Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test jUN JJW017 Phone 954-784-2941 e � � 800-848-1919 [FEZ ';`;:1vG Fax 954-784-7875 FI &TESTING INC. /� t'� ' ' �i'J' L www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 -7 V 3 ^ q Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creekslde Dater June 1, 2017 Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-530 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: . Material Type: Light Brown'Sand with Shell & Rock Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: RWO Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist D.ry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF PCF 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.9 115.3 ,1 117.1 10.9 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad 12" FL 7.4 . 114.9 117.1 10.9 • 98.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0 116.9 117.1 10.9 99.'8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification o Sallar3eariit&,Capacity. Legend for Elevation: A PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by. Qn - SL - r' -Sp Inghne FL Final Lift SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Fed-raL Eligine's,Ing infesting„�nc BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing floflda Reg No 59394 "" TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Ceiificate;of F�uthotizati�ri#54?1 r`.r As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property ofclieii ,-and; iitfiorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density teat deterrnirir rthe degrpe.^f cornpactiori,`i rite tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlyic,soil=materials be!om�tiie=proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required io;oedify that the;%riile�iying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend:`rhaQrsgil�boiinos-bE'perForned to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after;'heavy raih/storms refeshng,must,be performed on this work. a PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required,we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. . Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you,and we look forward to doing so in the near future.. Page 2 of 2 qPhone954-784-2941 Olt It 800-848-1919 ederAIS, �� : .a Fax 954-784-7875 i-1&TESTING INC. 9 www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 At q e 2 201� Field Density Tests of CQn*ji?. oils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creeksi p1e C°un`, Date: June 30, 2017 p Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: DR-641 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Pale Gray Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. 4-1 Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF PCF % 1 Center of Pad 12" FL 8.1 105.1 1.06.0 14.0 99.2% Yes 2 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.2 104.8 106.0 1 14.0 98.9% Yes 3 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.3 105.0 106.0 14.0 99.1% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 I 110 I ,11 I12 - 3 I4 ,marks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer. This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification`of,Soil: eari ig,Capacity. end for Elevation: Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by: f �Gt'i Springline FL=Final Lift p.` Keith Le51a�6c�F' I Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federal Engrneenng&Testing;Iric1� �, IBasecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing ', Florida- eg No 559R394740., r Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certlflcate.or Authonzatrdn#5471 utual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clie?rts and autthtiqzatrr forapublic9tion;bf statements,_r ions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determmPs fie degree of compaction of-the tes+ d layer of only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not ceriify.the underlyjF soilf�i atenals below the prnpor9d structure ills do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is required o a dty tha the,''onderl*rj"i i will'support We i structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommend"thd1 c�G.borings be pe,�rme to evaluate the (of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or afterrheavy rain/ rt+>>retP�bn £lpe-fr ormad on this PAGE 1 of 2 t Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer - Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET)` has'performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added,fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions.' Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is _- for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTIVI D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other, areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site-must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 �° Phone 954-784-2941 ede r 1765—06 q� 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-530 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Light Brown Sand with Shell & Rock Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.9 115.3 117.1 10.9 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad 12" FL 7.4 114.9 117.1 10.9 98.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0 116.9 117.1 10.9 99.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer,:-µw. _; This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not aver, cMl0"hI W.S it Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3= 1st,'2nd,3rd Lift Submitted, / -s.-- SL=Springline FL=Final Liftl�7 SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade A Fed raT E rn€EringA egting Inc. BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida R-qg No.59394 w TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade _ 1 Cert i�.ate-of,Authorication#5471 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the cohfidential-,prop.rty;of client§,and-autho2iation.fpr publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval-'A-den iity_;tzsttid L4mihe's^the ifEgre6 ovconiaaction of the tested layer of �:. material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density t&tsilo-not'. �iiti ttie uri�arlying;soil rnat6'04'below the proposed structure. L The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test;she 40.4;e06..ceFtifyTlt at"tie undedying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils;we%ucdiri�6'f do kia'§oi4'borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days rafter rissGv;y;ra?t17acrms,retesting.must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. I Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 ederti 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 131h Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17=DR-530 Area Tested: .B•uilding Pad Permit#: Material Type: Light Brown Sand with Shell & Rock Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton,.Ind. Address: 1430 Culver.brive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor. Optimum TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. %. Density. Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL. 7.9 115.3 117.1 10.9. 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad, 12" FL 1 7.4 114.9 117.1 10.9 98.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0 116.9 117.1 10.9 99.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 . 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a&iftcation of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: J PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift. Submitted by: SL=Springline FL=Final Lift �i`Keitfr'LeBlanc I?Etr,� -;:. SG=Sub grade BG=Below Grade - �' . 'r �-► '`F/7 g Federal Bngmeenng esting, Inc. BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing -'Re TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade _ Cer mebte of Authorization#5471:, As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidentigLproperty of clients;`'and.aythorization fos publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from.or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A-densi rest' '' r 9 9 P P g pp ty_ Ydeterp,ir�eq,t i?p degree of compd0ion of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do'not card the underlying soil materWls_; �iow the proposed structure. The results do.not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bodrije9t 44equfrsd to..cegifpL at th�,unaerlying soils will support the proposed struture without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils we"rec"omri enti that oil Corings�e performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of-90 days or a$©rheavy iaiii/tcrti�s;retesting must be performed on this work. ,; �.a '• PAGE 1 of 2 0 z . Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. i Page 2 of 2 • Phone 954-784-2941 i edeiPal 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING mc. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creekside Date: June 30, 2017 Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: DR-641 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Pale Gray Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF PCF % 1 Center of Pad 12" FL 8.1 105.1 106.0 14.0 99.2% Yes 2 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.2 104.8 106.0 14.0 98.9% Yes 3 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.3 105.0 106.0 14.0 99.1% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification of S0 Bearing'Capaaty Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3= 1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted,: SL=Springline FL=Final Lift q l SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade �` nFederpl{ nebring&TesU[tg 7ne BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing h Floricra Req No 593�4 TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certif.cate of Authorization#5471, As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients and'ta5tttorization i r=publication CF state� tts conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density testadetemiines ihe;deg ee of compaetionodf��$asted layer�of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the'underly hg soii4 iaterials below the��oFo"sod structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring to"s s Tegwred to cPTtity fhat,te unde�rl,�Anr�so`ts.will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recommenuAba soil borimbe�per or(ned.;to.evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days,,or�.4 F fieavy[aifitI. s r�tes>�a r��iatbe performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 +j Compacted Soils Method ®-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on 9 P P other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. 4. , Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 edefal ' Fax 954-784-7875 8 TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 87, Creekside Date: June 30, 2017 Address: 8537 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: DR-641 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Pale Gray Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM DA 557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum TEST LOCATION Elev. o Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass # Depth �o. PCF PCF % 1 Center of Pad 12" FL 8.1 105.1 106.0 14.0 . 99.2% Yes 2 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.2 104.8 106.0 14.0 98.9% Yes 3 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.3 105.0 106.0 14.0 09.1% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification-of Soil.Bearmg Capacity. Legend for Elevation: c -� y PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1 st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Oh"I:'eBlar�a'P SG=Subgrade BG=Below Gradeed+ ra1 Et{gmeertng&TestirtgJ i,-1c���'�/' BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing it rl6pida RecNo 5334 TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade rt`1cate of AC-i o zation#54T 1� , As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential,propetty of gients!ar authon�tlon for pub6eetion of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density,test-tlete iinesahendegree,of compacfbnapf;,the,tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests`do not certify the biidbrlyRtg soil matenals,bei v7 the proposed structure. The results.do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test-isirPgr ry ;t�rcerufq'lliat.the +c i rlW,, soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils ,%ea Gmr�rtei d,tFiatsQi�bo i43s`b-;parfortned to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of go days or'affer hea.raln/storrns,reteslog_musi be performed on this work. r.Fr��1a�z?_ , PAGE 1.of 2 i Compacted Soils Method 0-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2