HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test ` fn Phone 954-784-2941
L� 1 � •f 800-848-1919
eder" ` .A Ii. 11 Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING_ INC. '�� ' � (
pa _ �^, www.fed=eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach FL 33059
Field Density Tests.o$,ompacted.Soils Method-D;6938
'Project: :.Proposed Residence Lot 101; Creekside: , Date: June-1, 2017
Address,: , 8632 Cobblestone Dri, e,.Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-526
Area Tested: Building,Pad Permit'#: ` = .
Material.Type: Brown_Sand'wi h'Some Shelf Tech: Eli
Client: :D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: '1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: ' 95%
Palm Bay, FL 92907 = Proctor Method: . ASTM,D-1557 ;
Test -. Probe Moist Dry, Proctor.- 'Optimum
-TEST LOCATION Elev. Density value Moisture Compaction Pass
# Depth %. PCF PCF
1 NE Corner of Pad. 12" FL 6.4 .112.3 116.4 11.5 96.5% Yes
2 Center of Pad ;12" FL 9.6 115.3,' - 116.4' 11.5 99.1% Yes
3 SW'Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.9 113.0- 116.4 11.5 97:1% Yes;
4
5
6
7
9
10 =
12
13
14
Remarks: . See Reverse Side-(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer ;;• rtt --N'
This is a Compaction.Test only on the top 12"of the pad and rs notJ Ver f�fld 'G0,f Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: ty "= � �' ti
PR-Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted�bv: �3 � i
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift keltR681bnc P �
SG=Subgraile ,. BG=Below Grade ty��Feder� IEn�clneerlllg 8�°7t trig, lnc
BC Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing a Florida-Reg !Vo 59394� `
TOP=To of Pipe.FG=Finished Grade �r�+,
p p -CertlfrcateRaf,�Aeltl�onzfion# 47,1
Asa mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients and-authonza ior+forputilication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval,A=densii;�fect"delerrrf;rr) s the degree pT compaction of the tested layer of
9 " to n r
material only.A density does not replace.a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certifyrthe�,dri°erl,mg soil rtate r31s oelow the proposed structure:
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A ssoil'tionng to fIt": quired to certify that th underlying soils will support the ,
proposed structure without settlement:If no soil borings have been perforated to verify the underlying soils xwe recor�mt�dat7iptsuil rdo;ings-be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a penod°of-90 days'or after bd rl,3-a'a�1o"rms;retesting must be performed on this
work. 4 py�r try ,,.Ly s=.s Ez$2
PAGE 1-of 2x �
Compacted Soils Meth®' d ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal 'Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET). has performed a compaction test.at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the.degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions. .
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required;Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection'to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
ti� w
iC1 .. .. `
Page 2 of 2
eder�u
ax 954
R E C E I','r D JULJ UL $ 9 20 Phone 954-784-2941
jj --784 787
0-3800-848-1919
f �O,l�
&TESTING INC. I www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D=6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot.1.01.i'Creekside Date: 4uly5, 2017
Address: 8532 Cobblestone:.Drive, Fort-Pierce,-FL 34945' Order#: 177DR-667
Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest After Fill: Permit#:-
Material.Type: . Pale Gtay;Sand. Tech:. BK
Client: D.R. H6rton,'Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE- Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D=1657
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION . Depth /o
Elev. oi Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF PCF
1 Center of Pad 12" FL 10.1 103.9 105.8 13.5 '98.2% Yes
2- SE Corner of Pad 12 FL 9.2 104,.0, 105.8 13.5 98.3% Yes
3 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL , 9.0 104.5 105.8. 13.5 98.8% Yes
4
5
6
8
9
10
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer r
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verificet'alo' Qearing.Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade 1� federal�ngmeer►ngL&-,Tesfii4 he
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of FootingyFlon�a Reg,No�5994 '� M1�
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade gnAkq!lonZBtlon
a
As a'mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential. rope iemts,and,autho' tior f&1publication'of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports•is reserved pending our written approval.Atde6'ifi test deterr�iines theTdegree o compac3wn�f the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not ce"rfi r sh u{tder�nng`scll,Inatpoz s�elbv,�.the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bonng test-is required ceriify tilat�the'� oils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to�verify the underlying sods;``-we recommend �Fidtaod;porin�j6e psrfortned to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heav�'ran/s�ors�Y€tes}}�ingrmusf be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted.Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal.Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed.a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our.scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The.scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other- areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Phone 954-784-2941
ede' rii 1' 800-848-1919
Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,K 3306.9
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils'Method D-6938 _
Project: Proposed•,Residenc'e.,., Lot 101,-Creekside• Date: July 5 2017
Address: 8532'Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce; FL 34945. Order#: . 17-DR=667'
Area Tested; Bulldjri�Pad.-`Ret"W-A- fter:Fill, Permit#:
Material Type. Pale Gray Sand Tech: BK
Client: D:R:.Horton,•Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive.NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method:;_.. ASTM D-:1557 .
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION• De th EIeV. bi Density,; Value Moisture compaction Pass
p PCF PCF
1 Center of Pad 1;2" FL- 10.1 ,,103.9 1,05..8 . 13.5 98.2% Yes
2 SE Corner of Pad 12" FL ''9.2 . 104.0 :105.8. 13.5 98:30% , Yes
3' NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0' 104.5' 105.8 ' 13.5' -98.8% Yes '
4
5
6
7
- 8
9
10
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse.Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer_,.___.,.;
This is a-CompactionTest only on the top 12"of the pad and is nbf a t0 ,0 f►of'$oil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
S ,ft
u �, �0
PR ,Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift bmitted y ,g
SL=Springline "" FL=Final Lift ��y .
n,9� lth LeBlanc Bf�E o / r>•
SG=Subgrade - BG=Below Grade_ ederal E glpeennrT`e�tmg Ine.
��, _'FJo�ida l2e iVo 59394 lea
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing
TOP=Top of Pipe. FG=Fir ished Grade -6wr Cer� rcat:of/ufhortzatro #5471 N
As a mutual protection to clients'the public and-ourselves,all reports are submitted as the,.confidei4ual,property 6fecllents an�aaUthorization.oi`poblication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending,our written approv'aIpTA-decisuyest determines the'tegie�Qr coynpA
ction of the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density testsdo notlav tif,i tnelundla 4ytng'�,'sohm to aF'below the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A sod Bonn test I� egU�ired to certiM1fy#4 t alye.uoderying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils eve recr rmr4erct tl5at so�ilionrigs be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days o aft r�hesv'y�raiQp be performed on this
work. iFA.
PAGE.1 of 2
Compacted Solis Method D-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A.soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are.capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does.not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed'in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is.,.
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other.analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work.was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98%-of the AASHTO T-180 standard for pa4ed'areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing,_Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent'conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, ,construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to'construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
y
Page 2 of 2
- f Phone 954-784-2941
ed
800-848-1919
era
I��� O�,`r—� Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING INC. v www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 101, Creekside Date: July 5;2017
Address: 8532 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-667
Area Tested: Building Pad - Retest After Fill Permit#:
Material Type: Pale Gray Sand Tech: BK
Client: D.R.;Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
PCF PCF %
1 Center of Pad 12" FL 10.1 103.9' 105.8 13.5 98.2% Yes
2 ISE Corner of Pad 12" 1 FL 9.2 104.0 105.8 1 13.5 98.3% Yes
3 NW Corner of Pad 12" FL 9.0 104.5 105.8 1,3.5 98.8% Yes
4 "
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verifggtion;of; oil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: '��'
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submltto�I by�5
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift „����
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade4y1j,ti>lederal Enylne�r g Testing', Inc.
{{
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing �.- loriita Reg.No 5934 „
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade x- rM Gerti-1 ate of Aut�io►izatlon#5471
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confider�tiaL pope ty�of,client: 6nd:authorizeCb6h for,publication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approvalryp;densit�test determines She`degrPe`ocompaction of the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests-,ddo riot-certify-the undgr!yipg',�soil,matenals below the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil�tioruie te5st-.is required=tQ 6qify it�at=the„underlying soils will support the
structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the under) m �' b proposed g p fY y' gtsoils �e rer�om endct�at sgil .orings be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 9l)o�aq�,-,U-diteq b.-a 6j�ils"'orms,retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2 _
Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing; Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced,
project on the reverse side. The purpose. of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions-
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas' or dates.. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
Phone. 954-784 2941
L4 ede ral - 800.848-1919
/ Fax 954-784-7875
8 TESTING INC. j �a 3 6 I� www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Solis Method D-6938
Project: Proposed.Residence- Lot 101,:Creekside, Date: June 1, 2017
Address: 8532-Cobblestone b�ive, Fort Pierce; FL 34945� Order#: 17=DR-526
Area Tested: Buildifi 'Pad Permit#:
Material Type: :Brown Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive..NE Compaction Req.:, 95%
Palm Bay,'FL 32907' Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# - TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction., ..Pass
PCF. - PCF W.
1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.4 112.3 116.4 11.5 96.5%. Yes
2 Center of Pad 12" FL 9.6 115.3 116.4 : 11.5 99.1% Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL - 6.9 113.0 116.4 11.5 '97.1% Yes
4 :
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and- -Soil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: n,a
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submi#igdr
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift r 'r� o"Kith LeBlanc l?�� T #�
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade a' o� FederahErglneen g� 7esting Inc.f
,�h aH f K w f T_•
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing ,� rorid ,Reg.:No. 9394�
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade _ � rest7ate of Autfsonza2oori#5471
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confi '' 9 S' �`P P p r/enUal properly oT c�fents and authzaa�ton forputilication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports Is reserved pending our written approval._A.b rs.y.test}$eterrnines the degreF pf ompacUon of the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests-qo,not gerlify ifi0pdo�l Gng seaha+?rials-below the proposed structure.
IF
The results do nobpreclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil bonn. sjs require to fe y that the underlying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying sods,wa��e^5rtmio�^US�t pil'borings be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a penod of..90 days qi�affsr fUeairyL iri/storms reiest rig must be performed on this
work. - s
PAGE 1 of 2
y
Compacted Solis Method ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas,of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &.Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.-
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
_ h Phone 954-784-2941
r � -�`� 800-848-1919
edera'
Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed>Residence Lot 101, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017
Address: 8532 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-526
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Brown Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay,,FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev.. % Density Value Moisture Compaction , Pass
PCF. PCF %
1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.4 112.3 116.4 11.5 96.5% , Yes
2 Center of Pad 12 FL 9.6 115.3 116.4 11.5 99.1% Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 6.9 113.0 116.4 11.5, 97.1% Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a veriffcatiomof Soil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2rid,3rd Lift Submittedby.7-�=
-b .
SL=Springline FL=Final Liftth'LeBlanc$P FM//fX7
SG=Subgrade BG Below Grade ���j -�deral Ingineenng&�Test�raq;
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing �K`�Ierrda Regrf�6o`'S9394��;
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade o te ofA,,uthoiizatldn 'f
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submitted as the confidential prope,rty.of clier3ts aird,autho-zatior for_puohcation of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports Is reserved pending our written.approval.A densityltest determines the"degree•of-com the tested layer of
material only.A density does,not replace a soil bearing capacity determination:These density tests do not cerhr7the;undo lying soil-ma'adals GEIOW.the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test s,re`qui?ed totxi tlfat cg�in'derlging soils will,support the.
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we�ecofi.ennd`tffatfsoiLtru�irigsae performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or aft&, 1 ms, et�'sting must be performed on this
work. �V
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test,must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide*a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public-and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
�:1.. 3(fir-_ _ •`
` � t
Page 2 of 2