Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBPSC ITEM NO. VI11
r.,_
DATE: 01/05/2010
~ ` ~ ~ ~ j' ` . AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR (X )
PUBLIC HEARING ( }
LEG. ( )
QUASI-JD ( )
CONSENT { )
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY:
Kristin Tetsworth
SUBMITTED BY: Growth Management Department Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Petition of BPSC Industries, LLC Major Site Plan located at 2525 Center Road.
BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: June 6, 2006 - BOCC designated as a Brownfield Area
RECOMMENDATION: Board adoption of Resolution No.10-008 granting BPSC Major Site Plan approval
with conditions as outlined in the attached memorandum.
COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE:
( ) APPROVED ( ) DENIED
( ) OTHER
Faye W. Outlaw, MPA
County Administrator
~ Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney ( ) County Surveyor ( )
Daniel S. McIntyre Ron Harris
County Engineer ( ) ''j~ ERD ( ) -
Michael Powley Smith
Originating Dept. ( )
Mark Satterlee
w r
r
U~ ~ l (i(r
~ ~ I < ~ ~ ~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~
BPSC Major Site Plan 0 AGENDA ITEM No. VIII
BOCC Hearing Date: MJSP 06-014
January 5, 2010
Tuesday@ 6PM
GM File Number ~ - _ _ _ -
MJSP 06-014 , - '
Applicant
i,
BPSC Industries, LLC .
fill I `
i r ~ ~
Proper#y Location ~ , ~ n ~ ~ ~
2525 Center Road, 1300 feet - ' ~ i
South of St. Lucie Blvd. , i . .
I, l
Future Land Use & Zoning ~ i ~ ~ ~ "
IND (Industrial) & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
IL (Industrial Light) _
_.il t ~perty' ~ w ~~,,yy~
'f, V X01
Staff Recommendation ~ ~ f
f ~ -
Board ado tion o Resol tion . ,
u
No.10-008 granting BPSC
Major Site Plan approval with - f' '
conditions as outlined in the -
attached memorandum. _
_ ~ ~ i . ~ P_I
Previous Action ' "
June 6, 2006 - BOCC desig- _ ~ - ~ ~
Hated as a Brownfield Area
Project Staff Location: 2525 Center Road, on the south side approximately 1300 feet south of
Larry Szynkowski, AICP St. Lucie Blvd. where Center Road curves 90 degrees east & parallel to Canal #1
Project Description approval will be required fora proportion-
ate fair share agreement that will deter-
Petition of BPSC Industries, LLC Major Site mine the transportation concurrency for
Plan with eight buildings consisting of: this project. Another condition of ap-
proval will be required for an alternative
IndrioRd • Warehouse 202,950 square feet tree mitigation method utilizing a land
j , • Office 72,000 square feet; swap for conservation.
• Manufacturing 91,000 square feet Recommended Board Action
• Mezzanine storage 9,000 square feet
~ c~~, Board adoption of Resolution No.10-008
o N i The total gross floor area of the project is granting BPSC Major Site Plan approval
0 374,950 square feet. with conditions as outlined in the at-
tached memorandum.
st~uciesiv Background
~ `p subjeciptoperty Notice Requirements: None
This project application was received in 2006
Y on a Brownfield site that has been remediated
`T under Department of Environmental Protec- Further details are found in the at-
`,y~ N tion direction. The petitioner will dedicate 70 tached staff report or at the Growth
iA 9~Q L feet of right-of-way for the extension of 53rd Management Department.
9a N Street from the south and 10 feet of right-of-
Orange Ave ~ ~ way for Center Road. The petitioner has re- phone: 772.462.6456
quested a credit for impact fees for the value E-mail: szynkowl@stlucieco.org
a ~ of the right-of-way dedications. A condition of
~ R
~ ~ Growth Management Department
3
y
L it. t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Mark Satterlee, AICP, Growth Management Dire
FROM: Larry Szynkowski, AICP, Senior Planned
DATE: January 5, 2010
SUBJECT: Petition of BPSC Industries, LLC Major Site Plan located at 2525 Center
Road.
ITEM NO. VIII
Background:
The petitioner is requesting Major Site Plan approval for a 374,950 square foot,
office/warehouse complex with eight buildings on 35.55 acres of a 56.56 acre site at 2525
Center Road. The remaining 21 acres is currently proposed to remain undeveloped. The
Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application on October 22, 2009 and
certified the project on December 9, 2009.
11.02.07. Standards for Site Plan Review
Consistency with Local Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan:
The proposed eight-building office warehouse use is consistent with the general purpose, goals,
objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (Section 3.01.03.S;
Section 7.04.01; and Section 7.09.04) and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Policy
1.1.9.5 and Policy 1.1.15.1.
Effect on Nearby Properties:
The officelwarehouse use is consistent with the three adjacent parcels to the north, east and
west since they are in the same Industrial Light Zoning District. This use will not have an undue
adverse effect upon the single-family neighborhood to the south as an eight-foot wall and
landscape buffer is proposed on the south side of the development. In addition, there is an 240
foot wide Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District Canal #1 right-of-way situated between the
subject property and the residential neighborhood.
Environmental Impact:
The Environmental Resources Department Final Report is attached. As part of an alternative
tree mitigation plan, the petitioner has proposed to convey a parcel of land to the County in
BPSC Industries, LLC
Major Site Plan
MJSP 06-014
January 5, 2010
Page 2
addition to plantings on the site. This land conveyance will be a separate item to be considered
by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) at a future date.
Adeauacy of Public Facilities:
The proposed office warehouse development complies with the standards of Chapter V,
Adequate Public Facilities of the Land Development Code (LDC.) Section 5.06.02 of the LDC
requires a proportionate fair share agreement in order to meet traffic concurrency requirements.
That agreement will also come before BOCC as a separate agenda item at a future meeting.
Recommendation:
Board adoption of Resolution No.10-008 granting BPSC Major Site Plan approval with
conditions as outlined in this memorandum.
Attachments
Is
cc: Patrick Borrico, BPSC Industries, LLC
Brian Nolan, ASLA, Lucido & Associates
Ron Harris, St. Lucie County Surveyor
Michael Powley, St. Lucie County Engineer
Christopher Lestrange, Code Compliance Manager
Amy Mott, Supervisor Environmental Resources Department
Paula Bushby, Supervisor, Zoning Division
File
irmm~tai ~urc~
- -
= ~ Agenda Item
Companion Report
z,.,,. -~,y,®..~
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Karen L. Smith, Environmental Resources Department Director
FROM: Jennifer Evans, Environmental Planning Coordinator
Amy Mott, Environmental Regulations Manager
DATE: December 23, 2009
SUBJECT: Resolution 10-008 -Petition of BPSC Industries, LLC for
approval of the BPSC Major Site Plan
®e~artment Coordination
Environmental Resources Department (ERD) worked closely with Growth
Management, as well as other members of the Development Review Committee
regarding this item.
ERD has included four condition of approval within the attached resolution.
Recommendations
ERD supports Growth Management's recommendation of approval with
conditions as outlined in Resolution 10-008.
Signatur
-1-
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
~
_ k:
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ FINAL REPORT
TO: Larry Szynkowski, DRC Planner
THROUGH: Karen Smith, Environmental Resources Director
FROM: Jennifer Evans, Environmental Planning Coordinator
Amy Mott, Environmental Regulations Manager
DATE: December 29, 2009
SUBJECT: BPSC Industries, LLG, Major Site Plan
A Major Site Plan, known as BPSC (aka Center Road Landfill), was submitted September 13,
2006. The applicant proposes to construct 351,000 square feet of warehousing/office on a 56.56
acre site located south of St Lucie Boulevard on Center Road. The site was historically a landfill
and has been designated a "Brown Field" site by the Environmental Protection Agency. As a result
of this designation, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection requested the applicant
place two feet of soil material to cap the site if developed. The site is currently disturbed with
invasive ground covers with a mostly native canopy of Slash Pine and Laurel Oaks. This would
result in the loss of all native trees onsite.
Applying the mitigation ratios required by the Land Development Code, the applicant is required to
provide a total of 3,331 inches of mitigation. The estimated value to purchase this quantity of trees
is $106,560. This monetary equivalent does not include additional cost incurred for delivery,
installation and maintenance.
To meet mitigation requirements, the applicant proposes to convey a parcel of land, known as the
Cassens Parcel, to the county per Land Development Code 6.00.05(D)(3)(b)(2), in conjunction
with additional onsite plantings. The Cassens Parcel is located adjacent to the county-owned Ten-
Mile Creek Preserve and is an integral part of the Greenways and Trails System. The most recent
assessment by the St Lucie County Property Appraiser valued this parcel at $6,400 in 2009.
According to a third party appraisal, the highest and best use of this parcel would be as
speculative land holding for possible mitigation or annexation to neighboring property due to
factors such as lack of legal access and limit to a single unit development. It should be noted this
appraisal report also states that no access properties, such as this parcel, sell for 50 to 60 percent
of the value of sales with access.
Although there is a significant difference between the Cassen's parcel assessed value and
required mitigation value, staff is recommending approval of donation of the Cassen's parcel due
to the unique circumstances of this site and the following additional considerations:
• Public health and safety benefit of properly containing a Brownfield site within the County;
• Estimated 2.7 million dollar cost {as provided by the applicant) to properly contain the site;
• Poor condition of the BPSC site (including safety hazards and low ecological value);
• 1,360" of trees with an estimated value of $43,520 to be planted on the BPSC site in
addition to the minimum required landscaping;
• Desirable location of the Cassen's parcel due to the connectivity to the Greenways and
Trails Master Plan and adjacent County preserves;
• Public benefit of the Cassen's parcel as recreation, including expansion of Ten-Mile Creek
canoe trail for ecotourism;
• The Cassen's parcel high ecological value;
• Inability of the County to directly obtain the Cassen's parcel in the past due to high price;
• Value of Cassen's parcel prior to economic downturn;
• Opportunity to obtain additional Environmentally Significant Lands otherwise not feasible
considering recommendation by the St Lucie County Lands Acquisition Committee to
refrain from any further land purchases without a match;
• Increased cost to the County to accept and plant a large amount of donated trees (an
alternative option potentially available to the applicant};
• Inability of the county to accept and plant trees at this time due to low staffing levels.
Conditions of Approval:
1) Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall have
conveyed the parcel of land, known as the Cassens Parcel and identified with parcel
identification number 2326-421-0001-000/7, to St. Lucie County in a manner and form
acceptable to the County Attorney free and clear of liens and encumbrances.
2) Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall
finalize an improvement agreement acceptable to Environmental Resources
Department covering the cost of all required landscaping, irrigation, and related
improvements shown in the site plan. A copy of this agreement can be obtained by
visiting the SLC Environmental Resources Department website at:
htt%lwww stlucieco org/EnvironmentalResources Departmentlindex.htm.
3) Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall have
obtained and provided Environmental Resources Department with copies of any required
federal and state permits. If federal or state agency compliance requires modification to the
development plans, the applicant will promptly modify the plans and submit to St. Lucie
Gounty for review and approval as required by the Land Development Code. The applicant
will not use the County's development approval to prevent compliance with any federal or
state agency requirements.
4) Per Section 7.09.05, Category I Invasive Exotic vegetation shall be removed from within the
project boundary.
~1
a'~~
~cn
~ ~
~
S '
~ ~ pt ~ - ,4 si 4' - ~ ''j' '3 1 ; r ir;~} 7J1'1rt4 r
t F
p,~' 1 '-S
G
u'.l q~~
yj~~"~
S
}
w~ ~ ~f. - S t~~ ~ 1T~.~p 'vft L.J.
"'r ' i ~ • ~ R~* y}SY ~ l i
l~ "
~ i
t ~Ij~73.~ N _ q:111 ..~~yy~l
M } t~ } l /
~ ~ ~ A~ i-
r yy a c~ yr,.-ts ~ ' ~ _ 75~ ~~*'F ~k 1i~> is ~ ~ ~ C"U
a'~z ~s H s~ ~ ' ark i a~~~ Gj 'r',,-. '-I
~ q5' is 4 ~ ~ i ~ S'C ~ _i~ 'e,-~ ~'1~~~ ~•r~ ` rl _
~Ytar.' { +~tx, - ~ ~ ~ (S k,"~# ,y ~
~}i,~a~4`~s`~'w~i ~ ~~_-5 Y3~
t y Z
I f S J ! if - i t A 3 t ~
may' k i s ~t ~ 4 7^ 5vs S`}~
t cr i ~ R ~xi ~ h S'~ I
i ~ i
P g ~~~~i
a Ga - z' 3 ~ a tlw
~ ~
_ ' yyJ F ~ ~ TC
Y ~ 5(' i:-~ '~~J
I ~d! ti ~ X xs~a, i -.lr~ $ iY '~--1 ,~.3~Vk ,~'i ~~rtr~r _ s R ,i~~J.e {"~,t~~ f~
e i .il R 44 i.-. 6 3 ~^r'. 1 'p t r,~ -g~`~ 74
t _ S`F 'd
~ yeti ~ ...rte.`' hh,'"~~ ~ 7.'- r~ r sue" ~ 14 - ~
lk` •r y w a t t hyi ~.P ~~y~. r. s~ b 2~tt r~ 4 - ~
h s~•, y 3 r7~t '~3~'+~~f A~~Y i` ~~55 it' ~ ;tY~'i ~y ,2 s,. t~ r~ ~'t~
".ri ~~~7'~y i C ~iR~ ~a:.T`>~`~ s~Ya ~ r ° f` '.Sq~7'~I ~Ni 4,~
,r =~f. , ~ h ,fir n 'k~' 9 t cl7
v ~ ~ i ~ 4 e4 ~ ~ ~ f i ,f fiF 1 11 ~ ~ I , t ~ ~ ~ - t_rJ ~ ~.7
5 nyr ~ rya f "~X~ar ~ ~ r": n S 11 i.,' fQi..~
Iii v- ~ ,~k'?r~w ~rv yi!~$a _ ~ a w ~ ~ ~ ~ tom.
~ .
~ J `k(}, ~ : ~ ~~iS _ ~ .1 ~ 5 1'` 4 t tf _ - - C~1 ~
rya ~ ~4E' ~ ~ 1 W
sxuf ~ `S t` rrv
I Z-'=+
~
>t`~
~ _ .
1 RESOLUTION NO. 10-008
2 File Number: MJSP 06-014
3
4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO A MAJOR SITE PLAN
5 PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BPSC
6
7 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
8 testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
9 determinations:
10
11 1. BPSC Industries LLC presented a petition for Major Site Plan approval for the project
12 to be known as BPSC for property located at 2525 Center Road that is on the south
13 side of Center Road, approximately 1300 feet south of St. Lucie Boulevard in the IL
14 (Industrial, Light) Zoning District and as described in Part B, consisting of eight (8)
15 buildings containing:
16
17 202,950 square feet of warehouse
18 • 72,000 square feet of office;
19 9,000 square feet of mezzanine,
20 91,000 square feet of light manufacturing;
21 • 374,950 square feet of total floor space; and
22 365,950 total square feet of building footprints.
23
24 2. On June 6, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition of BPF Industries,
25 LLC for the designation of the subject property as a Brownfield Area for the purpose of
26 environmental rehabilitation and economic development. This Board approved the
27 designation of the subject property as a Brownfield Area and declared BPF Industries,
28 LLC as the entity responsible for the Brownfield site rehabilitation and creation of at
29 least ten (10) new permanent jobs.
30
31 3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed
32 project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the
33 future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
34
35 4. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and
36 standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County
37 Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County.
38
39 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the
40 character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities or other
41 matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
42
43 6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed
44 project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and
45 screening.
46
Page 1 Resolution No. 10-008
January 5, 2010 Files No.: MJSP 06-014
1 7. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere
2 with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable
3 district regulations.
4
5 8. The proposed project will be served with water provided by Fort Pierce Utilities
6 Authority and sanitary sewer provided by St. Lucie County Utilities.
7
8 9. The applicant has applied for a certificate of capacity as required under Chapter V, St.
9 Lucie County Land Development Code, which will be issued upon the adoption of the
10 Proportionate Fair Share Agreement.
11
12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
13 County, Florida:
14
15 A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the
16 Major Site Plan to be known as BPSC Industries, LLC, is hereby, approved as shown
17 on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Lucido & Associates on August
18 16, 2006, last revised on September 30, 2009 and date stamped received by the St.
19 Lucie County Growth Management Department on October 12, 2009, subject to the
20 following conditions:
21
22 1. No development permits shall be issued until complete sets of sealed constructible final
23 engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for the site work and offsite
24 improvements are approved by the Office of the County Engineer, Public Works
25 Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth
26 Management Department, Fire Department, and any other agency that may be
27 determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the
28 review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and
29 ofFsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the
30 applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the
31 departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans
32 are received in the Department of Growth Management.
33
34 2. Within 90 days after receiving final site plan approval, the applicant shall convey the
35 required road right of way for 53`d Street (70') and Center Road (10'). Manner and form of
36 conveyance shall be acceptable to the County Attorney. The sketch and legal
37 description shall be prepared by a Florida licensed surveyor and mapper. Pursuant to
38 Section 1-17-33.1 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, the applicant may be
39 granted credits against road impact fees.
40
41 3. Prior to the issuance of a right of way permit, the applicant shall execute a Road
42 Improvement Agreement with St. Lucie County and submit a surety for the proposed
43 public improvements. The amount of surety shall be 115% of the engineer's estimate of
44 probable cost. The amount of surety shall be approved by the County Engineer and the
45 form of surety shall be approved by the County Attorney. A copy of the standard
46 "Agreement" can be obtained by visiting the St. Lucie County Public Works Department
47 website at: http:llwww.stlucieco.g_av/public workslindex.htm.
4$
49 4. This development order will not take effect until Board adoption of a Proportionate Fair
50 Share Agreement that shall be initiated for the development's traffic impacts to the
51 following intersections on King Highway: Angle Road and St. Lucie Boulevard.
52
Page 2 Resolution No. 10-008
January 5, 2010 Files No.: MJSP 06-014
1 5. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall
2 finalize an improvement agreement acceptable to Environmental Resources
3 Department covering the cost of all required landscaping, irrigation, and related
4 improvements shown in the site plan. A copy of this agreement can be obtained by
5 visiting the SLC Environmental Resources Department website at:
6 http:l/www.stlucieco.orglEnvironmental Resources Department/index.htm.
7
8 6. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall have
9 obtained and provided Environmental Resources Department with copies of any
10 required federal and state permits. If federal or state agency compliance requires
11 modification to the development plans, the applicant will promptly modify the plans and
12 submit to St. Lucie County for review and approval as required by the Land Development
13 Code. The applicant will not use the County's development approval to prevent
14 compliance with any federal or state agency requirements.
15
16 7. Per Section 7.09.05, Category 1 Invasive Exotic vegetation shall be removed from within
17 the project boundary.
18
19 8. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the applicant shall have
20 conveyed the parcel of land, known as the Cassens Parcel, identified as PID# 2326-421-
21 0001-000/7, to St. Lucie County in a manner and form acceptable to the County Attorney
22 free and clear of liens and encumbrances.
23
24 B. The property on which this Major Site Plan approval is being granted is described as
25 follows:
26
27 PARCEL 1:
28 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE S.E. 114 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH,
29 RANGE 40 EAST; EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE CANALS
30 AND PUBLIC ROADS.
31 CONTAINING 17.70± ACRES.
32
33 PARCEL 2:
34 THE WEST 795.1 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1167.5 FEET OF THE NORTH 1217.5 FEET OF
35 THE S.W. 1/4 OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST;
36 EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE CANALS AND PUBLIC
37 ROADS.
38 CONTAINING 21.13± ACRES.
39
40 PARCEL 3:
41 THE SOUTH 583.8 FEET OF THE NORTH 633.8 FEET OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE S.E. 1/4
42 OF THE N.W. 114 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST; EXCEPTING
43 THEREFROM RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE CANALS AND PUBLIC ROADS.
44 CONTAINING 8.92± ACRES.
45
46 PARCEL 4:
47 THE SOUTH 583.8 FEET OF THE NORTH 1217.6 FEET OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE S.E. 1/4
48 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST; EXCEPTING
49 THEREFROM RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE CANALS AND PUBLIC ROADS.
50 CONTAINING $.77± ACRES.
51
52 ALL LYING AND BEING WITHIN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTAINING 56.56±
53 TOTAL ACRES.
54
Page 3 Resolution No. 10-008
January 5, 2010 Files No.: MJSP 06-014
1
2 Location: The south side of Center Road, approximately 1300 feet south of
3 St. Lucie Boulevard
4
5 C. The St. Lucie County Director of Growth Management is hereby authorized and
6 directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map
7 of St. Lucie County. Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption
8 of this resolution.
9
10 D. The Director of Growth Management shall coordinate the issuance of further site
11 Development Permits. No final site construction authorizations or site Development
12 Permits shall be issued until all requirements for such permits are met.
13
14 E. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. The
15 recording of this resolution does not authorize commencement of any on-site
16 development activities without obtaining such further development permits as may be
17 required. All applicable conditions of approval as set forth above, and applicable code
18 requirements must be met to satisfaction of the County before final site construction
19 permits are issued.
20
21 F. A copy of this Order shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A,
22 which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management
23 Director and mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as
24 identified on the site plan applications.
25
26 G. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral nonseverable part of the Major Site
27 Plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Part A is
28 determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to
29 comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution
30 shall become null and void.
31
32 H. This Major Site Development Plan approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months after
33 the date of adoption of the Proportionate Fair Share Agreement, unless an extension is
34 granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(2), St. Lucie County Land
35 Development Code or unless a building permit is secured.
36
37 I. The effective date of this resolution shall be the date of adoption of the Proportionate
38 Fair Share Agreement.
39
40 J. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Page 4 Resolution No. 10-008
January 5, 2010 Files No.: MJSP 06-014
1 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
2
3
4 Commissioner Charles Grande, Chairman XXX
5
6 Commissioner Doug Coward, Vice Chair XXX
7
8 Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX
9
10 Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky XXX
11
12 Commissioner Chris Craft XXX
13
14
15
16
17
18 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of January 2010.
19
20
21
22 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
23 ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
24
25
26
27
28 BY
29 Chairman
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
41 CORRECTNESS:
42
43
44
45
46 Deputy Clerk County Attorney
47
48
49 Is
50 G:\ PRC7JECT FILES\BPSC MJSP 06-014\10-12-2009 Resubmittal\BOCC\Resolution No 10-008 MJSP
Page 5 Resolution No. 10-008
January 5, 2010 Files No.: MJSP 06-014
W ~ ~ o
~ ~ A ~
~
% ~ a
~,,.r i ~ . vl ~ ~ ~
~ U t1
~ ~ ~ ~ m
o`~a~r.---'~f ~r Q.
~ m
~ ~ ~ ~
---o~ ~
ear Ha~~ p
~a~p0
a FL\ye U 'S i
/ l~d`ao ~
`B ~ oWa ~
o
z _
P ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ - o~sa'O6 .
A x ~~=ie '
~ endAan ~ ~ a ~ ~ - ~N» E y s~a~e PM"+1 a ~
~ O o ~ s ~ uosMn
a' ~ m L.~.~~ S x
~ (A a N m s y sz s ,~~me ~ ~ Pnie osm~d _ 8- ~ ~
_ ~ Q _ e ~ s ~ ~ ~ os`~~ ~
rS t o s` o~
m
r
~ ' ~ ~ _ - i~~ E~ 9?y~h
P~ ~ X21 ~ ,iq. E .~,g-' t a` o
v a ~ i ~
~ ~
~ w _ ~ _ PM8 e on'17S
19 ~ Uod
= E a,aw
N b uoa;i P21 `-u~vu~` ouuol 3 . yse~
-
I~ s ~ ~ - >
~ u
H s +~n+H s u~N ~w 3 ~ Pn18 ~ ~u,ofjl""pYj W
ua S - ouuol M ~
m
1 eny aos,am~ ~ ~ y
1
~ p uo7suyo~~~ - ~ r q a
9 3 $J e~}N~ ~ 2c~\
o v y G
' PH uo7suyof m ~ P~`9 P~ Uryp m
~ \9S O m
~P21 P,e6a~goj~° YS
I C
p
~ ~ c
m
o A m m 1
U ~ v m
~ ~ ~ ~ i,,.o~ ~~,tis ~ ~ g
~ i
i m ~ _ - P21 auk a3uea~,`._
~ w m
I ~ d `
a ~ ° _
~ c~ ~ cS
~ `pa~buipjoj{ jesp~ J I
~
~eue~ bZ-~ _
1 ~
m U
1 Q
cS
I ~ ieuep
I
Duo
~a
~ ~o
i 0~~
fY-
r
~ --___-----_______--.____i
,f7uno~ aagoyoaa~p
_ z
~ ~
0
~
cn U j' \'4
: ~ ~ o
~ O a~l~ddtfS ~ o
a ~ ~ ,y
m ~
~ ~ U
c~ ~ ~ Q
c c~ J ~
x
o ~ ~ > '
~ ~ ~~ca
N V .Q N ~
O ~c4i ~q W a
~ ~ o Q Q ~ v'
N ~ LL D
O ~ W ~a~i
i p o~
~ ~ ~ - ~M'
i~ ~ 1'S H1L~b N W~~ o
~O ~S J m~-°aa~i
.I `-~yUN
W VJ 'O to ~ ~
O i- U ~_'~0.~
U ~ ~ x~~~~
~ ~ ~ z 1S~Hl6t~ N U
J ~
Q ~ ~ ~
U ~ o
~ („7 ~ ~ m - o
~ ~ U ao 1S1'S,I:~N ~~a~
~ ~ ~~rn
LLI ~
O O = J z' ~ 'm ~ rn
O V U ~~Ct6
~QQ O O ~ 7
0 ~ ~ a~l~2~~1N~~ ~ 1'S Q2jE5tN ~ ~r~~~~=
~ ~ N ¢QUU-'J
~ U
_ ' ~ d..
(n -F~ I
N ~ ~ ?
N O N
O ~ N ~ ~
L
~ .O ~ ~
Z_ON ~VNH~_4WM~d~ 0
m ~ U
4- J r ~
O d- ~ ~
~ ca M Q z r ~ ~
o ~
u.. ~ ~
Q c~
_ z
N
~ ~
0
N
U ' ~A
fJ2~"ddbS
o
C~ .y
U
® ~ a
J
x
- > I
.Z Q
z N m
~v Z W ~
o ~ Q ~ d'
C ~ TY
LL D ~a
Z ~ ti m
W n a~.~
co~~
~M ~n_
-
~ 1'SHl_~_trN ~m'~o
W -a ~ :c.
J c6~aN
~ .
m ~ N~~VO
1 I O.O
O Q' -
W ~ ~ -O ~ ~
O J X~~~p
C.U ~ h °z 15,H16b N
J ~
n0 Q
LL ~ Q I I ~
~1 m U -u
~ p .m °o
V ~ ~
U a~ 1S 1S,1;5 N ~
'a ~ c,af
I tLW ~m~
~ z: m ~~Z s
~Z' U J
'U C ~ ~ 0.t6
O ~ O N lB -
LA ~ ~ ~ to
Q<C O O~ ~
U a2~,2i~1N~~ 1'S (I23£~1N ~ vv"~
C?~C7z~~
<CQUU--
d'
I
Z'ON ~IiNV~_aWM~d~
C12~'N~~~I Q
V
r- N
Z ~ ~ Cn
U Q Q
,i
~ ~ i
~ ~
~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ N
°
L t ~
o
ea~'ddds ~ ~ o
~ ~
U
~ Q
w ~
ip FCQQA W
z N Q
,Z Z Q
~ ~Q L•7
~ o Q W.
~ ~ ~
0 1'S H1Ltr N
J
~ m 0 ~
r ~ z
O ~ ~ z 1S,Hl6tr N
~ -Z Q ~ ca ~
Q' z Q ~ ~ °~o
(n m z U s~n~Rs
~ = Q
~ p 1S 15,1: N o ~ .x ~ ~
Q LLW V~~~ro
z ~ ~ ~
~ a2j,23~1RJ~~ 1'S a2~£~1N
~ ~
z
Z'ON IbNN~_4WM~dd 0
a2~'N~~~1 Q
U
N
~ ~
~ ~ Z ~ ~
U
_ ~ a i~7 a t yA t N
i ~ ~ e~ ~;P~ ~~~~~fti `~t~~'~~t~~~~`DF~. '~4`~i4'~~1~~iFry~ yti 'y~;~
1 i L3 t~ a ~ ~ y.- R t ~ r rid., l „i". ~ O
a.~ ,~,-n r~,~~t 7.z, « a ~ 4'~,L ~,'rF ~ 34 ~a' spar :2 _ ~ v MFG' c~
k ~~~t*f~~kN~~,'~i„~"'~A:''4~~~`~I~ .1~~~~`~~A~ ~~~:r:~ i~fsx~' ar~t~~~ ~ . r,;; +ra ~1~~ a~
- ~16`2A~'~'. :t'~~s%ti+:`' t~5 sj"`~~y~ f '~9Y~,7~ ~~,~~t~!i:_ 1,-, ~ A .fl
r ° '~",~'~S"~~`'+A~fi ~cl ~:~ad ddb'5.~.....~ - - ,J ~u i1S~15~q~N~
1~ ~ ~ p o
~ ~ ~ y . y ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I~'~€r~~~'~s ~ ~~~y~ ~ ~[`J~~ i 1S aNZt' P~ 'i~ 1~ ~
} h ~t~'~ r~"~~`~ ~Y 6'~ ~'r: ~ i~L- ul ld ~ Off.
~ -~w~~ u ~
i tsy. ~ ~ ~~F ~ 1 ~ ~~W~~ ~ ~ r,
y N, - ~ ~C~ I~ ~r~ ~I q -
• .
F~~a~ i~~,1E ip;.~f W. ,N°',4,
.1 ?l~~?"~~~'?;i~~, i h'l~ •LLJ lli~l', yam. ~1~ ~il
~ _ v, d ~ t Q ~lif9,:
q ~
i ~a3 ~ w~3~' ~ ~ ~'Q ~r ~~y ~,w r ~ ; 4~
W c ~dytl' ~ ~ C r rol ~
~c~~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ z Q~ 1S Hl' ~ N~ o
Q J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r`~ ~~lif~iri~A~~ ~`gii:,7l:t,l CV
W ' ~ 1' r ~1 ~ r-
Et .ul~ f r ~ ~i ~ tTS
U 4a,X ~ `Y „S ~ ~t~ _ `ms's
LyL~. , ~ { _ a' Q .fm2 ~_e.f. Via. ~
//t~11 W J ~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ e ~11p ~ ~ ~
VJ ~ caF ~ ~l w~ ~t id r ~ . f ~,~Q ~~i 1. a ~ __~~b~ Q
ZM vim. V'~~ ~r C, i w~ ~ ~ ~ ~r.( is - ~ ~ t''- tYX'~`2 ~ kli}'.~u9
`d rf
r.~ y .i, v.~
Q tY~G~ ~ "krr ri ~ it t e }fir„
~ . ~e y b~. L LS h't
iE `act N~1N~~ - 7~~L~'. p ~y; t~ylSL~4~I~S.f~Jy,,
r ~ r'1
4 ? V~
nJ
1 it a ado - r ~ ~ Zed ~ Rif F S-~~
~ ~ _ ~G r, R r ~ ~`r a t
,J a ~ F~ z, f
'c .r ~ t ,t c. _
~ ~ ~ ky
~ :h~ R; t
~ ~~eQ a n z.
~ ;
l i' 1 f I t
. ] l 1
~ iy 4~,;
i
, ~i ~ _ ~ ,7 9w_~ r ~ _
t i1r` ty yr{~~.
a .ir.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~. .4~VNV~'al.. ~ .E y ~'~SYC.: .r-.. Q
L
y _ a~ N~~» Q,
@: a 1 1 ~ y ~f.: F :'i~
.L.. i cis F ~ ;~i iF~f+i ~ ~ t~~~, ~ (.k t~. ~1V~
~ ' . ~ ~Y~ ~ ' ~
i ~ t', -
~ l' ~ t r'' ~ a~ i~ l
r r ~ 3
2=
f
~
RESOLUTION NO. 06-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCiE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, MAKING FINDINGS; DESIGNATING AS A BROWNFIELD
AREA WITHIN UNINCORPORATED ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL REWABiLZTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, A5 31 34
4Q W 795.1 FT OF 5 1167.5 FT OF N 1217.5 FT OF SW i/4 OF NE 114 AND SE
il4 OF NW 114-LESS RDS AND CANALS- {56.62 AC) (OR 689-2644), LOCATED
AT 2525 CENTER ROAD, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34946; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Florida has provided, in Chapter 97-277, Laws of Florida,
codified at Sections 37b.77-376.84, Florida Statutes, for the designation by resolution,
at the request of the property owner, of one or more parcels as a "Brownfield Area," and
for the corresponding provision of environmental remediation and economic development;
and
WHEREAS, the property owner, BPF Ind., LLC, has requested designation as a Brownfield
Area the parcel {31 34 40 W 795.1 FT OF 5 1167.5 FT 4F N 1217.5 FT OF SW 1/4 OF NE
1!4 AND SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4-LESS RDS AND CANALS- {56.b2 AC} {OR 689-2b44},
located at 2525 Center Road, Fort Pierce, Florida, 3494b}depicted on Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, an May 22, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners held a public meeting
near the area to be designated #o provide an opportunity far neighbors and nearby
residents to provide comments and suggestions, in accordance with Section 376.80 {2){a);
and
WHEREAS, in Resolution No. Ob-035, the Board of County Commissioners determined the
subject parcel (31 34 40 W 795.1 FT 4F S 1167.5 FT OF N 1217.5 FT OF SW 1/4 ©F NE
1/4 AND SE 1/4 4F NW 1/4-LESS RDS AND CANALS- (56.b2 AC) {OR b89-2644},
located at 2525 Center Road, Fart Pierce, Florida, 34946) should be considered for
designation as a brownfield area; and
WHEREAS, St. Lucie County has reviewed the requirements for Brownfield Area
designation, as specified in Section 376.80(2}(b), Florida Statutes, and has determined
that the proposed area qualifies for designation as n Brownfield Area because the
following requirements of Sec#ian 37b.80(2}{b} have been met:
1. BPF Ind., LLC is the owner of the parcel proposed for designation and has
agreed to rehabilitate and redevelop the hrnwnfw~r~
EDWIN M. FRY, Jr., CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
SAINT LUCIE COUNTY
FILE # 288391806121/2006 at 04:12 PM
OR t300K 2594 PAGE 23&9 - ?371 Doc Type: RESO
RECORDING: $27.00
2. The rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield area is
consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and is a permissible
use under St. Lucie County's land development regulations.
3. Proper notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has
been provided to neighbors and nearby residents and BPF Ind., LLC, has
afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity to provide comments and
suggestions about rehabilitation.
4. BPF Ind, LLC has provided reasonable assurances that they have sufficient
financial resources to implement and complete a rehabilitation agreement
and redevelopment plan.
5. The rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site will
result in economic productivity of the area along with the creation of at
least ten {10} new permanent jobs at the brownfield site, which are not
associated with implementation, demolition, or construction of the
brownfield site.
WHEREAS, St. Lucie County wishes to notify the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection of its decision to designate a Brownfield Area for rehabilitation far purposes
of Sections 376.77-377.84, Florida Statutes, and
WHEREAS, the procedures set forth in Section 125.bb, Florida Statutes, have been
followed, and proper notice has been provided in accordance with Sections 376.$0(1) and
1bb.041(4}(b)2, Florida Statutes.
N4W THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the area depicted on Exhibit A, 31 34 40 W
795.1 FT OF S 1167.5 FT OF N 1217.5 FT OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1!4 AND SE 114 OF NW
114-LESS RDS AND CANALS- (5b.b2 AC} (OR b89-2b44), located at 2525 Center Road,
Fort Pierce, Florida, 3494b), is hereby designated as a brownfield area. BPF Ind., LLC
shalt be the entity responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation pursuant to Section
376.80(3}, Florida Statutes.
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Doug Coward AYE
Vice Chairman Chris Craft AYE
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis AYE
Commissioner Joseph E. Smith AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2006.
~,15 CpURT
ATTEST: - BOARD OF COUNTY COAAMZSSIONER~
~
4.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA
~ ; i a
- d
r~ BY: ~ t
f ~r
EPUTY CL ~ CHAT AN;~i',,a ~ r J-,.~ " ` $
APPROVED AS TO L f A ~t ~ s
CORRECT 55: t ~-;sue n~
c~~ic--~"°r.a,.
COUNTY A RNEY
~
From: Deanna Givens
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 8:32 AM
To: Lawrence Szynkowski
Subject: FW: Bankruptcy and foreclosures
~~CBtllYfla ~Ari~'~'Bfl;
~~~QIIBni31g ~~'eehllit:ian
t~~~€',ti~~rtl~ ~t.tn.tgc?~>iea~4.
(riven ~d(7n gth>icicco.or~:;
7
7`~-4fi2-~a~i ~'ii
From: Chris Newman
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 8:26 AM
To: Deanna Givens
Cc: Katherine Smith
Subject: RE: Bankruptcy and foreclosures
No bankruptcy or foreclosure.
From: Deanna Givens
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:53 PM
To: Katherine Smith; Chris Newman
Subject: Bankruptcy and foreclosures
Can you please check for any bankruptcy and foreclosures on the following property.
BPSC -1431-130-0000-010-0
Thank you
Deaima Livens
P1R>iniing Teclmieian
Crowlh Management
Givenscl(n'sthieieeo.fn~;,~
772-462.6426
f'Ieas~: Note; Florida has very broad public records Taws. Mast written communications to or #rom County officials regarding County business
are public records available to the public and media upon request. It is the policy of St. Lucie County that all Counfy records shall be open for
personal inspection, examination and ! or copying. Your e-mai3 communications vdill be subject to public disclosure unless an exemption
applies to the communication. if you received this email in error. please notify the sendor by reply e-mail and delete aA materials from all
computers.
Pk :use Note: Florida has very broad public reoords laws. Most wrrtten communications to or #rom County officials regarding County business
are public records available to the public and media upon request. It is the policy of St. Lucie County that all County records shall be open for
personal inspection, examination and ; or copying. Your e-mail communications will be subject to public diselost~re unless an exemption
OFFICE USE ONLY:
DATE FILED: SP NUMBER: Y~1:T5 P ~ Cn ~
REVIEW FEE: RECEIPT NO: RESOLUTION NO:
CONCURRENCY FEE: ~ RECEIPT NO: CERT. CAPACITY NO:
'
_ _ _ _
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
2300 Virginia Ave
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
772-462-2822
APPLICATION FOR MINOR/MAJOR SITE PLAN
AND CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY
DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTAL
Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St. Lucie County Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982.
The proper non-refundable application fee must accompany atl applications. For additional details on the information necessary for a submission of a site plan, please
refer [o Section 11.02.00, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. For assistance in submitting the application, please contact the St. Lucie County Growth
Management Department, Planning Division.
REVIEW FEES AND THRESHOLD FOR REVIEW
Minor Site Plan Major Site Plan
Required Review $400.00 Less than 10 Acres $700.00
Fee 10-50 Acres $850.00
More than 50 Acres $1000.00 = $5/acre over 50 Acres
Concurrency Fee $200.00 $400.00
Review Thresholds Residential Development Residential Development
Single Family 3 to 10 Lots Single Family >10 Lots
Multi Family < 50 Units Multi Family =>50 Dwelling Units
Non-Residential Non-Residential
General Non-Residential 6,000-24,999 sf General Non-Residential =>25,000 sf
Drive-thru Facility <24,999 sf Commercial Lodging < 6 units
Fuel Dispensing Uses <24,999 SF
Commercial Lodging < 6 units
Plat Fee {no $250.00 $250.00
im rovements)
Site Plan Extension $200.00 $200.00
Type of Site Plan (please check one) Minor Site Plan ( ) Major Site Plan [ ~
Submission of Application
Initial submission shall include the following: -
1) One (1}original of the completed site plan application. r , ~ i ~'tt`t'~
2) Twenty (20) copies of the site plan graphics. (24 inches by 36 inches sheets)
3) Twenty (20) copies of the landscape plan.
4) Twenty (20) copies of the required boundary and topographic survey.
5) Five (5) copies of the Transportation Impact Report (if applicable).
6) Five (5) copies of the Environmental Impact Report (if applicable).
7) Five (5) copies of the Preliminary Drainage Data.
8) Two (2) copies of Aerial.
9) One (1) copy of the St_ Lucie County Property Appraiser Tax Map (Scale 1200) with property under petition highlighted.
All applications for Site Plan approval must be completed and filed with the department before 4:30 PM each business day to meet applicable tiling deadlines.
For an application submission to be determined complete, all required materials must be present at the time of submission.
Project Information
Location/Site Address Just South of St. Lucie Blvd. on Center Road (a.k.a 53 rd Street)
Site Plan Name BPSC
143113000000100
Property Tax ID
Number
Legal Description Please see attached documentation for Legal Description
(attach extra sheets if
necessary)
Section 31 Township 34 South Range 40 East
Parcel Size Acres 56 56 Square Footage 246,2894 sf.
Zoning District IL Land Use IND
Classification
Warehousing/Office
Description of Project
[ ]Residential Number of Residential
UnitslSubdivided Lots
[ )Commercial Total Square Footage
Type of Construction
(Check all appropriate
boxes} [ Industrial Total Square Footage 351,000 sf.
[ ib? ~ Please specify This site has been designated as a Brown Field
Number and size of N/A
outpareels (if applicable)
St. Lucie County
Application for Minor/Major Site Plan Checklist
Have you shown or provided the following required information?
Boundary & Topographic Information:
(Refer to Section 11.02.09(A)(2), St. Lucie County Land Development Code)
Yes No
Aerial Photograph (subject property highlighted?) ?
Location Sketch ?
BoundarylTopographic Survey
Positive Outfall ~
Floodplain
Drainage Basin Boundaries ?
Preliminary, SFWMD Pemvt Data ?
Site Plan Information:
(Refer to Section l I.02.09(A}(3), St Lucie County Land Development Code)
Yes No Yes No
Location, Dimension & Setbacks ? Parking and loading areas
for all buildui s
Identification of maximum ~ Water/Wastewater Facilities
buildable area under review
Identification of all easements ~ Identification of all draina e facilities ~
Identification of adjacent
drivewa s 1~ Location of all streets
Location of all o ens aces ~ Landsea in Plan ?
Li htin Plan Phasin Plan ?
Trans ortation Im act Re ort ? Environmental Im act Re ort ?
Vegetation Removal Plan ? Sea Turtle Protection Plan ?
If you have answered NO to any item above, please explain why in the space below:
1. At this time a mitigation plan will be provided.of
2. The proposed project is not proposed to be phased.
3. The area that the proposed project lies is not applicable to a Sea Turtle Protection Plan.
SPECIAL NOTICE
(PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW)
Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of site plan approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior
to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional
information to ensure a complete review of this project.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Applicant Information (Property Developer) Agent Information
Name: i3•P.S.C. Industries, LLC. Name: Lucido & Associates
Address: 5026 Marina Circle Address: 100 Avenue A Suite 2A
Boca Raton Florida 33486 Fort Pierce FL 34950
Phone: (954)520.8000 Fax: NSA Phone: 772-467-1301 Fax:772-467-1303
Property Owner Information
This applicati of be considered complete without the notarized signature o ro ert owners of record, which shall serve as an
acknowle ment of the submissi o ~ a lication for site plan approval. T property own ''s signature below shall also rve as authorization
far the ove applicant or a t on behalf of said property owner.
f ' may/ !f ~
Pro e~ty Ow er igna Property Owner Name (Please Print)
Mailing Address: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'ff~
'~~j v
Phone: ~~...5 ~ I'' / ~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COi)NTY OF f - L-vC~c~ ~ 01?NTCb: USF, ONLY
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ Project Reviewer:,
day of T~" , 20 Of~ , by C1 t~~ __~x~~~ rte"' DRC Review:
who is personally known to me or who has produced / ~c~~~ Approval Date:
as identification. Comments:
nature of '
/rv~ t' ~--/~C
Type or Print me of Notary
n Notary Public Title
Commission Number
(Seal)
a IPI~C • ~ a ,
?~N ~1®
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 11.02.07
of Section 11.00.03 and 11.00.04. All requests for Planned Development Site Plan
extension shall be accompanied by a complete explanation of the reasons that the
site plan extension is necessary.
d. No Final Planned Development Site Plan shall be extended for any period beyond
24 months from the date of original expiration as set forth in the Final
Development Order for that Final Planned Development Site Plan without
undergoing a complete re-review in accordance with the provisions of Section
11.02.00 and demonstration of compliance with all applicable codes in effect at
that time.
C. Abandonment of Construction:
1. In cases where a building permit has been secured, but construction has not
commenced and proceeded toward completion, site plan approval shall terminate and
became null and void after notice and hearing by the Board of County Commissioners
if the Board by a 415 vote determines that construction of the approved development
plan has been abandoned or suspended. For the purpose of this paragraph, construc-
tion shall be considered to be abandoned or suspended if at the hearing it is shown:
a. That an active building permit had not been maintained in accordance with the
approved site plan and Section 13.00.00, or;
b. It is shown to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners that the
applicant has not proceeded toward the completion of the permitted structure(s)
for a six month period prior to the issuance of a Notice of Intent to Revoke, unless
the inactivity is attributable to the deliberate and scheduled phasing of a
multiphase project.
1. A public hearing to consider the revocation of site plan approval shall be
scheduled before the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with
requirements of Section 11.00.04. Formal notice of this public hearing shall
be provided to those parties identified on the Building Permit application.
2. This section shall not operate to invalidate any site plan prior to the end of
the initial twenty four (24) month approval period or any authorized
extension thereof.
11.02.07. Standards for Site Plan Review.
Site plan approval shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates the following:
A. Consistency With Local Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan. The proposed building or
use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this
Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of
St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed
on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other
requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County.
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:27 Adopted May 19, 2009
11.02.07 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
B. Effect on Nearby Properties.
1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby
property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility
facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general
welfare.
2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the
proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site
design, landscaping, and screening.
3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as
not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in
accordance with applicable district regulations.
C. Adequacy of Public Facilities. The proposed building or use complies with the
standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities.
D. Adequacy of Fire Protection. The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County -
Fort Pierce Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demon-
strated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and
emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection.
E. Adequacy of School Facilities. The proposed building or use will be served by adequate
school facilities.
E Environmental Impact. For developments required to provide an environmental
impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contra-
vene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of
Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis", of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island
Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Harn and Associates, Inc.
(August, 1982),
11.02.08. Conditions on Site Plan Approval.
A. Major Site Plan Approvals. The Growth Management Director shall attach any
reasonable condition, limitation, or requirement to a Minor Site Plan approval as is necessary
to effectuate the purposes of this Section and to carry out the spirit and purpose of this Code
and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Such conditions shall be set forth expressly in
the Final Development Order approving the site plan and shall include the following:
1. Traffic Control Devices. Whenever, as the result of additional traffic generated by a
proposed development, it is determined based on the Manual an Uniform Traffic
Control Devices that there is a need for installation of traffic control devices (including
traffic signals, signing, and pavement markings) to ensure safe traffic circulation onto
and off of the site, the site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that
the applicant be responsible for installing all said devices and signs, or make an
equitable contribution toward such installatian. In the case of those developments
accessing onto any portion of the State Highway system, concurring approval, in the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:28 Adopted May 19, 2009
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 11.02.08
farm of a Notice of Intent or other authorized conceptual approval, from the Florida
Department of Transportation about any signals or other regulatory devices is
required to be obtained before any Final Development Order is issued.
2. Access Improvements. A site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that
the applicant provide the access (ingress and egress) improvements determined to be
necessary as a result of traffic generated by the development.
3. Water and Sewer Dry Line Improvements. If the proposed development is within a
water or sewer utility's five (5) year service area, the developer shall construct and
dedicate to the County, or at the County's discretion, the applicable service provider,
dry water and sewer lines in accordance with standards and specifications of the
County and the applicable service provider
4. Connected to Regional Utility Systems. A site plan shall not be approved except upon
the condition that the development connect to a regional potable water distribution
andlor wastewater collection system when the system becomes available to service the
development.
5. Right-of--Way Dedications. A site plan shall not be approved that does not provide for
dedication of the necessary right-of--way as required in Section 7.05.02.
6. Projects Requiring Dther Regulatory Approval.
a. For developments requiring any permit from the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the Florida
Department of Natural Resources, or any other state or federal regulatory
authority, the Growth Management Director shall not approve unconditionally a
Minor Site Plan until it has received from such agency notice of either issuance
of or intent to issue the required regulatory permit.
b. The Growth Management Director may approve a Minor Site Plan conditioned
upon receiving notice of either issuance of or intent to issue any required
regulatory permit if it can make, an a tentative basis and subject to confirmation,
the findings required in Section 11.02.07(E). A site plan approval conditioned
upon receiving notice of either issuance of or intent to issue any required
regulatory permit shall not preclude the Board of County Commissioners, after
reviewing the regulatory permit application and other information, from revok-
ing such conditional site plan approval based solely upon an inability to confirm
the findings required in Section 11.02.07(F) or from protesting the permit
application.
7. Comprehensive Plan and Code. The Growth Management Director may add any
condition deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Code, the
St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled
Laws..
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:29 Adopted May 19, 2009
11.02.08 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
B. Major Site Plan Approvals. The Board of County Commissioners shall attach any
reasonable condition, limitation, or requirement to a site plan approval as is necessary to
effectuate the purposes of this Section and to carry out the spirit and purpose of this Code and
the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Such conditions shall be set forth expressly in the
Final Development Order approving the site plan and shall include the following:
1. Traffic Control Devices. Whenever, as the result of additional traffic generated by a
proposed development, it is determined based on the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices that there is a need for installation of traffic control devices (including
traffic signals, signing, and pavement markings) to ensure safe traffic circulation onto
and off of the site, the site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that
the applicant be responsible for installing all said devices and signs, or make an
equitable contribution toward such installation. In the case of those developments
accessing onto any portion of the State Highway System, concurring approval, in the
form of a Notice of Intent or other authorized conceptual approval, from the Florida
Department of Transportation about any signals or other regulatory devices is
required. to be obtained before any Final Development Order is issued.
2. Access Improaements. A site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that
the applicant provide the access (ingress and egress) improvements determined to be
necessary as a result of traffic generated by the development.
3. Water and Sewer Dry Line Improaements. If the proposed development is within a
water or sewer utility's five (5) year service area, the developer shall construct and
dedicate to the County, or at the County's discretion, the applicable service provider,
dry water and sewer lines in accordance with standards and. specifications of the
County and the applicable service provider.
4. Connected to Regional Utility Systems. A site plan shall not be approved except upon
the condition that the development connect to a regional potable water distribution
andlor wastewater collection system when the system becomes available to service the
development.
5. Right-of--Way Dedications. A site plan shall not be approved that does not provide for
dedication of the necessary right-of--way as required in Section 7.05.02.
6. Projects Requiring Other Regulatory Approval.
a. For developments requiring any permit from the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the Florida
Department of Natural Resources, or any other state or federal regulatory
authority, the Board of County Commissioners shall not approve unconditionally
a site plan until it has received from such agency notice of either issuance of or
intent to issue the required regulatory permit.
b. The Board of County Commissioners may approve a site plan conditioned upon
receiving notice of either issuance of or intent to issue any required regulatory
permit if it can make, on a tentative basis and subject to confirmation, the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:30 Adopted May 19, 2009
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 11.02.09
findings required in Section 11.02.07(E). A site plan approval conditioned upon
receiving notice of either issuance of or intent to issue any required regulatory
permit shall not preclude the Board of County Commissioners, after reviewing
the regulatory permit application and other information, from revoking such
conditional site plan approval based solely upon an inability to confirm the
findings required in Section 11.02.07(F) or from protesting the permit applica-
tion.
7. Reduction In Maximum Residential Density. The Board of County Commissioners
shall require a reduction from the maximum density permitted in the zoning district
in which a proposed development is to be located when such allowable maximum
residential density:
a. Would impose an excessive burden, as determined by recognized engineering or
other professional standards, on public facilities that would serve the proposed
development; or
b. Would contravene any goal, objective, or policy of the St. Lucie County Compre-
hensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis", of the St.
Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982).
8. Comprehensive Plan and Code. The Board of County Commissioners may add any
condition deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Code, the
St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the St. Lucie County Cade and Compiled
Laws.
11.02.09. Submittals for Minor and Major Site Plans.
A. Minor and Major Site Plan Requirements. Site Plan submittals shall include the
following materials:
1. General Information:
a. The applicant's name and address.
b. The applicant's interest in the subject property.
c. The owner's name and address, if different from the applicant, and the owner's
signed consent to the filing of the application.
d. The street address and a legal description of the property.
e. The present zoning classification and existing uses of the subject property
proposed to be reclassified.
f. Information on land areas adjacent to the proposed development and an indica-
tion of the relationships between the proposed development and existing and
proposed adjacent areas, including land uses, zoning classifications, densities,
circulation systems, public facilities, and unique natural features of the land.
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:31 Adopted May 19, 2009
1L02.09 ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
g. A development schedule indicating the approximate date construction of the
development or stages of the development can be expected to begin and be
completed.
h. A statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to the future selling or
leasing of all or portions of the development, such as land areas, dwelling units,
and commercial facilities.
i. A statement describing whether the project will utilize existing water and sewer
facilities and if so a letter from the service provider stating capacity will be
available for the project.
2. Existing Conditions:
a. An aerial photograph of the property on which the development activity is to take
place. The aerial photograph used to satisfy this requirement may be obtained
from the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser.
b. Detailed location sketch of the proposed development designating the section,
township and range.
c. A topographic survey of the entire project site, prepared in accordance with the
current standards of Chapter 61G17-6 FAC, which shall include, at a minimum:
the project boundaries, a north arrow, a scale indicator, bench mark information
(NGVD} and;
1. One (1) foot contours shall be shown and shall extend at least 50 feet around
the project site, except that the Growth Management Director may autho-
rize partial relief from this standard when the following conditions exist:
a. Existing grade conditions, throughout the site are such that one foot
contours would not be discernable. In these instances, contours at two
(2) foot intervals may be provided; and/or,
b. Existing grade conditions, over the entire site, vary less then two feet
above base elevation.
2. A sufficient number of spot elevations shall be shown to support the contour
information and to accurately reflect the site topography.
All topographic surveys shall be submitted on a sheet size twenty-four (24") by
thirty-six (36") inches and shall be the same scale as the project site plan.
All topographic surveys shall have been prepared within the 24 months prior to
the application for site plan being filed and shall reflect current property
conditions.
d. A boundary survey and legal description prepared in accordance with the current
standards of Chapter 61G17-6 FAC. All boundary surveys shall be submitted on
a sheet size twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches and shall be the same
St. Lucie County Land Development Code
11:32 Adopted May 19, 2009
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
BPSC 53RD STEET PARCEL
36.55 -ACRES
ST. LUCIE C®UNTY, FLORI®A
AUGUST 31, 2005
Prepared by:
Ecol~sgicai
Consulting
of Florida
4646 SE Pompano Terrace
Stuart, FL 34997
772-220-7817
soos.ao
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Site Location 1
3.0 Methodology 1
4.0 TopographylHydrology ...................................................................................1
5.0 Soils ..............................................................................................................3
6.0 Site Conditions ..............................................................................................3
7.0 Habitat/Land Use .....................................................................................:....5
8.0 Critical Habitat/Listed Species Observations ................................................7
9.0 Wetlands and Surface Waters .......................................................................8
10.0 Conclusion ....................................................................................................8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 USGS Quadrangle Map 2
Figure 2 Soils Map 4
Figure 3 Land Use and Land Cover Map 6
LIST OF TABLES
. Table 1 Land Use and Cover Summary 5
Table 2 FNAI Listed Species 7
PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs 10
ATTACHMENT
Correspondence with Agencies 13
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
BPSC 53RD STREET PARCEL
36.55 a ACRES
ST. LUC1E COUNTY, FLORI®A
9.Q INTfZODUCTION
The project involves the construction of a warehouse storage facility and associated
stormwater system on a ±36.55-acre site. The proposed project will be permitted
through South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) with this report supporting
the Environmental Resources Permit (ERP) and St. Lucie Gounty site plan review
process.
2.0 SITE LOCATION
The project is located within Section 31, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie
County, Florida (Figure 1). Specifically the project is located on 53`d Street just south of
St. Lucie Airport.
The site is bordered to the east by an existing race track, to the south by a drainage
canal and single family residential, to the west by industrial development and to the
north by 53`d Street, vacant open land and industrial uses.
3.Q METHODOLOGY
The assessment methodology consisted of the review of topographic information, soils
maps, and recent aerial photographs and County ordinances governing critical habitat
and listed species specific to the County.
A field reconnaissance of the subject parcel was then conducted which included
' pedestrian transects through the parcel to map and identify specific habitat and land
uses and vegetative cover types. Field notes were taken and an aerial photograph was
marked with land use and cover types and any environmental findings.
4.0 TOPOGRAPHYIHYDROLOGY
According to the USGS topographic quadrangle (Ft. Pierce, FL), the site has an
average elevation of 21 feet NGVD, with two depressions identified. ®ne of the
depressions is located in the northwest corner and the other in the north central portion
of the site.
Ir- ~
~ ® * 1 • ~ ~ ~t rte,..,....,. _
~2
4 1i' rl l1 1;. I)~~'
- 1 S _ II
~
f; ~
!S
jj i / 7
- `---~.m_,.. ti ,,.r..~;x¢..v K. ~-++...s...w~
r~.1.y -'f"~~.`~'~`~.~ ..X^r`•^..------':,,......, ++-~...-~-..+---Jl~
. CC
,y ~...V_.~_~~.. ~ 1__ ~ ~ . ~__v--..
v
~j~ •l
-T(' j~I v ~
- Id i t q C a .0~
I~e iro ~ a m n` f`- 4 i s
F" I
I ~ ~la ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~I ~~A~~la 'Q
_
- - - - ,I--= ~ ~ ~
~I, p , I
~ ' ° ~R~PE ; T~{°
• ~ ao .Iw o u ~ R~_
r ; a ~ c,~ ° ° ~ ~ ~ " as
~ ry
~ ~ s ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ : ~ _ ~
f~. _ - -
~~---1 _ _ ~ .r
~ it ~ P -A e~ ~ ~~r~ ~ I~ o~ P >l
~ ~I ~ qoa wro ~ ,a m nli al~~._. 4 ~ I
I
~ ! - ~ it b
7 ~ ' " ~ Sl U 1~ zr ~i • I o r D ~1 ! ~ ca
,A
~ a I p n a~ n a s n~ l~ tr a a,a f~ _ Y~, ~ a
_ ( _ ~ _
a ~ o e o ~ •a # ~':`~}pR ~ ((f!f! 51< 4~ i18^~R R U~I1 T~r
_t{ 4 ~ y 3R t7 Y;1 PJ Wu.,. -~~f I ~ p ~A fE'1 ~ "
C / q t ~ ,
7..~~ 'L'.~wr~'~7=:: 1.r -11 +N-t [ ~ a ! # '''}j{{c tr i. UO p F IJI1r n
'x09?i'3t4sPtY
n-. YR~»~ .f+tV N. :pp_ S'~. - _ _ f~~ I
_ r. -.-:4 .Ili:- -r... _ »-+-s.. _ _ _
n ~,~e ~ H p ~ 1 ~ _~La`.
~ M P I~,; ~ ~ ~ it R 4 b ~ B D y
R'e. M A I. P ` q q
~F ~ ~ OD i! ~ H 1 ~
D J
7: t t p 1~ O R O d
~il a ! ~ g _~~R II 1111 ~1 U
~~i _ IL.rs 1 _:::~1-d _J ~ _ K .~J
I
I A i 4 d ~ ~I r n
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN. AS AN INSTRUMEN(OF GRAPHIC SCALE
SERVICE, IS INTENDEDONLY FORTHESPECIFICPURPOSEANDCUENT FOR WHICN IT WAS PREPARED.REUSE EOp 0 500
OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRnTEN AUiHORITATION ANDADOPTATION BY
ECOIOGICAI CONSULTING OF FLORIDA SHAH BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO ECOIOGiCAI CONSULI7NG OF FLORIDA
1 inch =1,000 ft.
N
E~~ USGS QUADRANGLE WE FIGURE 1
Ecoicgiaai BPSC 36.55 AC PARCEL S DATE: 8-29-06
~'O~isilitifl9 SOURCE: USGS FT. PIERCE (18&3) QUADRANGLE
tYf Piorida ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA PROJECT No. 6005.00
SECTION 3I, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST
Site reconnaissance confirms the depression in the northwest corner of the site,
however the previous activities on site have altered the remaining area and the second
depression is now covered. by the race track and facilities.
Currently the depressions and water feature have been filled and replaced with a race
track and associated facilities. A small ditch is currently present near the east property
boundary. Minor swales are present as part of the water management system for the
race track, and a levee is adjacent (off site) to the south property boundary associated
with the drainage canal
5.0 SO/LS
According to the Soils Survey of the St. Lucie County Area, St. Lucie County, FL
(USDA-SCS, 1977), the sails consist of Pits (Figure 2). The on site soil is characterized
as follows:
1. Pits 33 . This map unit consists of excavations from which soil and
geological material have been removed mostly for use in road construction or
in building foundations. Included with Pits is sandy and loamy waste material
that is piled or scattered around the edges of the pits. Pits are generally small,
but a few excavations are large. Many of the pits have been abandoned.
Some are filled with water and are shown as water on the soil map.
On site reconnaissance indicates Pits may not accurately describe the soils currently on
site. If at one time the entire site was classified as pits, all pits have since been filed with
waste materials and there are currently no signs of the previous depressions.
S.0 SITE CONDIT/ONS
An assessment of the extent, distribution and composition of vegetative communities for
the 9.43-acre site was conducted by Chris Sopotnick of Ecological Consulting of Florida
{ECF), on several events. The first review occurred on March 28, 2006, prior to mowing
activities on site. ECF worked with the client selectively mow the parcel to obtain tree
survey data, as well as accurate gopher tortoise data. This process occurred from May
-July 2006 with ECF attending three monitoring events.
Pedestrian transects were conducted throughout the site with vegetative communities
mapped on a county blueline aerial photograph.
A description of each community type is provided in the HabitatlLand Use section of this
report.
3
{ ~y ~
f 4v
~ y~S y
~ ~
~ ~ t'
/
5 _i ~ c` ' ~ 1.
1~
~ ~
~
i
t ~ r- ti
~ ~~Y ~ A~1
t ^ 4 . I ,
F-
~ r ,t ~ ~ _ k
11 ~ /~r ~ ~ J ~
d ~f~ ~ Tb. l~.
-'ll`
- '~`+~h. _ , J _ _ y,~•• SCI _
a.
L-.a'4
_J'~~j ~
Gel ' ~ ~ , r, ~ ~ ..r' ,
~J ~ {
3, r. Ali ~ i~ _ Y ~ y/1
7 `,j
r _ x b Imo.
t "mss
8 rc ~ ~ SOIL TYPES
_ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 33) Pits
-
Ll~ r e.~._.___.____
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESEMED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF GRAPHIC SCALE
SERVICE, IS INTENDEOONLY FORTHE SPECIFICPURPOSEANOCUEM FORWHICHRWAS PREPARED.REUSE 900 0 500
OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADDPTATIDN BV
ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING Of FLORIDA SHALL DE WITHOUT UASIOTY TO ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING OF FLORIDA
1 inch= 1,000 ft.
N
E~vF SOILS MAP WE FIGURE 2
E~o~QgE~a~ BPSC 36.55 AC PARCEL S DATE: 8-29-06
COtiELIt~Og SOURCE: USDA NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF ST. IUCIE
OT Flollda COUNTY AREA, FLORIOA(19T7) PROJECT NO. 6005.00
ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA SECTION 3I, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST
7.0 HABITAT/LAND USE
Onsite habitats and adjacent land uses have been characterized using the Florida Land
Use Cover and Forms Classifications System {FDOT, 1985) (FLUCFCS), and are
described below and depicted on the Land Use and Cover Map (Figure 3).
0 183 -Race Track and Associated Facilities: A large portion of the site is classified
as race track and associated facilities. This is currently the dominant use of the site,
A dirt track and associated buildings are present with the remainder of this land
cover type in open land far parking. The open land component is vegetated with
bahiagrass {Paspa/um notatum), with occasional slash pine (Pinus elliotti?), and
cabbage palm (Baba/ palmetto).
0 511 -Upland Cut Ditch: An upland cut ditch is located near the east property
boundary, and is primarily covered by a canopy of Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthefolius), with some coastal willow (Salix caroliniana) present.
0 641 D -Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed: A freshwater marsh is found in the northwest
corner of the site. This wetland is highly disturbed and is characterized by a dense
cluster of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), coastal willow, occasional St. John's
wort (Nypericum spp.), water hyssop (Bacopa monnier~), and Brazilian pepper.
0 746 -Disturbed Land, Former Land Fill Operations: This community is the dominant
coverage on site. This area has uneven terrain, with scattered construction related
debris mixed with the soil and present on the surface. This area has been
revegetated since land fill operations ceased. Currently the site has a canopy of
slash pine and an occasional laurel oak (Quercus /aurifolia), with an occasional
cabbage palm observed within the sub canopy. The dominate vegetation within this
community is a monoculture of giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), with pockets of
Brazilian pepper.
TABLE 1 -LAND USE AND COVER SUMMARY
FLUCFCS CODE COMMUNITY NAME ACRES PERCENT
183 Race Track and Associated Facilities 4.42 12.1
511 U land Cut Ditch 0.11 0.3
641 D Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 1.10 3.0
Disturbed Land, Former Land Fill 84 6
746 O erations 30.92
Total Area 36.55 100.0
5
~r F
r+ r'
~ ~N~: ~
{y - _
5 ~,r^ -
4
_
t
~ S~r~
,f
,
# : Y~
i ,
` 3~.
t
t} ~ ~ ~
t si ~ ~
t,21
t
~~i,r
r~~ ',~t
a`". '»j~
r~
~gl
~ ~ r..
. ~
Y"f..( y V
! I
'ti1E1.
I LAND USE AND COVER TYPES
i i
' FLUCFCS
• ~ ~ CLASSIFICATION ACRES
•
183 RACE TRACK AND FACILITIES 4.42
L
't 511 UPLAND CUT DITCH 0.11
641D FRESHWATER MARSH, 1.10
DISTURBED
DISTURBED LAND, FORMER
746 LAND FILL OPERATIONS 30.92
TOTAL 36.55
THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WTIH THE CONCEPTSAND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN MSTRUMENTOF GRAPHIC SCALE
SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CUENT FOR WHICH R WAS PREPARED. REUSE
OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTENAUTHORIZATIONANDADOPTATION 6Y i50 0 150 450
ECOLOGICAL CONSULTING OF FLORIDA SNAIL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO ECOLOGICAL CONSULTNG OF FLORIDA
1 inch = 300 ft
N
E~;~ LAND USE AND COVER MAP WE FIGURE 3
EcoAogtcal BPSC 36.55 AC PARCEL S DATE: 8-29-06
Consulting
Of Flot9da SOURCE: USGS FT. PIERCE (1983) QUADRANGLE
ST.LUCIE000NTY FLORIDA SECTION 3i,TOWNSHIP34SOUni,RANGE40EAST PROJECT No. 6005.00
8.0 CRITICAL HABITATI LISTED SPECIES OBSERVATION
The site was reviewed for the presence.. of habitat conducive to federal and state listed
flora and fauna. An initial review documented vegetative communities and noted areas
listed as potential habitat. A cursory survey was performed by ECF on March 28, 2006,
with a gopher tortoise survey conducted after initial mowing of the area an June 16,
2006. The methodology included meandering pedestrian and vehicular transacts
throughout the parcel.
One active gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow was noted on site (see
Figure 3). Review of the parcel did not encounter any commensal species of the gopher
or any additional burrow on this site. The low density of tortoise activity was anticipated
based on the original review on March 28' 2006. Due to the previous uses of the site
and existing debris noted it was anticipated to be unlikely that gopher tortoise would
utilize this parcel.
The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) provides a matrix by county of rare and
endangered species in Florida. `Based on the known distribution and preferred habitats
of certain species, the following listed wildlife has the potential to occur on site:
TABLE 2 -FNAI LISTED SPECIES
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME EVIDENCE/SIGHTING STATUS
FWC USFWS
Eastern Indi o snake Drymarchon corias couperi Not observed T T
Go her tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Not observed SSC
Go her fro Rana capito Not observed SSC
Florida ine snake Pituo his melano/eucus mu itus Not observed SSC
Bald ea le Haliaeetus /eucocephalus Not observed T T
Burrowin owl Speotyto cunicularia Not observed SSC
Abbreviations:
SSC =Species of Special Concern, T =Threatened
USFWS =United States Fish and Wildlife Service, FWC =Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,
None of the other species were identified on site.
Coordination letters have also been sent to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) requesting input
and a search of their databases for any other information about the site or nearby sites
(Attachment 1). Correspondence from the Division of Historical Resources is attached
indicating no significant archaeological or historical resources are recorded on the
project site, and due to the location and/or nature of the project it is unlikely that any
such site will be affected.
7
9.0 WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATERS
The site includes one wetland in the northwest corner of the site. This wetland has been
highly disturbed by the previous activities on site, and although considered jurisdictional
by SFWMD, the wetland is considered low quality due to the inundation by exotic
vegetation. There is also a ditch present along the western property boundary. This
ditch is classified as other surface water (OSW) and would be regulated by the SFWMD
and the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE).
Carolyn Farmer of SFWMD attended a field meeting on July 12, 2006 to confirm the
limits of jurisdictional wetlands on site. The ACOE has not yet confirmed jurisdictional
areas on site. The ACOE will confirm the jurisdictional limits upon receipt of the ERP
application.
90A CONCLUSION
The subject property contains one wetland, an other surface water and a single active
gopher tortoise burrow.
An ERP application with SFWMD is being prepared and will be submitted upon
completion. Initial field meetings with SFWMD staff have indicated that due to the low
quality of the on site wetland, upon justifying that avoidance and minimization of the
wetland is not practicable, the wetland can be permitted with proper offsetting
mitigation. In order to have a usable project the applicant has determined that
avoidance and minimization of the wetland is practicable. Currently the applicant and
design team are evaluating mitigation options to present to SFWMD in the ERP to offset
the loss of this wetland. Upon completion of the ERP the County will copied with the
mitigation plan.
The FWC has jurisdiction over the gopher tortoise. An application for relocation of this
tortoise will be made 90-days prior to site clearing and after approval of the site plan by
the County. The tortoise will be relocated off the project site on land under contiguous
ownership by the applicant. No impacts to gopher tortoise are anticipated for this
project.
At the local level, St. Lucie County requires a Vegetation Removal Permit, as well as
mitigation for native trees that cannot be preserved and incorporated into the
development plan. This site includes slash pine, laurel oaks, live oaks and cabbage
palms that would require permitting and mitigation by the county if impacted. The
landscape architects plan will incorporate tree impacts and a tree mitigation plan to
offset the impacts.
8
REFERENCES
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry.
April 2004. Preservation of Native Flora of Florida, Chapter 5B-40005, Florida
Administrative Code.
Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover & Farms
Classification System Handbook. Tallahassee, Florida. 91 p.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2004. Florida's Endangered
Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern, Official Lists.
Tallahassee, Florida. 9p.
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1977. Soil survey of St.
Lucie County Area, Florida. 183 p. + maps.
Florida Natural Areas Inventory, 2006. FNAI Tracking List, St. Lucie County, FL
St. Lucie County, Resource Protection Ordinance, Chapter Vi, Section 6.00.00
9
PHOT4GRAPH~
to
Photo 1. Gopher Tortoise Burrow (FLUCFCS 746)
aY L t r ° Zl- r 'r ~S ~ i "p ~~4 1: ' ~u k C
~ '
6~l r ~ )p°,~,.1 f i ~Z Oif+t ~`e Sk ~ ~'?c, t...
i S~~ ~ 3
t a ~ t` ac k~h~ ~ ~ `'t ty! E .'4~'~1 ~qt',+~`t i,~:
+ F -~~+~~~w~~E k.+rr~7 c~ ~ q.,
~'t ~ ~~~~~~65 cif ' 'b-i ~'A,_
~ T i~.
~ . ~i.
% Y es ~k1.ylyi,~g~ ~ d itLy'r
d i ,~}~ti `S
t ~ ' Jhl, 19 3 xLY. 2 z ~ t S`
t t j .~kt ~1~~ L 4t.-.
i' SKIS ° ~~+'ln W'~%rTi1t
A~ _ r+ ~C" n ~ _
[ r w R~
- ~ f ..$Xi
t
L~~ ~`~u z
Photo 2. Race Track Parking Area (FLUCFCS 183)
11
Attachment 'I
Copies of Correspondence to the Agencies
13
~ , .
~ . f*?!Nlti~j~
7G~'~'~~Y•1Citi
~s~u~r~ k~tr~rtc#n 3~~~T
A~i•%?7~
2?.r~•fil~~f f .J~ ~~t<:K, ~=i~3~C t~~~cvtSG'
~~x ~€~-2;3t~ ~t~fid t~t.s ~'s~i ~c~ V1fii~hfe 5esv?ce
'~~.t~ #rtci~ ~raEtagical ~ervsc?s ~f#i~e
1 Q~' te~~t
t~~C~~~~r, ~L 3~tJ
at. ~.c+~te C:~~, Florida
Gtr. t~o~
A .}~~rrr; t~.risr~r~artr~ie~.S ~~~ource ~errxart ~~pii~~te~rt ~6lt be ~~a~~i~~ t~ o~~~ ~I~ri~~
'~t~r °~n~~ei~t~ i~tri~t a^ ; the ~ Ar~'sy rah' 335xt`;~ ~i ~ PC~~~d
~,z~i~~ro~~f ~€arehea~~~ ~#e~+ero~arnent wi~~it~ r€~;sr~`s~rri t..~ssie fit, in.~2~i~
~~urt.#~ A4r~~c~rt. Tt^rt~ ~aro~e~t r~ currently rrr the. pl~~it~ ~~~~~e~ G~~ ~tir~~Ii~~c
~~~'~t~t~~r~t eat tta ~iA~ ~ ern reque~tirt~ ~:carrespai3di~r~o~ t~ ~ ~~~di.~i,~
l~i~~n t4~~ ~peoi~~. may affected kay ~~v~l~gr~t
pr~~t~r ieac~~t~t~ iri ~t~rari 3" tawnat~i~ ~3~ ~out~. rar~g~ o.~~ Ott ~u~t
sc~u'tk~ a~f tine i I_raore ~oi~r~ty AirNort
~h y~re~°ty sn~l~id~~ a rack tra~~c anc~ ai~s~~tated facfli'CGe~, sic ~l ~'t~~tt"tdt'~~~~~~~~
ta~t~s~~ c3~st~rb€:c# iara~a (fiearrrrer(y a :anti till s~~ratror~} thi he. re~e~te~~it s}a~~ carte
~r~t~ rtttrt~tot,t~ exotat: arat~ nuisar}ce veg~;ttiue spec~is~
4~ro~ra~~~3 for y~tur review i~ a s~ce iocatiesrt rrtaaa, ~uaeira~t~le rrta~, ~e~i. ~t~t~ l~t~d r€tye
~n~l octvor rna{~ ~ineitt~irt~ eurrent aerial
~l~a~e ntrrm G~trot~~tt Maur data~rase tt•+~at. ttt~ ~rta~~~t gate etr rte~zri~~ ar~e~~~~ rtat utiit~ed
key arty Fa~raiiy try}~t~ ~pet;res ~hsrtK ycna ftar ~o~tr ravi~zw ~Ytr~ ~~~c~~~.~rcagect ~i. if
yt~tr ~~~ttttf ltaue arty rcarnrnants ~ qut~i~t+art~, s~f~ae tresrrot e sit ~reaz.ir ~r'tt~~i.
cc~rt~fent~t~re Tharr~ ~cata
incerety,
et~Eta~{itv~i ~ta~t*Kultinq nt Florida
! ~j x 'r
c<,S
~~ViF~("s ~C3pQ$~'~~~:k
l»GC?LCafaiGhiL •aS~~~~S~+?~~'CS ~~nf~r ~'~i~ntt~f
W~ ~"L..~NG't r1L•G ihl;~A Ttt"7#16S
r~~r~~,~ rrc~r~ a~ ,~r.~v~~u~ i~~S
~ticirasure~
x'~C-~1k91'T7`tiVC~ .~~fi?V1~~5 ~fl(}~
1t~lftlVl7f.TfylNiH ~s~RV1C£:~
t.tSTFCa ~F'~C1~S .
~ ,:;~F>
sr~~d~i
X646 j~ F~:~r~.~rtcr ~'~re fi~~'#`t~ ?~}~I~
Stu~t~t. ~fcar7t~~z
ft3r 7~~...~"~~-~'~"#~ ftir#~~4i1 ~.hbts~
~~dx ~3~t3a~~•~~'ld
1~~ 4€ ~n~iirQnrr3~#`#F~1 Serv~..,s
~tr.~t't~~ ~!~#2 ar#d ~{d'~~~'~ ~.;orrS~~~tratlOrt wE74`~it71#~9l~3f1
~~~ti i~ll~#°lr~~~tt ~~#~Qt
fit, ~ ~~a't~, ~'#~rida
s. ~:~i~~
~ ~o~nt ~:n~l,~onn~an~at. €~~sc~urc~ ~er~~at ~~Ilcatist~n wvaR# s~;#~i~i; ~Ir~ri~~
lit t~t~n.~~€~r~~n~ E~~~t~~ct ~r the u.~ Army ~t~rp~ ofi ~tr~ ~
~Ca~'rt'~~rcl~i w~rrsl~~~~~ d~uelopr~?ant wit-~r~n c~~~r~ ~.u~~#
€~u#~ty t~ir~o~
t Tt,~ ro~~~t is cur-e;~~lY !n t~ l~rir~f~ ~~t~ a~ ~z r~ ef~~~~~
a~~rr~t ~i= tip ~ requestiri~ corr~~i~#3~ ~rc~ ~er~~ ~rc~
{iz~d ~~~s ~h~r, may ca aff~ ~~~~t~~~~t~#~r~ ~ i~~~ `~[~e
r~~~y lot.t~d ~~ctton 3, towrYS~ii~ ~~u~~, r~r~ ~~t, :k€'~ ~a~t
~r~u~h of €~t~ i~{,~ci~ ~oaari~y ~;r~crt
"~'r}~ ~ro~~rty ln~lu~f~~ a racy track. anti ~ssocia~~~i f~ciiitl~r;. wrst~~e t#~~ re#~tl~~r c~~~~~ z~3
b~#~ ~dis~urr~ac# #~r£d:~ ,~r~rrrrerly a .and fil! op~r~.~ir~r~} ~(~at r~~r~~~f.~'~n~tslas
a~r~d rs~~'lroua ~xatic ~rnd nu,sar~.e v~~~~t~3t€vc~ ~~~~ios
~ft~i~ ~'F:At ~C?1.1f ~~S`1fi~W 491 S~tB iOC:dt1C7#1 1'Y2~.~}., (;~ta~,#' rat"#~~'C~. Rld~.R~ 2'S't~#~~ i1~~'~n ~~~C~#`tE~ i,tfix~"s
and rc~~t'or r~~ siirtcl~~dirc~ currant aerial}
cor~irt~ t(~{r~~€c~P! your da~abas~ t1~at tF~~ ~Sr~~~c~ fiit~ car n~~r3~~ ~~~.~t ~tttiti~~:~#
k~~ ~r~y ~t~ t~~t~i ~~~c:i~s Thanx, yc~u fc~r ~~or r~ui~w c~€ tl~i~ ~S~`c~~i>~ If ~~~a
~z~#~! k~~ve any cor~r~nzents or questl~n~, ~io~~~ or}ri~acs aTre afi yo~ar~~€i~e~ti~v~~'i~nc~.
~"h~n1€ yo{,
inc~rely
~:ct~l~ogrc~t ~.~nsu#t~n~ ,y~ c,c~r,da
. ~
' r..{EMY t~ ~4F. a~P~~kt{lYl FS{~~
~GCa€~~GtCAI ~S.S~`v5~N1~'NT~ ~~#~t~r ~Gf~il~iSt
tNP TG.AlY!'~JrLrr'U~;~ 7'i{~11t~
nni r~taa r;pn~ 6~f~sNn#afv~
~t~~~c~~ui
~~t~rvfl ~ rf~vc s~f~vt~~'~ ~Ctt3~
nnc}rvrt~~~tnr~ ~~rz~#e~'~
r,fS7'~CS 9a'f-r~Cf~S ~ .
}
1 - f .~~~E~,. .
~1F~Gi.LL
#~~h'
~~rtt 'f~3, ~4~r
~ l~~?~ip~it~ T~~~
~Pu~tf. ~`~ta~t~da
J~~~ ~~'t~~2~r.~tP~t~ew~
J~21X. u~~~~^{9~c$Y3Ydt ~~~~'~#'~~~~}~°t~ ~'~~'i8~?f~3i di~C~
~t~ ~rat~at~~:treet
3~. ~fi i~r~ ~ ~~ree1
. ~ Flaricta
E
r-`..,,
~tt~l~t uar~xt~~n~~t t~~source hermit appti~att~r~ uvitt b~.~~#ta~#. ~t~~i~a
~~~1° t~it~'2Et ~,~d tn~ li.._ Army ~c~r~~ 2$ ~~r ~r~~~ct
t c~arr~rr~~rot~i v~~rf~r~t~~e det~~tc~~men# can ~ t trg €~~~r~ ~2;. ~ year
~.~~e ~;Q~nl`~, Atrp~ari;.
t c~ro~t 2[2~~ ~ rr~~.~~ r$u~ew a* this prc~~,ect pile. Y~~ ~r
t~i~t:~rio~t car ar¢;a~~t~aicat prop~;rtres tt~a~ rria~ ~y 't• pte.
"2"2 ~~2#r,~u~t~~ ifat~~~t~zn ~s pr~v:fed f~s~ yc~~ r€~ui:~v .
4 ~ lea,-_~;ia.~.d me Praj~~~ st~~ r~c~r~~s~~~ ~f a~.. ~c.~'~~. '`2~~
t~~~ttd ~r~ son °i , tc~wnst~~p 34 ~2sut#~~, rarPe east, arf r~ ~r~ ~stt~t
t.~cts ~c~unty Air~aorC
~te..l~..a~.~ nctcsea pease frnd a srt~ i~t€,~ti~ra r}a, ~rse~ 4 a:~~t m~~s.
2~rQ~e~ ~sie: ~2~ pr~ape €€~cluda ~ ro~a t~~~ ass~o~~t~d
ttitt~.~. w€~ ~e r~rrtainder of ~4~~ std tr~;it~~ s~t~~r~~d t~~t ~~c~`4~ a 4~t~~3 2?2!}
ar~tr=2ar~} tt~~t has rev~~etaked v~it~ stas#~ ~#in~ ~rsd ~~le~--~ ~tt~ ~r~d €~~t~rtre
+~~~eta~tu~ species Aland use end cs~~r t'n~p 2~ ~r~avtd,
ore ttPrc~ t~. ~3'~~ r'c2 ~ is ccar~~r~tt . to ~
~ 1 ~~.~rt. sues:
and wiit a ~orr€o~acrciet vuar~t~t~~ts ittt~ m~itt~ ra~d~ .and dctnac„a. .
°2'~t~ar•rt< ypu €ear yc~~r reurew of l;~~s prQ~xe~ prt~je~ ~2#e. tf you ati~t~td: cvtrr~~~
car ~?~estiar~s, peease contact e at: yoa~r e~rtt~~t cor~~renteraoa. `i"'~$~2<c y~~,.
~tncerefy
- ~caLC~alc~~~. ,~~s~~~1~~~r~s ~ccatoe~{' teal ~c~r~sutfiin~ at 2=tartda
ifld~Tt.AlitL~ t~~L.P(tl&~17"lar'1I~
~ ~
M~rl~ rrc~tu 1~~.ranlnrtn~C~ t .
~Gl:;ri~lrrr;ua ~~~ula~~ t~auid ~ ~a~+4tnicle
~~n~ar ier~ttst
Mr~NITC3F211~ifs` ~~fi'U/C~~
r !s r~~ ~l~~a~~s ~ntasur~s
6t7
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Sue M. Cobb
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
Mr. David C. Sopotnick May 10, 2006
Ecolaggl1cal Cansulting Florida
4646 SE Pompano Terrace
Stuart, Florida 34997
Re: DHR No: 2006-03265 /Received by DHR: April 19, 2006
BP_CS 56.62 AC Par__c_el
St. Lucie County
Dear Mr. Sopotnick:
Our office received and reviewed the referenced project in accordance with Chapters 267 and 373,
Florida Statutes, Florida's Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations, for possible
impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of
Historic Places
(NRHP), or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological value. The State Historic Preservation
Officer is to advise and assist state and federal agencies when identifying historic properties, assessing
effects upon them, and considering alternatives to avoid or minimize adverse effects.
Our review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical
resources are recorded within the project area. Furthermore, due to the location andlor nature of the
project it is unlikely that any such site will be affected.
If there are any questions concerning our comments or recommendations, please contact Scott Sorset,
Historic Sites Specialist, by phone at {850) 245-6333, or by electronic mail at srsorset~dos.state.fl.us.
We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties.
Sincerely,
1•
Frederick P. Gaske, Director, and
State Historic Preservation Officer
500 S. Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • http://www.flheritage.com
O Director's Office O Archaeological Research ®Historic Preservation D Historical Museums
(850) 245-6300 • FAX: 245-643b (850) 245-6444 • FAX: 245-&452 {850} 245-6333 • FAX: 245-6437 {850} 245-&400 • FAX: 245-6433
O Southeast Regional Office Q Northeast Regional Office O Central Florida Regional Office
(954) 467-4990 • FAX: 467-4991 (904) 825-5045 • FAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 • FAX: 272-2340