 1 P1by /lDViz4Cld �'il�LlliN6 r�C�i—ll u ,20!1Eby who is personally known has produced a who is personally known_o s produced a as identif ati n Ir �,`�`'"�•� a fi ti w Sign re of Notary Public I �; Signature of No,"R&Wie 1 L; •, � J .�' &�D U• ^• c n Z< 11 U- N ti _ U JA �� � Print Name of Notary Public Print Name of Notary Public S O` .M a ' !' I PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT.SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ® r Building&Code:Regulations Division 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE,FL 34982-5652 (772)462-1553 FILLED LAND AFFIDAVIT I,the undersigned, am the owner of the following described property, 2 J GZJ© a ©� �J � � ®© S (Pareet Id#/LegaV&sert0tion/Ad&ess) for which I have applied to St. Lucie County for a Final Development Permit. In accepting this Final Development Permit, BP Number , I acknowledge that as owner of the above described property, and in accordance with Section 7.04.01(D), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I shall be responsible for assuring adequate.drainage so-that-the-immed.iate community WIILL NOT be adversely affected. 4 -f11rther acknowIedge-ihhf'in.granting t1 is permit for;'thhe development of this..property, St. Lucie City is neither obliged near liable to provide for, or`>t Aintiin in a1!y fiorm, � adequate drainage off my property which will not adversely affect the immediate community. -Prope owner Name(Pl`ease Pnint t r rro/pDtertry0Zwnergnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF 6t ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE.-ME THIS � L� DAY—OF BY(V ' l l WH \1 I � • � � O IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TOME U OR WHO HAS I A PRODUCED �V �5 bCQ I„ AS IDENTIFICATION. SIGNATURINF NOTARY PUBLIC TYPE OR P NT NOTARY � �� LOMMISSION NUMBER MARY ANN HOOD '�pv p`e� Notary Public-State of Florida `� ' Commission#FF 202265 SLCPDSD Revised 04/11/2011 "� »o;� M Comm.Expires Mar 17,2019 '�F°;�°�' Bonded through National Notary Assn•