HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Tests L- I ® Phone 954-784-2941
800-848-1919eder -
1. Fax 954-784-7875
UN '� 9 201 ' O�O _
&TESTING INC. . . www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 PFPMI*V7f G
Field Density Te�t�s'6f Soils Method.0-6938
Project: -Proposed Residence. Lot 102, Creekside " Date: June T•, 2017•
Address: 8528`Cobblestone•Drive, Fort Pierce;'FL 34945 Order* '17-DR-527
Area Tested:- Building Pad Permit#
Material Type: Brown-Sand with Some Shell'. :_ Tech:: ED
Client' D.R. Horton; Inc:
Address": 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Re'q.: 95% -
-Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: . ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist. Dry.,: Proctor Optimum
TEST LOCATION Elev. Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass_ ,
# Depth % PCF PCF
1 NE Corner of.Pad IT FL 7.2 113.4 116.1 11.2 97.7% Yes
2 Center of Pad 12" FL_ 8.0 T13.8. 116.1 11'.2 .98.0' Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad. 12" FL. 7.8 113.6 116.1 11.2� 97.8% Yes
9
10
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information-for Disciaiiner
This is a Compaction Test only on.the top 12'of:the pad and is not'a v rlfi�attorit'o#'&o.'al,.Bearirig Capacity.
Legend for Elevation' o"
PR Proofroll 1,2,3= 1st,2nd,3rd,Lift. Submitted
SL=Springline FL,=Firial Lift qi�, 7
SG=Subgrade, BG=Below Grade �� ° {� `1=eder�l Er�gineenng Testing;Inc
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing onda;Reg No 59394
TOP=Top of Pipe. FG=.Finished Grade rt r
�ecafetof A_�tnorization5471, "
As a mutual protection-to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports,are submitted as the confdenti ri�p`riy of clients and authorizati6'for publication.of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or,regarding our reports,is reserved pending our written approval A densN,1 fes�determ`nes t�ie�de2ree of,�can�acbon of they-tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity detenninaiion.These density tests do not ae tirFp heundedyfog�soil_ t'- �fe als below-the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A sod;,bonng test s1cg6,Tad,_C�Certitfte underlying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been-performed to verify the underlying sods we rbcPr�mend thstSsollrbonngs be performed to evaluate the
fink '.
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for period of 90 daysor after heevr�fn7s`�onns refesUng must be performed on this
work. -
PAGE'1 oft t ,
Compacted Soils Method ®-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to-your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the.tested layer of.
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring.test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope.of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all-foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the .scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope rof services is,
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested-layer of,matedal only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available-at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98%-of the AASHTO'T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to -water erosion, rain waters,_ construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and'ourselveg,.all reports are submitted are the confidential property df'clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
i v
Page 2 of 2
Phone 954-784-2941
eder I' r-�--' 800-848-1919
/7� 0(�/�� Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING INC. ` . WroMfed-eng.Com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33M
_Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence,. - Lot 102, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017
Address: 8528 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: .17-DR-527
Area Tested: �,Blailding'Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Brown Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED.
Client: D.R..Horton, Inc.
Address:- 1430.CulVor l rive.NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay; FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM.D71557.
Test Probe, Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION De th .Elev. % Density' Value.. Moisture Compaction Pass'
p PCF PCF- %
1 NE Corner of Pad 12". FL. 7.2 113.4. 116.1 11.2 97.7% Yes
2 Center of Pad' ' 12"' FL 8.0 113.8'. 116.1 J 1.12 98.0% Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.8 113.6' 116.1 11.2 97.8% Yes
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks'. See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
'This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad artd`is-notaverification of oil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift f Submlrted bg:u a ,°
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift c�� o Kelth;.l_e3Tanc�p E
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade r �� p Federal En meen. ,&Testin Inc.• .
x Fa , 9 9,
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing `�' t., ` �Q 't
*o�i ,jwFl yr tla Reg t dZ, 394-�,,
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate of ALthori7ation#5471
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves,all reports are submi$ed as,the eonTdential pr ber,y�aciients arid' iu 6 nation for publication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written appr vQ.,A.d&Qiy test;deteTm'iries the'degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These densi .iAsts�Jo=nerti-c 'the undeil 'n oil;meterials below the ro osed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.AoiLbori�g tes4:�ry�rqui�ed'to oe7#i>j L`at the underying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil.borings have been performed to verify the underiyeng,spils,the recommend`that%oil borings be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure.After laying dormant for a period of w0 d4ssl riaff�r4heal.,-w rms,retesting must be performed on this
work. ` 0..
PAGE 1 of 2
C
0
c
• f.
Compacted Soils Method ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
ti 1r:. - _ 1.�.♦. _"
Page 2 of 2
i
/ Phone 954-784-2941
800-848-1919
e e r
Fax 954-784-7875
&TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 102, Creekside Date: June 1, 2017
Address: 8528 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order#: 17-DR-527
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit#:
Material Type: Brown Sand with Some Shell Tech: ED
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE . Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum
# TEST LOCATION Depth Elev. % Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass
p PCF PCF %
1 NE Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.2 113.4 116.1 11.2 97.7% Yes
2 1 Center of Pad ' 12" FL 8.0 1 113.8 116.1 11.2 98.0% Yes
3 SW Corner of Pad 12" FL 7.8 113.6 116.1 11.2 97.8% Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side(Page 2 of 2)for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"of the pad and is not a verification,of 'Oi:Pieariktg Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR=Proofroll 1,2,3=1st,2nd,3rd Lift Submitted by,
SL=Springline FL=Final Lift
SG=Subgrade BG=Below Grade Feder Engi een g,gesting lr�
BC=Basecourse BOF=Bottom of Footing :::Florida Reg.'No.59394_,
TOP=Top of Pipe FG=Finished Grade Certificate of- ithb6iatie-n#5471° 7 '
As a mutual protection to clients,the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential roe ��' 'P P P p p rty�af clien s sand aut brization for"ublica an of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density:test�deierm`nes,the dggree,ofgortipacUpthe test@d;layer of
material only.A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination.These density tests do not certify'theur 9-4ng soil�rR�t 61s,balo�lhe proposed structure.
o 1 , e!•:
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.A soil boring test�is'requlrzd 14 tter�ff thavtlib�urd3rlygg,soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement.If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils,we recomr fe�d-'�^at so,--! onngs 6�,�erfo�med to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed'structure.After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or'after heavy ramlgtorme,.ceta"s h�'must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
}
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas-such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering &Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re-compacted and
re-tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been,a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2