Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test Phone 954-784-2941 ral- �/ - , 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 A&TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.col'1'1 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project:- Proposed Residence, Lot 84,,Creekside ,. w Date: July 5,2017 Address: 8505,Cobblestone.OrM6, Fort-Pierce, FL 34945: Order#: 17-DR-665'.. Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest After.Fill Permit#: Material Type: Dark Gray Sand with Some Shell Tech: BK: Client: D.R.Horton; Inc" Address`.' 1430 Culver Drive NE,.- 'Compaction'Req:: '. 95% - Palm Bay, FL 32907 'Proctor Method: AS TM D-1557. Test Probe Moist Dry• Proctor• , Optimum # TEST LOCATION:. Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass FCF. PCF, !a. 1 Center of Buildin Pad 12" FL- 11.2 - 106.0 107.0_, 14.0 99.1% Yes 2 18VV, Corner otbuildiihig Pad 12" FL 9.3Y. 105.4 107.0, 14.0 98.5% Yes. 3 NW Corner of Building Pad 12" J FL 9.6 105.0 107.0 14.0 98.1% ,Yes,' 5 6 8 9 10 11 .12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of.2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer:- This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not:azve,ifAotibnacsf,SoojfBearing Capacity: you �► .' s J-�✓ Legend for Elevation: F� `� a �� P bmi R=Prooftoll 1,2,3 1st,2ndi 3rd Lift Sutted b Q� ° SL=-Springline FL=Final Lift £ '�`Kelth LeBlah''&,R`E � ° n Federal Engigeprmg(547img SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade o,,. o U G BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of footing Elohda Rug.No-59394 4, 7 _ ..� y :: a ., `�* Ceslificate.of Mthorizatl&d#5471 TOP=Top of Pipe FIG=Finished Grade ,, L As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the,confidential p�operty.,of clients,and`auth or&.tion�Tor.,publication-of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval:A-6e'-r gest'de�riAines th'e degree'r,�sompaction of the tested layer of material only.,A density does not replace a soil bearing.capacity determination.These density,teW,do fief G--.ify fhe•uiiJerlyirig sA1 r .enals below the proposed structure. The results;do not preclude or guarantee that future.settlement and cracking will not occur:A soil bonnb jqs is required+o de`i�Z!NaV0 underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils A0+,r"engmmsf d that s%gll<''uonngs be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days o afte{9he%rdi tones,retesting must be performed on this - work. PAGE 1 of 2 . Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services.. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree'of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based,on current common industry requirements of 95% of the-ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 1919 ed'et—al ` 954-784-7875 . Fax 954-784-7875 J. 4H.11-11&TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field'Density Tests of Compacted Soils-Method D-6938'. Project: Proposed'Residence Lot 84,,Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8505 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-665 Area Tested: Building Pad --Retest After Fill Permit#: Material Type: Dark Gray Sand with Some Shell Tech: BK. Client: D.R.' Horton, Inc.' Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE. Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907, Proctor Method: ASTM D-155T Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION: De th Elev.. % Density. Value Moisture Compaction Pass P PCF PCF % 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 11.2 106.0, . 107.0 • 14.0 99.1% Yes 2 SW Corner of building Pad . ,. 12" FL 9..3-- 105.4' '107.0. '14.0 981.5% ' Yes 3 NW Corner of Building Pad `. 12" FL 9.6' 105.0 107.0 14.0 98.1% Yes 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification.of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,.2nd;3rd Lift Submitted4br e,, �' SL=S rin line FL=Final Lift y P 9 ' �`�,w'` trCelttt LeE'�lanc'A.F SG=Sub grade BG=Below Grade �r r/7 g f ,�rF�deral EngiheerdnTesting Inc. i BC=Basecourse BOF Bottom of Footing � '- - �,�`^o�. Florlda,Rt';g+ TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade M . '�C.ertifii;t b of uthorl�r tl�n#5471 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the corifidpparproperty�ef-clients;and'aut riiatia':for-'publication of statements, ,•, -•- , conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval,A;dQnsity-test determines the degree,gi-compaction of the tested layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests W npl. eft f'the underlyin below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil'b ng test4s requited to certify hat tte underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying so-s,Ve recommend'thatts9il41, Hngs be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 dad§oNah"6r,h,35Mrain%sfpghs'retesting must be performed on this work. g�u . PAGE 1 of 2 F ts� ' l Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials-is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the-degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available.at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. 1 1 Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 ede-i- a "` 800-848-1919 ' l Fax 954-784-7875 8 TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com . 250 SW i3th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence , - Lot 84, Creekside Date: June 1; 2017. Address: 8505'C6bblestone Drive; Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-532' Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material.Type: Brown Sand with Some-Shell-. Tech: ED Client:. D.R.-Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction-Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: . ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moit Dry, Proctor. Optimum # TEST LOCATION Depth Eley. ohos• Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF . ' % 1 NE Corner of Pad . 12" FL 9.0 115.5 116.3" 11.7 99.3% Yes. 2 Center of Pad 12 FL 1.2 .114.2 116.3 ,11..7 98.2% Yes, , 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL. 8.3 114.9 116.3 11.7 98.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verific tliDti"df 4olvfiearmg Capacity. L`K Legend for Elevation: 9 � ,• � PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by �`6 a, f� SL=Springline FL=FinafLift 'AP <irltfj,LoBlan P � �,'Fetleraa,lR Eeng n"e� �� "- `stSG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade t BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing �t©'F�18r d No 59394, l�ignGcti TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade r �Cei lficatp-of At3thortiatlom As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves;all reports are submitted as the confidenbal property of clrents,acid authorizationcforulrcaLon of statements, P pending approval. ty; °' ' conclusions or extracts from or regardingour re reports is reserved endin our written a royal.A dense testermines.the�degree -of the.tested layer of 1•: material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These'density tests do not certifjwttjeUpaedyrrg son n ataria!6��`e�a o�c 'the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring tees;is rag31L°ed toy certify that lfv�u d�rly1q oils will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils.,we recommend'th�t;Oil t ogr��rs�be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days testing:must be performed on this work. • "`''� �'�� ,,jiff �;•,.,�. ,ry PAGE 1 of 2 ,���� Compacted Solis Method ®-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at-the referenced project on, the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the-underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc: shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations;overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. --a Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 edeta' l 1 .16 3 Fax 954-784-7875 &TESTING INC. www.fod-eng.com 25D SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 84, Creekside Date: June 1;2017 Address: 8505 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce,FL 34945 Order#: 17=DR-532 i Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#: Material Type: Brown.Sand with.Some Shell Tech: ED Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction.Req.: -95%0 Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D71557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum # TEST LOCATION . De th Elev. W. Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass, p PCF . PCF % 1 NE Corner of,Pad - 12" FL 9.0 115.5. 116.3 11.7 99.3% Yes, 2 Center of Pad 12" FL 7.2 114.2 11-6.3 11.7' 98.2% Yes. 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.3 114.9 116.3 11.7 98.8% Yes 4 - 6 . 8 9 10 11 • 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verificatioLalrfiEle��ilrig Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted SL=Springline FL=Final Lift r r Kef'h:-be8land-' P E SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade F6.d4rpl Englnper��gw"T—. 5tir t7nta? � r M BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing 59$94 TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade CPrfrficate of ArJtMoriztlon#571 As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property;bf,clients and authors 1 n forpubl�catytan;of statements conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test de'errirrnesthe degree-.of;caatpactici `�tv ea'i d,layer of--; rp> — material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify thci.-ur?d dying•sole I ti alscbek proposed sfrucfure. The results do not preclude or.guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is requited tod)¢[tl tha4 tneu 3 �lyi,g'soils-.will support the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils; m we recomend� rm that,Cv6II tirinys be�t{ierformed`to evaluate the suitability of.the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heady-ra&stb' s;rrotrsting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Solis Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required,-we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the.ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 j CONED J Phone 954-784 2941 L i eder" 800-EN 1 9 Zo97 Fax 54 9U.748-1s19 84-7875 S TESTING INC. - V/v((J„ C www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 n: i•' Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D'6938 Project: Proposed Residence:' ,.Lot 84, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 Address: , `8505 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce FL.34945 - Order#: 17-DR-532 Area Tested: Building'Pad Permit#: Material Type: Brown Sand with Some Shell ' Tech: ED Client:• D.R. Horton, Ind.- Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction.Req.: 95% Palm Bay;FL 32901 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1551 Test -probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum (TEST LOCATIONElev. Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass # Depth % PCF PCF 1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0 115.5 116.3 11.7 99.3% Yes 2 Center of Pad' 12" FL 7.2 114.2: 116.3, 11.7 98.2% Yes 3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 8.3 114.9 '116.3 11.7 98.8% Yes 4 _ 5 6 7 8 9 . 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: .See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification o ioi1 EPalrlrtiapacity:__:. Legend for Elevation: �,� ° .:>`0 s �� PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by:. +�/ 'J SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith LeE3lbh6 0'E 9' , f . SG=Subgrade z BG=Below Grade t '-Federal Englneer�r5�j:&a� $rlg'inc� '` '� BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Florida Rsg No.5934 Q o j 4, TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate of Au4it dnett�r47,-1� As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidenUal property of ohehtiFieN aut�i -n 46n for publiEa�sCtrr 6f statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved.pending our written approval.A density test determires'4ije degree of,co o�c0ori.atQ,1te 4'iayer of c .+rr . material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underl}n N sc�7Pfnate��s below;thcj�,rrposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test Is required to cert`y�� +ee� nderlwng�soifs wilhsupport the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils;-we recommendth90soll borings be,pEAorned to evaluate the Mtn ' •i suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed stricture.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or;,after heavy rain/stor isj'r t_estin st be g mu _performed on this work. gas.• .s^ -. .;-,. _. L PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method ®-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material-only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing.the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were n'ot available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as'roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on . other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 edeA�.�' `�� 800-848-1919 r 4 .� " " �� Fax 954-784-7875 s TESTING INC. E C E I V E D JUL 19 2017 www.fed-orTg.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 84, Creekside Date: July 5, 2017 Address: 8505 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL,34945 Order#: 17-DR-665 Area Tested: Building"Pad - Retest After Fill Permit#: Material Type: ' Dark Gray Sand with Some"Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum TEST LOCATION Elev. o Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass # Depth /0 PCF PCF 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 11.2 106.0 107.0 14.0 99.1% Yes 2 SW.Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 9.3 105.4' 107.0 14.0 98.5% Yes 3 NW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 9.6 105.01 107.0 14.0 98.1% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer QOo t This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verificatton_o#bb l w Ali g„Cap"z ity .; F 6u.'� Legend for Elevation: '= a ��, P�,y PR=Proofroll 1,2,3 1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Kelth'LeBlanc,°P i �K V w SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Federaf�ngl�teering:8r TPsfing Irtc n t, BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Flonda Reg IJo 5a94�a o- TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade GrCertifcauthoriza�tlon#5471 0 k� ; As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property of ofients;,�n(t autfidria�'Lo�foy pobli'aticnfrstatements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test_deteOines the Veareec8f ofrpai4�on,q¢�tl algsted'.layer of material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify the underlying so I rg3+enals below t(6ro{.osed structure. The results do not preclude or,guarantes that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test.is regwred to cer�+ty that: igl`ru ilerfy�n ils.wpl suppoR the proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils we recommend;fhat sod<oodrt9� ,�bironned to evaivate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days ortafter heavy refn/storm$retespng must be performed on this work. '~ PAGE 1 of 2 t� Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recom "mend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and re-tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions-or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. !." pnnp 2 of 2