HomeMy WebLinkAboutProduct Approval (8) VS
Intertek
Architectural Testing
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT
Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Rendered to:
NEXGEN FRAMING SYSTEM, LLC
Melbourne, Florida
PRODUCT TYPE: 8'x 10' Composite Wall Panel
MODEL: Insulated CFS with Synthetic Stucco Finish Wall Panel
This report contains in its entirety:
Cover Page: 1 page
Report Body: 12 pages
o``oSEp�.A.RFF'%
Sketches: 3 pages
Photographs: 2 pages _ * No.58920
Drawings: 4 pages
0'. STATE OF (V41`
OR1�3' lqz�'\�
l0ll�j1p�lL`E\`����`
OigieN sgm bj:.los¢ph a Ra.tl
2016.04.18 16:28:05 -04'00'
Test Start Date: 9/16/2013
Test End Date: 11/8/2013
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Test Record Retention End Date: 11/8/2023
Miami-Dade County Notification No.: ATIWPB 12032
FIL
- a
2658 Electronics Way www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building P• 561.881.0020
West Palm Beach, FL 33407 f. 717.764.4129
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
Page 1 of 12
1.0 Client Identification:
y
1.1 Report Issued To: NexGen Framing System, LLC
445 Stan Drive, Suite 1
Melbourne,Florida 32904
1.2 Contact Person: Z. Cliff Singleton
2.0 Laboratory Identification:
2.1 Test Laboratory: Architectural Testing,Inc.,
an Intertek company("Intertek-ATI")
2658 Electronics Way
West Palm Beach,Florida 33407
2.2 Laboratory Phone Number: 561-881-0020
3.0 Project Summary:
3.1 Introduction: Architectural Testing, Inc., an Intertek company ("Intertek-ATI")
was contracted by NexGen Framing System, LLC to conduct TAS 201,TAS 202,and
TAS 203 testing on their composite wall panel in accordance with Florida Building
Code for High Velocity Hurricane Zone and Miami-Dade County requirements. The
three specimens tested met the performance requirements set forth in the
protocols. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Test Results
Specimen# Test Protocol Design Pressure
1 TAS 201 (Large Missile TAS 203 +45 -45 psf
2 TAS 201 (Large Missile TAS 203 +45 -45 psf
3 TAS 202 TAS 201 (Large Missile TAS 203 +45 -45 psf
3.2 Product Type: 8'x 10' Composite Wall Panel
3.3 Series/Model: Insulated CFS with Synthetic Stucco Finish Wall Panel
3.4 Miami-Dade County Notification No.: ATIWPB 12032
3.5 Test Dates: 9/16/2013 - 11/8/2013
3.6 Test Record Retention End Date: 11/8/2023
3.7 Test Location: Intertek-ATI test facility in West Palm Beach, Florida.
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
Page 2 of 12
3.0 Project Summary: (Continued)
3.8 Test Specimen Source: The test specimen(s) was provided by the client.
Representative samples of the test specimen(s) will be retained by Intertek-ATI for
a minimum of ten years from the report completion date.
3.9 Drawing Reference: The test specimen drawings have been reviewed by
Intertek-ATI and are representative of the test specimen(s) reported herein. Test
specimen construction was verified by Intertek-ATI per the drawings located in
Appendix C. Any deviations are documented herein and on the drawings.
3.10 List of Official Observers:
Name Company
Z. Cliff Singleton NexGen Framing System, LLC
Jeff McGovern Intertek-ATI
Kristin Nolan Intertek-ATI
Veron Wickham Intertek-ATI
Joseph A. Reed, P.E. Intertek-ATI
Alan Rule Intertek-ATI
4.0 Test Protocol(s):
TAS 201-94,Impact Test Procedures
TAS 202-94, Criteria for Testing Impact & Non Impact Resistant Building Envelope
Components Using Uniform Static Air Pressure
TAS 203-94,Criteria for Testing Products Subject to Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading
5.0 Test Specimen Description:
5.1 Product Sizes: Table 2 provides product sizes for the overall test specimens.
Table 2: Overall Specimen Size
Overall Area: Width (in.) Height(in.)
80.0 ftz
Overall size 96 120
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Ak Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016 .
Architectural Testing Page 3 of 12
5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued)
5.2 Frame Construction: The frames for all three specimens were fabricated
utilizing the members listed in Table 3.
The specimen consisted of 3.5" CFS 20GA stud wall assembly. Studs were 24" on
center with double studs every 48" on center. Studs were connected using 3/16"
diameter rivets at all CFS member intersections. Double studs were attached by
using two #10 x 1" self-tapping screws located 24" on center. Horizontal supports
were staggered 4' 0-1/4" from the bottom of specimen and 1' 11-3/4" from the
top of specimen. Specimen was sheathed with 1/2" gypsum board attached with
#8 x 1-1/4"self-tapping drywall screws.
Table 3: Wall Panel Details
Frame Member Material Description
1/2" Gypsum Board. #8 x 1-1/4"
Drywall Gypsum board self-tapping screws at 7" on center
perimeter, 8" on center in field.
3.5" CFS min 20GA stud at 24" on
Studs 20 ga. stud center.
3/16" diameter rivets at CFS
member connection.
Insulation Spray foam Min. 2.75" open cell spray foam 0.5
LBS density. (Sprayed on site.
Min 1.25" polyurethane spray foam
Insulation Spray foam 2.0 lb density with embedded 10
oz./yd. open weave glass fiber
reinforcin mesh.
EPS sheet EPS sheet 1" EPS sheet. 3.0 lb density.
BASF Senergy Alpha Basecoat with
Base coat Synthetic stucco embedded 20 oz./yd. open weave
lass fiber reinforcing mesh.
BASF Senergy Alpha Basecoat with
Base coat Synthetic stucco embedded 20 oz./yd. open weave
lass fiber reinforcing mesh.
Waterproofing 100%acrylic BASF Senershield-R
rimer
Finish stucco 100%acrylic BASF Synergy Finish Coat.
Textured Classic and colored
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Ak Test Report No.:.C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural resting Page 4 Of 12
5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued)
5.2 Frame Construction: (Continued)
5.2.1 Frame Corner Construction: The frame corners were constructed as
described in Table 4.
Table 4: Frame Corner Construction Details
Location joinery Type Details
All corners 3/16" diameter rivets At CFS member connection.
Horizontal supports 3/16" diameter rivets At CFS member connection.
Double studs Two #10 x 1" self-tapping 24" on center along double studs
screws
5.3 Installation: Table 5 provides details of the test specimen installation into the
Pine test buck. The exterior perimeter of the test specimen was sealed with
sealant.
Table 5: Installation Details
Location Anchor Description Anchor Location
Head and sill 1/4 x 2-3/4"self-drilling screw 24" on center
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 5 of 12
6.0 Test Results: The temperature during TAS 202 testing was between 76°-80°F.
Results are tabulated as follows:
6.1 Protocol TAS 202-94,Static Air Pressure
Table 6 provides the results for the air infiltration test.
Table 6: Test Specimen#3 TAS 202,Air Infiltration Test Results
Test Pressure Results
Air Infiltration at 1.57 psf 25 mph) 0.00 Cfm ft2
Air Infiltration at 6.24 psf 50 mph) 0.00 Cfm ft2
Table 7 provides the results for positive and negative uniform static load test.
Table 7: Test Specimen#3 TAS 202,Preload and Design Load Test Results
Load Indicator Deflection(in.) Permanent Set in.)
(psf) Location Measured Allowed Measured Allowed
+33.75
50% of Test B 0.316 0.667 0.010 0.240
Pressure
+45.00
Design B 0.436 0.667 0.017 0.240
Pressure
-33.75
50%of Test B 0.326 0.667 0.020 0.240
Pressure
-45.00
Design B 0.463 0.667 0.030 0.240
Pressure
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 6 of 12
6.0 Test Results: (Continued)
6.1 Protocol TAS 202-94,Static Air Pressure(Continued)
Table 8 provides the results for the water penetration test.
Table 8: Test Specimen#3 TAS 202,Water Penetration Test Results
Title of Test Pressure Results
Water Penetration 6.8 sf Pass
15% of Positive Design Pressure p
Table 9 provides the results for the structural overload test.
Table 9: Test Specimen#3 TAS 202,Structural Overload Test Results
Load Indicator Deflection in. Permanent Set in.
(psf) Location Measured Allowed Measured Allowed
+67.50 B 0.924 N/A 0.031 0.240
Test
Pressure D 1.136 N/A 0.129 N/A
-67.50 B 1.063 N/A 0.112 0.240
Test
Pressure D 1.301 N/A 0.147 N/A
Note: See Intertek ATI Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Deflection/permanent set
reported is the overall deflection between three points (longest unsupported span) which
accounts for support movement. Indicator D was reported without support movement.
Conclusion: Intertek-ATI observed no signs of failure in any area of the test specimen
during the TAS 202 testing; as such, the test specimen satisfies the requirements of
TAS 202.
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Ak Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
IL Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 7 of 12
6.0 Test Results: The temperature during TAS 201 testing was between 75°-80°F.
Results are tabulated as follows:
6.2 Protocol TAS 201-94,Large Impact Procedures
Tables 10, 11,and 12 provide the results for the large missile.impact test.
Table 10: Test Specimen#1 TAS 201, Large Missile Impact Test Results
Impact Missile Missile Missile
# Weight Length Velocity
lbs. in. (ft./sec.)
1 9.3 94 50.58
2 9.3 94 49.14
3 9.3 94 49.09
Table 11: Test Specimen#2 TAS 201, Large Missile Impact Test Results
Impact ' Missile Missile Missile
# Weight Length Velocity
lbs. in. (ft./sec.)
1 9.4 92 49.26
2 9.4 92 49.68
3 9.4 92 49.85
Table 12: Test Specimen#3 TAS 201, Large Missile Impact Test Results
Impact Missile Missile Missile
# Weight Length Velocity
lbs. (in.) ((ft./sec.)
1 9.4 92 50.38
2 9.4 92 49.98
3 9.4 92 49.55
Note: See Intertek-ATI Sketches#1 and#2 for impact locations
Conclusion: The large missiles impacted each intended target and Intertek-ATI
carefully inspected each impact location. Intertek-ATI observed no signs of
penetration, rupture, or opening after the large missile impact test; as such, each test
specimen satisfies the large missile requirements of TAS 201.
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 8 of 12
6.0 Test Results: The temperature during TAS 203 testing was 79°-88°F. Results are
tabulated as follows:
6.3 Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading
Tables 13 through 21 provide the results for the positive and negative cyclic load test.
Table 13: Test Specimen#1 TAS 203, Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time
Design +45.0/-45.0 psf Stage
Pressure 1 2 3 4
Pressure Range (psf) 9.0—22.5 0—27.0 22.5—36.0 13.5—45.0
Average Cycle Time(sec.) 3.25 6.22 3.41 6.92
Number of Cycles 3500 300 600 100
5 6 7 8
Pressure Range (psf) 13.5 —45.0 22.5 —36.0 0—27.0 9.0 —22.5
Average Cycle Time(sec.) 7.90 4.33 3.79 3.27
Number of Cycles 50 1050 50 3350
Table 14: Test Sped en#1 TAS 203, Positive Cyclic Load Test Results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.816 0.042
D 0.988 0.085
Table 15: Test S ecimen #1 TAS 203,Ne ative Cyclic Load test results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.725 0.037
D 0.848 0.068
Note: See Intertek-ATI Sketch 93 for indicator locations. Deflection/permanent set
reported is the overall deflection between three points(longest unsupported span) which
accounts for support movement. Indicator D was reported without support movement
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 9 of 12
6.0 Test Results: (Continued)
6.3 Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading (Continued)
Table 16: Test Specimen#2 TAS 203, Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time
Design +45.0/-45.0 psf Stage
Pressure 1 2 3 4
Pressure Range (psf) 9.0 —22.5 0—27.0 22.5—36.0 13.5—45.0
Average Cycle Time (sec.) 3.44 6.28 3.32 6.88
Number of Cycles 3500 300 600 100
5 6 7 8
Pressure Range (psf) 13.5—45.0 22.5—36.0 0—27.0 9.0—22.5
Average Cycle Time (sec.) 8.00 4.00 3.80 3.00
Number of Cycles 50 1050 50 3350
Table 17: Test Sped en#2 TAS 203, Positive Cyclic Load Test Results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.641 0.051
D 0.894 0.147
Table 18: Test S ecimen#2 TAS 203, Negative Cyclic Load Test Results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.641 0.072
D 0.852 0.184
Note: See Intertek-ATI Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Deflection/permanent set
reported is the overall deflection between three points(longest unsupported span) which
accounts for support movement. Indicator D was reported without support movement
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
' �Ak Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
�- Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 10 of 12
6.0 Test Results: (Continued)
6.3 Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading (Continued)
Table 19: Test Specimen#3 TAS 203,Cyclic Test Spectrum and Average Cycle Time
Design +45.0/-45.0 psf Sta e
Pressure 1 2 3 4
Pressure Range (psf) 9.0—22.5 0—27.0 22.5—36.0 13.5—45.0
Average Cycle Time(sec.) 2.60 2.90 3.60 7.00
Number of Cycles 3500 300 600 100
5 6 7 8
Pressure Range (psf) 13.5—45.0 22.5—36.0 0—27.0 9.0 —22.5
Average Cycle Time(sec.) 7.60 4.20 3.80 3.10
Number of Cycles 50 1050 50 3350
Table 20: Test S ecimen#3 TAS 203, Positive Cyclic Load Test Results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.587 0.002
D 0.750 0.069
Table 21: Test S ecimen#3 TAS 203,Negative Cyclic Load Test Results
Indicator Maximum Permanent
Location Deflection Set
in. in.
B 0.689 0.049
D 0.821 0.128
Note: See Intertek-ATI Sketch #3 for indicator locations. Deflection/permanent set
reported is the overall deflection between three points(longest unsupported span) which
accounts for support movement. Indicator D was reported without support movement
Conclusion: Intertek-ATI observed no signs of failure in any area of the test specimens
during the cyclic load test; as such, the test specimens satisfy the cyclic load
requirements of TAS 203.
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing Page 11 of 12
7.0 Test Equipment:
Cannon: Constructed from steel piping utilizing compressed air to propel the missile
Missile: 2x4 Southern Pine
Timing Device:-Electronic beam type
Cycling Mechanism: Computer controlled centrifugal blower with electronic pressure
measuring device
Deflection Measuring Device: Linear transducers, 1" dial indicators, 2" dial
indicators
8.0 Laboratory Compliance Statements: The following are provided as required by the
protocols for the testing reported herein.
Upon completion of testing,specimens tested for TAS 201-94 met the requirements of
Section 1626 of the Florida Building Code, Building.
Upon completion of testing,specimens tested for TAS 202-94 met the requirements of
Section 1620 of the Florida Building Code, Building.
Upon completion of testing,specimens tested for TAS 203-94 met the requirements of
Section 1625 of the Florida Building Code, Building.
Tape and film were used to seal against air leakage during structural testing. In our
opinion,the tape and film did not influence the results of the test.
www,archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
Page 12 of 12
Intertek-ATI will service this report for the entire test record retention period. Test
records that are retained such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of
test specimens, or other pertinent project documentation will be retained by Intertek-ATI
for the entire test record retention period.
This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement
by this laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates
only to the specimen(s) tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without
the written approval of Intertek-ATI.
For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, Inc.
Nil*Signed bY' hA.Rent
Alan Rule Joseph A. Reed,P.E.
Technician Team Leader Director- Engineering
AWR:cmd
Attachments(pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included.
Appendix A: Sketches(3)
Appendix B: Photographs(2)
Appendix C: Drawings(4)
This report produced.from controlled document ternplaty AT[00651.,issued 01/1.8/1.3.
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
�- Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Architectural Testing Report Date: 4/18/2016
�1• �,,_._�'`'� mow. :.�� `�
,44
Sketch#1
Impact Locations- Specimen#1
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
k Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
Sketch#2
Impact Locations -Specimens#2 and#3
www.archtest.com www.intertek.com/building
I
�Ak Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
r-- A ,
L-J
--N
Sketch#3
Indicator Locations
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Ak
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Report Date: 4/18/2016
Architectural Testing
fr
t
k �
Photograph No. 1
Exterior View
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
Test Report No.: C4826.01-450-18
Architectural Testing Report Date: 4/18/2016
1
i '�
s
...SIR
#
k
Et
s
r�<'
v:
k .
h,
# sf_
63,
Photograph No.2
Interior View
www.archtest.com . www.intertek.com/building
$' S1
(2)114 x 2 314 SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 2'-0"OC
TO 2X10 WOOD FRAME
-- --------- -------- --- ————— ———————— —
i
i M
Ci
i
I i
I
- , I
3116 DIA BUTTONHEAD RIVETS @ j
ALL CFS MEMBER CONNECTION
1 '
i
(2)#10 x 1"
SELF TAPPING SCREWS -_ I
@ 24"oc max I o
TYR ALONG DBL STUDS i
� � I
_ I
i
S2 S2
I _
I
i
—- °I-
--.__T..
(2)1/4 x 2 314 SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 2'-0"OC
TO 2X10 WOOD FRAME
z' 2, }2, 2,
_._ ......................... ..........._ .............._.
Test sample compliz5 witli these dc(ails.
Deviation'—Ivied. ELEVATION -EXTERIOR VIEW
2epmlt C4826.01-450-I8
Date 09/11/14 Verified t;y:Stephen Grata EXTERIOR EPS SHEATHING AND
SYNTHETIC STUCCO FINSIH NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
Scale 3/4" = V-0"
THEDESKMI TIOEDMWPi6ARETHEanl6NEPROPBM()FNIXGEJ FRAMMMTB4LLr-7HECOWANYWRESSCPEER4 5THE00M GfrANDPNYOTMPFOPM
RIGHTS TNTHBE PL SAND MATIDNS.W REWD.CE@5,RNMfS OR MOD6I Mf6 OFTHEE DDORIENIS WNHWFTHE WESEDWMMNCRISENF OFNE(GEN MW4G SYSTEM LLB S PRORIBM BYLAW
,� NexGen Framing System,LLC
Insulated
SHEET Cold Formed Steel Panel
SCALE w/Synthetic Stucco Finish on Exterior NexGen Framing system,LLC
11/27/2013 & 445 Stan Dr,suite 1
DATE Melbourne,FL 32904
TC Drywall Finish on Interior Office(321)43 t-6536
DRAWN wwYv.NexGenFraming.conT _
,jS1
(2)1/4 x 2 3/4 SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 2'-0"OC
TO 2XI 0 WOOD FRAME 8-
.........................................................................
FULL LENGTH GYPSUM SHEET i
————————— ———————— - ———————— ————————
.......... ....... /4
w
Al
8 x 11/4"
SELF TAPPING
DRYWALLSCREWS
7"OC MAX PERIMETER
C MAX IN THE FIELD
Lu
w r/ A.
1/2"GYPSUM BOARD-
A.
A
r
V
V
S2 S 2
Uj
4/
4
a.
Z
D
'4 4
(2)1/4 x 2 314 SELF TAPPING SCREWS @ 2'-0"OC
TO 2XI0 WOOD FRAME I Isi
A
--'V
Test sample.complies ILitb these deckfuls.
Deviations me fluted. ELEVATION INTERIOR VIEW
I�Cpcjrl itC4826.01450-18
Date 09/11/14 Verified Bv:Stephen Grala
INTERIOR DRWALL SHEATHING AND
STUD CONFIGURATION SHOWN
Afir ONLY DRYWALL CONNECTORS SHOWN FOR CLARITY
wr Scale.3/4" = V-0"
ME DBM IN TH5EDRAVANGSAWTHE EXCUSUE PROPM OFNE(GEN ffAMmSffPEM LLCTHE COMPANY DNMY REWVS 1HE COPOGHTANDANYOMPROPERlY
W MINIHESE RANSAND ELLVATIDNS.ANY RUM=C%,RMONS OR MODnCAIMNS OFTHM DOalMENTSWUHMIME WRSSID WfUMN COURNTOF NaGEN FRAMR6 WMM LIA IS 9MUM BY LAW
2 of 4 NexGen Framing System,LLC
Insulated
SHEET Cold Formed Steel Panel
SCALE w/Synthetic Stucco Finish on Exterior NexGen Framing System,LLC
11/27/2013 & 445 Stan Dr,Suite I W,
DATE Melboume,FL 32904
TC Drywall Finish on Interior Office(321)431-6536
DRAWN v"vw.NexGcnFr;mning.cojjj
•+;
W
iZ
JQ
1 INSIDE
iV
o w PF -
1 OUTSIDE
HORIZONTAL SECTION S2-S2
ONLY DRYWALL CONNECTORS SHOWN FOR CLARITY
1/4" 3 518"
is
j-, 11/2"
5 110
FINISHED WIDTH
VERTICAL SECTION S1-S1
ONLY DRYWALL AND DOUBLE STUD
CONNECTORS SHOWN FOR C*RITY
Test sample complies with these details. ALL FRAMING MATERIAL IS 20GA 50 KSI
De'iations are noted. COLD FORMED STEEL
Report C4826.01450-18
Date 09/11/14 Verified 13y:Stephen Grala
Scale 3/4" = V-0"
TIEDERMINTIBEDRAWIN(SAPETIEEnMfVEPROPDDYDFKMENFR*MSYSIEMn47HEMIPANYBNJrSNRM&SnECOMM ANDPNYMMPFDPBM '
IttaMINTHESEgNGANDHEVATANS.ANVRBTIODULItIXS,RL7,MSCAMODMTIDHSOFTI{BEDODRAENMWUHOUTTHEWSSEDWMTENMN-WDFNnICBnRAhMSMEM=SFTMI BYLAW
3 of 4 NexGen Framing System,LLC
Insulated
SHEET Cold Formed Steel Panel f
SCALE - w/Synthetic Stucco Finish on Exterior NexGen Framing System,LLC
u/ZT/zoi3 & 445 Stan Dr,Suite 1
DATE — '. Melbourne,FL 32904
7c Drywall Finish on Interior Office(321)431-6536
DRAWN -' www.NexGenFraming.coni
1/2"GYPSUM BOARD
.5"CFS MIN 20GA STUD 0 MAX 24"O.C. �/ ; MAX.2.75"OPEN CELL SPRAYFOAM
OUBLE EVERR 4'OC MAX .5 LBS DENSITY
\ !
MIN.1.25"POLYURETHANE CLOSED
CELL
_ 2.0Ibs DENSITY SPRAY FOAM
WITH EMBEDED 10 ozlvd IMPACT
OPEN WEAVE GLASS,
FIBER REINFORCING MESH
1"EPS SHEET 3.0 LBS DENSITY
JMA = i
SYNTHETIC STUCCOOR EXAMPLE:
T
BASF-SENERGY ALPHA BASECOAT)
!( I
(100%ACRYLIC)
W/EMBEDED MIN 20ozlvd HIGH IMPACT OPEN WEAVE GLASS,
FIBER REINFORCING MESH
/ SYNTHETIC STUCCO BASECOAT
(FOR EXAMPLE:
BASF-SENERGY ALPHA BASECOAT)
(100%ACRYLIC)
y W/EMBEDED MIN 20oz/yd HIGH IMPACT
i OPEN WEAVE GLASS,
Y ; FIBER REINFORCING MESH
ACRYLIC PRIMER FOR WATER
PROOFING
(FOR EXAMPLE:
BASF-SENERSHIELD-R)
ACRYLIC FINISH STUCCO
(FOR EXAMPLE:
BASF-SENERGY FINISH COAT)
100%ACRYLIC
i TEXTURED(CLASSIC)AND COLORED
x6t sample complies with these de(ails.
De:iDliens are noted. TYP. INSULATED WALL PANEL
Reportf! C4826.01450-18 N.T.S.
Dane 09/11/14 Verified By:Stephen Grala
NO CONNECTORS SHOWN FOR CLARITY
Scale 3/4" = V-0"
TNEDMISIN THEE DMVMGSMTNEEXQIEM PROM YOFNoM RRMSMIM n4TNE W1PANY0ff1MPSHl STRCDPAMANDANY=0PKFEW
I✓iQa DIRSERNbMDEEVATD&AWFUROD)MOIS,FEVMMORMOD61 MNSOFT13ECOOIAM%VDHOJrTIEBMZSSEDWRMICOt WOFf✓ (ONWIMS15IEI•IUT S PROKMEDB/IAW
NexGen Framing System,LLC
r
4 of 4 Insulated
k SHEET Cold Formed Steel Panel
k SCALE w/Synthetic Stucco Finish on Exterior NexGen Framing System,LLC
445 Stan Dr,Suite 1
u/v/zoi3
DATE & Melbourne,FL 32904
Tc < Drywall Finish on Interior Office(321)431-6536
DRAWN
www.NexGen Fram ing.com