No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject InformationGFA � V FLORIDA S LEADING ENGINE ERING SOURCE l Report of Geoteohnical Exploration � January E, 2014 GFA Project No.: 13-2092.01 For: Phoenix Realty Homes FEES=��VIE=® APR 13 2017 pERNUTTUNG St. Lucie CcL-n,- rL January 8, 2014 Phoenix Realty Homes Attention: Mr. Alan Tarpell 1760 N. Jog Road, Suite 140 West Palm Beach, Florida 33411 Site: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Vicinity SW of Bonita Isle Dr. & Al St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project # 13-2092.01 Dear Mr. Tarpell: GFA International, Inc. (GFA) has completed the subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation for the above -referenced project in accordance with the geotechnical and engineering service agreement for this project. The scope of services was completed in accordance with our Geotechnical Engineering Proposal dated December 12, 2013, planned in conjunction with and authorized by you. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of our subsurface exploration was to classify the nature of the subsurface soils and general geomorphic conditions and evaluate their impact upon the proposed construction. This report contains the results of , our subsurface exploration at the site and our engineering interpretations of these, with respect to the project characteristics described to us including providing recommendations for site preparation and the design of the foundation system. Based on a site plan (author and date unknown) (reproduced in Appendix B - Test Location Plans) and conversations with the client, the project consists of constructing one or two-story residences with shallow foundations. We have not received any information regarding structural loads. For the foundation recommendations presented in this report we assumed the maximum column load will be 70 kips and the maximum -wall loading will be 4 kips per linear foot. GFA estimates that 0 to 2 feet of fill will be required to bring the foundation pads to design grade. A total of thirty-eight (38) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT).soundings to depths of approximately eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet, and fourteen (14) Auger Borings (AS) to approximately six (6) and ten (10) feet, below ground surface (BGS) were completed for this study. The subsurface soil conditions encountered at this site generally consist of sand (SP) to the auger boring termination depths of 6 and 10 feet. The CPT soundings generally indicated BGS the soils were medium dense to dense to 18 feet, and then very dense to the sounding termination depths of 18 to 20 feet. Most soundings were terminated due to cone refusal on very dense/hard soils at 18 to 20 feet. The exception was at the boring AB @ Lot 11, where sand with pieces of wood and roots was encountered at 3Y2 to 5 feet deep. Please refer to Appendix E - Record of Test Borings for a detailed account of each boring and sounding. 521 NW Enterprise Drive Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 • (772) 924.3575 (772) 924-3580 (fax) www.team9fa.com OFFICES THROUGHOUT FLORIDA Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report St. Lucie County, Florida January 8; 2014 GFA Project No. 13-2029.Of Page 2 of 10 The subsurface soil conditions at the project site are generally favorable for the support of the proposed structures on shallow foundations. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf may be used for foundation design. Potentially unsuitable soil (sand with pieces of wood and roots) was encountered at boring AB @ Lot 11 at depths of 3'/2 to 5 feet, and GFA recommends that test pits be performed in that area prior to, or during, stripping and clearing. Unsuitable soils may be encountered that must be excavated and removed to at least 5 feet outside the footprint of the building and then backfilled with compacted structural fill. After excavation and backfill operations (where needed) are completed, the subgrade soils should be improved with compaction from the stripped grade prior to constructing the foundation pads. The top 2 feet below stripped grade should be compacted to a minimum of 95% density prior to placing fill to achieve final grade. Fill (including stemwall backfill) should be placed in 12-inch lifts and compacted to achieve a minimum 95% density. After excavation for footings, the subgrade to a depth of 2 feet below bottom of footings should be compacted to achieve a minimum 95% density. Analysis of the foundation performance under hurricane conditions or ,other storm events, including the effects of loss of soil support due to scour or other forces, is not within the scope of this report, and the recommendations are valid only for normal conditions. Additional analysis and options for foundation systems with scour conditions or other scenarios can be performed if requested. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project and look forward to a continued association. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments, or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed, Resp, itSiWd, Gamok F riFia• ert nzatiion Number 4930 y .. -Alker Ito ICal E,AAr_►6er Project Manager 5 07 O..'� t�D A�. NA L ENG Copies: ttlRaw GfF Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014 GFA Project No. 13-2029.Of Page 3 of 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................ .. 4 .. ... ... .................. 1.1 Scope of Services............................................................................................................4 1.2 Project Description...........................................................................................................4 2.0 OBSERVATIONS........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Site Inspection..................................................................................... ..... .................4 2.2 Field Exploration........................................................................ .. . .. ... ... ..............5 2.3 Laboratory Analysis............................................................................... ........................5 2.4 Geomorphic Conditions......................................................... ...... .... ........................5 .................................. 2.5 Hydrogeological Conditions..............................................................................................6 3.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................6 3.1 General............................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Site Preparation..................................................................................................................7 3.3 Design of Footings.................................................................................................8 .................. 3.4 Ground Floor SlaIs.-..................................................................................................9 4.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS.......................................................................................................9 5.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................9 Appendix A - Vicinity Map Appendix B - Test Location Plan Appendix C - Soil Survey, Map Appendix D - Notes -Related to Borings Appendix E - Record of Test Borings Appendix F - Discussion of Soil Groups GFf Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of Services Geotechnical Report January 8, 2014 Page 4 of 10 The objective of our geotechnical services was to collect subsurface data for the subject project, summarize the test results, and discuss any apparent site conditions that may have geotechnical significance for building construction. The following scope of services are provided within this report: 1. Prepare records of the soil boring logs depicting the subsurface soil conditions encountered during our field exploration. 2. Conduct a review of each soil sample obtained during our field exploration for classification and additional testing if necessary. 3. Analyze the existing soil conditions found during our exploration with respect to foundation support for the proposed structure. 4. Provide recommendations with respect to foundation support of the structure, including allowable soil -bearing capacity, bearing elevations, and foundation design parameters. 5. Provide criteria and site preparation procedures to prepare the site for the proposed construction. 1.2 Project Description Based on a site plan (author and date unknown) (reproduced in Appendix B - Test Location Plans) and conversations with the client, the project consists of constructing one or two-story residences with shallow foundations. We have not received any information regarding structural loads. For the foundation recommendations presented in this report we assumed the maximum column load will be 70 kips and the maximum wall loading will be 4 kips per linear foot., GFA estimates that 0 to 2 feet of fill will be required to bring the foundation pads to design grade. The recommendations provided herein are based upon the above considerations. If the project description has been revised, please inform GFA International so that we may review our recommendations with respect to any modifications. 2.0 OBSERVATIONS 2.1 Site Inspection The project site was generally flat and grassy with a few trees. The grade at the site was estimated to be even with the adjacent road at the time of drilling. Residential structures were north of the property. The interior roadways for the subdivision had been constructed. The Atlantic Ocean was about 800 feet east, and the Indian River (Intracoastal Waterway) about %2 to 1 mile west, of the property. A few small residential structures and a dirt parking area are Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014 GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 5 of 10 shown at the site on aerial historical photographs from the GoogleEarth website dating from 1994 to 2007. 2.2 Field Exploration A total of thirty-eight (38) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings to depths of approximately eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet, and fourteen (14) Auger Borings (AB) to approximately six (6) and ten (10) feet, below ground surface (BGS) were completed for this study. The locations of the soundings and borings performed are illustrated in Appendix B: "Test Location Plan". The Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) methods were used as the investigative tools. CPT tests were performed in substantial accordance with ASTM Procedure D-3441, "Deep Quasi -Static, Cone and Friction Cone Penetration Tests of Soils" and the auger borings in substantial accordance with ASTM Procedure D-1452, "Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". The soil samples recovered from the soil borings were visually classified and their stratification is illustrated in Appendix E: "Record of Test Borings". It should be noted that soil conditions might vary between the strata interfaces, which are shown. The soil boring_ and sounding data reflect information from a specific test location only. Site specific survey staking for the test locations was not provided for our field exploration. The indicated depth and location of each test was approximated based upon existing grade and estimated distances and relationships to obvious landmarks. The boring and sounding depths were confined to the zone of soil likely to be stressed by the proposed construction and knowledge of vicinity soils. 2.3 Laboratory Analysis Soil samples recovered from our field exploration were returned to our laboratory where they were visually examined in general accordance with ASTM D-2488. Samples were evaluated to obtain an accurate understanding of the soil properties and site geomorphic conditions. After a thorough visual examination of the recovered site soils, no laboratory testing was deemed necessary. Bag samples of the soil encountered during our field exploration will be held in our laboratory for your inspection for 30 days and then discarded unless we are notified otherwise in writing. The recovered samples were not examined, either visually or analytically, for chemical composition or environmental hazards. GFA would be pleased to perform these services for an additional fee, if required. 2.4 Geomorphic Conditions The South Florida region is a low probable area of sinkhole development or intense seismic activity. There are no known fault lines located on or near'the project site. Based on the Seismicity Map of the State of Florida produced by B.G. Reagor 1987, the closest seismic activity occurred near Miami in 1945. This event registered a III on the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931. This intensity is similar to -vibrations like that due to passing of heavy or heavily loaded trucks. The UBC Seismic Zone Map shows the state of Florida to be located within a 0 Seismic Zone, and there are typically no seismic analyses required for projects located within 0 Seismic Zone. GFF Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project No. 13-2029.Of Geotechnical Report January 8, 2014 Page 6 of 10 The geology of the site as mapped on the USDA Soil Survey website consists of Canaveral fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (10), and Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 percent'slopes (27). These are sandy soils and organic soils are not indicated. It should be noted that the Soil Survey generally extends to a maximum depth of 80 inches (approximately 6% feet) below ground surface and is not indicative of deeper soil conditions. Please refer to Appendix C - Soil Survey Map for a detailed report for the soil survey. Boring fogs derived from our field exploration are presented in Appendix E: "Record of Test Borings". The boring logs depict the observed soils in graphic detail. The CPT soundings indicate the penetration resistance values logged during the test. The classifications and descriptions shown on the logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples. All soil samples reviewed have been depicted and classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, modified as necessary to describe typical Florida conditions. See Appendix F: "Discussion of Soil Groups", for a detailed description of various soil groups. The subsurface soil conditions encountered at this site generally consist of sand (SP) to the auger boring termination depths of'6 and 10 feet. The CPT soundings generally indicated BGS the soils were medium dense to dense to 18 feet, and then very dense to the sounding termination depths of 18 to 20 feet. Most soundings were terminated due to cone refusal on very dense/hard soils at 18 to 20 feet. The exception was at the boring AB @ Lot 11, where sand with pieces of wood and roots was encountered at 3Y2 to 5 feet deep. Please refer to Appendix E - Record of Test Borings for a detailed account of each boring and sounding. 2.5 Hydrogeological Conditions On the dates of our field exploration, the groundwater table was encountered at depths ranging from approximately 4% to 5% feet below the existing ground surface. The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall and other site specific and/or local influences including the water levels in the nearby Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River) and Atlantic Ocean with tidal influences. Brief ponding of stormwater may occur across the site after heavy rains. No additional investigation was included in our scope of work in relation to the wet seasonal high groundwater table or any existing well fields in the vicinity. Well fields may influence water table levels and cause significant fluctuations. If a more comprehensive water table analysis is necessary, please contact our office for additional guidance. 3.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 General A foundation system for any structure must be designed to resist bearing capacity failures, have settlements that are tolerable, and resist the environmental forces that the foundation may be subjected to over the life of the structure. The soil bearing capacity is the soil's ability to support loads without plunging into the soil profile; Bearing capacity failures are analogous to shear failures in structural design and are usually sudden and catastrophic. 6f/. Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Geotechnical Report January 8, 2014 Page 7 of 10 The amount of settlement that a structure may tolerate is dependent on several factors including: uniformity of settlement, time rate of settlement, structural dimensions and properties of the materials. Generally, total or uniform settlement does not damage a structure but may affect drainage and utility connections. These can generally tolerate movements of several inches for building construction. In contrast, differential settlement affects a structure's frame and is limited by the structural flexibility. The subsurface soil conditions at the project site are generally favorable for the support of the proposed structures on shallow foundations. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf may be used for foundation design. Expected settlement of the structure is 1 inch or less total and less than %2 inch differential. 3.2 Site Preparation GFA recommends the following compaction requirements for this project: ➢ Proof Roll _ .............................................95% of a Modified Proctor ➢ Building Pad Fill............................................................95% of a Modified Proctor ➢ Footings........................................................................95% of a Modified Proctor The compaction percentages presented above are based upon the maximum dry density as determined by a "modified proctor" test (ASTM D-1557). All density tests should be performed to a depth of 2 feet below existing grade and below bottom of footings. All density tests should be performed using .the nuclear method (ASTM D-2922), the sand cone method (ASTM D-1556), or Hand Cone Penetrometer (HCP) tests. Our recommendations for preparation of the site for use of shallow foundation systems are presented below. This approach to improving and maintaining the site soils has been found to be successful on projects with similar soil conditions. 1. Initial site preparation should consist of performing stripping and clearing operations. This should be done within, and to a distance of five (5) feet beyond, the perimeter of the proposed building footprint (including exterior isolated columns). Test Pits should be performed at Lot 11 and where unsuitable soils are encountered, they should be removed. Foundations and any below grade remains of any structures that are within the footprint of the new construction should be removed, and utility lines should be removed or properly abandoned so as to not affect structures or pavements. 2. Following site stripping (and excavation where needed) and prior the placement of any fill, areas of surficial sand (not exposed limestone) should be compacted ("proof rolled").and tested. We recommend using a steel drum vibratory roller with sufficient static weight and vibratory impact energy to achieve the required compaction. If the subgrade is too wet or the inflow of groundwater cannot be controlled so that the compaction is not achievable, then very clean granular fill may be placed up to 1 foot above the water table, intensively densified and compacted until no further settlement can be visually discerned at the fill surface, and 1 foot of soil both above and below the water table have achieved at least 95% density. Density tests should be performed on the proof rolled surface at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feet, or a minimum of three (3) tests, whichever is GFF Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project No. 13-2029,01 Geotechnical Report January 8, 2014 Page 8 of 10 greater. Areas of exposed intact limestone shall be visually confirmed by the project geotechnical engineer prior to fill placement, in lieu of proof rolling. Fill material may then be placed in the building pad as required. The fill material should be inorganic (classified as SP, SW, GP, GW, SP-SM, SW-SM, GW-GP, GP -GM) containing not more than 5 percent (by weight) organic materials. Fill materials with silt/clay-size soil fines in excess of 12% should not be used. Fill should be placed in lifts with a maximum lift thickness not exceeding 12-inches. Each lift should be compacted and tested prior to the placement of the next lift. Density tests should be performed within the fill at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feet per lift in the building areas, or a minimum of three (3) tests per lift, whichever is greater. 4. For any footings bearing on a limestone formation, the bottom of all footing excavation shall be examined by the engineer / geologist or his representative to determine the condition of the limestone. The limestone shall be, probed' for voids and loose pockets of sand. Such areas shall be cleaned to depth of 3 times the greatest horizontal dimension and backfilled with lean concrete. 5. For footings placed on structural fill or compacted native granular soils, the bottom of all footings shall be tested for compaction and examined by the engineer / geologist or his representative to determine if the soil is free of organic and/or deleterious material. Density tests should be performed at a frequency of not less than one (1) density test pet each isolated column footing and one (1) test per each seventy five (75) lineal feet of wall footings. 6. The contractor should take into account the final contours and grades as established by the plan when executing his backfilling and compaction operations. Using vibratory compaction equipment at this site may disturb adjacent - structures. We recommend that you monitor nearby structures before and during proof -compaction operations. A representative of GFA International can monitor the vibration disturbance of adjacent structures. A proposal for vibration monitoring during compaction operations can be supplied upon request. 3.3 Design of Footings Footings may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Shallow foundations should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches below final grade. This embedment shall be measured from the lowest adjacent grade. Isolated column footingsshould be 'at least 24 inches in width and continuous strip footings should have a width of at least 18 inches regardless of contact pressure. Once site preparation has been performed in accordance with the recommendations described in this report, the soil should readily support the proposed structure resting on a shallow foundation system. Settlements have been projected to be less than 1-inch total and '/-inch differential. All footings and columns should be structurally separated from the floor slab, as they will be loaded differently and at different times, unless a monolithic mat foundation is designed. GFF Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014 GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 9 of 10 3.4 Ground Floor Slabs The ground floor slabs may be supported directly on the existing grade or on granular fill following the foundation site preparation and fill placement procedures outlined in this report. For purposes of design, a coefficient of subgrade modulus 150 pounds per cubic inch may be used. The ground floor slab should be structurally separated from all walls and columns to allow for differential vertical movement. Excessive moisture vapor transmission through floor slabs -on -grade can result in damage to floor coverings as well as cause other deleterious affects. An appropriate moisture vapor retarder should be placed beneath the floor slab to reduce moisture vapor from entering the building through the slab. The retarder should be installed in general accordance with applicable ASTM procedures including sealing around pipe penetrations and at the edges of foundations. 4.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS This consulting report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the current project owners and other members of the design team for the Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 located at St. Lucie County, Florida. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted local geotechnical engineering practices; no other warranty is expressed or implied. The evaluation submitted in this 'report, is based in part upon the data collected during a field exploration, however, the nature and extent of variations throughout the subsurface profile may not become evident until the time of construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to reevaluate information and professional opinions as provided in -this report. in the event changes are made in the nature, design, or locations of the proposed structure, the evaluation and opinions contained in this report shall not be considered valid, unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions modified or verified in writing by GFA international. Analysis of the foundation performance under hurricane conditions or other storm events, including the effects of loss of soil support due to scour or other forces, is not within the scope of this report, and the recommendations are valid only for normal conditions. Additional analysis and options for foundation systems with scour conditions or other scenarios can be performed if requested. 5.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based on the data obtained from the tests performed at the locations indicated on the attached figure in Appendix B. This report does not reflect any variations, which may occur between borings. While the borings are representative of the subsurface conditions at their respective locations and for their vertical reaches, local variations characteristic of the subsurface soils of the region are anticipated and may be encountered. The delineation between soil types shown on the soil logs is approximate and the description represents our interpretation of the subsurface conditions at the designated boring locations on the particular date drilled. GFF Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, Florida GFA Project No. 13-2029,01 Geotechnical Report January 8, 2014 Page 10 of 10 Any third party reliance of our geotechnical report or parts thereof is strictly prohibited without the expressed written consent of GI✓A International. The applicable SPT methodology (ASTM D-1586), CPT methodology (ASTM D-3441), and Auger Boring methodology (ASTM D-1452) used in performing our borings and sounding, and for determining penetration and cone resistance is specific to the sampling. tools utilized and does not reflect the ease or difficulty to advance other tools or materials. 1) I V /.1 Yw.aC 3iS C Hl l� . 44 Ai .Si k -2"'i'3- fit•° -^-} .''si'i +bµ'�'•r-yo i^s "`d o _ ,h`Z,• :s +�:..+fi- Ewa H n g` v�A Y i.°' ; a x Yii• �4+t ,„ l.ala �'i "lt,�r�" nh iJ Sx.,ia Vt i ^ E S, "li 1+�1' ` •-�=' ?44 2.1alcr 7} 3�ii?+„� t�� �,. r r .c.� 3•a a Y �» ;.-.,^_'\..c :tii. M1 .r+a , T4'''•",'W� i ��. - _ }�tt'� •`t S � ��Y i�i t�Y i. �i .. t 1Y'�G � Y•�Y � �t� -- T j � \\ �}4"� � ;�. f .. _ �• A S� �Ic t n '�� `' �J r d � 1. i� �:. e l�; t' �. �w t ,� ael. F £ � ' v �� �` 4yi4��#� j, a�L � •:i',.���) sit t71,�t.3" AQ \ i-tr ,` ''ii ni fY 3:�' {4• ••` tf .1 )ZfR 4 L{ .,� r z YiF !) Yi Vie", �,� � �� -�,.�,.,��•�;.,-�-�^ S '� a _-°�'*� (3ontt�•Islc•Dr � tht--? 4t, 'fit " .r 1 WAY �} i ��c 14 � t \k 4. a t''' F7k�•�tM,.t .Sr'nt'S ; i , S. 1, t, / fi � � +• ' �, {. U f -YS y k�7��j t a i� i,N iE•'"* Imp a wa n OBI a e At di \tt \ram i �nR� ,!k-sr� �'r t� i � �r ,ha i • ft t ' t / i • ` # ��j ;#.kYh ,sd i7€� t f�IN , tti3 •' ` R t ' \" x v,�w"�'?`�" ,"i �tt6ni�s.5����� �"' at .. tt ��..x Sz. -•'n'` 1+ g k'y `"jRE!f 3 r 5 /s/ a°rrtt` %Al S� BIRO pit ..i.. � . `f, .. .., r' f , >'µ?:ie , r�=f w �',�•� ,,.. ^'�'�ffi''t�'�r .4Sfs°'��� ;� t, ;�,. �S '•s,. I Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend St. Lucie County, Florida (FL111) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOi 110 Canaveral fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 11.5 90.6% 27 Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 percent�slopes 1.2 9.4% Totals for Area of interest ......... _..�. ... .............. _.__.._.__.__. 12.6 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the.survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can'be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the. dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range -of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it Is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforrns or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If 10 Custom Soil Resource Report intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes tha map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha - Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report St. Lucie County, Florida I O—Canaveral fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 10 to 100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period: 350 to 365 days Map Unit Composition Canaveral and similarsoils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Canaveral Setting Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, dunes on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): lnterfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Sandy marine deposits Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches Drainage class. Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very high (19.98 to 39.96 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: out Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content.' 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 6.0 Available water capacity. Very low (about 1.9 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Land capability (nonirrigated): 6s Hydrologic Soil Group: AID Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Typical profile 0 to 6 inches. Fine sand 6 to 80 inches: Fine sand Minor Components Myakka Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Flats on marine terraces Landfonn position (three-dimensional): Taff Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G 156BC 141 FL) Pompano Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape. Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hyddc lowlands (G15613C141 FL) Palm beach Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Dunes on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on ridges and dunes of xedc uplands (G 156BC111 FL) 27—Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 10 to 20 feet Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost --free period. 350 to 365 days Map Unit Composition Palm beach and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components. 10 percent Description of Palm Beach Setting Landform: Dunes on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Shells and sandy marine deposits Properties and qualities Slope. 0 to 5 percent i Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the mostlfmiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very high (19.98 to 39.96 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency ofponding. None 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Calcium carbonate, maximum content 25 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity. • Very low (about 2.4 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Land capability (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on ridges and dunes of xeric uplands (G156BC111 FL) Typical profile 0 to 8 inches. Fine sand 8 to 80 inches. Fine sand Minor Components Canaveral Percent of map unit.- 10 percent Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, dunes on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) 14 u NOTES RELATED TO RECORDS OF TEST BORING AND GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE I. Groundwater level was encountered and recorded (if shown) following the completion of the soil test boring on the date indicated. Fluctuations in groundwater levels are common; consult report text for a discussion. 2. The boring location was identified in the field by.offsetting from existing reference marks and using a cloth tape and survey wheel. 3. The borehole was backfilled to site grade following boring completion, and patched with asphalt cold patch mix when pavement was encountered. 4. The Record of Test Boring represents our interpretation of field conditions based on engineering examination of the soil samples. 5. The Record of Test Boring is subject to the limitations, conclusions and recommendations presented in the Report text. 6. "Field Test Data" shown on the Record of Test Boring indicated as 1116 refers to the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and means 11 hammer blows drove the sampler 6 inches. SPT uses a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. 7. The N-value from the SPT is the sum of the hammer blows required to drive the sampler the second and third 6- inch increments. 8. The soil/rock strata interfaces shown on the Records of Test Boring are approximate and may vary from those shown. The soil/rock conditions shown on the Records of Test Boring refer to conditions at the specific location tested; soil/rock conditions may vary between test locations. 9. Relative density for sands/mvets and consistency for silts/clays are described as follows: SPT CPT SANDS/GRAVELS SPT CPT SILTSICLAYS BLOWS/FOOT KG/CM- RELATIVE DENSITY LOWS FOOT K /CM` CONSISTENCY 0-4 0-16 Very loose 0-1 0-3 Very soft 5-10 17-40 Loose 2-4 4-6 Soft 11-30 41-120 Medium Dense 5-8 7-12 Firm 31-50 121-200 Dense 9-15 13-25 Stiff 50+ over 200 1 Very Dense 16-30 25-50 Ve stiff >30 >50 Hard 10. Grain size descriutions areas follows: NAME SIZE LIMITS Boulder 12 Inches or more Cobbles 3 to 12 Inches Coarse Gravel Y. to 3 Inches Fine Gravel No. 4 sieve to % inch Coarse Sand No. 10 to No. 4 sieve Medium Sand No. 40 to No. 10 sieve Fine Sand No. 200 to No. 40 sieve Fines Smaller than No. 200 sieve 11. Definitions related to adjectives used in soillrock descriptions: PROPORTION ADJECTIVE APPROXIMATE ROOT DIAMETER ADJECTIVE <5% Trace Less than 1/32" Fine roots 5% to 120% Little 1132" to ''/<" Small roots 12% to 30% Some '/<" to P, Medium roots 30% to 50% And Greater than V Large roots Organic Soils: Soils containing vegetable tissue in various stages of decomposition that has a fibrous to amorphous texture, usually a dark brown to black color, and an organic odor. Organic Content <25%: Slightly to Highly Organic; 25% to 75%: Muck; >75%: Peat a GF t GFA: INTERNAIIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE bF1% ; PORT ST..UCIE, FLORIDA 34986 PHONE: (771) 924-357$ - FAM (772)'924358U CONE PENETRATION S:OV"MN.O (AS`i`iYCD 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1V31/2013 Project No.: 13.2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Lots 1 3$ Lab No.: St Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PIVURI. Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 3 Front N27.506290 W;80.34736° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data q. Depth P P+S (ts� FR (meters) 5 10 13.2 0.2 30 40 60 4.4 0.4 80 100 160 0.8 0.6 100 110 200 13 0.8 70 90 140 1.9 1,0 90 110 /80 1.5 1.2 80 100 160 0.6 1.4 55 62 110 1.4 1.6 40 52 80 1.7 1.8 50 60 100 2.0 2.0 50 65 100 13 2.2 40 50 80 1.7 2.4 40 50 80 1.8 2.6 42 53 84 0.8 2.8 25 30 50 2.6 3.0 30 40 60 2.2 3.2 30 40 60 1.5 3.4 25 32 50 4.0 3.6 30 45 60 2.2 3.8 40 50 80 1.7 4.0 50 60 100 2.6 4.2 60 80 I20 1.7 4.4 55 70 110 2.4 4.6 70 90 140 1.9 4.8 80 100 160 0.8 5.0 25 35 50 5.3 5.2 70 90 140 1.9 5.4 150 170 300 r# W 5.6 250 REF 500 5.8 Cone $earingi qe• (fs#}. Friction Ratio, FR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 5 . 10 '. 15 d w ,wp 20 _ v A 25 30 35 40 P.•IProjectsL013113-2092.01 Tarpon Fla it, St. 4tde Cotatty(PkoenirBeatty Hontes) IGeaWppettdleesUpp E- CPT(38) A:IIYTE A TrONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE.DW8.7; P08T ST 3:C,CIE; FLORMA.349.86 PHONE:.(772) 924-AS75 - fA (772)9243580 L CONE PENP';!'12ATION SOUNDING ("TMD 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13 2092.Q1 Project: Proposed Tarpon Fiats Subdivision - :Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PMJRL Rig 1D: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 7 Back N27.5055711 NVSO.3073,4a Page: 1 of.1 Elevation: Existing Grade De th f Cone:$ealzng; gc: (ts P""?P�s(t'--n-OF Friction Ratio, FR R (meters) (0 4D 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 7 14 9.4 0.2 40 50 80 33 0.4 70 90 140 1.9 0.6 138 150 260 0.5 0.9 80 90 160 0.8 1.0 50 60 100 • 2.6 1.2 100 120 200 1.3 1.4 110 130 220 1.2 1.6 120 140. 240 1.1 1.8 90 1t0 180 1.5 2.0 70 90 140 m 2.2 32 44 64 19 2.4 11 20 22 4.8 2.6 12 20 24 33 2.8 35 41 70 1S 3.0 I 30 38 60 1.5 3.2 30 37 60 3.3 3A 40 55 80 19 3.6 47 58 94 2.1 3.8 55 70 110 1.2 4.0 60 70 120 3.7 4.2 55 70 110 1.2 4.4 50 60 100 13 4.6 I 60 70 120 1.1 4.8 90 100 I80 0.7 5.0 90 100 L80 IS 5.2 159 170 300 0.9 5.4 200 220 400 ##W 5.6 r 250 REF 500 5.8• A,2t .w A .25 J0 35 40 P.•IProjec[s12013113-1097.01 Tarpon Flats, S1. Lflde Cormry(PlioenLTRealtyHames)IGeoL4ppendicesLtpp E-CPT(38) GFA INTERNATIO!NAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE; PORT ST.:LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986 PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772).924=3580 CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441) Cl' lent. Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12131/2013 Project No.: 13-2092.61 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: - St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PllM, Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 8 Center N27.505470 W80.307080 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data ' qDe th�j Coup Bearing, qc: (ts Friction Ratio, FR P tI ,(} 40 .80 1'ZO i'60 y00. 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 B P P+S + (tsf) Fit (meters) 6 12 11.0 0.2 30 40 60 2.2 0.4 80 90 160 1.7 0.6 100 120 200 1.0 0.8 65 80 130 1.5 1.0 40 55 80 2.0 1.2 18 30 36 3.7 IA 30 40 60 2.2 1.6 50 60 100 13 1.8 70 80 140 1.2 2.0 42 55 84 1.6 "2.2 55 65 110 1.9 2.4 65 80 130 2.0 2.6 60 80 120 2.2 2.8 60 80 120 2.2 3.0 60 80 120 2.2 3.2 70 90 140 19 3.4 60 80 120 . 71.6 3.6 50 701 100 2.6 3.8 60 80 120 1.1 4.0 60 70 120 2.2 4.2 50 70 100 2.6 4.4 70 90 140 19 4.6 90 110 180 0.7 4.8 110 120 220 0.6 5.0 150 160 300 0.9 5.2 160 180 320 0.8 5.4 210 230 420 tE###fl 5.6 REF REF #Mg## 5.9 .a M o. d A 25 4 30 3S -E Al Profectsl-1013{13-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Gtcte Comity(Pliowric Reafry Homes) IGeolAppeadice Wpp E- CPT (38) i .�F�,:IN;TE�IA�'tONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE D1ttVE, PdFET ST Lt C1E, FLaR DA 34986 PHONE: (772) 924 3575 - :FAX (77Zj 9243580 CONE PEN]9"ATION' SOI NDIN.G (ASTM.D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31120/3 Project No.: 1342092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-.0 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PURL Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 9 Front N27.505240 `WRO.30679a Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field DataTai __1 Cone $eating; c (tstj Friction Ratio, FR P E. P4S 9e FR Depth 0 40 80 120 160 -no 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 (tSt) (me ers) 0 10 20 33 0.2 15 20 -30 2.2 OA 25 30 so 05 0.6 15 17 30 3.1 0.8 25 32 50 3.2 1.0 40 52 s0 1.7 1.2 60 70 120 2.2 1.4 5 100 120 200 1-3 1.6 90 110 ISO 0.7 1.8 90 100 180 0.7 2.0 90 l00 180 Is 2.2 60 so 120 1.1 2.4 100 110 200 1.3 2.6 70 90 140 1.6 2.8 53 70 106 2.5 3.0 10 60 80 120 1.9 3.2 53 70 106 2.5 3.4 50 70 100 2A 3.6 62 80 124 2.1 3.9 60 80 120 2.2 4.0 50 70 100 2.6 4.2 70 90 140 1.9 4.4 90 110 180 1.5 4.6 15 110 130 220 1.2 4.8 130 150 260 1.0 5.0 140 160 280 0.9 5.2 220 240 440 0.6 5,4 �. 760 180 320 0,8 5.6 230 250 460 5.8 REF ItEF #0116#il �. A PAProjects4013113-3092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Colony (Plicenir Realty llon+es)1Geol4ppendicesiApp E- CPT (38) WWINTERNo `IOKa 521 N.W. ENTERPR[S1 :DR[Y.E, PORT ST- LI)CIE, F[.ORIDA.34986 PHOS-E:,(772) 924-3575 - F= (772).9U-3580 CONE PENETRATION SOVNDING ;(ASTI Ii 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 138 Project No.: Lab No.: 13-2092i01 St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PNI/Rl; Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 10 Back N27.50493° 'W..80.30692° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data I Cone Bearing, gc;(tstj Friction Ratio, FR P i P+S rwsl FR rDQpth, I 0 40 80 120 I60 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 14 28 4.7 0.2 40 50 80 3.3 0.4 70 90 140 1.9 0.6 60 80 120 1.4 0.8 35 48 70 2.5 1.0 42 55 84 2.7 I.2 35 52 70 3.8 Id 60 80 120 2.2 1.6 SO 100 160 1.7 1.8 90 110 ISO 1.5 2.0 80 100 160 1.7 21 100 120 200 1.3 2.4 100 120 200 1.3 2.6 80 100. 160 1.7 2.8 70 90 140 1.9 3.0 1, 60 80 120 2.2 3.2 70 90 140 1.9 3.4 70 90 140 0.9 3.6 90 100 180 15 3.8 70 90 140 1.9 4.0 60 80 120 0.6 4.2 50 55 100 2.0 4.4 30 45 60 4.4 . 4.6 1 70 90 140 1.9 4.8 50 70 100 2.6 5.0 90 110 I80 1.5 5.2 130 I50 260 1.0 5.4 60 80 120 21 5.6 ,- 70 90 140 1.9 5.8 cu 130 150 260 1.0 6.0 - 140 160 280 6.2 �� w a 25 30 35 40 P:1ProjectA2013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flou, A Lucie County (PAoentr Realtyifonnes)I GeoUppendicesUpp E - CPT (38) 8 16 4.1 0.2 30 35 60 2.2 0.4 50 60 100 2.6 0.6 100 120 200 0.7 0.8 45 55 90 1S 1.0 30 40 60 4A 1.2 90 llo lao is l.a 90 110 180 IS 1.6 60 80 120 1.1 1.8 70 80 140 0.9 2.0 TO 80 140 0.9 2.2 40 50 80 0.8 2.4 60 65 120 0.8 2.6 55 62 110 1.2 2.8 50 60 100 0.7 3.0 40 45 80 0.8 3.2 40 45 80 0.8 3.4 45 50 90 0.7 3.6 50 55 . 100 13 3.8 60 70 120 I.1 4.0 70 80 140 0.9 4.2 70 80 140 0.9 4.4 80 90 160 08 4.6 80 90 160 0.8 4.8 50 60 100 0.9 5.0 20 27 40 33 5.2 45 55 90 1.9 5.4 37 SD 74 3.6 5.6 r„ a. 220 240 440 0.0 5.8 250 250 500 � 6.0 refusal ###k!#k 6.2 :a GFAINTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. EN .EPJiR1 Ef0-v J•, Mitf-ST::LUCIE, FIARIDA:34986 PHONE: (772) 924-3575 -*)FAX' (772):934-3580 CONE PENETRATION SO� LN- G: (ASTMD3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1213112013 Project No.: 13-2092A1 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Suhdivislan - Lot$1-39 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PALM Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 11 Center N27.506740 'W80..307119 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data q�� p�, ar C:one Hearing; qc-(tst) Friction Ratio, FR .. _a - FR 1)e [ 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 ' P+S . (�o (meters) 0 t P E. a l..t .: I ! I 10 t ! l _ %.. _, 3- 1.11 15 ! IL k _ i i f. ... ij _ a0 lI - - �� zs 1. k. is _ 30 R i l 35 ,t,_ P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats. St. Lucie Cotairy (Phoeeiix Realty domes) lGeoUppardice, Upp E- CPT (38) GFA.Il' PNAT'IDIVAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE nH1V*E POET Sr LeCIE; FIDMVA34986 PHONE::(772) 92.4-3S75 - FAX: (=712)•924 3580 CONE PENETRA'I O)K . SOUNDING: (ASTM. D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lois 1-0 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PWRL. Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 12 Front N27.50627° V80.307090 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade .Cone Beating; q¢.(tsf) � FR Depth J 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 �- ` i�_a___� Friction Ratio, FR 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 Field Data I _ _ _" r. I P i D-i.0 tLS,l 1 1 lnacwaa/I O 8 16 11 0.2 50 60 100 13 0.4 60 70 120 2.2 0.6 80 100 160 0.8 0.8 100 110 200. 0.7 1.0 90 too I80 0.7 1.2 90 100 180 1.5 1.4 5 60 80 120 1.1 1.6 70 80 140 0.9 1.8 50 60 100 13 2.0 55 65 110 1.6 2.2 52 65 104 OA 2.4 65 65 130 1.0 2.6 60 70 120 1.1 2.8 60 70 120 13 3.0 10 58 70 IN 1.1 3.2 80 90 160 1.2 3.4 65 80 130 2.0 3.6 60 80 120 1.7 3.9 45 60 90 1.0 4.0 58 65 116 0.6 4.2 65 70 130 1.5 4.4 55 70 110 1.2 4.6 IS 58 68 IN 23 4.8 130 150 260 1.0 5.0 180 200 360 0.7 5.2 220 240 440 Safi 5.4 250 REF 500 5.6 d; w .J 20 a 5 30 35 .40. PAPmjeds12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, Sr. Lude Camity (Phoenix Realty Hon1es)1Geoblppend1cesUpp E- CP2'(38) 0 . _. GFA .IiYT,E:RNATIC?NA::L 521 N.W. ENT4I PRI $ D$tA" PggT ST LLCiE, Fi oli X34986 PHONE: (772) 9244574 - ,FAX: (772), 924-3580 Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38• St. Lucie County, FL Location: CPT - Lot 13 Center N27.50616° W80.306949 Elevation: Existing Grade Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092:01 Lab No.: Field Ctew: P.MIRL Rig ID: OshKosh Page: 1 of 1 Field Data qDepth : 'Cone Bearing' qc (tst) Friction Ratio, FR P J P+S I (tl I FR (meters) i 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 7 14 9.4 0.2 40 50 80 1.7 0,4 60 70 120 2.2 0.6 80 100 160 1.7 0.8 80 100 160 1.7 1.0 70 90 140 1.9 1.2 60 80 120 2.2 1A 60 80 120 1.1 1.6 70 80 140 0.9 1.8 70 80 140 0.9 2.0 70 80 140 0.9 2.2 50 60 100 13 2A 40 50 80 0.8 2.6 55 60 110 1.1 5 53 62 106 IA 3.0 44 55 88 1.4 3.2 33 42 66 0.4 3A 18 20 36 1.8 3.6 25 30 50 2,6 3.8 55 65 110 1.4 4.0 58 70 116 1.1 4.2 80 90 160 0.8 4.4 60 70 120 1.1 4.6 70 80 140 0.9 4.8 70 80 140 0.9 5.0 50 60 100 1.3 5.2 50 60 100 0.7 5.4 20 25 40 6.6 5,6 150 170 300 0.9 5.8 230 250 460 0.0 6.0 1 250 250 500 612 «. O, A 25, 304 354 P.'n'OJeC&L2OI31I3-1092.01 Tarpon Flats, S1. Lttcle Cow,ty (Pltoetttc Realty Hontes) iGeol9ppendicesL4pp E - CPT (38) GFA INWRNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTER '-RISE DBFN E, PoltT S t - LT CI , FI;,0IU64. 34986 PHO.NE:.(772) 924=3575 - FAY: (772) 924-3580 CONE PE IOMO`TION SOU:NDIlIG: (ASTN[03441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 112/Z014 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots,1-,38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: P-hi R . Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 14 Back N27.505961 W80.30666' Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data q� _ e Cone.Bearing, gc-(tso thP Friction Ratio, FR p p+S^ (fn FR ((De meters )1 0 40 BO l20 160 200 240 280 • 320 0 2 4 6 8 I i 9 18 3.7 0.2 45 50 90 , 15 0.4 55 65 110 2.4 0.6• 80 100 160 1.7 0.8 100 120 200 1.3 1.0 80 100 160 1.7 112 55 75 110 2A 1.4 55 75 110 -1.2 1.6 80 90 160 0.8 1.9 80 90 160 0.8 2.0 70 - 80 140 1.9 21 50 70 100 13 2.4 55 65 110 2A 2.6 50 70 100 13 2.8 65 75 130 15 30 65 180 130 2.0 3:2 90 110 180 15 3.4 100 120 200 13 3.6 100 120 200 0.7 3.8 100 110 200 13 4.0 70 90 140 0.9 4.2 70 80 140 .1.9 4.4 60 80 120 2.2 4.6 60 80 120 2.2 4.8 60 80 120 1.1 5.0 60 70 120 1.1 5.2 60 70 120 1.1 5.4 60 70 120 2.2 5.6 r 100 i20 200 13 5.8 230 250 460 9#### 6.0 REF REF #4f#### 6.2 w G4 v A� 25 is i I r� P:1Projectsl2073113-2092.01 Tarpon Plats, St. Lucie Comarry (Phoenix RealV Homes)1GeoL4ppeadicesL4pp E- CPT (38) GFA OTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DkME, PORT Sr..-Lucis; FI: gam 34986 PHONE: (772) 924-3.515. - :Fna: (7.72)924-358b CONE PUNZETRATION S,OMMI G: (ASTM:D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Lots 1-38 Lab No.: Si. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PAM. Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 15 Front N27.505661 W80.3068Sa Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Cone 1ieal•ing, gc,ftst) Friction Ratio, FR Field Data De t6 2 4 6 B P P+S q` FR P 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 _T (fs1) (me ers) 0 5 10 13.2 0.2 30 40 60 2.2 0.4 40 50 80 1.7 0.6 60 70 120 1.1 0.8 60 70 120 0.6 1.0 50 55 IN 09 1.2 48 55 96 0.7 IA 5 45 50 90 0.7 1.6 50 55 100 13 1.8 70 80 140 1.9 2.0 60 80 120 1.7 2.2 60 75 120 2.2 2.4 60 80 120 1.1 2.6 70 80 140 1.4 2.8 65 80 130 2.0 3.0 10 60 80 120 21 3.2 70 90 140 0.9 3.4 70 80 140 0.9 3.6 70 80 140 IA -3.8 60 75 120 1.1 4.0 55 65 110 1.8 4.2 60 75 120 1.7 4.4 65 80 130 IS 4.6 15 55 70 110 1.8 4:8 75 90 150 1.8 5.0 90 110 I80 1-5 5.2 190 210 380 ##W 5.4 250 REF 500 5.6 .w. 20 a zs :r 30 35 4.0 1 AlProjectsUOIA13-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Cotutty (PhaenLc Realty Hbmes)lGeaUppendicesUpp E- CPT (38) l G" IN, TER -NATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTJE]kPR19kbkiVt, PoRT- Sw. -LUCIE, FLORMA 34986 PHONE; (772) 914-M.7.,5 - JF"- (772) 9243.580 CONE PENETRATION' SOUNDING (ASTMIY3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/212014 Project No.: 13-1092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lois 1-3.9 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PAM Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 16 Center N27.50553P W80.30663d Page: I of I Elevation: Existing Grade FieM 'T Depth oring, qc� (01) ..-q -c'f -T � �,, T T Friction Ratio, FR P T-P� !FFIR (tsf): - meters) 1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 5 10 13.2 0.2 30 40 60 1.1 OA 40 45 80 1.7 0.6 5, 65 110 2.4 O's 70 90 140 1.9 1.0 70 90 140 0.5 1.2 so 55 100 0.7 IA 45 so 90 0.7 1.6 55 60 110 I'S 1'8 55 70 110 11 2.0 70 so 140 19 2'2 70 90 14 1:9 2A 70 90 140 1.9 2.6 70 90 140 1.6 2.8 so 67 100 2.0 3.0 11 30 45 60 4.4 3.2 80 100 160 1.7 3A 80 100 160 1.7 36 70 90 140 1.2 31 52 65 104 2.5 4.0 60 80 120 1.1 41 55 65 110 1.2 4A so 60 100 1.3 46 so 60 100 1.3 4:8 45 55 90 1.5 5.0 100 110 200 1.3 5.2 150 170 300 0.4 SA 170 180 340 0.8 5.6 230 250 460 ##99# 5.8 t2 250 REF 500 6.0 2C 25 30 35 40 PAPrqJects120J3113-209201 Tatpon Flats, St. Lucie Cowity (Phaenbc Realty Homes)1GeaL4ppendfceA4ppE- CPT (38) . GF',A_IN`I' RNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTF.lI RISE. BRi i t PORT SM LU,CIE, FLORMA 34986 PHow b (772) Sz43S-7$. - ::Fax: (1.72) 924 3580 �. CONE PENRTRATION S,OL?MjWG (ASTiyiD3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13=.2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Cots 1-SS Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/i2L Rig ID: hKosH Osof Location: CPT - Lot 17 Back N27.505370 W80:306446 Page: _ 1 i Elevation: Existing Grade De Cone Beating, 4c (4 p Friction Ratio, FR Fi�-Data�q, pFR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 (meters) 0 2 4 6 8 5 10 6.6 0.2 30 35 60 2.2 0.4 60 70 120 0.9 0.6 62 70 124 1.1 0.8 { i 65 75 130 1.0 1.0 kk z 70 80 140 0.9 1.2_ ? 90 100 180 1.5 1.4 80 100 160. 1.7 1.6 5 } ! l 110 130 220 0.6 1.8 80 90 160 1.2 2.0 V AT 42 57 84 4.2 2.2 23 50 46 3A 2A i 40 36 25 52 42 30 80 72 50 1.0 0.9 1.6 2.6 L8_..:, 3.0 10 r 1 �...._ �...,. t , 21 27 42 1.6 3.2 , 20 25 40 1.0 3.4 8 11 16 4.1 3.6 25 30 50 2 6 3A 20 30 40 33 4.0 20 30 40 33 4.2 50 60 100 13 4A 4 70 80 140 0.9 4.6 15 90 100 180 1.5 4.8 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 { r i 100 110 200 0.7 5.2 ' t- :. 1 (• 50 60 100 2 6 5.4 l 80 150 100 170 160 300 1.7 0.9 5.5 5.8 " ~' .1�i° y `� - 130 120 150 140 260 240 1.0 6.0 6.2 _ PAProjectsL013113-2092.01 Tmpon Plats, St, Lttct'e Cotatty(PGoe»icRealtyXontes)IGeoL4ppatdlcesLlpp E-CPT(38) Is A INTERNATIONAL 52.1 N.W. ENTE"RlSE.6%UVt Po[tT.. ST. L;UCIE, FLQRtDA.34Q86 Pl€oNt, (772) 9Z'4-3575 - FAk: (772)124-3580 CONE PENETAA,TTON `$.OUNDII .G (A'$TM-D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes_ Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13 2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Chew: PM RL Rig 1D: OAKosl Location: CPT - Lot 18 Front N27.505081 W$0.3065�0 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field DaUsTgr T� Cone Bearing; qr-(tsf) Friction Ratio, FR FR Depth i 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 P P+S (tsn I I (meters) i I { 4 8 16.5 0.2 40 so so 1.7 0.4 42 52 84 16 0.6 38 48 76 1.7 0.8 50 60 100 13 1.0 -- 70 so 140 1.7 1.2 52 70 104 2.0 1.4 52 68 104 13 1.6 70 so 140 0.9 1.8 5o 60 100 13 2,0 40 50 so 2'0 2.2 32 44 64 1.7 2.4 37 45 74 1.8 2.6 38 48 76 23 2.8 37 50 74 1.8 3.0 1 C 40 5o 80 3.3 3.2 70 90 140 09 3.4 70 so 140 1.9 3.6 60 8o 120 2.2 3.8 70 90 140 0.9 4.0 90 100 ISO 1.5 4,2' 90 110 180 0.7 4A 80 90 160 0.8 4.6 1 40 50 '80 33 4.8 80 100 160 1.7 5.0 120 140 240 1.1 5.2 120 140 240 1.1 5.4 200 220 400 #.4q## 5.6 d 250 REF 500 5.8 w 20 -Yi d 4 25 30 35 40 P:IProjeus12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, 34 Ltteie Cotmty (Phoenix Really Home;)!Geo1,4ppe1tdicesUpp E- CPT (38) OFA INTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTE1iRiVE, PaRT-STi UCIE, FWRIPA 34986 PH0149- (772) 9244P5 S* - FAX: (772) 924-3580 CONE PENETRATION SO.UNI)WG' `(ASTM,D-3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-3$ Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PIMIRL. Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 19 Center N27.50668° '4V8030676' Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Dataq. r -1. Cane #eking, ;qr (ts)Friction Ratio, FR P P+S SFR (meters) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 0 10 20 13.2 0.2 70 90 140 0.9 OA 90 100 18o 1.1 0.6 55 70 lie 1,2 0.8 28 38 56 2.4 1.0 22 32 44 6.9 1.2 80 100 160 1.7 IA 100 120 200 1.3 1.6 5 100 120 200 0,7 1.8 70 80 140 0.9 2.0 55 65 110 1.2 2.2 90 109 180 0.7 2A 80 90 160 0.8 2.6 60 70 120 1.1 2.8 70 80 140 0.9 3.0 10 70 80 140 IA 3.2 55 70 110 1.2 3.4 So 60 100 43 3.6 So 90 160 1.7 3.8 60 80 120 1.7 4.0 65 80 130 2.0 4.2 80 100 160 0.8 4A 90 100 180 0.7 4.6 IS 90 100 180 0.7 4.8 90 100 180 0.7 5.0 90 100 180. 0.7 5.2 60 70 120 2.2 5.4 130 ISO 260 0.5 5.6 ^. y 240 250 480 0.6 5.8 w 220 240 440 -7.5 6.0 70 250 Soo 6.2 a A 25 30 35 40 NProjectst2013113-2092,01 Tarpatt Plats, St. Lucie COtatty (PltMtir Realty Hon,es)1GeA4ppend1cesL4pp E- CPT (3 Y) -GFA WTI<iUNATI©l TA 521 N.W. ENTEAI*RIS pRi , PaBT'ST. LUCIg, F -'. DA340 6 PH6A:;(772) 924 3575: - FAX: (772) 9,24 3590 Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/1014 Project No.: 13-2092:01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots.1.38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field C ew: ] .]WRL, Rig ID: OshKo* Location: CPT - Lot 20 Back N27.506440 W80.31l6686 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data . qO { F Depth�i C. $eating, gc,(ts€j Friction Ratio, FR P P+S (tst) ' R (meters)1 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 e , 1. 6 12 11.0 0.2 70 80 140 0.9 0.4 80 90 160 1.2 0.6 55 70 110 1.2 0.8 100 110 200 13 1.0 80 100 160 0.8 1.2 100 110' 200 1.3 1.4 100 120 200 1.0 1.6 65 80 130 1.5 1.8 55 70 110 1.8 2.0 60 75 120 1.1 2.2 65 75 130 1.0 2.4 40 50 80 1.7 2.6 70 80 140 0.9 2.9 80 90 160 0.8 3.0 II 80 90 160 1.7 3.2 70 90 140 1.9 3.4 80 100 160 1.7 3.6 80 100 160 1.7 3.8 70 90 140 1.9 4.0 80 100 160 1.7 4.2 60 80 120 1.1 4.4 70 80 140 19 4.6 U 80 100 160 1.7 4.8 80 100 160 1.7 5.0 70 90 140 19 5.2 62 100 200 82 120 220 124 200 400 2.1 13 0.7 5.4 5.6 5.8 y� y. 220 210 240 230 440 420 0.6 6.0 6.2 a .2C ..• d 25 30 35 40 AIProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Cotatty (Phoenix Realty Honrer)iGeo.UppeadlcestApp E - CPT (38) r GFA:1NTER-NATIONt L 521 N.W. ENTERiRISIEi• bkf-VE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FWIUUk 34986 PHONE: (772) 924-3$15 - FAX (172) 974-3586 L CONE PENETRATION SOUNDIN (ASTiVI D.3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: I/2/2014 Project No.: 13-109101 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision- Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PY A Rig ID: OthKosh Location: CPT - Lot 21 Center N27-506369 W803.Q6430 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data T Cone,wating', qg. (tsp Friction Ratio, FR 4` FR Depth 0 40 80 120. 160 200 240 280 320 ? 4 .�8 P i P+S i .� . %--. ti I -------, � a 8 16 83 0.2 60 70 120 1.1 0.4 90 100 180 0.7 0.6 90 100 180 15 0.8 160 120 200 13 1.0 70 90 140 0.9 1.2 too 110 200 1.3 1.4 70 90 140 1.9 1.6 s 80 too 160 1.7 1.9 70 90 140 1.9 2.0 80 100 160 1.7 2.2 80 100 160 1.7 2.4 70 90 146 1.9 2.6 70 90 140 0.9 2.8 60 70 120 2.2 3.0 10 40 60 80 3.3 3.2 60 80 120 2.2 3.4 60 80 126 1.1 3.6 70 80 140 1.9 3.8 70 90 140 1.9 4.0 80 100 _ _ 160 1.7 4.2 70 90 140 1.9 4.4 70 90 140 0.9 4.6 IS 70 80 140 1.9 4.8 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 90 100 180 1.5 5.2 70 90 140 0.9 5.4 80 90 160 0.8 5.6 90 100 180 1.5 54 e 180 200 360 0.7 6,0 y0 230 250 460 6.2 Q: 25 30 '35 40 PAProjeasU013113-1091.01 Tarpm) Flats, Sr. Gene Comity (PkoenLr Realiv Homes) I GeoL4ppeadieesLlpp E- CPT (38) GFA .I11TTER1tiT'TIONAL 521 N.W. ENTEitl'RISE IIRFVE, PORT ST. L19CIE; FLORIDA 349$6 PHONE: (772) 924-1575 - FA*; (772).924�3580 CONE PENETR MON SOVIVDING (AA,STNJD 3441) !` . Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13-1092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lo.:ts 138 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: Pik Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 22 Front N27.50610 %80.306241 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data ConeBearing, gc (tsf) 4` Depth Friction Ratio, FR P P+S FR 0 40 8o 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 (tsQ meters)!, 4 6 8 19 36 1.8 0.2 15 20 30 1.8 0.4 6 10 12 11.0 0.6 5 15 10 6.6 0.8 15 20 30 8.8 1.0 60 80 120 1.7 1.2 65 80 130 2.0 1.4 55 75 110 1.2 1.6 60 70 120 1.1 1.8 80 90 160 0.8 2.0 70 80 140 1.7 2.2 57 75 114 1.2 2A 70 80 140 0.9 2.6 70 80 140 1.9 2.9 80 100 160 0.9 3.0 11 80 90 160 1.7 3.2 80 100 160 1.7 3A 60 80 120 2.2 3:6 70 90 140 1.9 3.8 60 80 120 1.1 4.0 60 70 120 1.4 4.2 52 65 104 IS 4.4 60 72 120 1.1 4.6 1! 60 70 120 0.94.8 40 48 80 1.7 5.0 50 60 100 13 5.2 70 80 140 1.9 5.4 ; 150 170 300 0.9 5.6 140 160 280 019 5.8 r�- 100 120 •200 13 6.0 150 170 300 6.2 .'� a m A' 36 ' .33 40 A(Projects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Cozotty (Phoenix Really Hontes)WeMppendicesUpp E- CPT (38) :GFA.TNTE ' - 'A. 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE Mft PORT S'G L►;cm, )F.t.OR1DA 34986 PHOINt: (772) 924-3575 - FAXL- (7tl .924-3980 CONE PENETRATION 90UNDING: (ASTM'D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL �' Field Crew: P.iV1/R>r Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 23 Back N27.505901 W80.306401 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade FE�el-dDa­ta.__ i : P+S y� De thCane Besting, gc:(ts fl Friction Ratio, FR t.FP 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 (tsfj � (meters) ' � i. 9 18 7.3 0.2 70 80 140 0.9 0.4 90 100 180 1.5 0.6 130 150 260 1.0 0.8 150 170 .300 0.9 1.0 140 160 280 0.9 1.2 80 100 160 0.8 1.4 80 90 160 1.7 1.6 100 120 200 0.7 1.8 100 110 200 13 2.0 80 100 160 0.8 2.2 60 70 120 1.1 2.4 60 70 120 1.4 2.6 55 68 110 1.8 2.8 65 8o 130 2.0 3.0 11 70 90 140 1.9 3.2 80 100 160 1.7 3A 70 90 140 0.9 3.6 60 70 120 1.1 3.8 70 80 140 1.9 4.0 70 90 140 09 4.2 50 60 100 2.0 4.4 40 55 80 2.0 4.6 1 68 80 136 1.9 4.8 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 60 70 120 1.1 5.2 60 70 120 2.2 5.4 110 130 220 1.2 5.6 w 170 190 340 0.8 5.8 a 190 210 380 0.7 6.0 130 150 260 6.2 w 2' A 4ti PAProjeus12013113-2092,01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Cotatty (Phoentr Realty Xantes)1Gea14ppendkes.4pp E - CPT (38) GFA INTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34996 PHONE: (772) 924-3515 - FAX: (774\924-3.$80 CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTMD-3441) Client- Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/Z014 Project No.: 13-2092i01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew; OVAL Fig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 24 Center N27.505790 W80.306240 Page: I Of I Elevation' Existing Grade FNe-I)�Da,Sa Cone Bearing, q�,-(tkf) qc Depth Fridioulatio, FR P P, F P+S FR 0 (Pneters) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 5 10 13.2 0.2 40 so so 1.7 0.4 20 30 40 3.3 0.6 so 60 100 1.7 0.8 52 65 104 1.3 1.0 52 62 144 2.5 1.2 so 140 160 1.2 IA 60 ?S 120 1.1 1.6 too Ila 200 1.3 I's 60 SO 120 2.2 2.0 60 so 120 1.7 2.2 55 70 110 2A ZA 50 70 100 0.7 2.6 45 So 90 1.2 2.9 47 55 94 1.1 3.0 27 35 54 1.5 3.2 22 28 44 3.0 3.4 30 40 60 2.6 3,6 38 so .76 1.4 3.8 62 70 124 1.6 4.0 .55 70 110 0.6 4.2 55 60 Ito 0.6 4A 55 60 110 1.2 4.6 55, 65 m 1.2 0 40 50 80 1.7 5.0 60 70 120 2.2 5.2 70 90 140 0.9 SA 100 110 200 0.7 5.6 tz� ,,)a 110 200 1 90 Ito ISO 1.5 6.0 200 220 400 6.2 .0 i u � � Hill �niO1ON if Mum ilia NO a iuiu 0 Now �i _ �iuiei A'WiviectsV013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Coiarfy(PlioenLr Realty Hamcs)1GeaL4ppmrdfces1AppH- CPT (38) GFA INTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986 PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580 CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING. (ASTMC D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/1014 Project No.: 13-2992.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PMlRL Rig ID: OshKosb Location: CPT - Lot 25 Front N27.505580 W80-306000 Page: I of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade qe Dep�th Cone Bearing, qc (tst) Friction I2 o,. FR ' Field Data P P+S (q FR (meters)' 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 4 8 1 5 10 6.6 0.2 40 45 80 1.7 0.4 55 65 110 2A 0.6 90 1I0 180 0.7 0.8 120 130 240 1.1 1.0 80 100 160 1.7 1.2 70 90 140 19 1.4 80 100 160 1.7 1.6 70 90 140 0.9 1.8 60 70 120 1.1 2.0 45 55 90 1.2 2.2 42 50 84 1.1 2.4 25 32 50 1.3 2.6 60 65 120 1.1 2.8 42 52 84 0.8 3.0 10 45 50 90 0.7 3.2 55 60 110 0.6 3A 40 45 80 0.8 3.6 45 50 90 1.5 3.8 30 40 60 2.9 4.0 42 55 84 1.6 4.2 80 90 160 0.8 4.4 90 100 180 1.5 4.6 15 100 120 200 0.7 4.8 90 100' 190 0.7 5.0 80 90 160 0.8 5.2 110 120 220 0.6 SA 130 140 260 1.0 5.6 m 100 120 200 1.3 5.9 w 230 250 460 94### 6.0 20 REF REF ###### 6.2 +. y 25 30 35 40 AWrojects120131131091.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Genie Cowny (PlroenicRealty Homes) 1GeolAppandicesUpp 6- CPT(38) _GFA. iNTERN:ATIONAT. 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DWYE, RokT. S.T LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986 PHot�1: {772} 924-3575: -.:FaX (772y;914s3580 CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (I STM;ia 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes r Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13 `2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PJM/RL Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 26 Back N27.505260 V80.306.079' Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade q� Cone':Bearing, ge,(tstj Friction Ratio, FR Field Data P P+S it � FR (mete s) 0 40 8o 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 B D 8 16 8.3 0.2 50 60 100 2.6 0.4 80 100 160 0.8 0.6 60 70 120 1.11 O.S 60 70 120 1.1 1.0 70 80 140 1.9 1.2 80 100 160 1.7 1.4 5 100 120 200 13 1.6 90 110 ISO 1.5 1.8 60 80 120 1.4 2.0 32 45 64 1.9 21 32 41 64 1.9 2.4 28 37 56 1.9 2.6 22 30 44 2.7 2.8 23 32 46 5.7 3.0 10 40 60 SO 1.7 3.2 90 100 ISO 0.7 3.4 90 100 ISO 0.7 3.6 70 80 140 0.9 3.8 90 100 180 0.7 4.0 90 100, 180 0.7 4.2 110 120 220 0.6 4.4 8o 90 MO 0.8 4.6 IS 80 90 160 03 4.8 IOD 110 200 13 5.0 100 120 200 13 5.2 120 140 240 1.1 SA , 130 160 260 I.0 5.6 Z 150 170 300 0.9 5.8 - c� 220 240 "0 MW 6.0 a 30 REF REF ###N## 6.2 A. w A I P;1ProjectsU013113-209201 Tarpon Flats. Si. Lrwfe Coway (Phoensr Beatty Honw)I GeoUppendlce Opp E- CPT (38) GFA INTER NATIONAL 521 N.W. ENT&fp-.WSE:D,R1-t!K, PORT ST..li11CIE; FLOFUDA 34986 PHONE:'(771) 04 3575 - FAX.- (772) 924-3580 CONE MNET ATION 'SOUNDIP4tG (ASTMWD 3441) j Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/211014 Project No:: 13-2-092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Fiats S6lidivision - Lots 138' Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PNM- Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 27 Center N27306590 W80.30627° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Cone;l3earing; gc•(tsf) Friction Ratio, FR Field Data qQ FIRDeptb� r__.___� 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 0 12 24 5.5 0.2 60 70 120 2.2 0.4 80 100 160 1.7 0.6 80 100 160 1.7 0.8 60 80 120 13 1.0 50 62 100 1.1 1.2 42 50 84 2.4 1.4 60 75 120 2.2 1.6 5 70 90 140 1.9 1.8 80 100 160 1.7 2.0 70 90 140 1.9 2.2 60 80 120 1.1 2.4 50 60 100 0.9 2.6 45 52 90 1.5 2.8 55 65 110 1.2 3.0 10 50 60 100 13 3.2 70 80 140 0.9 3.4 60 70 120 1.1 3.6 50 60 100 13 3.8 50 60 100 1.3 4.0 60 70 120 1.1 4.2 10 80 140 0.9 4.4 70 80 140 0.9 4.6 15 80 90 160 0.9 4.8 s0 90 160 1.7 5.0 70 90 140 0.9 5.2 70 80 140 0.9 5.4 ,. 50 60 100 2.6 5.6 �. 50 70 100 2.6 5.8 s 70 90 140 1.9 6.0 ;Z 90 110 ISO 6.2 u a .25 30 35 40 P:IProjec1sL013W-1092.01 Tarpon Plan, Sr. Lucie Corody (P/meitix'Realry Ho))ies)lGeoWppertdIcesL4pp E-CPT (38) J GFA INTEx:NATIQNAL- 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE;: DRIVE, PORT ST. Lum, FGORWA 34986 PH01YE:'(77i) 924'3575i - FAB: (71i ,) 97.4-3580 CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 344'1) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014 Project No.: 13 Z09201 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -'fiats 13.8, Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PIVM- Rig ID: OsiKosh Location: CPT - Lot 28 Front N27.50636° W80.30624° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade }- -Cone } 3earing,:gc;(tst) Field Data 1 q` i Dept' 1 � Friction Ratio FR P P+S- FR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 (meters)' 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 I i 1 7 14 9A 0.2 70 80 140 0.9 0.4 110 120 220 12 0.6 70 90 140 1.9 0.8 90 110 180 1.5 1.0 100 120 200 1.3 I.2 60 80 120 2.2 1A 80 100 160 1.7 1.6 60 80 120 1.1 1.8 45 55 90 iS 2.0 40 so so 1.7 2.2. _ 40 50 80 1.7 2A 5o 60 100 2.0 2.6 60 75 120 1.1 2.8 70 80 140 0.9 3.0 70 80 140 1.9 3.2 70 90 140 0.9 3.4 80 90 160 1.7 3.6 60 80 120 2.2 3.8 70 90 140 1.9 4.0 80 100 160 0.8 4,1 70 80 140 1.9 4A 80 Io0 160 0.8 4.6 100 110 200 13 4.8 80 100 160 0.8 5.0 70 80 140 0.9 5.2 70 80 140 0.9 5.4 80 90 160 1.7 5.6 G; 100 120 200 1-35.8 r« 120 140 240 1.1 6.0 120 140 240 6.2 A' 3Q.'f P: IProjecu11013113.1091,01 Tarpon Flats, St. b(de County (PGoenk Realty Homg_s)1Ge0Wppend1C0sWpp E- CPT (38) G, FAINTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST.I.Vcal FXpgIb;04986 PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - PAIL' (712Y924-3980 CONE PEN)E',T-R.ATION i5O1J TDING (A$TM)D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 120JIJ2013 Project No.: 13-1092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Lots 1-39 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PMRL Rig ID: 0AKos'h Location: CPT - Lot 29 Center N27.506170 W80.306070 Page: I Of I Elevation: Existing Grade Cone-Bearm qc-.(td),' Field Data I q Depth .0 . 0 40 BO 120 160 200 240 280 320 1 -T-p+-S-] FR (meters) Friction Ratio FR Ratio, 0 2 4 6 8 8 16 8.3 0.2 30 40 60 11 0.4 32 37 64 2:1 0 .6 is 25 30 0.9 0.8 8 10 16 66 1.0 6 14 12 5� 1.2 20 25 40 3.3 1.4 60 70 120 1.1 1.6 50 60 100 1-3 1.8 so 90 160 6.8 2.0 80 90 160 04 2.2 35 40 70 1.9 24 'i 70 90 140 .9 Z. 70 80 140 IA 2.8 55 70 Ito 1.2 3.0 R 70 90 140 0.9 3.2 70 80 140 1.2 3A so 63 100 2.6 3.6 60 80 120 1.7 3.9 65 8' 130 1.3 4.0 62 75 124 0.2 4.2 68 70 136 is 4A 65 80 130 0� 4.6 15 65 70 130 2.0 4.8 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 70 80 140 0.5 5.2 60 65 120 1.3 5.4 48 60 96 2.3 5.6 d. 70 9' 14 ' .9 5'8 130 150 0 260 0.6 60 178 190 356 6.2 C. v. A. .25 30 35 40 P-'1Pr0J9cJTV013113-209Z01 Tarpon Flats, St. L tide County (PfioenLTRealty Ham&x) I QeoWppendicewWppE- CPT (38) . .. . . . ... GFA:INTER:NiAT ONt1I. 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRlYE, PQ2 y &r.1u6E, FCot iva.34986 PHONE::(772) 934=3575'- FAX: (772);914-3580 CONE PENETRATION OTJND!NmG (AFI M D; 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092:01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -:Lots 1:38. Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PiV1rfRL Rig ID: OsbKosh Location: CPT - Lot 30 Back N27.506101 W80.80583° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade qx Depth !t Cone te'aring, gc,(tst) Friction Ratio, FR Field Data P I P+S (aA FR (meters) l 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 8 16 4.1 0.2 35 40 70 0.9 OA 35 40 70 1.9 0.6 40 50 80 1.7 0.8 50 60 I00 1.1 1.0 42 50 84 2.2 1.2 38 52 76 1.7 1.4 60 70 120 1-31.6 50 62 100 13 1.8 50 60 100 13 2.0 55 65 110 1.8 2.2 65 80 130 1.0 2.4 60 70 120 2.2 2.6 60 80 120 22 2.8 60 80 120 2.2 3.0 80 100 160 1.7 3.2 70 90 140 0.9 3.4 80 90 160 0.8 3.6 80 90 160 0.8 3.8 70 80 140 5 4.0 45 55 90 IS 4,2 70 80 140 0.9 4.4 70 80 140 0.9 4.6 70 80 140 0.9 4.8 70 80 140 0.9 5.0 40 50 80 0.8 5.2 25 30 50 2.6 5.4 110 120 220 12 5.6 y 140 I60 280 0.9 5.8 ": 220 240 440 6.0 250 REF 500 6.2 6; d G: iIE: EN Q P:IProjectsL013113-209101 Tarpon Flats, St. Lncle Cmmty (PkoenixRealty Homes)IGeo44ppendfceai4pp E- CPT (38) GFA.TNTERNAT;IONAL. 521 N.W. ENTERMO. DRIVE; PORT; ST. LUCIE; F..Loe n c 34986 PHdW, (77Z) 914-3575: - FAX : (77Z) 924-3580 Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13;2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots:I-38. Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Ctew: P914L Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 31 Front N27.50579' W80s30591' Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade q, -De th Cone Be ... g, qc (tsf} Friction Ratio, FR Field Data P P+S (tsn FR (meters) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 3 6 i5A 0.2 28 35 56 1.7 0.4 30 37 60 0.9 0.6 25 29 50 1.3 0.8 20 25 40 2.6 1.0 22 30 44 2.1 1.2 35 42 70 19 1.4 38 48 76 1.4 1.6 40 48 80 1.3 1.8 50 58 100 1.1 2.0 40 48 80 1.2 2.2 55 62 110 0.6 2.4 45 50 90 0.7 2.6 40 45 80 3.0 2.8 42 60 84 1.6 3.0 11 55 65 110 1.2 3.2 55 65 110 0.6 3.4 55 60 110 1.6 3.6 42 55 84 1.6 3.8 60 70 120 1.1 4.0 65 75 130 1.0 4.2 70 80 140 09 4.4 80 90 160 0.8 4.6 1 `- 80 90 160 1.7 4.8 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 80 90 160 1.7 5.2 130 150 260 0.5 5.4 140 150 280 0.9 5.6 " 140 160 280 0.9 5.3 130 150 260 1.0 6.0 130 150 260 6.2 = a0 ++ A 30 •35 40 P:IPro)eds12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lime Cowry (PhoeiArRealo Homes)IGeoUppendicesUpp E- CPT (38) I GF-A,INTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTMPRISE-DRIVA ' POPWSMIXCIE, FLORMA-34996 PHQNt-:.(7t)91-4-!575 - #AX:(772)024-3580 CONE PEN.ETRr�TION.,5.OU-!N;'DIN'G, (AXTM Duo) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13 2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-3.8 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PAM, Rig ID: 0shKoA Location: CPT - Lot 32 Center N27.505620 W80.105730 Page: I Of I Elevation: Existing Grade C �oue,]$parinj, qc-( Q q, Depth I �M Friction Ratio, FR Field Data : P I (FP I P+S P+S� (tsf) (tq '� FR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 -280 320 0 2 (meters) .4 6 8 8 16 4.1 02 40 45 so 0.8 O� 55 60 110 0.8 0.6 45 52 90 1.8 0.8 35 47 70 1.5 1.0 28 36 56 1.2 1.2 So 55 100 1.6 14 48 60 96 1.4 1.6 45 55 90 1.8 1.9 48 60 96 1.1 210 47 55 94 1.4 2.2 55 65 110 0.8 2.4 60 67 120 1.4 2.6 42 55 84 1.6 2.8 70 80 140 is 3.0 80 100 160 0.8 3.2 70 80 140 1.9 3.4 60 90 120 0.6 3.6 40 45 so 1.7 3,8 60 70 120 2.2 4.0 60 so 120 2.2 4.2 90 110 ISO 1.5 4.4 80 NO WO 1.7 4.6 70 90 140 019 4.8 90 IN 180 1.5 5.0 120 140 240 0.6 5.2 130 140 260 0.5 5.4 220 230 440 ##W 5.6 250 REF 500 5.8 '2Q - 25 - 30- 35 1J PAProjedrU013113-2091.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoedv Realty Homes) I GeoWppendiceslApp CPT (38) ......... GFA:INTEI TATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERFR(SE'DRIVE, POR' 'ST6 LUCIE, FLORIUA34986 PRONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580 Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 33 Back N27.505500 'W80.3.0555° Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade 90 Depth Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR Field Data 0 4n RO on IAn Inn Idn nOn inn n e 4 a (tsiTT meters) P P+S' 8 16 8.3 0.2 30 40 60 1.8 OA 52 60 104 13 0.6 37 47 74 0.9 0.8 32 37 64 1.0 1.0 18 23 36 1.8 11 15 20 30 2.2 1.4 30 35 60 15 1.6 33 40 66 2.0 1.9 43 53 86 1.8 2.0 53 65 ]06 1.2 2.2 80 90 160 0.8 2A 80 90 160 0.8 2.6 90 100 180 1.5 2.8 80 100 160 1.7 3.0 1 70 90 140 0.9 3.2 80 90 •160 1.7 3.4 70 90 140 1.9 3.6 70 90 140 1.4 3.8 65 80 130 2.0 4.0 70 90 140 1.9 4.2 90 110 180 15 4.4 100 120 200 13 4.6 1: 110 130 220 1.2 4.8 140 160 280 0.9 5.0 130 150 260 1.0 5.2 150 170 300 0.4 5.4 150 160 300 0.4 5.6 140 150 280 OS 5.8 200 210 400 0.7 6.0 220 240 440 6.2 s I� .. a p r 3M; 25 1. 30 35 ..:. 40 - . . n GFA LN'PE .NATIONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIna 34986 PHONE: (773) 9244575 --`AX:'(77.2) 924-3590 CONE PENETRt TIOI SOL�,ING� (ASTIVi D 3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092.61 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision -Lots 1-38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL Rig ID: OshKosFi ih1 Location: CPT - Lot 34 Center N27.50481' OO--m'635° Page: 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data q` (tst) FR De h pth (meters) j P f P+S 10 20 6.6 0.2 50 60 100 13 0.4 45 55 90 1.2 0.6 40 48 80 1.0 0.8 27 33 54 2.0 1.0 27 35 54 1.7 1.2 55 62 110 1.8 IA 35 50 70 0.9 1.6 55 60 110 1.8 1.8 50 65 100 13 2.0 so 60 100 0.8 2.2 37 43 74 1.8 2A 20 30 40 43 2.6 17 30 34 35 2.8 48 57 96 1.4 3.0 11 60 70 . 120 1.7 3.2 65 80 130 1.0 3A 70 80 140 1.9 3.6 80 100 160 0.9 3.9 100 110 200 1.3 4.0 100 120 200 0.7 4.2 100 110 200 13 4.4 70 90 140 0.9 4.6 1: 90 100 180 0.7 4.8 80 90 160 1.7 5.0 70 90 140 1.9 5.2 I00 120 200 13 5.4 120 140 240 1.1 5.6 y 150 170 300 ##### 5.8 .6/. 250 REF 500 6.0 " 2C 2S 30 35 40 Cone`Bearing; ge; (tst) Friction Ratio, FR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 P.IProjectti?0/3113-209Z01 Tarpon FIal,. St. Lade Comity (Phoentc Realty Hon es)IGeo�Appendices IApp E- CPT (38) GFA INTERNATIONAL 521 N.W. ENC00111SE;69W.E, Pour ST.;LvcIE, Fi QMV.X 34996 PHONE: (772) 924-1575 - Fax: (772) 924-3580 CONE PENETRATION SUUND IG :(A4TM D 34.41) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092:01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision- Dots 14$ Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: P11?il1tL: Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 35 Back N27.504760 W80303980 Page: I of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade --- - :Eone Bearing,°qc (ts} Friction Ratio; FR Field Data. 9� De th p -?; p } S FR t - 0 40 80 120 160 '.200 ` 4' 0.; 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 (meters) 10 20 6.6 0.2 35 45 70 1.9 0.4 50 60 100 2.6 0.6 70 90 140 0.9 0.8 90 100 180 1.1 1.0 60 75 120 1.1 1.2 50 60 100 1.6 1.4 38 50 76 1.0 1.6 52 58 104 13 1.8 50 60 100 1.1 2.0 55 63 110 1.8 2.2 65 80 130 1.8 2.4 62 80 124 1.6 2.6 52 67 104 0.9 2.8 35 42 70 3.8 3.0 50 70 100 13 3.2 70 80 140 09 3.4 100 110 200 0.7 36 90 100 180 IS 31 80 100 160 1.7 4.0 80 100 160 I.7 4.2 70 90 140 1.4 4.4 65 80 130 1.0 4.6 80 90 160 0.8 4.8 90 100 180 0.7 5.0 40 50 80 1.7 5.2 80 90 160 0.8 * 5.4 IN 110 200 0.7 5.6 120 130 240 1.1 5.8 w 140 160 280 0.9 6.0 200 220 400 62 .. G d A a PAProlec(SL013113-209M Tarpon Flats, St. Lade Cmmry (Phoentr Realty, Homes) WeaWppendicaWpp E- CPT (38) GFA. iNTI� �ATONA,L 521 N.W. ENTgRrR1SE DRIVE; PORT ST. Lum, FLOR73)A 34986 PHONE: (772) 924-35i5: - FAX: (772) 924-3580 CONE PENETRATION 1'?{©fit SO -NDiNG (AS .,M. D 3441.) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1213112013 Project No.: 13-2092.01. Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38' Lab No,: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: Pi4L/RL Rig ID: OshKosh Location: C'PT - Lot 36 Front N27.504980 W80.305841 .Page, I of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data qC Depth P I P rS (ts FIR (meters) 9 40 50 18 e0 7.3 1.3 0.2 0.4 52 �5 60 70 104 1!0 1.9 1,8 0.6 0.8 65 8o 130 1,0 1.0 60 60 70 70 120 12.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 50 60 too 1.3 1.6 70 65 80 80 140 130 1.4 1) 1,8 2,0 53 62 65 70 106 124 1.1} 1.1 2.2 2A 45 55 90 1.6 2.6 27 38 54 4.9 2.8 70 70 90 80 140 t40 0.9 1.1 3.0 3.2 68 80 136 1.9 3.4 70 90 140 19 3.6 110 130 220 1.2 3.8 100 120 200 1.3 4.0 too 90 120 Ila 200 IRO !,3 0,7 4.2 4.4 70 80 140 0.9 4.6 50 60 too 0.9 4.8 45 70 52 90 90 140 2.9 1.9 5.0 5.2 90 so 110 too 180 160 1.5 0,8 5.4 5.6 tie 120 220 112 5.8 t00 120 -00 113 6.0 110 130 220 6.2 11 25 30 35 40 Cone 130aririg,.q ,(tsf) Friction patio, FR 0 40 80 120 160 20J 240 280 310 0 3 4 6 8 r; v1i 1 r� SF h��F WW krti �1, k .F z 1. IY rP� #if .rya P.IAviects12013t13-209?.01 Tarpon Flats, St. bide Caiaity (Pkaenec Sealo, Homes) IGeaUppeadicesNpp E- CPT (38) i F p F. i i l I --_1.... ... �.. ._ i GFA.INTERNATONAL 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRl1r'4 Po1rr S'r.,.LVCIF, FLORIDA 34986 PHONE: (771) 9243575r - FAX::(772) 924-3589, CONE PENETRATION SOLTNDWG (ASTM D 3441)' I Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No,: 13-2042.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision: -Lots 1=38 Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PAURL Rig ID: OshKosb Location: CPT - Lot 37 Center N27.504970 'R'$0.305520 Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data 9a FR[Depth P P+S (tsf) meters) s 25 30 IQ so 6.6 2.6 0.2 0.4 50 70 60 90 100 140 2.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 60 45 70 55 120 90 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 36 43 72 1.5 1.4 32 40 64 2.1 1.6 32 33 42 42 64 66 1.9 1.0 1.8 2.0 39 40 44 so 78 8o 1.7 1.7 2.2 2A 60 62 70 70 120 174 0.9 0.7 2.6 2.9 55 62 110 0.6 3.0 65 70 130 0.8 3.2 65 73 130 2.0 3.4 80 100 100 120 160 200 1.1 1.3 34 3,8 110 130 220 1.2 4A 110 130 220 1.2 4,2 80 100 160 0.8 4A 110 120 220 1.2 4.6 100 120 200 I3 4.9 70 90 140 0.9 5.0 35 110 45 130 70 220 3.8 1.2 5.2 5.4 120 140 240 1.1 5.6 150 170 300 0.9 5.8 170 180 190 200 340 360 0.8 6.0 6.2 w M 25 30 35 40 Cone Bearingi ge:(tst) Friction Ratio, FR . 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 t 0 2 4 6 8 P1 P:IPiaiects120013-2092.01 Tarpait Flats, St. Ltwe County (PGoente Realty Hat11es)1Geo44ppead1CUWpp E- CPT (38) 521 N.W. ENTERPRISE;1)AME, PORT.91f.1 tcfi, FLO91DA 34986 PHON> : (772) 924 3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3590 CONE PENETRATII?N. $'OUNDING (aTMD.3441) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013 Project No.: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision-Lots.l M Lab No.: St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: Pi ,&L Rig ID: OshKosh Location: CPT - Lot 38 Back N27.504880 W80.30533' Page: 1 of 1 Elevation: Existing Grade Field Data -'� Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) 7 Friction Ratio, FR P P+S (�A FIR(metetrs) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8 8 16 41 0.2 30 35 60 21 0.4 30 40 60 2.0 0.6 35 44 70 2S 0.8 45 58 90 1.5 1.0 50 60 100 13 1.2 45 55 90 1.5 1.4 35 45 70 2.5 1.6 42 55 84 1.6 1.8 60 70 120 1.1 2.0 55 65 110 0.7 2.2 32 38 64 1.0 2.4 40 45 80 1.7 2.6 25 35 50 2.6 2.1 70 80 140 0.9 3.0 II 110 120 220 1.2 3.2 80 100 160 1.0 3.4 68 80 136 1.9 3.6 100 120 200 1.3 3.8 100 120 200 1.3 4.0 100 120 200 0.7 4.2 100 110 200 1.3 4.4 110 130 220 1.2 4.6 15 120 140 240 1.1 4.8 150 170 300 0.9 5.0 150 170 300 0.4 5.2 130 140 260 1.0 5.4 100 120 200 0.7 5.6 , 1 160 170 320 ##1#i# 5.8 250 REF 500 6.0 a 20 G d A 25 30 III 0 40 F:IProjects11013113-1093.01 Tarpon Flats, 5t. Gmie Comly (Plioedr Realo Hoaies)tGeoL9ppendicesupp E- CPT (38) r i /�r�RNAT,4�av AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No: St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12/31/2013 & 1/2/2014 Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: PWRL TEST LOCATION: AB@ CPT- Lot 1 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks , 0-1 Brown fine sand SP 1 —1%2 brown fine sand, little shell SP 1 % — 3 -Light Gray fine sand, little shell SP 3-4 Brown fine sand, trace roots SP 4-5 Light brown fine sand, little shell SP 5-6 Gray fine sand, little shell SP Water table at 5%2 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB@ CPT- Lot 4 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-2 Brown fine sand SP 2-3 Light brown fine sand, trace clay and shell SP 3 — 4%2 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 4% — 5%2 Light brown fine sand, some shell SP 5Y2 — 6 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP Water table at 5Y2 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB CPT- Lot 7 Depth feet - Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-2 Brown fine sand SP 2 — 2%2 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 2%2 - 4 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP 4 — 4%2 . Dark gray fine sand. trace shell SP 4'/2 -10 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP Water table at 5% feet below ground surface 0110- Since 1988 AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No: St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12/31/2013 & 1/2/2014 Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: PM/RL TEST LOCATION: AB@ CPT— Lot 10 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-1 Brown to gray fine sand SP 1 —1 % Reddish brown to gray fine sand SP 1% — 2 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 2-3 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP 3-4 Dark gray fine sand; trace shell SP 4 —' 5 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP 5-6 Grayish brown fine sand, trace shell SP Water table at 5% feet below ground surface , TEST LOCATION: AB& CPT— Lot 11 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks --0 —1 Brown fine sand SP 1 —1 % Light brown fine sand SP 1% — 3%2 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP 3%— 5 Dark gray fine sand, some roots and pieces of wood (highly organic) SP,PT 5-6 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP Water table at 5 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: ABQ CPT— Lot 14 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-2 Brown fine sand, trace shell SP 2-3 Gray fine sand, trace clay, little shelf SP 3 — 4% Dark grayish brown fine sand SP 4%Z — 5 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 5-6 Light brown fine sand, little shell SP Water table at 5 feet below round surface r r JF-rai rWa's z%, C�clr ate.: ���Rruii'c��aP� AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 St. Lucie County, FL Elevation: Existing Grade Project No: 13-2092.01 Lab No: Test Date: 12/31/2013 & 1/2/2014 Technician: PM/RL TEST LOCATION: AB@ CPT— Lot 17 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-1 Brown fine sand, trace shell SP 1 — 3%2 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 3%2 — 4%2 Light brown fine sand SP 4'/2 — 6 Light brown fine sand, little shell SP Watertable at 5 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB@ CPT— Lot 21 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-2 Brownish gray fine sand, trace shell SP 2-3 Gray fine sand, trace shell SP 3 — 3%2 Brown fine sand, trace tree root debris SP 3'/2 — 6 Gray fine sand SP Water table at 5% feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB0 CPT— Lot 22 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0-3 Grayish brown fine sand SP 3-4 Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 4-6 Light brown fine sand, little shell SP Water table at 4%2 feet below oround surface AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No: St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12/31/2013 & Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: 1/2/2014 PNURL TEST LOCATION: AB CPT— Lot 25 Dept h feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0 — %2 Brown fine sand, trace shell SP %2 —1'/ Gray fine sand, little shell SP 1 %2 — 3 —Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP 3-6 Light brown finesand, little shell SP Water table at 4'/a feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB CPT— Lot 27 Depth feet Description color, texture, consistency, remarks 0 =1 Brown fine sand SP 1-2 Light gray fine sand, trace shell SP 2-5 Light brown fine sand SP 5-6 Light brown fine sand, little shell SP Water table at 5 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: AB CPT Lot 29 Depth. feet Description color, texture; consistency, remarks 0-1/2 Dark brown fine sand SP Y — 4 Light brown fine sand SP 4-5 Brown fine sand, trace shell SP 5-6 Brown fine sand, little shell, SP Water table at 5%2 feet below ground surface AUGER BORINGLOGS (ASTM D-1452) Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01 Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No: St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12131/2013 & 1/2/2ol4 Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: PM/RL TEST LOCATION: A @ CPT— Lot 33 Depth (feet) - Description (color, texture, consistency, remarks) 0-3 Brown fine sand (SP) 3-4 Light brown fine sand. SP 4-6 Light brown fine sand, trace shell (SP) -------- -- Water table at 6 feet below ground surface TEST LOCATION: A @ CPT— Lot 36 Depth (feet) Description (color, texture, consistency, remarks) 0-2 Brown fine sand (SP) 2-5 Light brown fine sand (SP) 5-6 Light brown fine sand, trace shell (SP) Water table at 43/feet below ground surface F Appendix F - Discussion of Soil Groups Gf� DISCUSSION OF SOIL GROUPS COARSE GRAINED SOILS GW and SW GROUPS. These -groups comprise well -graded gravelly and sandy soils having little or no,plastic fines (less than percent passing the No. 200 sieve). The presence of the fines must not noticeably change the strength characteristics of the coarse -grained friction and must not interface with its free -draining characteristics. GP and SP GROUPS. Poorly graded gravels and sands containing little of no, plastic fines (less than 5 percent passing the. No. 200 sieve) are classed in GP and SP groups. The materials may be called uniform gravels, uniform sands or non -uniform mixtures of very coarse materials and very fine sand, with intermediate sizes lacking (sometimes called skip -graded, gap graded or step-' graded). This last group often results from borrow pit excavation in which gravel and sand layers are mixed. GM and SM GROUPS. In general, the GM and SM groups comprise gravels or" sands with fines (more than 12 percent the No. 200 sieve) having low or no plasticity.. The plasticity index and liquid .limit of soils in the group should plot below the "A" line on the plasticity chart.. The gradation of the material is not considered significant and both well and poorly graded materials are included. GC and SC GROUPS. In general, the GC and SC groups comprise gravelly or sandy soils with fines (more than 12 percent passing the No, 200 sieve) which have a fairly high plasticity. The liquid limit and plasticity index should plat above the'"A" line on the plasticity chart. FiNE GRAINED SOILS ML and MH GROUPS. In these groups, the symbol M has been used :to designate predominantly silty material. The symbols L and H represent low and high liquid limits, respectively, and an arbitrary dividing line between the two set at a liquid limit of 50. The soils in the ML and MH groups are sandy silts, clayey silts or inorganic silts with relatively low plasticity. Also'included are loose type soils and rock flours. CL and CH GROUPS. In these groups the symbol C stands for clay, with L and H denoting low or high liquid limits, with the dividing line again set at a liquid of 50. The soils are primarily organic clays. Low plasticity clays are classified as CL and are usually lean clays, sandy clays or silty clays. The medium and high plasticity clays are -classified as CH. These include the fat clays,,gumbo clays and some volcanic clays. GFi� OL and OH GROUPS. The soil in the OL and OH groups are characterized by the presence of organic odor or color, hence the symbol O.. Organic silts and clays are classified in these groups. The materials have a plasticity range that corresponds with the ML and MH groups. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS The highly organic soils are usually very soft and compressible and have undesirable construction characteristics. Particles of leaves, grasses, branches, or other fibrous vegetable matter are common components of these soils. They are not subdivided and are classified into one group with the symbol PT. Peat humus and swamp soils with a highly organic texture are typical soils of the group. Grb