Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0 Septic 02 Pereira Lot 1 NOE - noble oaks PERMIT #: 56-SF-2166104
APPLICATION #:AP1577844
• STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DATE PAID
ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FEE PAID:
SYSTEM
•�y RECEIPT #:
DOCUMENT #: PR1467497
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR: OSTDS New
APPLICANT: Aurelio Pereira
PROPERTY ADDRESS: Noble Oaks Ln Fort Pierce, FL 34981
LOT: 1 BLOCK: SUBDIVISION:
PROPERTY ID #: 3404-312-0001-010-7 [SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, PARCEL NUMBER]
[OR TAX ID NUMBER]
SYSTEM MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF SECTION
381.0065, F.S. , AND CHAPTER 64E-6, F.A.C. DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF SYSTEM DOES NOT GUARANTEE
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE FOR ANY SPECIFIC PERIOD OF TIME. ANY CHANGE IN MATERIAL FACTS,
WHICH SERVED AS A BASIS FOR ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO MODIFY THE
PERMIT APPLICATION. SUCH MODIFICATIONS MAY RESULT IN THIS PERMIT BEING MADE NULL AND VOID.
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT EXEMPT THE APPLICANT FROM COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER FEDERAL,
STATE, OR LOCAL PERMITTING REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY.
SYSTEM DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS
T [ 990 ] GALLONS / GPD FuiiClean CE10 PBTS CAPACITY
A [ ] GALLONS / GPD N/A CAPACITY
N [ ] GALLONS GREASE INTERCEPTOR CAPACITY [MAXIMUM CAPACITY SINGLE TANK:1250 GALLONS]
K [ 1,050 ] GALLONS DOSING TANK CAPACITY [ 38.30 ]GALLONS @[ 12 ]DOSES PER 24 HRS #Pumps [ 1 ]
D [ 672 ] SQUARE FEET Netafim(08WRAM1-12) drib SYSTEM
R [ ] SQUARE FEET N/A SYSTEM
A TYPE SYSTEM: [ ] STANDARD [X] FILLED [ ] MOUND [ ]
I CONFIGURATION: [X] TRENCH [ ] BED [ ]
N
F LOCATION OF BENCHMARK: survey disk center Of rd left property Corner
I ELEVATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM SITE [ 5.00 ] [ INCHES FT ] [ ABOVE BELOW]BENCHMARK/REFERENCE POINT
E BOTTOM OF DRAINFIELD TO BE [ 4.00 ] [ INCHES FT ] [ ABOVE BELOW]BENCHMARK/REFERENCE POINT
L
D FILL REQUIRED: [ 17.001 INCHES EXCAVATION REQUIRED: [ 20.00 ] INCHES
The system is sized for 3 bedrooms with a maximum occupancy of 6 persons (2 per bedroom),for a total estimated flow of
D 460 gpd. Performing Lift Dosing. Pumps must be certified as suitable for distributing sewage effluent.
T NEEDS BIANNUAL OPERATIONG PERMIT/MECONTRACT FOR 2 YEARS. PE DESIGN REQUIRED SIGN OFF AT
H CONSTRUCTION FINAL(designed by Nicholas Turnbull)
HOLD FINAL APPROVAL FOR COPY OF PBTS NOTICE IN PUBLIC RECOREDS.
E SAMPLING FOR TN,TP,AND FECAL SHALL OCCUR SEMIANNUALLY, MONITORING FOR CBOD5,AND TSS SHALL
R OCCUR SEMIANNUALLY.
SPECIFICATIONS BY: SCOTT FRANZ TITLE:
APPROVED BY: TITLE: Environmental Specialist II St. Lucie CHD
Brian j Sngram
DATE ISSUED: 11/05/2(�20 EXPIRATION DATE: 05/05/2022
DH 4016, 08/09 (Obsoletes all previous editions which may not be used)
Incorporated: 64E-6.003, FAC Page 1 of 3
v 1.1.4 AP1577844 SE1425620
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
A party whose substantial interest is affected by this order may petition for an
administrative hearing pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Such
proceedings are governed by Rule 28-106, Florida Administrative Code. A petition for
administrative hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Agency Clerk for the
Department, within twenty-one (21) days from the receipt of this order. The address of the
Agency Clerk is 4052 Bald Cypress Way, BIN A-02, Tallahassee, Florida 32399. The Agency
Clerk's facsimile number is 850-413-8743.
Mediation is not available as an alternative remedy.
Your failure to submit a petition for hearing within 21 days from receipt of this order will
constitute a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing, and this order shall become a 'final
order'.
Should this order become a final order, a party who is adversely affected by it is entitled
to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are
governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings may be commenced
by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Department of Health and a
second copy, accompanied by the filing fees required by law, with the Court of Appeal in the
appropriate District Court. The notice must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the final order.
St. Lucie County Health Department
E 5150 NW Milner Dr Port Saint Lucie, FL 34983
HEALTH
PAYING ON: #.56-SF-2166104 BILL DOC#:56-BID-4984432 CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION#:AP1577844
RECEIVED FROM: Florida Onsite Svstems & Design AMOUNT PAID: $ 430.00
PAYMENT FORM: CREDIT CARD 00921J PAYMENT DATE: 09/11/2020
MAIL TO: Aurelio Pereira
FACILITY NAME :
PROPERTY LOCATION:
Noble Oaks Ln
Fort Pierce, FL 34981
1
Lot: Block:
Property ID: 3404-312-0001-010-7
EXPLANATION or DESCRIPTION: QUANTITY FEE
128 - OSTDS Construction System Inspection Research Fee 1 $ 5.00
-1 - Surcharge (All) 1 $ 45.00
-1 - OSTDS New Permit Surcharge 1 $ 100.00
-1 - OSTDS Construction Application and Plan Review,New 1 $ 100.00
126 - OSTDS Construction Permit (New or Mod, Amendment) 1 $ 55.00
127 - OSTDS Construction System Inspection 1 $ 75.00
133 - OSTDS Construction Reinspection 1 $ 50.00
RECEIVED BY: VanceMH AUDIT CONTROL NO. 56-PID-4663590
STATE OF FLORIDA PERMIT NO.
r � DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DATE PAID:
L _ ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DIPOSAL SYSTEM FEE PAID:
APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RECEIPT #: ,� f3
APPLICATION FOR:
[X ] New System [ ] Existing System [ ] Holding Tank [ ] Innovative
[ ] Repair [ ] Abandonment [ ] Temporary [ ]
APPLICANT: Aurelio Pereira
Fax (386) 736-1463
AGENT: Florida Onsite Systems & Design TELEPHONE: (407) 383-7676
MAILING ADDRESS: 411 E. Rich Avenue Deland, FL 32724
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S AUTHORIZED AGENT. SYSTEMS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED BY A
PERSON LICENSED PURSUANT TO 489.105 (3) (m) OR 489.552, FLORIDA STATUTES. IT IS THE APPLICANT'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE DATE THE LOT WAS CREATED OR PLATTED (MM/DD/YY)
IF REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF STATUTORY GRANDFATHER PROVISIONS.
PROPERTY INFORMATION
LOT: 1 BLOCK: -- SUBDIVISION: Noble Oaks Estates PLATTED:
PROPERTY ID #: 3404-312-0001-010-7 ZONING: res I/M OR EQUIVALENT: [ NO ]
PROPERTY SIZE: 0. 5 ACRES WATER SUPPLY: [ ] PRIVATE PUBLIC [ ]<=2000GPD [X ]>2000GPD
IS SEWER AVAILABLE AS PER 381.0065, FS? [ NO ] DISTANCE TO SEWER: >100 FT
PROPERTY ADDRESS: Lot 1- Noble Oaks Lane Fort Pierce, FL 34981
DIRECTIONS TO PROPERTY:
BUILDING INFORMATION [X ] RESIDENTIAL [ ] COMMERCIAL
Unit Type of No. of Building Commercial/Institutional System Design
No Establishment Bedrooms Area Sqft Table 1, Chapter 64E-6, FAC
1
SFR 3 3704
2
3
4
[ ] Floor/Equipme�ntt Drains [ ] Other (Specify)
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Scott M. Franz #SR0121704 cflsoilsolutions@cfl.rr.com
DH 4015, 08/09 (Obsoletes previous editions which may not be used) Page 1 or 4
Incorporated 64E-6.001, FAC
S`-S'F-21 bblay
Elite Engineering
of D®Land LLC
October 17, 2020
Brian Ingram
St Lucie County Environmental Health
3855 South US 1
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Subject: Lot 1- Noble Oaks Lane, Fort Pierce
Mr. Ingram:
This letter serves as a request for approval of the above referenced site for a performance base
treatment system meeting advanced secondary treatment standards for CBOD5,TSS, TN, TP and
fecal consisting of one FujiClean CE10 (900 gpd treatment capacity) treatment unit with a
corresponding drip effluent (irrigation) disposal system. The performance based treatment
system is required to obtain a 50-foot setback to the design high water line of a wet retention
pond. A 25% drainfield reduction will be applied for design purposes only.
The FujiClean treatment unit, when properly maintained and operated, can reduce effluent to 10
mg/L or less for CBOD5, TSS and TP, 20 mg/L or less TN. As per DOH Memo #08-003,
monitoring for CBOD5 and TSS will be accomplished by conducting a visual inspection of the
ground surface above the drip emitter lines by the approved maintenance entity semiannually.
Samples for TN and, TP shall be obtained semiannually from the sample port in the headworks
or directly from the aeration chamber as per FujiClean sampling protocol document. The soil
will be utilized as part of the treatment system in order to achieve 200 fecal col/100 ml or less.
Sampling for fecal will be conducted using "monitoring wells"/ports (slotted pipe). Sampling for
fecal shall occur semiannually. Cover vegetation shall be St. Augustine grass or other approved
vegetation.
We appreciate your assistance on this matter and the approval of the proposed system. If you
have any questions, please feel free to contact us at any time.
Sincerely..
f1
Nick Turnbull, P.E.
FL License# 79123
CA31525
PO Box 229283,Glenwood,FL 32722
Page 1 of 1
STATE OF FLORIDA PERMIT # ,`,s�:2r��(oy
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
�( ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM
SITE EVALUATION AND SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
APPLICANT: Aurelio Pereira AGENT: Florida Onsite Systems and Design
LOT: 1 BLOCK: -- SUBDIVISION: Noble Oaks Estates
PROPERTY ID #: 3404-312-0001-010-7 [Section/Township/Parcel No. or Tax ID Number]
TO BE COMPLETED BY ENGINEER, HEALTH DEPARTEMENT EMPLOYEE,OR OTHER QUALIFIED PERSON. ENGINEERS
MUST PROVIDE REGISTRATION NUMBER AND SIGN AND SEAL EACH PAGE OF SUBMITTAL. COMPLETE ALL ITEMS.
PROPERTY SIZE CONFORMS TO SITE PLAN: [X] YES [ ] NO NET USABLE AREA AVAILABLE: 0. 5 ACRES
TOTAL ESTIMATED SEWAGE FLOW: 460 GALLONS PER DAY [RESIDENCES-TABLE 1/OTHER-TABLE2]
AUTHORIZED SEWAGE FLOW: 1250 GALLONS PER DAY [1500 GPD/ACRE OR 2500 GPD/ACRE]
UNOBSTRUCTED AREA AVAILABLE: 1171 SQFT UNOBSTRUCTED AREA REQUIRED: 797 SQFT
BENCHMARK/REFERENCE POINT LOCATION: survey disk center of road left property corner
ELEVATION OF PROPOSED SYSTEM SITE IS 5 [INCHES/FT] [ABOVE/BELOW] BENCHMARK/REFERENCE POINT
THE MINIMUM SETBACK THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED FROM THE PROPOSED SYSTEM TO THE FOLLOWING FEATURES
SURFACE WATER: 50 FT DITCHES/SWALES: n/a FT NORMALLY WET? [ ] YES [ ] NO
WELLS: PUBLIC: n/a FT LIMITED USE: n/a FT PRIVATE: n/a FT NON-POTABLE: n/a FT
BUILDING FOUNDATIONS: 13.2 FT PROPERTY LINES: 10.1 FT POTABLE WATER LINES: 54.7 FT
SITE SUBJECT TO FREQUENT FLOODING: [ ] YES [X] NO 10 YEAR FLOODING? [ ] YES [X] NO
10 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION FOR SITE: -- FT MSL/NGVD SITE ELEVATION: -- FT MSL/NGVD
SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SITE 1- 5" above SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SITE 2- 9" above
MUNSELL #/COLOR TEXTURE DEPTH MUNSELL #/COLOR TEXTURE DEPTH
10YR 4/2,5/3 FS/SCL-fill 0 TO 17 10YR 4/2, 5/3 FS/SCL-fill 0 TO 20
10YR 3/1 Ab FS 17 TO 25 10YR 3/1 Ab FS 20 TO 27
10YR 5/1 w/5/6 SCL 25 TO 42 10YR 5/1 w/5/6 SCL 27 TO 45
10YR 6/1 w/5/6 SCL 42 TO 55 10YR 6/1 w/5/6 SCL 45 TO 51
cemented @ 55" cemented @ 51"
USDA SOIL SERIES: Mapped Wabasso USDA SOIL SERIES: Mapped #5
Unable to determine series Similar to Udorthents
OBSERVED WATER TABLE: 46 INCHES [ABOVE/BELOW] EXISTING GRADE. TYPE: [PERCHED/APPARENT]
ESTIMATED WET SEASON WATER TABLE ELEVATION: 25 INCHES [ABOVE/BELOW ] EXISTING GRADE
HIGH WATER TABLE VEGETATION: [ ] YES [X] NO MOTTLING: [ ] YES [X] NO DEPTH: -- INCHES
SOIL TEXTURE/LOADING RATE FOR SYSTEM SIZING: SCL/0. 65 DEPTH OF EXCAVATION: 20 INCHES
DRAINFIELD CONFIGURATION: [X ] TRENCH [ ] BED [ ] OTHER (SPECIFY'
REMARKS/ADDITIONAL CRITERIA: depleted matrix w/redox startinc
Aa "' boring 1, soils were
essentially the same in both borings
Rev. 10117120
SITE EVALUATED BY: .�� _ fin. _ _DATE: 31 Aug 20
Scott M. Franz, CPSS- Soil Scientist, CEHP & Contractor #SR0121704 (407) 383-7676 cflsoilsolutions@cfl.rr.com
DH 4015, 08/09 (obsoletes previous editions which may not be used) Incorporated: 64E-6.001, FAC Page 3 of 4
Elite Engineering of Deland,LLC.
P.O.Box 229283
Glenwood,FL 32722
eeod.nt 0 amail.00m
Florida Reg.#79123,CA31525
Property Card Page 1 of 1
i5(o-SF- 216610�
Michelle Franklin, CFA--Saint Lucie County Property Appraiser--All rights reserved.
Property Identification
Site Address:TBD Parcel ID: 3404-312-000 1- Account#: 188254 Sec/Town/Range:
010-7 04/36S/40E
Map ID:34/04S Zoning:RS-2-Cou Use Type: 0000 Jurisdiction: Saint Lucie
County
Ownership Legal Description
Aurelio Pereira 4 36 40 THAT PART OF SEC MPDAF: FROM NW COR OF
Maria Pereira SW 1/4 OF SEC,TH S 00 12 52 E 339.52 FT,TH N 89 47 42 E
1425 SE Village Green DR 231.61 FT TO POB;TH CONT N 89 47 42 E 104 FT,TH S 00
Port St Lucie,FL 34952 12 18 E 159.85 FT TO CURVE CONC SE,R OF 136 FT,TH
SWLY ALONG ARC 56.15 FT,TH S 34 47 42 W 24.93 FT TO
CURVE CONC NW,R OF 60 FT,TH SWLY ALG ARC 57.60
FT,TH N 00 12 18 W 244 FT TO POB(0.50 AC-21,735 SF)
(OR 1739-1732)
Current Values Historical Values 3-year
Just/Market: $19,100 Assessed: $19,100 Year Just/Market Assessed Exemptions Taxable
Exemptions: $0 Taxable: $19,100 2020 $19,100 $19,100 $0 $19,100
Sale History
Date Book/Page Sale Code Deed Grantor Price
04-17-2018 4130/2730 0198 QC Pereira Aurelio $131,500
Total Areas
t Finished/Under Air 0
(SF):
'v Gross Sketched Area 0
(SF):
Land Size(acres): 0.5
Land Size(SF): 21,735
Total Building Count:
Special Features and Yard Items
Type Qty Units Year Blt
All information is believed to be correct at this time,but is subject to change and is provided without any warranty.
©Copyright 2020 Saint Lucie County Property Appraiser.All rights reserved.
https://www.paslc.org/RECard/ 9/11/2020
i
151s-5�'• 21 bblc y �
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29,2020
i
Application: Noble Oaks Ln Reviewed by: Eb Roeder and Xueqing Gao CHD:St Lucie
We focused our review on the engineering design for the drip-irrigation system, assuming that the St
Lucie County Health Department has reviewed other permit aspects of the proposed system. But if we
see some other issues with the design,we will comment, too,with the understanding that county health
department will comment on the same issues.
The application is incomplete (mainly missing information on how treatment standards for fecal coliform
are going to be met and O&M manual)and contains several apparent inconsistencies and errors.
Please address the comments in red font in the following tables:
Site evaluation/plan comments
Unobstructed area not identified, CHD to check.
Site evaluation shows authorized sewage flow of 1500 gpd/acre, but application shows public water
supply, is one wrong?
There are two locations labeled as benchmark on the site plan, please confirm that the one with less
information nearer to the SW corner was used as indicated on the site-evaluation.
SET 5/5 IRC BEN ARK
(LBB098 / F PCP
/ 5547
CURB INLET sue,
ND
/
(LB5547)
L ,
•�S , 5 lt� AM �l e����y esc
V .0
U� S�
There are references to AquaKlear performance comments underneath the certification of design./These
should refer to FujiClean information as in the cover letter. Please revise.
cw0!!e�
Comment only:
If the installer is not precise or the terrain varies it would quickly become a mound system. If so,they'd
be attempting to place shoulders and slope into the utility easement. Utility easements are an
obstruction,so shoulders and slopes cannot be placed there unless:
• There are no underground utilities present
• The property owner has written:
• permission from the easement owner to place part of the system in the easement
• Assurances that there will not be vehicular traffic or damage to the system by the
easement owner
1 of 9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
I
PBTS (see check list of HSES 10-001):
APPLICATION [64E-6.026(2)]
1. Application, site plan and site evaluation signed, dated and sealed by Site plans and site
engineer. [64E-6.026(2)] evaluation sealed.
2. System design criteria [64E-6.026(2)(a)]: _ I
Performance Level: Baseline [] STS [] ASTS[x] AWTS[ ] Florida Keys []
Parameter Performance level Treatment Supporting information for
required accomplished by which treatment level [y/n/comment]
(annual average) system component
CBODS 10 mg/L Fuji Clean CE10 Reference to DOH Innovative System
Testing result and Aqual(lear NSF
40/245 data, please correct
Total Suspended 10 mg/L Fuji Clean CE10 Reference to DOH Innovative System
Solids Testing result and AquaKlear NSF ff
40/245 data, please correct L
Total Nitrogen 20 mg/L Fuji Clean CE10 Reference to DOH Innovative System
Testing result and AqualUear NSF Q
40/245 data, please correct L Uc Q
Total Phosphorus 10 mg/L This is typical septic tank effluent
concentration.
Fecal Coliform 200 counts/100 ml Chlorination based on Missing, please provide
sample location?;Please specify model and Yee- 6 o° \
M✓9\u A-� if^
installation Dina, l 1
Other system design calculations: Drip, see drip
comments.
3. Monitoring requirements [64E-6.026(2)(a),64E-6.029,see HSES memo 08-003]
Parameters to be monitored: CBODS[] TSS[] TN[x] TP[x] Fecal Coliform[X] OK.TN,TP,and fecal
coliform will be sampled from the sampling port in the headworks or directly from the aeration chamber
semiannually.Monitoring for CBOD5 and TSS will be accomplished by conducting a visual inspection of the
ground surface above the drip emitter line by maintenance entity semiannually.
Sampling frequency: OK.TN,TP,and fecal
coliform will be sampled
semiannually.CBOD5 and
TSS will be inspected
semiannually.
Monitoring ports provided: OK.A sampling port will
be installed in the
headworks.Samples can
also be collected from the
Fuji Clean ATU chamber.
Monitoring locations identified: OK.Samples will collected
either from the sampling
port in the headworks or
directly from the Fuji
Clean ATU chamber.
Method of monitoring flow through system. OK.A flow meter
specified in the SKE Single
2of9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
Filter Headw.orks on
Sheet 2 of 2.
4. System design calculations. [64E-6.026(2)(b)] OK,The advanced
secondary treatment is
used to achieve 50-foot
setback to a wet
retention pond.
5. System design plans and drawings, including installation instructions Missing disinfection ejvj
[64E-6.026(2)(c)] information.AquaKlear is
referenced in installation JJ
instructions.See also C fes
comments on the drip
irrigation.
6. If soil is used for treatment, a site plan showing direction of N/A
groundwater movement, location of monitoring wells, and extent of
effluent plume. [64E-6.026(2)(d)]
7. Contingency plan for system failure. [64E-6.026(2)(e)] OK.When alarm starts,
owner must contact ME,
ME must inspect and
repair the system within
36 hours(Specified on
Sheet 2 of 2).
8. "Certification of Design" statement signed, dated and sealed by the OK. Included on the
engineer? [64E-6.026(2)(f)] Certification of Design on
Sheet 2 of 2,which is
sealed by the design
_ engineer.
9. Operation and maintenance manual [64E-6.026(g)]? Missing. CHD to confirm
receipt of the operation ��
and maintenance manual.
Needs to include ��(� SS-1
chlorination instructions Y!
if chlorination is used.
10. Cover letter from engineer requesting the approval of a PBTS. OK
DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE LEVELS
1. Are there any modifications to setback requirements? Yes.Advanced secondary
treatment level proposed
to allow 50-foot setback
from a wet retention
pond.
2. Is there a modification to the separation from the wet season high No
water table?
3. Is there a request for an increase in authorized sewage flow? No
4. Is there a drainfield size reduction? No
DRAINFIELD MODIFICATIONS [64E-6.028(3)-(5)]
1. Drainfield infiltration surface reductions adhere to treatment level OK.
design?
2. Drainfield infiltration surfaces identification? OK
3. Drainfield infiltration surface calculations? OK.
4. Design meets effective storage volume requirements? n/a
3 of 9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
5. Design meets total storage volume requirements? n/a
6. Design meets unobstructed area requirements? OK
7. Modeling programs [footnote 2, Table IX]? n/a
PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL [64E-6.027(5)]
1. As-built provided by engineer?
2. "Certification of Installation"statement by engineer?
3. CHD inspection and construction approval?
4. PBTS notice in public records at courthouse completed?
5. Copy of signed maintenance agreement with a permitted maintenance
_entity?
6. Application for operating permit and fee?
Drip Irrigation Review Items
64E-6.009, Ok/not Comment
FAC ok/???/n/a
(5) (5)Drip irrigation systems—Drip irrigation ok
systems may,at the option of the applicant,be
used in lieu of a mineral aggregate drainfield. Drip
irrigation systems shall meet all requirements of
this chapter except as noted below.
(5)(a) (a)Drip irrigation systems shall receive effluent OK The proposed system is a
fi•om an approved aerobic treatment unit or a PBTS that includes a Fuji
performance-based treatment system designed to Clean CHO ATU system
meet at least secondary treatment standards for (and some disinfection?) ]ft'Sk
CBOD5 and TSS,and shall meet the following designed to achieve the Apt
requirements: advanced secondary
treatment.
(5)(a)1. 1. Drip irrigation systems shall be designed by an OK Design signed by Nicholas
engineer licensed in the State of Florida. Turnbull,a PE whose active
status can be found from
the DBPR license database.
(5)(a)2. 2.The infiltrative area required shall be the same OK Proposed drainfield is
as the area required for a mineral aggregate larger than required for a
drainfield with reductions allowed for the mineral aggregate
reduction of CBOD5 and TSS as noted in this drainfield.
chapter for aerobic treatment units.
(5)(a)3. 3. In an absorption bed configuration,the Na The proposed system is a
drainfield area shall be calculated as extending one trench system.
foot beyond the sides of the outermost emitter
lines.Notwithstanding the provision of paragraph
64E-6.014(5)(b), F.A.C.,the individual bed size
limitation of 1500 square feet does not apply to
dri emitter systems.
(5)(a)4. 4. In a trench containing a single emitter line,the Ok 2*1*453=906 sgft, which
drainfield area shall be calculated as 2 feet is larger than the required
multiplied by the emitter spacing in feet multiplied 706 sgft.
by the number of emitters.
(5)(a)5. S.Drip effluent disposal systems shall be ??? (1) The pump design
considered pressure distribution systerns.Head capacity is marked as
4of9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
loss calculations shall be provided to insure proper 19 gpm on the pump
hydraulic pressure at the emitter.Pump selection curve while the design
shall be indicated in the design specifications. calculation shows 14.9
Pump performance curves shall be included in the gpm. Is this due to
permit application. pump tank return to
set the pressure to 35 j
1 psi?Please reconcile.
(2) OK.Inlet pressure
specified as 35 psi
(80.9').This part
includes the head
needed to balance the
dripline friction loss
and maintain proper
emitter flow and flush
velocity.
(3) OK.Static head
specified as 5'.
(4) OK.Head loss through
supply line and supply
manifold calculated as
1.8'
(5) Head loss through
return line and piping
back to CE10 specified
as 23.1'.This is an
overestimate of the
losses during a flushing
cycle, but indicates the
pressure during a
dosing cycle.
(Overestimate because:
drainfield plan view did
not show the return
line is more than 10
times longer than the
supply line;flow in
return line is lower
than in the supply line)
(6) TDH is the sum of(1)
through(4)as 110.8'.
(7) Little Giant
WE20g05p4-21 pump is
selected for the
project.
(8) Pump curve provided.
(5)(a)6. 6. Recirculation rates shall be in the design ??? Maximum recirculation
specifications. rate 12.1 gpm specified on
Sheet 2 of 2. (8 gpm for
flushing+2-3 gpm filter
flush;where is remaining 2
gpm coming from?)
5of9
i
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29,2020
(5)(a)7. 7. Check valves, petcocks, inline filters,and OK Specified in the drainfield
vacuum breaking device locations shall be shown plan view and the AKE
on the design drawings. Single Filter Headworks
drawings(Sheet 2 of 2).
(5)(a)8. 8. Drip irrigation systems shall be time-dosed over ??? Please confirm that the
the 24-hour period. Demand control dosing shall apparent discrepancy
override timed-dosing in periods of flow where between 66 minutes daily 1
timed dosing cannot accommodate the excessive
run time specified,and 12 i
flow. doses times 6 minutes=72
<)j2_e minutes daily runtime
stems from rounding
66.2min daily runtime/12
to 6.
Demand override specified
in note 10,ok.
(5)(a)9. 9. Emitter lines shall be designed as a continuous ??? Four of the five emitter
loop circuit with no dead-ends. lines appear to start and
end on the supply
manifold.They should start
from the supply manifold
and end on the return
manifold. Please clarify.
(5)(a)10. 10. Emitter lines shall be drawn to scale and ok OK.The distance between
emitter spacing shall be indicated on the drawings. adjacent emitter lines
specified as 25"and
emitter interval specified
as 12"specified in the
System Specification Notes.
(5)(a)11. 11. Vacuum release valves shall be installed at the OK Vacuum release valves
highpoint of the emitter lines. installed at the highest
points in drainfield
specified in the drainfield
plan view drawing.
(5)(a)12. 12.The maximum emitter longitudinal spacing on ??? Cross section shows drip
an emitter line shall be 2 feet.The maximum line 6"below existing
spacing between adjacent emitter lines in an
grade, or only 19 inches
absorption bed configuration shall be 2 fcct.The above water table,please
24-inch separation from the seasonal high water correct.
table shall be measured fi-om the emitter orifice. ` The emitter spacing
Setbacks shall be measured from the drip e>riltt te
lines. ; `� specified as 12". The
(f e G�(z(( `"
� spacing between adjacent
emitter line specified as
u 25"for a trench drainfield.
L Estimated seasonal high
water table is 25 inches
below existing grade based
on Site Evaluation.The
excavato 20 o remove Inoppr dripline will be installed
now deeper than 1" below
2 the grade(specified in the
System Specification Notes
on Sheet 2 of 2).
6of9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
I
Date: September 29,2020
(5)(a)13. 13.The setback from drip emitter lines to building OK Specified in the drainfield
foundations and property lines shall be no less plan view on Sheet 2 of 2.
than two feet.
(5)(a)14. 14.The definition of a filled system in Rule 64E- n/a A standard subsurface
6.002, F.A.C., is not applicable to drip effluent system.
disposal systems.A drip effluent disposal system
is considered to be a mound system when any part
of the bottom surface of any drip emitter line is
located at or above the elevation of undisturbed
native soil in the drainfield area.A drip cfflucnt
disposal system is considered a standard
subsurface drainfield system when the entire
bottom surface of every drip emitter line is
installed below the elevation of undisturbed native
soil in the drainfield area.
(5)(a)15. 15. For mound systems there shall be a minimum n/a a standard subsurface
18-inch separation between the shoulder of the fill system
and the nearest drip emitter line. Mound system
slopes shall be in accordance with paragraph 64E-
6.009(3)(0, F.A.C., except that a minimum 2 foot
separation is required between the nearest drip
emitter line and a building foundation,retaining
wall,or similar obstruction. Mound systems shall
be stabilized in accordance with paragraph 64E-
6.009(3)(f),F.A,C.
(5)(a)16 16. For standard subsurface systems,the elevation n/a
of any fill covering the drainfield shall extend no
less than 18 inches away from all emitter lines
before tapering down to natural grade.
(5)(a)17. 17. Minimum cover on the emitter lines shall be 6 ??? Cross section shows 6"of
inches for all drip irrigation systems.The cover from the bottom of
maximum cover for all drip irrigation systems the drip line, not from the
shall be no greater than 12 inches. I top,please revise.Specified
L (0 SS Sg'-+ bv\ e in the System Specification
�,�,a S w -2r-e n Y i� ` t'—J`+ Notes 5 on Sheet 2 of 2.
L k 1 } County Health Department
check during system
14 00 d S' nv � �c� CJ t installation.
(5)(a)18. 18.The system shall include a petcock on the OK Petcock shown in the AKE
dosing pump discharge line for effluent sampling. Single Filter Headworks
drawing on Sheet 2 of 2.
(5)(a)19. 19.All systems shall incorporate an automatic ??? The difference in length of
mechanism for backwashing or flushing the drip five emitter loops is
lines and filters. 59 substantial. Please clarify
�M,,�,°( how flushing of the longest
S, driplines will be achieved
given preferential flow
through the shortest lines.
(5)(a)20. 20.All onsite sewage treatment and disposal County County Health Department
systems that include a drip effluent disposal Health checl<before system
system and aerobic treatment unit or performance- Department approval.
based treatment system shall have a biennial
operating permit,a maintenance contract with an check
a roved maintenance entity,and shall be
7 of 9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
inspected in accordance with the requirements of
i
this chapter.
(5)(a)21. 21. Drip irrigation systems shall be designed to OK The pressure at the emitter
have a minimum operating pressure at the emitter specified as 35 psi(>10 psi
head of 10 PSI, a maximum operating pressure at and<45 psi).The total
the emitter head of 45 PSI,a maximum system pump head provided at the
operating pressure of 60 PSI,and a maximum design flow(14.9)is about
discharge rate per emitter of 1.5 gallons per hour. 130 feet,corresponding to
56.6 psi(<60 psi).
The flow per emitter is 0.92 I
gallons per hour.
(5)(a)22. 22.The hydraulic surge storage requirement of OK
Rule 64E-6.028, F.A.C.,does not apply to drip
irrigation systems.
(5)(a)23. 23. Drip irrigation systems shall only use ??? OK.The Netafim
components approved by the Bureau of Onsite 08WRAM1-12 dripline will
Sewage Programs• be used for the proposed
drainfield.The proposed
AKE drip irrigation package
includes all the headworks
components and the
70000-005 drip control
panel.
Please provide information
S �V,6, regarding the filter type
�06 and the mesh size of the
filter. Does it provide
filtering to 100 um?
(5)(a)24. 24. Unobstructed area for drip irrigation systems CHD to
may be located anywhere on the establishment check
property that meets the setbacks for unobstructed
area and can be accessed via transmission lines,
supply lines and return lines installed in
accordance with this chapter. The land containing
only transmission lines,supply lines and return
lines shall not be included in the calculation of
unobstructed area.
(5)(a)25. 25. Supply lines and return lines shall be OK
considered as transmission lines for determining
setbacks not specified in this section.
(5)(a)26. 26. Except for slopes required to meet the ok St Augustine grass
stabilization requirements of paragraph 64E-
6.009(3)(0, F.A.C.,the area over the drip
irrigation drainfield shall be stabilized in the same
way or vegetated with plant species specified by
the design engineer.The species specified shall
not include trees.
(5)(a)27. For drip emitter lines using non-pressure- ??? Please clarify if the drip
compensating emitters,the maximum elevation R Q�„.�` lines will be on a slope.The
difference shall be four inches between the highest water table indicators were
and the lowest emitter in any individual line 20" below benchmark for
segment between the supply and the return line. profile 1 and 18"below
For drip emitter lines using pressure-compensating benchmark for profile 2.
8of9
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: September 29, 2020
emitters,there shall be no more than 18 inches of The given drainfield
elevation difference between the highest and P elevation only
lowest emitter in any line.Neither property slope J 9z t accommodates profile 1.
nor drip emitter line slope shall result in the depth 0— ,(,a ( No elevation changes and
of cover over the drip emitter lines to be outside of slope specified. Please
the range permitted in subparagraph 64E- provide.
6.009(5)(a)17, F.A.C.
(5)(a)28. The minimum effective soil depth below drip County County Health Department
emitter lines shall be 42 inches;however,spodic Health check
layers greater than 24 inches below the drip Department
emitter lines may remain in place at the discretion j
check
of the design engineer
(5)(b) (b)Drip irrigation systems shall be monitored By By maintenance entity
during required maintenance visits by visual maintenance i
inspection of the-round surface above the emitter entity
lines for evidence of soil saturation at the ground
surface. 1
i
I
u
,i
5
r
i
I'
I".
1�
r
1
ii
Y
li
I
9 of 9
Ongrarn, Brian J
From: Scott Franz <cflsoilsolutions@cfl.rr.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 11:21 AM
To: Ingram, Brian J; Roeder, Eb
Cc: Koerner, David J
Subject: RE:TBD Noble Oaks Ln OSTDS
Attachments: fuji_clean_usa_residential_om_manual_append ices.pdf; PBTS Drip Review.pdf
Importance: High
Eb, in regards to your review. I printed your comments and have written notes. The following are comments/discussion
to some of them in order:
1. Fecal Coliform-we have test data of units in operation where the fecal levels are consistently below 200 fecal
counts/100ml without Chlorination. We are not proposing chlorination for this reason. Fecal will be tested as
required/described in the submittal.
2. 19 gpm is the approximate flow of the pump as the system is designed. 14.9 gpm indicated by the calculator
should be taken exactly as labeled "minimum pump flow."This the minimum flow required to achieve 2 ft/sec
scour velocity based on the design inputs and is a check to ensure the selected pump will be big enough. 19 >
14.9 so the selected pump is appropriate.
3. Flushing-The note on page 1 of 1 (site plan) is based on your past comments and addresses the issue. 12.1 gpm
is the "maxmium recirculation during flush cycle via return line &filter flush line."That is 19 gpm—6.9 gpm
leaving the drip emitters= 12.1 gpm maximum recirculation back to trash compartment during a field flush.The
note "approximately 2-3 gpm via filter flush line during each pump cycle" is simply providing information as to
the approximate flow through the filter flush line.
4. Apparent discrepancy- I cannot account for the discrepancy but it is something the calculator is doing.This
information is not pertinent to the design, function or performance of the disposal system.The only value in
that section that matters is the run time.The control panel has a smart relay.The specific on and off time is
programmed.The system will pump for 6 minutes then shut off for 1 hour 25 mins.
5.. We do not consider the differences in length to be substantial by any means. Our scour calculator demonstrates
that we are well above the required 2 ft/sec in the longest lateral.
1
DRIP SYSTEM SCOUR VELOCITY ESTIMATOR
= Input OP = 30 psi
Area of 125" PVC Supply Line = 0.0104 Square feet
Area of 0.57" I.D_ Bioline = ®Square feet
Pump Operating Flow Rate= ®GPM
19 GPM is Eqivalent to: 0.042 cubic feet /second
Velocity in 125" PVC Supply= 4.07 ;feet/second
Equivalent Velocity in One Bioline = 26.46 feet/second
If number of Bioline loops is:
Velocity at start of each loop= 5.29 feet/second
Number of Drip Emitters = Total
Number of Drip Emitters = in Longest Lateral
Drip Rate per Emitter= GPH
Volumetric Loss due to Drip = 6.95 GPM Total
Volumetric Loss due to Drip= 0.84 GPM in Longest Lateral
Scour Velocity(end of loop) _ ®feet1second
6. The filter that comes in the headworks is the 120 micron Netafim disc filter approved by your office.
7. The shwt is clearly described based on boring 1 which is the lowest boring. No mention of indicators for boring 2
are made. I don't know why you would question if the drip line will be installed on a slope other than you see
that the ground elevation of boring 2 is 4" higher than boring 1. We are required to provide elevation
information for each boring based on site conditions at the time of the site evaluation. The specifications are
clear that the drip line is to be installed 4" above BM.#27 in the drip irrigation system section of the code allows
for a maximum amount of fall through the dripfield depending on what type of drip line is being used; pressure
compensating versus non pressure compensating. Netafim is clearly specified which you well know is pressure
compensating. Assuming the 4" difference in the boring elevations is"slope" one can easily see that it is well
within tolerances of this section.
8. It seems that your comment answers itself. Keep in mind that the elevations are current conditions and that site
development will take place which will change the elevations.This is one reason why we reference a fixed point.
I don't see that any additional clarification on this issue is warranted.
Revisions have been made to both pages 1 of 2 and 2 of 2. Original signed/sealed copies will be mailed to St. Lucie
County.
Thanks!
Scott Franz
2
From: Ingram, Brian J [mailto:Brian.Ingram@flhealth.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 9:44 AM
To: cflsoilsolutions@cfl.rr.com; floridaonsitesystemsanddesign@gmail.com; EEOD.NT@gmail.com
Cc: Koerner, David J
Subject: TBD Noble Oaks Ln OSTDS
Good morning,
There are several emails on the engineer specs so I included them all. Please disregard if this email does not concern
you.
We have received comments back from our review engineers for the OSDTS permit application that was submitted for
TBD Noble Oaks Ln.
There are a few errors and issues that need to be addressed. Please address the comments in red font and resubmit to
our office.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Brian Ingram
Environmental Specialist 11
Florida Department of Health-St Lucie County
Division of Environmental Health
3855 South US 1, Fort Pierce, FL 34982
MAILING: 5150 NW Milner Dr, Port St Lucie, FI 34983
office (772) 873-4905
"To protect, promote and improve the health of all people in Florida
through integrated state, county and community efforts."
NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state
business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your email communication may therefore be
subject to public disclosure.
How are we doing? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/XHBMW7K
7
J
Check List for PBTS/Drip Irrigation Systems per 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code
Date: May 13, 2016
Application: Review by: CHD:
PBTS(see check list of HSES 10-001):
Drip Items (see also table below)
APPLICATION [64E-6.026(2)]
1. Application, site plan and site evaluation signed, dated and sealed by engineer. [64E-6.026(2)]
2. System design criteria [64E-6.026(2)(a)]:
Performance Level: Baseline [ ] STS [ ] ASTS [ ] AWTS.{_ Florida Keys []
Parameter Performance level Treatment accomplished by Supporting information for
required which system component treatment level [y/n/comment]
(annual average)
CBOD5 (b ???mg/L
Total Suspended Solids 16 ???mg/L
Total Nitrogen O ???mg/L
Total Phosphorus 10 ???mg/L
Fecal Coliform Utz ???cfu/100mL
Other system design calculations:
Drip, see drip comments:
3. Monitoring requirements [64E-6.026(2)(a), 64E-6.029, see HSES memo 08-003]
Parameters to be monitored: CBOD5 [\] TSS 1-4-TN [ ] TP [ ] Fecal Coliform [ ] Other[ ]
Sampling frequency: I/ j .T-(_ 2,x ,i-
Monitoring ports provided:'_/
Monitoring locations identified:
Method of monitoring flow through system.
4. System design calculations. [64E-6.026(2)(b)]
5. System design plans and drawings, including installation instructions [64E-6.026(2)(c)]
6. If soil is used for treatment, a site plan showing direction of groundwater movement, location of
monitoring wells, and extent of effluent plume. [64E-6.026(2)(d)]
7. Contingency plan for system failure. [64E-6.026(2)(e)]
8. "Certification of Design" statement signed, dated and sealed by the engineer? [64E-6.026(2)(f)] ;
9. Operation and maintenance manual [64E-6.026(g)]?
10. Cover letter from engineer requesting the approval of a PBTS.
DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE LEVELS
1. Are there any modifications to setback requirements? 50 -{- '
2. Is there a modification to the separation from the wet season high water table?.!
3. Is there a request for an increase in aut orized sewage flow? !V
4. Is there a drainfield size reduction?
DRAINFIELD MODIFICATIONS [64E-6.028(3)-(5)]
1. Drainfield infiltration surface reductions adhere to treatment level design?
1 of 4