HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test .. ,FYI a .
(mac Rr0_-,'ED Phone 954-784-2941
eder
L 4 8� JUNJ 9 800-848-1919
2017: Fax.954-784-7875
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano BeachI,IFL 333069 C.7 t G INC. ��:tpb'ta WW Wfed-eng.COn1
Field.Density Tests of Compacted Soils M—'e�tthhod'^-D-6938-
Project: Proposed Residence Lot-103,,Creekside Date: June 1,2017
Address: -8524 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#:- 17-DR-528
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Light.Brown,Sand with Shell Tech:- ED
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430-Culver Diive'NE- Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557..
Dry, Proctor
Test TIE ST LOCATION Prolie Elev Moiofst. , Optimum
# Depth . Density' Value • Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF, PCF._ W,
1 NE Corner of Pad 12". FL 8.1 114.5 115.8 12.4 98.9% Yes
2 Center of Pad 12" FL 7.2 115.3 115.8 12.4 99,60/6 Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.2'" 113.0 115.8 12.4 91.6% Yes
5
6 -
7 =
8
9
10
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"'of the pad and is notfa4efification.clf.. 91l;l3eagrig ;apacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift` Submitted by'
SL.=Springline FL=Final Lift Keith'LElanc,:
SG=Subgrade BG=Below-GradeFederal Engineerihp&,a es`ting, In��GZ�r�
BC=•Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing Flonda`.Reg No_5934;
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certlfcate of Authorrzat'on#547io
r z.
As a mutual protection to clients;the public and-ourselves,all reports are submitted assthe confidential property of clients��8¢authorization for ublidaLon q statements;
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A densi test,determines•T.!de re---c earn a tic oI ofaf916sted layer of
9 9P 9 PP h _ f Ff- �� Y
-r„a !.'- .r c
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing.capacity determination.These density tests do not'certify t6Jut d aMyinq,Wi mkeria beiow"the"6sed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test is regwred toTi eft S+Yfhat f undaryng solls will support the
�7: 'Jr' AE � .> 5rr ti
proposed structure without settlement..If no,soil borings have been"performed to verify the underlying soils ewe reco"mmend that sgil odngs�be�p4_brined to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a,period of 90 days or after heavy,ra!kUsto, s retesting must be performed on this
work. .fi };.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted .Soils Method ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client-prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only'included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation.'This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in"the location of
the proposed structure, we 'recommend performing soil-borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to .
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of,the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for.performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials.The scope of services is
for determination'&the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only.'No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed..Determination of the-pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If'different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and '
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
1
Phone 954-784-2941
L 4 era 800-848-1919
� Fax 954-784-7875
8 TESTING INC. 16j 5",�� 3 W{NW.fed-eng.00111
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence ' Lot"103, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017 .
Address: '8524 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945_ Order#: 17=DR-528
Area Tested: Building-Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Light Brown Sand with Shell Tech: ED
Client: D.R..Horton, Inc.
Address:- 1430 Culver Drive NE, Compaction Req.: -95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D=1557
Test Probe Moist Dry , Proctor Optimum
# TEST L'OCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction' Pass
PCF PCF
1 NE Corner of Pad 12". FL 8.1 114.5 115.8 -.12.4 98.9% Yes
2 Center of Pad 12". FL 7.2 115.3 115.8 12.4. 99.6% Yes.'
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.2 A 13.0 115.8 12.4 97.6% Yes
5
6
8
9
10
11
12'
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not; :�i�rif@c��tir n pfi 5 H Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3= 1 st,2nd,3rd Lift Subm ttetl by ��
SL=Springline .FL=Final Lift
SG=Subgrade BG"=,Below Grade Federal,Englnee g&Tesfing, Inc.
BC=Basecourse BOF Bottom of Footing
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade whSo „y;�,:;ertifrate of AuthoriTati' 5471
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidsrtttahpro,perty of clients and autt�or�afion for publication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval"P�d�slty�:tbst deteftin Ctha�dearee of compaction of the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a'soil bearing capacity determination.,These density tests c!o nit ggrfye'uii�eriyiniRqu materials below the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bQ��rgv s as�r€gGire�tm�c rtf thai the underlying soils will support the
T.
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the undbdying Ws�:{N*1pgorrt,�pena thftt,sottitiorings be performed to evaluate the
a n,I•Pr '� .�•'.t S'
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days ar,a9gntic3y}ain/Storms;retesting must be performed on this
work. rr- v. ILI r _
PAGE 1 of 2
t
-
Compacted Soils Method D-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our'test was'to determine-the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil 'materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due. to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
4 .
Page 2 of 2
i Phone-954-784-2941
ed
er' itl
800-848-1919
Fax 954 784-7875
&TESTING INC. . V1WWJed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field_Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot•103 -Creekside Date: June 1, 2017
Address: '8524 Gobblestorie Drive; Fort Piercie'Fl- 34045 Order 17=DR-528"
Area Tested: 'Building Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Light Brown_Sand with Shell-" Tech: ED
Client: D.R. Horton,'Inc: :
Address: -1430-_Cu1ver Drive_NE .. Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557-
Test Probe Moist Dry, Proctor. Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth bey. % Density. Value Moisture Coil paction. Pass
PCF PCF- ' %
1 NE Corner of Pad 12",1 FL, 8.1 114.5 115.8 • 1.2.4,- 98.0% Yes
2 Center of Pad .12". FL 7.2 115.3 115:8 12.4. . 99.6% Yes;.'_
3,. SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.2 113.0 115.8 12:4 97.6% Yes
5
- 6 -
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page-2 of 21 for Additional Information for Disclaimer; ''�
This is.a Compaction Test only on the'top 12"of the pad and is not a v,,OW ,000 fearing Capaclty.
Legend for Elevation: . F3 c j a �"W
PR=Proofroll 12,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Subtted ,y.mi
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift Zy ^y' b Ith�l`eBlanc
Y�.. .tip
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade
tfederal,Englnering 8�Fe,flg,Inc
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footin '
�, „Florida Reg:No 59394 9
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade � +;1' rtitt' xgotoorization;547
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidentral propyrty of clients and authorizaUpn for,publtcaUon of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A densitJest dztemjgnes the degree�of'cdmpacUon•of'tiia tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace'a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do,not cerfi[y the underfyingtsoil rriatenal$(below;he proposed structure.
The results do'not preclude or guaraniee'that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil+bonrig tesE is vgNred to cQrtify aY�the�Undefting'soils will support the
owl
proposed structure without settlement.If'no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils weRrer£ornmgnd that c Borings be performed to evaluate the
.suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 91,,daYe or 00re.heav�T2lrU§fomis retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE-11 of 2
Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only: In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision-of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis-of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. 'If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an env!ronmental'analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has-been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2