Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Tests 17�� Phone 954-784-2941' C 800 848 1919 ederal R E C E I Vx 954-784-7875 - JULJAB. J 7,f�1� 8 TESTING INC. . www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,.K 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence: Lot 83, Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8501 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945' Order#: 17-DR-664 Area Tested." - Building Pad -Retest After Fill' ' Permit#: Material Type:, Pale.Gray Sand , Tech: BK .Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. ' Address: 1430 Culver'Drive NE Compaction Req.: "'95%, ' Palm Bay, FL 32907',- Proctor Method: A$TM D=1557- Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor'. Optimum # - TEST LOCATION-, Depth Elev. % Density-' Value Moisture Compaction Pass p PCF .. PCF. . .: .%.. 1 Center of Pad `12' FL -'9A,'­ 105A 107.1 11.2. 98.4% Yes 2 SW:Corner of-Pad' ' '12" FL. ''RA106.0 107.1 11.2 99.0% '= Yes 3 NE Corner of Pad 17, FL 8.8 :106.0°• 107.1. '11.2 . 99.0% Yes ' 4 ' 6 7 8 9 10 13 . 14 r Remarks: 'See Reverse Side.(P6ge'2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad andis not a.verifca. i�W,tfaid y Legend for Elevation: . • ' �� ,�F.'�,t,��, �' � o� ��>�. p z�� >.t PR=Proofroll 1,2;3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by&3 o, SL=Springline FL=Final Lift K�e�t1 Le lana E `o /gyp 9 JN i i/I/j7 SG=Subgrade . BG=.Below Grade Feglp Engineenn &i esting Slnc A o BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Flo CLa��g 4 b i TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certtfi ate o(�Authonzafori As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the-corifidential property of clier`,t ends t�thg f vb�!(eatr�h,of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test detemii}�e�tit degeef wthe tested layer of material only.A density does not replace'a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the'underl s s�Or4 ma' o s � e proposed'structure.. Y fY9 P fy fY fY t qa F t h The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is regwred torGE�Q�a"rri f, ing soils will support the proposed structure.without settlement If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we,'recorTrmend the (iSdPr� e'performed to evaluate the suitability of,the-underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy ram7stonns retestingr ust be performed on this work. : PAGE 1 of 2 �, Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering, & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side..The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the.tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of,the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas,:of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work-was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current'common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTIVI D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and-areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations,-overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. a ' �, e 954-784-2941 eder a Fax 91AM &TESTING INC. �'©� � / e 07AA"' jn COM 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Test's of Compacted Soils Method D- RMi�fN 6938st. Lucie Project: Proposed Residence . Lot-83, Creekside Date: _ June t1, o�lU Address: 8501 Cobblestone brive, Fort Pierce','FL 34945••' Order.+# A7-DR-533' Area Tested: Building.Pad Permit#: Material Type: Brown Sand with Shell " " Tech:" ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc, Address: 1.430..Culver Drive NE Compaction.Req.: -95% - Palm Bay,'FL..32907 Proctor Method: .:. ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor : ,Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value 'Moisture- Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.8 115.5 117.2 - .11.4 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad 12'r! FL 8.4 115.7 117:2 11.4 - 987% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12' FL 8.6 115.6 117.2 11.4 , '98.6% ' Yes- 4 6 8 9. 10 11 " 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse.Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer a This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verifica.l A` .e .P g'Capacity,. Legend for Elevation: °, 1 it n c5�1 PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by, ,�. , 1. SL=Springline FL=Final Lift �' S Kslt `L'eBla�c,P E 's" ° A4 c � / SG=Subgrade BG=Below'Grade , �deral-En6lnee��nc, yestm BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Aktd Rig No,�9394yso st .x, TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade °tc rtlficate� ? tfion �ion#541b As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are.submitted as the confidential ro„ert'o_f�ollents and arithonzatiori fos m tron P P P P P 3� 1, 41 c� tements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports Is reserved pending our written approval.'A densmtyAest de�emymesohr,i�%?gc�a 4 `C�r�tp Cttopac, t}me tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certmfy`th j�rinde ying',oil nngtedaln :he proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is requ;Tgd�Ulrertify thatP9,Llhd {yfng-soils will support the +[^ _rJra�r� AF) proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to,verify the underlying soils,we recommcgd-that sfiilaotpg8e perforrimed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy;rdirY�st�i3ii Cetesting must be performed on this WOdC. PAGE 1 of 2 �: e Compacted Soils Method ®-6938-Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test'was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil. materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of-the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the-degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-1.80 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. 10 rat Page 2 of 2 /� Phone,954-784-2941 e el :a CX v 800.848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed:Residence Lot 83, Creekside 'Date: June 1, 2017 Address: 8501 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 . Order#: 17-DR-533 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: -Brown.Sand with ShellTech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive,NE Compaction Req.: 95%. Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum. # TEST LOCATION De th Elev. oho Density. Value. Moisture. Compaction Pass p PCF PCF % 1. NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.8 115.5 117.2 11.4 98.5% Yes 2 Center of Pad' 12" FL 8.4 115.7 117.2 11.4 98.7% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.6 115.6 117.2 11.4 98:6% Yes 4 8 9 10 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and:is n,,t �6Fiefat�pn a'?Soil Bearing Capacity. 10 Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st, ft _2nd,3rd Li �Subrn�te�3�byp ° ° ' 14 w SL=Springline FL=Final Lift ��`,a ° z I�elth Lila P � 7�" ti t9 t� SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade r a ° Ste,pFe er�I�Englni li �'&yTesting, Inc.�� / �t ",Z) BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing a4 sFlonda;Reg 1Vg 5984,, TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade d'� ;�" �C�rttficate of AutFioriiation#5471 - C GalrSe ,tee As a mutual,protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential prdprty of clients,anal authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approvai�A de r t8 opierm_AeszthF,dfigrek-6f compaction of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density to§ts, pot ce f ha'u`n�adymg sGil:nlaterials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee fhat future settlement and cracking will not occur.A"soil bonny iet is reQw?g�`o;c rG.fy:'that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying^soil§ NE rectt+lmend t iai soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying`soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a,pen_o$'ofJU days �r;(ttef�snGy rain/storms,retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been-performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental,analysis,of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common,industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved-areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal,Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent -site 'disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. JX Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784 2941 r \` 800-848-1919 r` ede �^^- Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com L 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,R 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot-83; Creekside , Date:• June 1, 2017 Address: 8501 Cobblestone Drive, Fort.Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-533' Area Tested: Bullding Pad Permit#: Material[Type. Brown Sand-with Shell = ' Tech: ED Client: ' D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver-Drive,NE Compaction,Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist, Dry', Proctor Optimum.. TLST LOCATION_ Elev., o Density. Value Moisture Compaction Pass . # Depth /o PCF PCF' 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL. 8.8 115.5 117.2 11.4 , 98.5% .;. Yes 2 Center of Pad 12" FL 6 4. 115.7",_ 117.2 11.4 . 98.7% Yes 3 SW Corner^of Pad 12" FL 8:6 115:6 117.2 -11.4 98.6% Yes 4 6 - 8 9 10- 11 . 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and Is not a verifcatWit'9.11;Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll . 1 2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift S.ul3mittedy� _ SL=Springline FL=Final Lift X. eBlanC�P ,v SG=Subgrade. BG=Below Grade `Fe` rah s�pinPenng C Wig Inc. BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing r n Florida F{e�.No 59394 �'` TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade a G@fit of�A�thociaafan #5471s,� As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confide-_p�p{�ertyb clients.and euthorip a�on rpuhltcation of statements, conclusions or extracts from or,regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A densy te�t�detet+p�nes the devgreQ oFcq pacion4f the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do no��oef$ Tinderlg�rt kia etral `below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that.future settlement and cracking will not occur.A sod boring i�t isctpuufld to tic6rfif4hat�t, a underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils rere�5bbr�rgAllith3C`btiunngs be performed to evacuate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of g0 days or afte6 r,ii�/stdr6s,retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE.1;of 2 Compacted Sclls Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the 'reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. 'A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation-areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal,Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 7 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed'Re'sidence Lot 83, Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8501 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce;`FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-664 Area Tested: Building-Pad - Retest-After Fill . Permit#: Material Type: . Pale Gray Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton,_Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay,'FL 32907 Proctor Method:- ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION De th Elev. -ova Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass. p PCF. .• PCF % 1 Center of Pad 12" FL, 9.0 105.4 107.1 11.2, 98.4% Yes 2 SW Corner of Pad 12'..' FL 9.4 106.0 107..1 11.2' 99.0% Yes 3 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 4.8 106.0 107.1 11.2 99.0% Yes, 6 8 9 _ • 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: .See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer-__•—__: This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not•"Momctiatlo f pil,Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: a PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st;2nd,3rd Lift SL=Springline FL=Final Lift r�svrt�b� /7 SG=Sub rade BG Below Grade s 4r `l /! 9 t ;of tq pedeQE"r �ITeeal '�Testing, Inc. BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footingi� Flotyc(a;Reg No, 93�9 ;.,. f r TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade K p`� +° ��ertt >ate�f/uth ri2aflon#5471 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the Conti kn l gropertyrof 44fl9n for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending ouc.written approval Aie�� tes;detrtnines�theldgj� pf•=compaction of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests dm noS-c' e ling°sdil'vfl�terials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil:bBopg-ye••$h Csir�egorred t�o�c�rtif°y tha-4 ie underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the uhde`rlying.s&&& rac N�'iend:4haY soil;tiorings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 94-day.'.bt ofE67- i�vq farrilstorms,retesting must be performed on this work. ; ry�c l PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. . FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for-paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection-to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 t ede -a-1 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 16 8 TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,Fl.33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils'Method D-6938 Project:' Proposed Residence Lot 83, Creekside. Date: July 5,;201,7 Address: 8501"'Cot biestorie Drive,.Fort Pierce 'FL 34945 Order#: 17=DR-664 Area Tested: Building Pad -.Retest After Fill' Permit#: Material Type: Pale Gray Sand Tech: BK . Client: D.R-.Norton,"Inc.- Address: 1430,Culver Drive-NE. Compaction Req.: 95%_ _ Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method:. ASTM D-1557 . Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum TEST LOCATION .` Elev. ° Density. Value Moisture Compaction Pass # De'pth �0 PCF. PCF 1 Center of Pad. 12" FL 9.0 105.4 . 107.1 . ..11.2 98.4% Yes 2 SW Corner of Pad 12" -FL 9.4 106.0 107.1 1.12 '99.0% Yes 3 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.8 106.0 107.1 11.2 �99.0% Yes'- 4 6 8 10' 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer ;;_„ :.,_ This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a veriflcatio�i,6,t S t10.6aring:Capacity. Legend for Elevations PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift. Submitted by a a SL=Springiirie FL=Final LiftKe+th la �FE i �oa r s/�9�� SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade b*ta Fade,N`Er1g+neenng& es41ri , f€ ` BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing tcaLidB Re6-Mo 5� 944. '.LL TOP=Top of Pipe FG Finished Grade t,pert ficati'�f_Aut,bri4ation#rtiti �1 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the"confidential::pro�e or clients rpjia }Tlgnzt gsnvfo publipC of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density etri�iipes the dg�gree`ocompaQtif=the�lested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certdy;therihdz roposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is reauirFd to ce�rti tiia t�tQ Gr1flrig''soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.if no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils we recQ;nm�rZt tWasoil`bo°ri 13e performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or Sfler he2KN fa rliilotogrs� retirrg must be performed on this a7A�f work. PAGE 1 of 2_ Compacted Solis Method ®-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed-structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results.are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. '✓r ('� t' _,0 Page 2 of 2