Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test • Phone 954-784-2941 eder I L.- 800-848-1919 . 4 Fax 954-784-7875 >9<TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 100, Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8536 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-666 Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest After Fill Permit#: Material Type:- Light Brown Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction pass PCF PCF % r, 1 Center of Pad 12 FL 6.1 103.2 104.3 13.2 98.9/o Yes 2 1 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.8 103.8 104.3 1 13.2 99.5% Yes 3 ISE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.9 102.1 104.3 13.2 97.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a veri i f# n,;of_Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: "6 Z.P - PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted Eby y, G ll SL=Springline FL=Final Lift . � SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade L °- Federal Engineering;4' estlrig, Inc! BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing = -- --.FloridaReg'No.59394,E TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade CErtificate of Authorizat Sri#5471 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential-property of client o- ts,`and authorization for publication of statements, -tea: :_: -. conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A,dgns� F-Wst,deterrnines the degree`cf compaction of the tested layer of rl-« material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests d�nnt.�er11�tUe°ar�erlying soil Fin'afeiials.belowthe proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil 'to certSfy that;the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils;w "';-Tv;mrnend-tt- 'soil'borings-be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days o;��flernJhea�y-oa14sio sting must be performed on this work. T PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 edeml Phone 954-784 2941 �• 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 4S TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 100i Creekside . -Date: July 5, 2017- Address: 8536 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34045 Order#: 17-DR-666 Area Tested: Buiiding.Pad - Retest After`Fill Permit#: Material Type: Light Brown Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R..Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver.Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION De th Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction . Pass. p PC PCF 1 Center of Pad 12 FL 6.1 103.2 104.3 1 13.2 98.9% Yes 2 NW Cornet of Pad 12 FL 6.8 . 103.8 104.3 13.2 99.5% Yes 3 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.9 102.1 104..3 13.2 97.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page.2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verificatrontio}f Z"firig Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by SL=Springline FL=Final Lift i eih'Legianc SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade _ F deal Ep Ineerin �&Testln Inc g ., 9 �� BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing �;yFlontia Rig Igo b9394 TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade of Authonzatloq As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential prbnerty o`(client tend`WrtF a&tion&r publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density te;5t drm eteines the,degirei of cordpar%;i�;f the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the-unite tying 5ot1 maYeri�Psrge�ow the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bon-- 46 is reo-'rl�red t�certify hex the tmdec�yir gisoils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,were oYnn'er�it.'soil�uc�r�s.heaperfonned to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after l eavy ratp�cyp-�Shre`ating must be performed on this work. uW, PAGE 1 of 2 " •0 Compacted Solis Method D-6938 Disclaimer Engineering & Testing, Inc. FET has performed a compaction test at the referenced Pursuant to our request, Federal ) p p Y q � 9 9 9� � project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. ` , Page 2 of 2 ede14'1 Phone 954-784-2941 LA b 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 100; Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 Address: 8536 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945. Order#: 17-DR-525 Area Tested: " Building Pad Permit#:. Material Type:, Light Brown.Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED . Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.. Address: 1436 Culver Driv NE' Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. oho, Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF PCF % 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.5 :11 5.2. 116.9 12.1 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad 12" FL 9.6 115.8 11.6.9. 12.1 99.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.3 115.5 116.9 12.1 98.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a rverificatior}d#=,Sail!3earmg Capacity. Legend for Elevation: � �`� -5� •' ' PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted SL=Springline FL=Final Lift �t LeBlanc;=P E y r'/ �� SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade :; -ederal; ngine�lma `Testry;`znc7,, BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing 'mFlonrla_Rig No 59'894; ` TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished GradeCort�ficate of gGthor zatlon#54?� f, r,: As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential pioperty of clients and auu7orkation foryubliation of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density-test-datarrnines"the"degree;o�ordp2&i� Hof the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certf'thepndariyir3g o'I n�tenals tsiw uie-proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bonng tesCis regwre�to ce?ity chat a untierlying soils will support the r.. .;_c proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils;-we recon�hen�Y 4ha2 soil bafirig`s,beperformed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after hebv=!7rai cst�drr(rillAwsting must be performed on this work. i C PAGE 1 of-2 ft Compacted Soils Method D-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 ede 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 100, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 Address: 8536 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-525 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Light Brown Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF PCF % 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.5 115.2 116.9 12.1 98.5% Yes 2 1 Center of Pad 12" FL 9.6 115.8 116.9 12.1 99.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.3 115.5 116.9 12.1 98.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 . 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaim This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is',not-a ve00catl66W Utl,Bearmg$Gapacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by�� SL=Springline FL=Final Lift � lIth'LeRlanc-P`E� SG=Subgrade BG=Below Gradeeder Engnezitirfg&:�ssting;Inc; BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing r F�londa.Reg d No`59394 0 TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade of Authonzatlon,#5471 r L As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential prpP.Q0y,of clients and authonzabor3 for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.Adensity- < st dgti'9niines�e�deere�of compaction of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify,tkisunderlysng?soit materals bPalb'-'Fie proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soilbonng tesEjT�edufrcd�oeiiifry�t>tJi a underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we.recamn?ei;djKgi:,so6P'be iiigs be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavj:;alntiC;- ,;retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of�2 Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common,industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 - RECEIVED JUL 1 Phone 954-784-2941 L 4ed -er 800-848-1919 �7�� ��D �� Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Fieid­Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 1.00, Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8536 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-666 Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest After Fill Permit#: Material Type: Light Brown Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. o/0 Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 Center of Pad 12" FL 1 6.1 103.2 1 104.3 13.2 98.9% Yes 2 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.8 103.8 104.3 13.2 99.5% Yes 3 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.9 102.1 104.3 13.2 97.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verificationofSoil' earin ,Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by-` '. SL=Springline FL=Final Lift :_14FItI� eBlart {' 'Ut© ` SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal Engmse tng&r d's o /� BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing rlorlda`Re97,hio`533g4 t, �' TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade %ertlftate of A�rthonzatlon#,54.7;1T As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential properly rlientsatid au cauon of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test'0'-&_j ie�ihe degree of`compaction-ioK,the ested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify>he un&Ayi1ng moll mateiais bE v the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring testis rEauiied'>.d_"c�itifj,;tpat.;the;�rt�erlF� 'oils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils;"we recommend t absoil oi�rt�s be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after he-w ysr�a t m Pt Yrg must be performed on this work. , pal PAGE 1 of 2 .=z» Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of .material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending,written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. pane 2 of 9