HomeMy WebLinkAboutSoil Reprot 9.1.2021GFA INTERNATIONAL
FLORIDA'S LEADING ENGINEERING SOURCE
Report of Geotechnical Exploration
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Vicinity SW of Bonita Isle Dr. & A1A
St. Lucie County, Florida
January 8, 2014
GFA Project No.: 13-2092.01
For: Phoenix Realty Homes
Florida's Leading Engineering Source
Environmental - Geotechnical • Construction Materials Testing • Threshold and Special Inspections - Plan Review & Code Compliance
FRNATIO`
Phoenix Realty Homes
Attention: Mr. Alan Tarpell
1760 N. Jog Road, Suite 140
West Palm Beach, Florida 33411
Site: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Vicinity SW of Bonita Isle Dr. & Al
St. Lucie County, Florida
GFA Project # 13-2092.01
Dear Mr. Tarpell:
GFA International, Inc. (GFA) has completed the subsurface exploration
engineering evaluation for the above -referenced project in accordance with
and engineering service agreement for this project. The scope of services
accordance with our Geotechnical Engineering Proposal dated December 12
conjunction with and authorized by you.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
January 8, 2014
and geotechnical
the geotechnical
was completed in
2013, planned in
The purpose of our subsurface exploration was to classify the nature of the subsurface soils and
general geomorphic conditions and evaluate their impact upon the proposed construction. This
report contains the results of our subsurface exploration at the site and our engineering
interpretations of these, with respect to the project characteristics described to us including
providing recommendations for site preparation and the design of the foundation system.
Based on a site plan (author and date unknown) (reproduced in Appendix B - Test Location
Plans) and conversations with the client, the project consists of constructing one or two-story
residences with shallow foundations. We have not received any information regarding structural
loads. For the foundation recommendations presented in this report we assumed the maximum
column load will be 70 kips and the maximum wall loading will be 4 kips per linear foot. GFA
estimates that 0 to 2 feet of fill will be required to bring the foundation pads to design grade.
A total of thirty-eight (38) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings to depths of approximately
eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet, and fourteen (14) Auger Borings (AB) to approximately six (6)
and ten (10) feet, below ground surface (BGS) were completed for this study.
The subsurface soil conditions encountered at this site generally consist of sand (SP) to the
auger boring termination depths of 6 and 10 feet. The CPT soundings generally indicated BGS
the soils were medium dense to dense to 18 feet, and then very dense to the sounding
termination depths of 18 to 20 feet. Most soundings were terminated due to cone refusal on very
dense/hard soils at 18 to 20 feet. The exception was at the boring AB @ Lot 11, where sand
with pieces of wood and roots was encountered at 3'/2 to 5 feet deep. Please refer to Appendix
E - Record of Test Borings for a detailed account of each boring and sounding.
521 NW Enterprise Drive • Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 • (772) 924.3575 • (772) 924-3580 (fax) • www.teamgfa.com
OFFICES THROUGHOUT FLORIDA
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029, 01 Page 2 of 10
The subsurface soil conditions at the project site are generally favorable for the support of the
proposed structures on shallow foundations. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf may be
used for foundation design.
Potentially unsuitable soil (sand with pieces of wood and roots) was encountered at
boring AB @ Lot 11 at depths of 31/2 to 5 feet, and GFA recommends that test pits be
performed in that area prior to, or during, stripping and clearing. Unsuitable soils may be
encountered that must be excavated and removed to at least 5 feet outside the footprint
of the building and then backfilled with compacted structural fill.
After excavation and backfill operations (where needed) are completed, the subgrade soils
should be improved with compaction from the stripped grade prior to constructing the foundation
pads. The top 2 feet below stripped grade should be compacted to a minimum of 95% density
prior to placing fill to achieve final grade. Fill (including stemwall backfill) should be placed in
12-inch lifts and compacted to achieve a minimum 95% density. After excavation for footings,
the subgrade to a depth of 2 feet below bottom of footings should be compacted to achieve a
minimum 95% density.
Analysis of the foundation performance under hurricane conditions or other storm events,
including the effects of loss of soil support due to scour or other forces, is not within the scope of
this report, and the recommendations are valid only for normal conditions. Additional analysis
and options for foundation systems with scour conditions or other scenarios can be performed if
requested.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project and look forward to a
continued association. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or
comments, or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed.
Resp%RqYMkedgG FA`ition�i►l_ I rfG
F,�ri�i�•'CeAl i ;.8"horization Number 4930
•<
rtal�! M'�ler,
!$(Mrq;G c nical Et)girZer
a, lglstr6o n• J4c b675
D A • ��li,
ONq ` E N
0
Copies: �:?,"A Wessee
Lvid Alker
Project Manager
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida
January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01
Page 3 of 10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................4
1.1 Scope of Services............................................................................................................4
1.2 Project Description...........................................................................................................4
2.0 OBSERVATIONS.................................................................................................................4
2.1 Site Inspection.................................................................................................................4
2.2 Field Exploration..............................................................................................................5
2.3 Laboratory Analysis..........................................................................................................5
2.4 Geomorphic Conditions....................................................................................................5
2.5 Hydrogeological Conditions..............................................................................................6
3.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
..............................................6
3.1 General............................................................................................................................6
3.2 Site Preparation...............................................................................................................7
3.3 Design of Footings...........................................................................................................8
3.4 Ground Floor Slabs..........................................................................................................9
4.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS.......................................................................................................9
5.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................9
Appendix A - Vicinity Map
Appendix B - Test Location Plan
Appendix C - Soil Survey Map
Appendix D - Notes Related to Borings
Appendix E - Record of Test Borings
Appendix F - Discussion of Soil Groups
6[1
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 4 of 10
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope of Services
The objective of our geotechnical services was to collect subsurface data for the subject project,
summarize the test results, and discuss any apparent site conditions that may have
geotechnical significance for building construction. The following scope of services are provided
within this report:
Prepare records of the soil boring logs depicting the subsurface soil conditions encountered
during our field exploration.
2. Conduct a review of each soil sample obtained during our field exploration for classification
and additional testing if necessary.
3. Analyze the existing soil conditions found during our exploration with respect to foundation
support for the proposed structure.
4. Provide recommendations with respect to foundation support of the structure, including
allowable soil -bearing capacity, bearing elevations, and foundation design parameters.
5. Provide criteria and site preparation procedures to prepare the site for the proposed
construction.
1.2 Project Description
Based on a site plan (author and date unknown) (reproduced in Appendix B - Test Location
Plans) and conversations with the client, the project consists of constructing one or two-story
residences with shallow foundations. We have not received any information regarding structural
loads. For the foundation recommendations presented in this report we assumed the maximum
column load will be 70 kips and the maximum wall loading will be 4 kips per linear foot. GFA
estimates that 0 to 2 feet of fill will be required to bring the foundation pads to design grade.
The recommendations provided herein are based upon the above considerations. If the project
description has been revised, please inform GFA International so that we may review our
recommendations with respect to any modifications.
2.0 OBSERVATIONS
2.1 Site Inspection
The project site was generally flat and grassy with a few trees. The grade at the site was
estimated to be even with the adjacent road at the time of drilling. Residential structures were
north of the property. The interior roadways for the subdivision had been constructed. The
Atlantic Ocean was about 800 feet east, and the Indian River (Intracoastal Waterway) about'/z
to 1 mile west, of the property. A few small residential structures and a dirt parking area are
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 5 of 10
shown at the site on aerial historical photographs from the GoogleEarth website dating from
1994 to 2007.
2.2 Field Exploration
A total of thirty-eight (38) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings to depths of approximately
eighteen (18) to twenty (20) feet, and fourteen (14) Auger Borings (AB) to approximately six (6)
and ten (10) feet, below ground surface (BGS) were completed for this study. The locations of
the soundings and borings performed are illustrated in Appendix B: "Test Location Plan". The
Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) methods were used as the investigative tools. CPT tests were
performed in substantial accordance with ASTM Procedure D-3441, "Deep Quasi -Static, Cone
and Friction Cone Penetration Tests of Soils" and the auger borings in substantial accordance
with ASTM Procedure D-1452, "Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings".
The soil samples recovered from the soil borings were visually classified and their stratification
is illustrated in Appendix E: "Record of Test Borings". It should be noted that soil conditions
might vary between the strata interfaces, which are shown. The soil boring and sounding data
reflect information from a specific test location only. Site specific survey staking for the test
locations was not provided for our field exploration. The indicated depth and location of each
test was approximated based upon existing grade and estimated distances and relationships to
obvious landmarks. The boring and sounding depths were confined to the zone of soil likely to
be stressed by the proposed construction and knowledge of vicinity soils.
2.3 Laboratory Analysis
Soil samples recovered from our field exploration were returned to our laboratory where they
were visually examined in general accordance with ASTM D-2488. Samples were evaluated to
obtain an accurate understanding of the soil properties and site geomorphic conditions. After a
thorough visual examination of the recovered site soils, no laboratory testing was deemed
necessary. Bag samples of the soil encountered during our field exploration will be held in our
laboratory for your inspection for 30 days and then discarded unless we are notified otherwise in
writing.
The recovered samples were not examined, either visually or analytically, for chemical
composition or environmental hazards. GFA would be pleased to perform these services for an
additional fee, if required.
2.4 Geomorphic Conditions
The South Florida region is a low probable area of sinkhole development or intense seismic
activity. There are no known fault lines located on or near the project site. Based on the
Seismicity Map of the State of Florida produced by B.G. Reagor 1987, the closest seismic
activity occurred near Miami in 1945. This event registered a III on the Modified Mercalli
Intensity Scale of 1931. This intensity is similar to vibrations like that due to passing of heavy or
heavily loaded trucks. The UBC Seismic Zone Map shows the state of Florida to be located
within a 0 Seismic Zone, and there are typically no seismic analyses required for projects
located within 0 Seismic Zone.
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 6 of 10
The geology of the site as mapped on the USDA Soil Survey website consists of Canaveral fine
sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (10), and Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (27). These
are sandy soils and organic soils are not indicated. It should be noted that the Soil Survey
generally extends to a maximum depth of 80 inches (approximately 61/4 feet) below ground
surface and is not indicative of deeper soil conditions. Please refer to Appendix C - Soil Survey
Map for a detailed report for the soil survey.
Boring logs derived from our field exploration are presented in Appendix E: "Record of Test
Borings". The boring logs depict the observed soils in graphic detail. The CPT soundings
indicate the penetration resistance values logged during the test. The classifications and
descriptions shown on the logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the
recovered soil samples. All soil samples reviewed have been depicted and classified in general
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, modified as necessary to describe
typical Florida conditions. See Appendix F: "Discussion of Soil Groups", for a detailed
description of various soil groups.
The subsurface soil conditions encountered at this site generally consist of sand (SP) to the
auger boring termination depths of 6 and 10 feet. The CPT soundings generally indicated BGS
the soils were medium dense to dense to 18 feet, and then very dense to the sounding
termination depths of 18 to 20 feet. Most soundings were terminated due to cone refusal on very
dense/hard soils at 18 to 20 feet. The exception was at the boring AB @ Lot 11, where sand
with pieces of wood and roots was encountered at 3'/2 to 5 feet deep. Please refer to Appendix
E - Record of Test Borings for a detailed account of each boring and sounding.
2.5 Hydrogeological Conditions
On the dates of our field exploration, the groundwater table was encountered at depths ranging
from approximately 4'/4 to 51/4 feet below the existing ground surface. The groundwater table
will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall and other site specific and/or local
influences including the water levels in the nearby Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River) and
Atlantic Ocean with tidal influences. Brief ponding of stormwater may occur across the site after
heavy rains.
No additional investigation was included in our scope of work in relation to the wet seasonal
high groundwater table or any existing well fields in the vicinity. Well fields may influence water
table levels and cause significant fluctuations. If a more comprehensive water table analysis is
necessary, please contact our office for additional guidance.
3.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 General
A foundation system for any structure must be designed to resist bearing capacity failures, have
settlements that are tolerable, and resist the environmental forces that the foundation may be
subjected to over the life of the structure. The soil bearing capacity is the soil's ability to support
loads without plunging into the soil profile. Bearing capacity failures are analogous to shear
failures in structural design and are usually sudden and catastrophic.
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 7 of 10
The amount of settlement that a structure may tolerate is dependent on several factors
including: uniformity of settlement, time rate of settlement, structural dimensions and properties
of the materials. Generally, total or uniform settlement does not damage a structure but may
affect drainage and utility connections. These can generally tolerate movements of several
inches for building construction. In contrast, differential settlement affects a structure's frame
and is limited by the structural flexibility.
The subsurface soil conditions at the project site are generally favorable for the support of the
proposed structures on shallow foundations. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf may be
used for foundation design. Expected settlement of the structure is 1 inch or less total and less
than'/z inch differential.
3.2 Site Preparation
GFA recommends the following compaction requirements for this project:
➢ Proof Roll......................................................................95% of a Modified Proctor
➢ Building Pad Fill............................................................95% of a Modified Proctor
➢ Footings........................................................................95% of a Modified Proctor
The compaction percentages presented above are based upon the maximum dry density as
determined by a "modified proctor" test (ASTM D-1557). All density tests should be
performed to a depth of 2 feet below existing grade and below bottom of footings. All
density tests should be performed using the nuclear method (ASTM D-2922), the sand cone
method (ASTM D-1556), or Hand Cone Penetrometer (HCP) tests.
Our recommendations for preparation of the site for use of shallow foundation systems are
presented below. This approach to improving and maintaining the site soils has been found to
be successful on projects with similar soil conditions.
Initial site preparation should consist of performing stripping and clearing operations. This
should be done within, and to a distance of five (5) feet beyond, the perimeter of the
proposed building footprint (including exterior isolated columns). Test Pits should be
performed at Lot 11 and where unsuitable soils are encountered, they should be
removed. Foundations and any below grade remains of any structures that are within the
footprint of the new construction should be removed, and utility lines should be removed or
properly abandoned so as to not affect structures or pavements.
2. Following site stripping (and excavation where needed) and prior the placement of any fill,
areas of surficial sand (not exposed limestone) should be compacted ("proof rolled") and
tested. We recommend using a steel drum vibratory roller with sufficient static weight and
vibratory impact energy to achieve the required compaction. If the subgrade is too wet or
the inflow of groundwater cannot be controlled so that the compaction is not achievable,
then very clean granular fill may be placed up to 1 foot above the water table, intensively
densified and compacted until no further settlement can be visually discerned at the fill
surface, and 1 foot of soil both above and below the water table have achieved at least 95%
density. Density tests should be performed on the proof rolled surface at a frequency of not
less than one test per 2,500 square feet, or a minimum of three (3) tests, whichever is
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
St. Lucie County, Florida
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01
Geotechnical Report
January 8, 2014
Page 8 of 10
greater. Areas of exposed intact limestone shall be visually confirmed by the project
geotechnical engineer prior to fill placement, in lieu of proof rolling.
3. Fill material may then be placed in the building pad as required. The fill material should be
inorganic (classified as SP, SW, GP, GW, SP-SM, SW-SM, GW-GP, GP -GM) containing not
more than 5 percent (by weight) organic materials. Fill materials with silt/clay-size soil
fines in excess of 12% should not be used. Fill should be placed in lifts with a maximum
lift thickness not exceeding 12-inches. Each lift should be compacted and tested prior to the
placement of the next lift. Density tests should be performed within the fill at a frequency of
not less than one test per 2,500 square feet per lift in the building areas, or a minimum of
three (3) tests per lift, whichever is greater.
4. For any footings bearing on a limestone formation, the bottom of all footing excavation shall
be examined by the engineer / geologist or his representative to determine the condition of
the limestone. The limestone shall be probed for voids and loose pockets of sand. Such
areas shall be cleaned to depth of 3 times the greatest horizontal dimension and backfilled
with lean concrete.
5. For footings placed on structural fill or compacted native granular soils, the bottom of all
footings shall be tested for compaction and examined by the engineer / geologist or his
representative to determine if the soil is free of organic and/or deleterious material. Density
tests should be performed at a frequency of not less than one (1) density test per each
isolated column footing and one (1) test per each seventy five (75) lineal feet of wall
footings.
6. The contractor should take into account the final contours and grades as established by the
plan when executing his backfilling and compaction operations.
Using vibratory compaction equipment at this site may disturb adjacent structures. We
recommend that you monitor nearby structures before and during proof -compaction operations.
A representative of GFA International can monitor the vibration disturbance of adjacent
structures. A proposal for vibration monitoring during compaction operations can be supplied
upon request.
3.3 Design of Footings
Footings may be designed using an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Shallow
foundations should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches below final grade. This embedment
shall be measured from the lowest adjacent grade. Isolated column footings should be at least
24 inches in width and continuous strip footings should have a width of at least 18 inches
regardless of contact pressure.
Once site preparation has been performed in accordance with the recommendations described
in this report, the soil should readily support the proposed structure resting on a shallow
foundation system. Settlements have been projected to be less than 1-inch total and '/2-inch
differential. All footings and columns should be structurally separated from the floor slab, as
they will be loaded differently and at different times, unless a monolithic mat foundation is
designed.
GFf
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Geotechnical Report
St. Lucie County, Florida January 8, 2014
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01 Page 9 of 10
3.4 Ground Floor Slabs
The ground floor slabs may be supported directly on the existing grade or on granular fill
following the foundation site preparation and fill placement procedures outlined in this report.
For purposes of design, a coefficient of subgrade modulus 150 pounds per cubic inch may be
used. The ground floor slab should be structurally separated from all walls and columns to
allow for differential vertical movement.
Excessive moisture vapor transmission through floor slabs -on -grade can result in damage to
floor coverings as well as cause other deleterious affects. An appropriate moisture vapor
retarder should be placed beneath the floor slab to reduce moisture vapor from entering the
building through the slab. The retarder should be installed in general accordance with
applicable ASTM procedures including sealing around pipe penetrations and at the edges of
foundations.
4.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS
This consulting report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the current project owners and
other members of the design team for the Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
located at St. Lucie County, Florida. This report has been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted local geotechnical engineering practices; no other warranty is expressed or
implied. The evaluation submitted in this report, is based in part upon the data collected during
a field exploration, however, the nature and extent of variations throughout the subsurface
profile may not become evident until the time of construction. If variations then appear evident,
it may be necessary to reevaluate information and professional opinions as provided in this
report. In the event changes are made in the nature, design, or locations of the proposed
structure, the evaluation and opinions contained in this report shall not be considered valid,
unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions modified or verified in writing by GFA
International.
Analysis of the foundation performance under hurricane conditions or other storm events,
including the effects of loss of soil support due to scour or other forces, is not within the scope of
this report, and the recommendations are valid only for normal conditions. Additional analysis
and options for foundation systems with scour conditions or other scenarios can be performed if
requested.
5.0 BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based on the data obtained
from the tests performed at the locations indicated on the attached figure in Appendix B. This
report does not reflect any variations, which may occur between borings. While the borings are
representative of the subsurface conditions at their respective locations and for their vertical
reaches, local variations characteristic of the subsurface soils of the region are anticipated and
may be encountered. The delineation between soil types shown on the soil logs is approximate
and the description represents our interpretation of the subsurface conditions at the designated
boring locations on the particular date drilled.
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
St. Lucie County, Florida
GFA Project No. 13-2029.01
Geotechnical Report
January 8, 2014
Page 10 of 10
Any third party reliance of our geotechnical report or parts thereof is strictly prohibited without
the expressed written consent of GFA International. The applicable SPT methodology (ASTM
D-1586), CPT methodology (ASTM D-3441), and Auger Boring methodology (ASTM D-1452)
used in performing our borings and sounding, and for determining penetration and cone
resistance is specific to the sampling tools utilized and does not reflect the ease or difficulty to
advance other tools or materials.
Appendix A - Vicinity Map
0
13=Googl�
1>5. Navv. NGA. GEBCQ
W
4 t wli,* -rI
Appendix B - Test Location Plan
GF�
J
LL
A
C
3
O
Krpp P 1� A
u
ivy a>n
_.a
'A
am
f
At, i
S
'St
ie
Ac
I L i�
�
1.
I
LL
I, w nck y*4
if
-
CL
m
O � I
CIA
EL
o
..: ,.
u
O
W
H
m
Appendix C - Soil Survey Map
60
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
St. Lucie County, Florida (FL111)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
10 Canaveral fine sand, 0 to 5 11.5 90.6%
percent slopes
27 Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 1.2 9.4%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 12.6 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, ordissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
St. Lucie County, Florida
10—Canaveral fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 10 to 100 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F
Frost -free period: 350 to 365 days
Map Unit Composition
Canaveral and similar soils. 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Description of Canaveral
Setting
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, dunes on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very high (19.98 to 39.96
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding. None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content. 15 percent
Maximum salinity. Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum. 6.0
Available water capacity: Very low (about 1.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated). 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned
(G156BC999FL)
Typical profile
0 to 6 inches: Fine sand
6 to 80 inches: Fine sand
Minor Components
Myakka
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands
(G156BC141 FL)
Pompano
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands
(G 156BC141 FL)
Palm beach
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Dunes on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape. Linear
Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on ridges and dunes of xeric uplands
(G 156BC111 FL)
27—Palm Beach fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 10 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F
Frost -free period: 350 to 365 days
Map Unit Composition
Palm beach and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Description of Palm Beach
Setting
Landform: Dunes on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material. Shells and sandy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very high (19.98 to 39.96
i n/h r)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
13
Custom Soil Resource Report
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 25 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0
Available water capacity. Very low (about 2.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 7s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on ridges and dunes of xeric uplands
(G1 56BC1 11 FL)
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Fine sand
8 to 80 inches: Fine sand
Minor Components
Canaveral
Percent of map unit. 10 percent
Landform: Ridges on marine terraces, dunes on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned
(G156BC999FL)
14
Appendix D - Notes Related to Borings
19
NOTES RELATED TO
RECORDS OF TEST BORING AND
GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE
1. Groundwater level was encountered and recorded (if shown) following the completion of the soil test boring on
the date indicated. Fluctuations in groundwater levels are common; consult report text for a discussion.
2. The boring location was identified in the field by offsetting from existing reference marks and using a cloth tape
and survey wheel.
3. The borehole was backfilled to site grade following boring completion, and patched with asphalt cold patch mix
when pavement was encountered.
4. The Record of Test Boring represents our interpretation of field conditions based on engineering examination of
the soil samples.
5. The Record of Test Boring is subject to the limitations, conclusions and recommendations presented in the Report
text.
6. "Field Test Data" shown on the Record of Test Boring indicated as 11/6 refers to the Standard Penetration Test
(SPT) and means 11 hammer blows drove the sampler 6 inches. SPT uses a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches.
7. The N-value from the SPT is the sum of the hammer blows required to drive the sampler the second and third 6-
inch increments.
8. The soil/rock strata interfaces shown on the Records of Test Boring are approximate and may vary from those
shown. The soil/rock conditions shown on the Records of Test Boring refer to conditions at the specific location
tested; soil/rock conditions may vary between test locations.
9. Relative density for sands/gravels and consistency for silts/clays are described as follows:
SPT
CPT
SANDS/GRAVELS
SPT
CPT
SILTS/CLAYS
BLOWS/FOOT
KG/CM-
RELATIVE DENSITY
BLOWS/FOOT
KG/CM-
CONSISTENCY
0-4
0-16
Very loose
0-1
0-3
Very soft
5-10
17-40
Loose
2-4
4-6
Soft
11-30
41-120
Medium Dense
5-8
7-12
Firm
31-50
121-200
Dense
9-15
13-25
Stiff
50+
over 200
Very Dense
16-30
25-50
Very stiff
>30
>50
Hard
10. Grain size descriptions areas follows:
NAME
SIZE LIMITS
Boulder
12 Inches or more
Cobbles
3 to 12 Inches
Coarse Gravel
% to 3 Inches
Fine Gravel
No. 4 sieve to'/< inch
Coarse Sand
No. 10 to No. 4 sieve
Medium Sand
No. 40 to No. 10 sieve
Fine Sand
No. 200 to No. 40 sieve
Fines
Smaller than No. 200 sieve
11. Definitions related to adjectives used in soil/rock descriptions:
PROPORTION
ADJECTIVE
APPROXIMATE ROOT DIAMETER
ADJECTIVE
<5%
Trace
Less than I/32"
Fine roots
5%to 12%
Little
1/32" to %"
Small roots
12% to 30%
Some
/<" to I"
Medium roots
30% to 50%
And
Greater than V
Large roots
Organic Soils: Soils containing vegetable tissue in various stages of decomposition that has a fibrous to amorphous texture,
usually a dark brown to black color, and an organic odor.
Organic Content <25%: Slightly to Highly Organic; 25% to 75%: Muck; >75%: Peat
60
Appendix E - Record of Test Borings
Gf�
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 1 Back N27.50676° W80.30787°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
-
- •••--• •••-Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data .i
Tq�
FR
DepthP
0 40 80 120 l60 200 240 280 320 0 -
4 6
P+S
(
(meters)
0
15
30
4.4
0.2
50
60
100
2.6
0.4
90
110
180
0.4
0.6
35
40
70
2.3
0.8
8
20
16
6.6
1.0
19
27
38
4.5
1.2
55
68
110
1.8
1.4
5
50
65
100
2.2
1.6
45
62
90
1.5
1.8
65
75
130
1.5
2.0
55
70
110
2.0
2.2
48
65
96
1.4
2.4
65
75
130
1.2
2.6
58
70
116
2.0
2.8
45
63
90
0.9
3.0
10
52
58
104
1.3
3.2
60
70
120
1.1
3.4
60
70
120
1.1
3.6
50
60
100
0.9
3.8
38
45
76
1.7
4.0
35
45
70
1.5
4.2
52
60
104
2.5
4.4
70
90
140
1.4
4.6
15
65
80
130
2.5
4.8
55
80
110
2.4
5.0
100
120
200
1.3
5.2
120
140
240
1.1
5.4
1
180
200
360
0.4
5.6
y
240
250
480
#####
5.8
42
250
REF
######
6.0
20
w
a
v
A
25
30
35
40
P:IPrajecls12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Cotmty (Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PoRT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441) i
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 2 Center N27.506611 W80.30767° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data q� De th Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
P 1 P+S
(tst) FR (meters ) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
4
8
21.5
0.2
35
48
70
3.8
0.4
70
90
140
1.9
0.6
70
90
140
1.9
0.8
60
80
120
1.4
1.0
45
58
90
1.3
1.2
48
57
96
1.7
1.4
68
80
136
1.5
1.6
5
65
80
130
1.2
1.8
58
70
116
1.3
2.0
52
63
104
1.7
2.2
52
65
104
1.3
2.4
55
65
110
1.2
2.6
60
70
120
1.1
2.8
50
60
100
2.2
3.0
10
45
62
90
1.2
3.2
42
50
84
1.3
3.4
35
43
70
0.9
3.6
33
38
66
1.8
3.8
43
52
86
0.9
4.0
40
46
80
2.1
4.2
50
63
100
2.6
4.4
70
90
140
0.9
4.6
15
60
70
120
1.1
4.8
20
30
40
3.3
5.0
10
20
20
13.2
5.2
140
160
280
0.9
5.4
190
210
380
#####
5.6
a
250
REF
500
5.8
w
20
w
a
d
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-209 2.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Honnes)IGeoWppendiceslApp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATYON SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 3 Front N27.50629° W80.307360
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Cane Bearing, qc (tsf)
Depth
Friction Ratio, FR
Feld Data�qc�
P
p+S
FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
finetersl
0 2
4 6 8
5
10
13.2
0.2
30
40
60
4.4
0.4
80
100
160
0.8
0.6
100
110
200
1.3
0.8
70
90
140
1.9
1.0
90
110
180
1.5
1.2
80
100
160
0.6
1.4
55
62
110
1.4
1.6
5
40
52
80
1.7
1.8
50
60
100
2.0
2.0
50
65
100
1.3
2.2
40
50
80
1.7
2.4
40
50
80
1.8
2.6
42
53
84
0.8
2.8
25
30
50
2.6
3.0
10
30
40
60
2.2
3.2
30
40
60
1.5
3.4
25
32
50
4.0
3.6
30
45
60
2.2
3.8
40
50
80
1.7
4.0
50
60
100
2.6
4.2
60
80
120
1.7
4.4
55
70
110
2.4
4.6
15
70
90
140
1.9
4.8
80
100
160
0.8
5.0
25
35
50
5.3
5.2
70
90
140
1.9
5.4
150
170
300
#####
5.6
u
250
REF
500
5.8
w
20
Ct,
d
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjectsl2013I13-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (PhoenLx Realty Homes)IGeoUppendicesL4pp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. Lac1E, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 4 Back N27.50606° W80.30752°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
Depth
Friction Ratio, FR
P
-�
P+S
(
9�
(tsfl
pth (meters) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
'�
0 2
4 6 8
0
9
18
3.7
0.2
30
35
60
1.5
0.4
20
27
40
4.3
0.6
20
33
40
2.3
0.8
38
45
76
2.3
1.0
33
46
66
1.6
1.2
62
70
124
2.1
1.4
90
110
180
1.5
1.6
5
80
100
160
0.9
1.8
49
60
98
2.0
2.0
65
80
130
1.0
2.2
60
70
120
1.2
2.4
64
75
128
1.3
2.6
37
50
74
2.1
2.8
42
54
84
3.1
3.0
10
70
90
140
1.6
3.2
63
80
126
1.0
3.4
70
80
140
0.9
3.6
80
90
160
1.7
3.8
60
80
120
1.3
4.0
55
67
110
1.2
4.2
70
80
140
0.9
4.4
80
90
160
0.4
4.6
15
65
70
130
1.5
4.8
35
50
70
3.8
5.0
120
140
240
1.7
5.2
220
250
440
#####
5.4
REF
REF
######
5.6
a
20
a
a
G
25
30
35
40
III
III
nor
qlA
P:IProjects12013W-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (PhoenLr Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E-CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORTS']". LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 5 Center N27.50602° W80.30729° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
rFie1dJJData Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
iP+S (t � FR (mePeh )', 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
+_�
0
24
48
1.4
0.2
30
35
60
4.4
0.4
60
80
120
2.2
0.6
120
140
240
1.1
0.8
90
110
180
0.7
1.0
100
110
200
1.3
1.2
110
130
220
1.2
1.4
5
110
130
220
1.2
1.6
100
120
200
1.3
1.8
110
130
220
1.2
2.0
80
100
160
1.2
2.2
65
80
130
1.0
2.4
35
45
70
0.8
2.6
16
20
32
1.7
2.8
28
32
56
2.8
3.0
10
36
48
72
1.8
3.2
80
90
160
0.8
3.4
60
70
120
1.5
3.6
32
46
64
2.7
3.8
35
48
70
1.9
4.0
60
70
120
1.1
4.2
90
100
180
1.5
4.4
80
100
160
1.7
4.6
15
70
90
140
0.9
4.8
80
90
160
1.7
5.0
80
100
160
1.7
5.2
140
160
280
0.9
5.4
r
90
110
180
1.5
5.6
110
130
220
1.2
5.8
140
160
280
0.9
6.0
20
200
220
400
6.2
m
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Taipon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 6 Front N27.505911 W80.30713° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
PP
ield Data y� Depth
L P+S ( 1q FR (metersl 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
20
40
3.3
0.2
50
60
100
2.6
0.4
100
120
200
L3
0.6
120
140
240
1.1
0.8
100
120
200
1.3
1.0
70
90
140
0.9
1.2
80
90
160
1.7
1.4
5
80
100
160
0.8
1.6
80
90
160
0.8
1.8
70
80
140
1.9
2.0
50
70
100
1.3
2.2
47
57
94
1.7
2.4
25
37
50
1.8
2.6
30
37
60
2.0
2.8
31
40
62
2.6
3.0
10
30
42
60
2.0
3.2
39
48
78
2.0
3.4
58
70
116
1.7
3.6
65
80
130
2.0
3.8
80
100
160
0.8
4.0
90
100
180
1.5
4.2
80
100
160
1.7
4.4
80
100
160
1.1
4.6
15
52
65
104
1.3
4.8
60
70
120
2.2
5.0
70
90
140
1.2
5.2
27
40
54
4.9
5.4
60
80
120
2.2
5.6
d
160
180
320
0.8
5.8
w
160
180
320
0.8
6.0
20
130
150
260
6.2
a
A
25
30
35
40
P: IProiecls12013U3-209?.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Pdoentr Realty Homes)IGeoUppendicesL4pp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 7 Back N27.50557° W80.30724°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
qe
[(Depth
Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data
P
P+S
(tsn
FR
0 40 80 l20 l60 200 240 280 320 0 2
meters)
4 6 8
0
7
14
9.4
0.2
40
50
80
3.3
0.4
70
90
140
1.9
0.6
130
150
260
0.5
0.8
80
90
160
0.8
1.0
50
60
100
2.6
1.2
100
120
200
1.3
1.4
5
110
130
220
1.2
1.6
120
140
240
1.1
1.8
90
110
180
1.5
2.0
70
90
140
1.1
2.2
32
44
64
1.9
2.4
11
20
22
4.8
2.6
12
20
24
3.3
2.8
35
41
70
1.5
3.0
10
30
38
60
1.5
3.2
30
37
60
3.3
3.4
40
55
80
1.8
3.6
47
58
94
2.1
3.8
55
70
110
1.2
4.0
60
70
120
1.7
4.2
55
70
110
1.2
4.4
50
60
100
1.3
4.6
15
60
70
120
1.1
4.8
90
100
180
0.7
5.0
90
100
180
1.5
5.2
150
170
300
0.9
5.4
200
220
400
#####
5.6
250
REF
500
5.8
�.o
20
0.
4�
75
30
35
40
P:IProjects12MU3-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie Comity (Phoentc Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LucIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 8 Center N27.505471 W80.3070811 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data Depth
F4` FR 0 40 80 120 W 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
P P+S I lt.tl Ftmptnrcl.
6
12
11.0
0.2
30
40
60
2.2
0.4
80
90
160
1.7
0.6
100
120
200
1.0
0.8
65
80
130
1.5
1.0
40
55
80
2.0
1.2
18
30
36
3.7
1.4
5
30
40
60
2.2
1.6
50
60
100
1.3
1.8
70
80
140
1.2
2.0
42
55
84
1.6
2.2
55
65
110
1.8
2.4
65
80
130
2.0
2.6
60
80
120
2.2
2.8
60
80
120
2.2
3.0
10
60
80
120
2.2
3.2
70
90
140
1.9
3.4
60
80
120
71.6
3.6
50
701
100
2.6
3.8
60
80
120
1.1
4.0
60
70
120
2.2
4.2
50
70
100
2.6
4.4
70
90
140
1.9
4.6
15
90
110
180
0.7
4.8
110
120
220
0.6
5.0
150
160
300
0.9
5.2
160
180
320
0.8
5.4
210
230
420
#####
5.6
w
REF
REF
######
5.8
v
20
sa
A
25
30
35
40
Nil
Kim
pl
uwt�
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(PhoenLrRealty Nomes)IGeoWppendicesL4pp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 9 Front N27.50524° W80.30679°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
q`FFR Depth 0 40 8o 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
P (P+S I (tsi)_F (meters)
0
10
20
3.3
0.2
15
20
30
2.2
0.4
25
30
50
0.5
0.6
15
17
30
3.1
0.8
25
32
50
3.2
1.0
40
52
80
1.7
1.2
60
70
120
2.2
1.4
5
100
120
200
1.3
1.6
90
110
180
0.7
1.8
90
100
180
0.7
2.0
90
100
180
1.5
2.2
60
80
120
1.1
2.4
100
110
200
1.3
2.6
70
90
140
1.6
2.8
53
70
106
2.5
3.0
10
60
80
120
1.9
3.2
53
70
106
2.5
3.4
50
70
100
2.4
3.6
62
80
124
2.1
3.8
60
80
120
2.2
4.0
50
70
100
2.6
4.2
70
90
140
1.9
4.4
90
110
180
1.5
4.6
15
110
130
220
1.2
4.8
130
150
260
1.0
5.0
140
160
280
0.9
5.2
220
240
440
0.6
5.4
r
160
180
320
0.8
5.6
a
230
250
460
5.8
REF
REF
######
20
�r
f1
d
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjeclsl2013U3-2092.01 Taipon Flats, St. Lucie Comity (PhoenLr Realty Homes)lGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LCCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosil
Location: CPT - Lot 10 Back N27.504931 W80.306921 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
q� Depth
P P+S (ts� FR ( ) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
meters
0
14
28
4.7
0.2
40
50
80
3.3
0.4
70
90
140
1.9
0.6
60
80
120
1.4
0.8
35
48
70
2.5
1.0
42
55
84
2.7
1.2
35
52
70
3.8
1.4
5
60
80
120
2.2
1.6
80
100
160
1.7
1.8
90
110
180
1.5
2.0
80
100
160
1.7
2.2
100
120
200
1.3
2.4
100
120
200
1.3
2.6
80
100
160
1.7
2.8
70
90
140
1.9
3.0
10
60
80
120
2.2
3.2
70
90
140
1.9
3.4
70
90
140
0.9
3.6
90
100
180
1.5
3.8
70
90
140
1.9
4.0
60
80
120
0.6
4.2
50
55
100
2.0
4.4
30
45
60
4.4
4.6
15
70
90
140
1.9
4.8
50
70
100
2.6
5.0
90
110
180
1.5
5.2
130
150
260
1.0
5.4
60
80
120
2.2
5.6
70
90
140
1.9
5.8
130
150
260
1.0
6.0
140
160
280
6.2
20
a
at
A
25
30
35
40
P:1Projects12013113-2092.01 Tmpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeoL4ppendicesL4pp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. i.um, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 11 Center N27.506741 W80.307111
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
FieldData
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
�
Friction Ratio, FR
,
q.
I FR
Depth
e p 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2
4 6 8
P P+S
lfefl
(meters)
0
8
16
4.1
0.2
30
35
60
2.2
0.4
50
60
100
2.6
0.6
100
120
200
0.7
0.8
45
55
90
1.5
1.0
30
40
60
4.4
1.2
90
110
180
1.5
1.4
5
90
110
180
1.5
1.6
60
80
120
1.1
1.8
70
80
140
0.9
2.0
70
80
140
0.9
2.2
40
50
80
0.8
2.4
60
65
120
0.8
2.6
55
62
110
1.2
2.8
50
60
100
0.7
3.0
10
40
45
80
0.8
3.2
40
45
80
0.8
3.4
45
50
90
0.7
3.6
50
55
100
13
3.8
60
70
120
1.1
4.0
70
80
140
0.9
4.2
70
80
140
0.9
4.4
80
90
160
0.8
4.6
l5
80
90
160
0.8
4.8
50
60
100
0.9
5.0
20
27
40
3.3
5.2
45
55
90
1.9
5.4
37
50
74
3.6
5.6
y
220
240
440
0.0
5.8
250
250
500
#####
6.0
20
refusal
######
6.2
d
G
25
30
35
40
P:Wrojects12013U3-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (P6oenLr Realty Hontes)IGeoUppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuclE, FLOWDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAR: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING
(ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PMIRL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 12 Front N27.506270 W80.307091
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
p p+S 4c FR Depth 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
(tsf) (meters)
0
8
16
8.3
0.2
50
60
100
1.3
0.4
60
70
120
2.2
0.6
80
100
160
0.8
0.8
100
110
200
0.7
1.0
90
100
180
0.7
1.2
90
100
180
1.5
1.4
5
60
80
120
1,1
1.6
70
80
140
0.9
1.8
50
60
100
1.3
2.0
55
65
110
1.6
2.2
52
65
104
0.0
2.4
65
65
130
1.0
2.6
60
70
120
1.1
2.8
60
70
120
1.3
3.0
10
58
70
116
1.1
3.2
80
90
160
1.2
3.4
65
80
130
2.0
3.6
60
80
120
1.7
3.8
45
60
90
1.0
4.0
58
65
116
0.6
4.2
65
70
130
1.5
4.4
55
70
110
1.2
4.6
15
58
68
116
2.3
4.8
130
150
260
1.0
5.0
180
200
360
0.7
5.2
220
240
440
#####
5.4
250
REF
500
5.6
v
w
v
20
ar
is
25
30
35
PAProjects12013113-2092.01 Tmpon Flats, St. Lucie County(Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - Fax: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441) f
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 13 Center N27.506161 W80.306841 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
---• -- Tqc
--•---DeCone Bearing, qc (tst) Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data DepthP P+S FR 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
( (meters)'
0
7
14
9.4
0.2
40
50
80
1.7
0.4
60
70
120
2.2
0.6
80
100
160
1.7
0.8
80
100
160
1.7
1.0
70
90
140
1.9
1.2
60
80
120
2.2
1.4
5
60
80
120
1.1
1.6
70
80
140
0.9
1.8
70
80
140
0.9
2.0
70
80
140
0.9
2.2
50
60
100
1.3
2.4
40
50
80
0.8
2.6
55
60
110
1.1
2.8
53
62
106
1.4
3.0
10
44
55
88
1.4
3.2
33
42
66
0.4
3.4
18
20
36
1.8
3.6
25
30
50
2.6
3.8
55
65
110
1.4
4.0
58
70
116
1.1
4.2
80
90
160
0.8
4.4
60
70
120
1.1
4.6
15
70
80
140
0.9
4.8
70
80
140
0.9
5.0
50
60
100
1.3
5.2
50
60
100
0.7
5.4
20
25
40
6.6
5.6
y
150
170
300
0.9
5.8
230
250
460
0.0
6.0
250
250
500
6.2
20
d
Q
P:IProjecIW013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeotAppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PMIRL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 14 Back N27.505961 W80.306601 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data 9� Cane Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
I FR Depth 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
P I P+S i (tsf) (meters)'
0
9
18
3.7
0.2
45
50
90
1.5
0.4
55
65
110
2.4
0.6
80
100
160
1.7
0.8
100
120
200
1.3
1.0
80
100
160
1.7
1.2
55
75
110
2.4
1.4
5
55
75
110
1.2
1.6
80
90
160
0.8
1.8
80
90
160
0.8
2.0
70
80
140
1.9
2.2
50
70
100
1.3
2.4
55
65
110
2.4
2.6
50
70
100
1.3
2.8
65
75
130
1.5
3.0
10
65
80
130
2.0
3.2
90
110
180
1.5
3.4
100
120
200
1.3
3.6
100
120
200
0.7
3.8
100
110
200
1.3
4.0
70
90
140
0.9
4.2
70
80
140
1.9
4.4
60
80
120
2.2
4.6
15
60
80
120
2.2
4.8
60
80
120
1.1
5.0
60
70
120
1.1
5.2
60
70
120
1.1
5.4
r
60
70
120
2.2
5.6
y
100
120
200
1.3
5.8
4
230
250
460
#####
6.0
�
20
REF
REF
######
6.2
d
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjec1s12013113-2092.01 Ta)pon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Honnes)IGeoWppendicesL4pp E-CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
(((
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PNVRL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 15 Front N27.505661 W80.30685°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
9� De lbµµ''. Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
( � FR p 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
is (meters)
Friction Ratio, FR
0 2 4 b 8
Field Data
p � P+S i
€
0
5
10
13.2
0.2
30
40
60
2.2
0.4
40
50
80
1.7
0.6
60
70
120
1.1
0.8
60
70
120
0.6
1.0
50
55
100
0.9
1.2
48
55
96
0.7
1.4
5
45
50
90
0.7
1.6
50
55
100
1.3
1.8
70
80
140
1.9
2.0
60
80
120
1.7
2.2
60
75
120
2,2
2.4
60
80
120
1.1
2.6
70
80
140
1.4
2.8
65
80
130
2.0
3.0
10
60
80
120
2.2
3.2
70
90
140
0.9
3.4
70
80
140
0.9
3.6
70
80
140
1.4
3.8
60
75
120
1.1
4.0
55
65
110
1.8
4.2
60
75
120
1.7
4.4
65
80
130
1.5
4.6
15
55
70
110
1.8
4.8
75
90
150
1.8
5.0
90
110
180
1.5
5.2
190
210
380
#####
5.4
,.
250
REF
500
5.6
w_
20
a�
C�
25
30
35
40
P: IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Pdoenir Realty Homes)*eoL4ppendiceslApp E- CPT (38)
i
{
f
f
E
E
f
i
f
t
i
.
f�
f
II
{
1
i
i
t
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. Lum FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM(RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 16 Center N27.50553° W80.30663° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data q, Depth
P P+S (tsf) FR (meters)
5
10
13.2
0.2
30
40
60
1.1
0.4
40
45
80
1.7
0.6
55
65
110
2.4
0.8
70
90
140
1.9
1.0
70
90
140
0.5
1.2
50
55
100
0.7
1.4
45
50
90
0.7
1.6
55
60
110
1.8
1.8
55
70
110
1.2
2.0
70
80
140
1.9
2.2
70
90
140
1.9
2.4
70
90
140
1.9
2.6
70
90
140
1.6
2.8
50
67
100
2.0
3.0
30
45
60
4.4
3.2
80
100
160
1.7
3.4
80
100
160
1.7
3.6
70
90
140
1.2
3.8
52
65
104
2.5
4.0
60
80
120
1.1
4.2
55
65
110
1.2
4.4
50
60
100
1.3
4.6
50
60
100
1.3
4.8
45
55
90
1.5
5.0
100
110
200
1.3
5.2
150
170
300
0.4
5.4
170
180
340
0.8
5.6
230
250
460
#####
5.8
250
REF
500
6.0
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
5
10
15
w
20
O,
A
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013V3-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Hor»es)IGeoUppendicesUpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 17 Back N27.505371 W80.30644° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data .,,
9C
Depth
P.....i-
P+S
(tst)
FR
(meters)
5
10
6.6
0.2
30
35
60
2.2
0.4
60
70
120
0.9
0.6
62
70
124
1.1
0.8
65
75
130
1.0
1.0
70
80
140
0.9
1.2
90
100
180
1.5
1.4
80
100
160
1.7
1.6
110
130
220
0.6
1.8
80
90
160
1.2
2.0
42
57
84
4.2
2.2
23
50
46
3.4
2.4
40
52
80
1.0
2.6
36
42
72
0.9
2.8
25
30
50
1.6
3.0
21
27
42
1.6
3.2
20
25
40
1.0
3.4
8
11
16
4.1
3.6
25
30
50
2.6
3.8
20
30
40
3.3
4.0
20
30
40
3.3
4.2
50
60
100
1.3
4.4
70
80
140
0.9
4.6
90
100
180
1.5
4.8
70
90
140
0,9
5.0
100
110
200
0.7
5.2
50
60
100
2.6
5.4
80
100
160
1.7
5.6
150
170
300
0.9
5.8
130
150
260
1.0
6.0
120
140
240
6.2
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
5
10
15
a
20
g.
A
25
30
35
40
it
P:IPrajec1s12013U3-2092.0l Tarpon Flats, St. Lucre County (Phoentc Realty Homes)IGeoUppendicesL4pp E- CPT (38)
0-1
i
1
M
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 18 Front N27.50508° W80.30655°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
--- Cone Searing, qc (tsf)
Depth ';
Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data
Uqc
P+S kFR
f f
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
(meters)
0
�p
4 6 8
1
E
I
0
4
8
16.5
0.2
40
50
80
1.7
0.4
42
52
84
1.6
0.6
38
48
76
1.7
0.8
50
60
100
1.3
1.0
70
80
140
1.7
1.2
52
70
104
2.0
1.4
5
52
68
104
1.3
1.6
70
80
140
0.9
1.8
50
60
100
1.3
2.0
40
50
80
2.0
2.2
32
44
64
1.7
2.4
37
45
74
1.8
2.6
38
48
76
2.3
2.8
37
50
74
1.8
3.0
10
40
50
80
3.3
3.2
70
90
140
0.9
3.4
70
80
140
1.9
3.6
60
80
120
2.2
3.8
70
90
140
0.9
4.0
90
100
180
1.5
4.2
90
110
180
0.7
4.4
80
90
160
0.8
4.6
15
40
50
80
3.3
4.8
80
100
160
1.7
5.0
120
140
240
1.1
5.2
120
140
240
1.1
5.4
,1
200
220
400
#####
5.6
y
250
REF
500
5.8
w
20
o.
m
G
25
30
35
40
P.-Wrojects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(Phoenix Realty Homes)IGeoL4ppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LGc1E, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 19 Center N27.506681 W80.306761
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
9c
Friction Ratio, FR
[jFiild
(tst)eters):
�FRepth0
40 80 120 160 200 240 280
320 0 2
4 6 8
0
10
20
13.2
0.2
70
90
140
0.9
0.4
90
100
180
1.1
0.6
55
70
110
1.2
0.8
28
38
56
2.4
1.0
22
32
44
6.0
1.2
80
100
160
1.7
1.4
5
100
120
200
1.3
1.6
100
120
200
0.7
1.8
70
80
140
0.9
2.0
55
65
110
1.2
2.2
90
100
180
0.7
2.4
80
90
160
0.8
2.6
60
70
120
1.1
2.8
70
80
140
0.9
3.0
10
70
80
140
1.4
3.2
55
70
110
1.2
3.4
50
60
100
1.3
3.6
80
90
160
1.7
3.8
60
80
120
1.7
4.0
65
80
130
2.0
4.2
80
100
160
0.8
4.4
90
100
180
0.7
4.6
I S
90
100
180
0.7
4.8
90
100
180
0.7
5.0
90
100
180
0.7
5.2
60
70
120
2.2
5.4
..
130
150
260
0.5
5.6
y
240
250
480
0.6
5.8
41:
220
240
440
-7.5
6.0
20
250
500
6.2
a
m
A
25
30
35
40
P'W�M-Iljm
1�
1'll
MEN
P:IProjectsl2013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoen& Realty Nontes)IGeol4ppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 20 Back N27.506441 W80.306681 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data 1 q, Depth
P f P+S ' (tsf) FR (meters)
6
12
11.0
0.2
70
80
140
0.9
0.4
80
90
160
1.2
0.6
55
70
110
1.2
0.8
100
110
200
1.3
1.0
80
100
160
0.8
1.2
100
110
200
1.3
1.4
100
120
200
1.0
1.6
65
80
130
1.5
1.8
55
70
110
1.8
2.0
60
75
120
1.1
2.2
65
75
130
1.0
2.4
40
50
80
1.7
2.6
70
80
140
0.9
2.8
80
90
160
0.8
3.0
80
90
160
1.7
3.2
70
90
140
1.9
3.4
80
100
160
1.7
3.6
80
100
160
1.7
3.8
70
90
140
1.9
4.0
80
100
160
1.7
4.2
60
80
120
1.1
4.4
70
80
140
1.9
4.6
80
100
160
1.7
4.8
80
100
160
1.7
5.0
70
90
140
1.9
5.2
62
82
124
2.1
5.4
100
120
200
1.3
5.6
200
220
400
0.7
5.8
220
240
440
0.6
6.0
210
230
420
6.2
A
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0 .
10
15
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Taipon Flats, St. Lucie County (PGoenir Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. L,UCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - Fax: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 21 Center N27.50630° W80.30643°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Cane Bearing, qc (tsf)
9` Depth
Friction Ratio, FR
Field Data
P i P+S
t ltsfl
FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2
finetersl
4 6 8
E
r
0
8
16
8.3
0.2
60
70
120
1.1
0.4
90
100
180
0.7
0.6
90
100
180
1.5
0.8
100
120
200
1.3
1.0
70
90
140
0.9
1.2
100
110
200
1.3
1.4
5
70
90
140
1.9
1.6
80
100
160
1.7
1.8
70
90
140
1.9
2.0
80
100
160
1.7
2.2
80
100
160
1.7
2.4
70
90
140
1.9
2.6
70
90
140
0.9
2.8
60
70
120
2.2
3.0
10
40
60
80
3.3
3.2
60
80
120
2.2
3.4
60
80
120
1.1
3.6
70
80
140
1.9
3.8
70
90
140
1.9
4.0
80
100
160
1.7
4.2
70
90
140
1.9
4.4
70
90
140
0.9
4.6
15
70
80
140
1.9
4.8
70
90
140
0.9
5.0
90
100
180
1.5
5.2
70
90
140
0.9
5.4
80
90
160
0.8
5.6
y
90
100
180
1.5
5.8
180
200
360
0.7
6.0
`'
230
250
460
6.2
0
25
30
35
40
P:IProjec1s12013V3-2092.01 Tmpon Flats, St. Lucie Comity (PdoenLY Realty HomesJlGeoWppendreesL4pp E- CPT (38)
:--
i
i
I
E
{
j
r
E
i
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuC1E, FLORIDA 34986
PHONF,: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 22 Front N27.50614° W80.306241 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data j q� Depth
Cone Bearing, qc (tsi) Friction Ratio, FR
P [ P+S I (tsf FR (meters) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
18
36
1.8
0.2
15
20
30
1.8
0.4
6
10
12
11.0
0.6
5
15
10
6.6
0.8
15
20
30
8.8
1.0
60
80
120
1.7
1.2
65
80
130
2.0
1.4
5
55
75
110
1.2
1.6
60
70
120
1.1
1.8
80
90
160
0.8
2.0
70
80
140
1.7
2.2
57
75
114
1.2
2.4
70
80
140
0.9
2.6
70
80
140
1.9
2.8
80
100
160
0.8
3.0
10
80
90
160
1.7
3.2
80
100
160
1.7
3.4
60
80
120
2.2
3.6
70
90
140
1.9
3.8
60
80
120
1.1
4.0
60
70
120
1.4
4.2
52
65
104
1.5
4.4
60
72
120
1.1
4.6
15
60
70
120
0.9
4.8
40
48
80
1.7
5.0
50
60
100
1.3
5.2
70
80
140
1.9
5.4
150
170
300
0.9
5.6
y
140
160
280
0.9
5.8
100
120
200
1.3
6.0
20
150
170
300
6.2
m
G
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenbr Realty Komes)IGeoWppendieesWpp E- CPT (38)
f
f
i
i
E
i
(E€f
F.
E
f
I
E
i
[I
f
}
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 23 Back N27.505901 W80.306401 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data q, I Depth
P P+S � (to) FR (meters)
9
18
7.3
0.2
70
80
140
0.9
0.4
90
100
180
1.5
0.6
130
150
260
1.0
0.8
150
170
300
0.9
1.0
140
160
280
0.9
1.2
80
100
160
0.8
1.4
80
90
160
1.7
1.6
100
120
200
0.7
1.8
100
110
200
1.3
2.0
80
100
160
0.8
2.2
60
70
120
1.1
2.4
60
70
120
1.4
2.6
55
68
110
1.8
2.8
65
80
130
2.0
3.0
70
90
140
1.9
3.2
80
100
160
1.7
3.4
70
90
140
0.9
3.6
60
70
120
1.1
3.8
70
80
140
1.9
4.0
70
90
140
0.9
4.2
50
60
100
2.0
4.4
40
55
80
2.0
4.6
68
80
136
1.9
4.8
70
90
140
0.9
5.0
60
70
120
1.1
5.2
60
70
120
2.2
5.4
110
130
220
1.2
5.6
170
190
340
0.8
5.8
190
210
380
0.7
6.0
130
150
260
6.2
G
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
5
10
15
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (PdoenLY Realty Hotnes)IGeoWppendicesUpp E-CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 24 Center N27.505791 W80.30624° Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data
qc
FR
Depth
P
P+S (tsf)
(
(meters)
5
10
13.2
0.2
40
50
80
1.7
0.4
20
30
40
3.3
0.6
50
60
100
1.7
0.8
52
65
104
1.3
1.0
52
62
104
2.5
1.2
80
100
160
1.2
1.4
60
75
120
1.1
1.6
100
110
200
1.3
1.8
60
80
120
2.2
2.0
60
80
120
1.7
2.2
55
70
110
2.4
2.4
50
70
100
0.7
2.6
45
50
90
1.2
2.8
47
55
94
1.1
3.0
27
35
54
1.5
3.2
22
28
44
3.0
3.4
30
40
60
2.6
3.6
38
50
76
1.4
3.8
62
70
124
1.6
4.0
55
70
110
0.6
4.2
55
60
110
0.6
4.4
55
60
110
1.2
4.6
55
65
110
1.2
4.8
40
50
80
1.7
5.0
60
70
120
2.2
5.2
70
90
140
0.9
5.4
100
110
200
0.7
5.6
100
110
200
1.3
5.8
90
110
180
1.5
6.0
200
220
400
6.2
0
0+
5
10
15
25
30
35
40
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
P: I Projects 0013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(PlmenLx Realty Homes) I Geo (Appendices IApp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 1/2/2014
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 25 Front N27.50558° W80.306001 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data
q�
Depth
P
P+S
(tsf)
FR
(meters)
0
5
10
6.6
0.2
40
45
80
1.7
0.4
55
65
110
2.4
0.6
90
110
180
0.7
0.8
120
130
240
1.1
1.0
80
100
160
1.7
1.2
70
90
140
1.9
1.4
5
80
100
160
1.7
1.6
70
90
140
0.9
1.8
60
70
120
1.1
2.0
45
55
90
1.2
2.2
42
50
84
1.1
2.4
25
32
50
1.3
2.6
60
65
120
1.1
2.8
42
52
84
0.8
3.0
10
45
50
90
0.7
3.2
55
60
110
0.6
3.4
40
45
80
0.8
3.6
45
50
90
1.5
3.8
30
40
60
2.9
4.0
42
55
84
1.6
4.2
80
90
160
0.8
4.4
15
90
100
180
1.5
4.6
100
120
200
0.7
4.8
90
100
180
0.7
5.0
80
90
160
0.8
5.2
110
120
220
0.6
5.4
130
140
260
1.0
5.6
100
120
200
1.3
5.8
w
230
250
460
#####
6.0
20
REF
REF
######
6.2
a
A
25
30
35
40
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
P:IProjec1s12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(Phoenic Realty Honies)IGeoL4ppendicesUpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LL'CIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 26 Back N27.50526° W80.30607°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
qe Depth
Friction
Ratio, FR
Field Data
P+S
(tsf)
FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2
(meters)
4 6 8
0
8
16
8.3
0.2
50
60
100
2.6
0.4
80
100
160
0.8
0.6
60
70
120
1.1
0.8
60
70
120
1.1
1.0
70
80
140
1.9
1.2
80
100
160
1.7
1.4
5
100
120
200
1.3
1.6
90
110
180
1.5
1.8
60
80
120
1.4
2.0
32
45
64
1.9
2.2
32
41
64
1.9
2.4
28
37
56
1.9
2.6
22
30
44
2.7
2.8
23
32
46
5.7
3.0
10
40
60
80
1.7
3.2
90
100
180
0.7
3.4
90
100
180
0.7
3.6
70
80
140
0.9
3.8
90
100
180
0.7
4.0
90
100
180
0.7
4.2
110
120
220
0.6
4.4
80
90
160
0.8
4.6
15
80
90
160
0.8
4.8
100
110
200
1.3
5.0
100
120
200
1.3
5.2
120
140
240
1.1
5.4
130
150
260
1.0
5.6
150
170
300
0.9
5.8
w
220
240
440
#####
6.0
20
REF
REF
######
6.2
v
A
25
30
35
40
P:Wrojec1s12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenbc Realty Honnes)IGeoL4ppendicesUpp E-CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. Lucw, FL,ORInA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM
D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 27 Center N27.50659° W80.306271
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data TD�epth i Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
q`FFR
Friction
Ratio, FR
P i P+S
(tsf)
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
(ers)
280 320 0 2
4 6 8
0
12
24
5.5
0.2
60
70
120
2.2
0.4
80
100
160
1.7
0.6
80
100
160
1.7
0.8
60
80
120
1.3
1.0
50
62
100
1.1
1.2
42
50
84
2.4
1.4
5
60
75
120
2.2
1.6
70
90
140
1.9
1.8
80
100
160
1.7
2.0
70
90
140
1.9
2.2
60
80
120
1.1
2.4
50
60
100
0.9
2.6
45
52
90
1.5
2.8
55
65
Ito
1.2
3.0
10
50
60
100
1.3
3.2
70
80
140
0.9
3.4
60
70
120
1.1
3.6
50
60
100
1.3
3.8
50
60
100
1.3
4.0
60
70
120
1.1
4.2
70
80
140
0.9
4.4
70
80
140
0.9
4.6
15
80
90
160
0.8
4.8
80
90
160
1.7
5.0
70
90
140
0.9
5.2
70
80
140
0.9
5.4
50
60
100
2.6
5.6
y
50
70
100
2.6
5.8
70
90
140
1.9
6.0
90
110
180
6.2
20
a
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(Pdoentx Realty Homes)IGeoUppendiceslApp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuciF, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
1/2/2014
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 28 Front N27.506360 W80.30624°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data
p .P+S ((tsf)
q� De th '. Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction
FR ( p ) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2
meters s
Ratio, FR
4 6 8
0
7
14
9.4
0.2
70
80
140
0.9
0.4
110
120
220
1.2
0.6
70
90
140
1.9
0.8
90
110
180
1.5
1.0
100
120
200
1.3
1.2
60
80
120
2.2
1.4
5
80
100
160
1.7
1.6
60
80
120
1.1
1.8
45
55
90
1.5
2.0
40
50
80
1.7
2.2
40
50
80
1.7
2.4
50
60
100
2.0
2.6
60
75
120
1.1
2.8
70
80
140
0.9
3.0
10
70
80
140
1.9
3.2
70
90
140
0.9
3.4
80
90
160
1.7
3.6
60
80
120
2.2
3.8
70
90
140
1.9
4.0
80
100
160
0.8
4.2
70
80
140
1.9
4.4
80
100
160
0.8
4.6
15
100
110
200
1.3
4.8
80
100
160
0.8
5.0
70
80
140
0.9
5.2
70
80
140
0.9
5.4
80
90
160
1.7
5.6
y
100
120
200
1.3
5.8
w
120
140
240
1.1
6.0
120
140
240
6.2
20
G,
4
0
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects11013113-2092.01 Taipou Flats, St. Lucie County(Pkoenkc Realty Homes)IGeoWppendiceslApp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuC1E, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 29 Center N27.50617° W80.306071
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
q� Depth
Friction
Ratio, FR
P--
P+S
ItEn
FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
lmrtrrcl
0 2
4 6 8
t
1 t�
---. t
1
0
8
16
8.3
0.2
30
40
60
1.1
0.4
32
37
64
2.1
0.6
15
25
30
0.9
0.8
8
10
16
6.6
1.0
6
14
12
5.5
1.2
20
25
40
3.3
1.4
5
60
70
120
1.1
1.6
50
60
100
1.3
1.8
80
90
160
0.8
2.0
80
90
160
0.4
2.2
35
40
70
1.9
2.4
70
80
140
0.9
2.6
70
80
140
1.4
2.8
55
70
110
1.2
3.0
10
70
80
140
0.9
3.2
70
80
140
1.2
3.4
50
63
100
2.6
3.6
60
80
120
1.7
3.8
65
80
130
1.3
4.0
62
75
124
0.2
4.2
68
70
136
1.5
4.4
65
80
130
0.5
4.6
15
65
70
130
2.0
4.8
70
90
140
0.9
5.0
70
80
140
0.5
5.2
60
65
120
1.3
5.4
48
60
96
2.8
5.6
y
70
90
140
1.9
5.8
130
150
260
0.6
6.0
178
190
356
6.2
20
O,
m
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenbc Realty Homes) IGeolAppendiceslApp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE
PENETRATION SOUNDING
(ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats
Subdivision
- Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 30 Back N27.50610°
W80.30583°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Data
Cone Bearing,
qc
(tsf)
Friction Ratio, FR
�Field
P j
P+�
I ��
I (Q`t)
FR
j
(meters).
0
40 80 120
160 200 240 280 320 0 2
4 6 8
0
--
._
I
t
i
-
8
16
4.1
0.2
35
40
70
0.9
0.4
35
40
70
1.9
0.6
40
50
80
1.7
0.8
50
60
100
1.1
1.0
42
50
84
2.2
1.2
38
52
76
1.7
1.4
5
60
70
120
1.3
1.6
50
62
100
1.3
1.8
50
60
100
1.3
2.0
55
65
110
1.8
2.2
65
80
130
1.0
2.4
60
70
120
2.2
2.6
60
80
120
2.2
2.8
60
80
120
2.2
3.0
10
80
100
160
1.7
3.2
70
90
140
0.9
3.4
80
90
160
0.8
3.6
80
90
160
0.8
3.8
70
80
140
0.9
4.0
45
55
90
1.5
4.2
70
80
140
0.9
4.4
70
80
140
0.9
4.6
15
70
80
140
0.9
4.8
70
80
140
0.9
5.0
40
50
80
0.8
5.2
25
30
50
2.6
5.4
110
120
220
1.2
5.6
y
140
160
280
0.9
5.8
220
240
440
#####
6.0
�
20
250
REF
500
6.2
a
at
G
INN
INN
25
30
35
40
�u
11111
t
�
P:IProjects12013113-2092.0/ Tnrpon Flats, St. Lucre Cauity (PhoenLr Realty Hontes)lGeolAppendiceslApp E-CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
I CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING
(ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 31 Front N27.505791 W80.30591°
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data Cone Searing, qc (ts#) Friction Ratio, FR
P j P+S (q� FR (meter) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
3
6
15.4
0.2
28
35
56
1.7
0.4
30
37
60
0.9
0.6
25
29
50
1.3
0.8
20
25
40
2.6
1.0
22
30
44
2.1
1.2
35
42
70
1.9
1.4
5
38
48
76
1.4
1.6
40
48
80
1.3
1.8
so
58
100
1.1
2.0
40
48
80
1.2
2.2
55
62
110
0.6
2.4
45
50
90
0.7
2.6
40
45
80
3.0
2.8
42
60
84
1.6
3.0
10
55
65
110
1.2
3.2
55
65
110
0.6
3.4
55
60
110
1.6
3.6
42
55
84
1.6
3.8
60
70
120
1.1
4.0
65
75
130
1.0
4.2
70
80
140
0.9
4.4
80
90
160
0.8
4.6
15
80
90
160
1.7
4.8
70
90
140
0.9
5.0
80
90
160
1.7
5.2
130
150
260
0.5
5.4
140
150
280
0.9
5.6
d
140
160
280
0.9
5.8
130
150
260
1.0
6.0
130
150
260
6.2
20
Ck
a
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Homes) IGeol4ppendicesUpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. Luc1E, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAx: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 32 Center N27.50562° W80.305731 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data q, De th Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
p+S (tst) FR (met rs) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
8
16
4.1
0.2
40
45
80
0.8
0.4
55
60
110
0.8
0.6
45
52
90
1.8
0.8
35
47
70
1.5
1.0
28
36
56
1.2
1.2
50
55
100
1.6
1.4
5
48
60
96
1.4
1.6
45
55
90
1.8
1.8
48
60
96
1.1
2.0
47
55
94
1.4
2.2
55
65
110
0.8
2.4
60
67
120
1.4
2.6
42
55
84
1.6
2.8
70
80
140
1.9
3.0
10
80
100
160
0.8
3.2
70
80
140
1.9
3.4
60
80
120
0.6
3.6
40
45
80
1.7
3.8
60
70
120
2.2
4.0
60
80
120
2.2
4.2
90
110
180
1.5
4.4
80
100
160
1.7
4.6
15
70
90
140
0.9
4.8
90
100
180
1.5
5.0
120
140
240
0.6
5.2
130
140
260
0.5
5.4
220
230
440
##0#
5.6
y
250
REF
500
5.8
w
20
a
A
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects120l3113-2092.01 Tmpon Flats, St. Lucie Canty (Phoentr Realty Homes)IGeoUppendicesUpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 33 Back N27.505501 W80.305551 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data
qc.
(ts�
FR
Depth
(meters) I
P
P+S
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0 , ._
8
16
8.3
0.2
30
40
60
1.8
0.4
52
60
104
1.3
0.6
37
47
74
0.9
0.8
32
37
64
1.0
1.0
18
23
36
1.8
1.2
15
20
30
2.2
1.4
5
30
35
60
1.5
1.6
33
40
66
2.0
1.8
43
53
86
1.8
2.0
53
65
106
1.2
2.2
80
90
160
0.8
2.4
80
90
160
0.8
2.6
90
100
180
1.5
2.8
80
100
160
1.7
3.0
10
70
90
140
0.9
3.2
80
90
160
1.7
3.4
70
90
140
1.9
3.6
70
90
140
1.4
3.8
65
80
130
2.0
4.0
70
90
140
1.9
4.2
90
110
180
1.5
4.4
100
120
200
1.3
4.6
] 5
110
130
220
1.2
4.8
140
160
280
0.9
5.0
130
150
260
1.0
5.2
150
170
300
0.4
5.4
150
160
300
0.4
5.6
y
140
150
280
0.5
5.8
200
210
400
0.7
6.0
220
240
440
6.2
20
at
G
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St, Lucie County (PhoenLr Realty Homes) IGeoWppendicesUpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCID, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - Fax: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 34 Center N27.50481° W80.306351
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data qc Depth Cone Searing, qc (tsf)
p 1
Friction
Ratio, FR
P P+S
(tsf)
FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
(meters) 's
0 2
4 6 8
0
10
20
6.6
0.2
50
60
100
1.3
0.4
45
55
90
1.2
0.6
40
48
80
1.0
0.8
27
33
54
2.0
1.0
27
35
54
1.7
1.2
55
62
110
1.8
1.4
5
35
50
70
0.9
1.6
55
60
110
1.8
1.8
50
65
100
1.3
2.0
50
60
100
0.8
2.2
37
43
74
1.8
2.4
20
30
40
4.3
2.6
17
30
34
3.5
2.8
48
57
96
1.4
3.0
10
60
70
120
1.7
3.2
65
80
130
1.0
3.4
70
80
140
1.9
3.6
80
100
160
0.8
3.8
100
110
200
1.3
4.0
100
120
200
0.7
4.2
100
110
200
1.3
4.4
70
90
140
0.9
4.6
15
90
100
180
0.7
4.8
80
90
160
1.7
5.0
70
90
140
1.9
5.2
100
120
200
1.3
5.4
,.
120
140
240
1.1
5.6
150
170
300
#####
5.8
w
250
REF
500
6.0
s
20
a
v
A
25
30
35
40
i
�e
11�oil
P:IProjec&2013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (PhoenLc Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesL4pp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location:
CPT - Lot 35 Back N27.504761 W80.305981
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
Field Data
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
Friction Ratio, FR
I FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
0 2
4 6 8
P
i
P+S
P
(9f)
(meters)
0
10
20
6.6
0.2
35
45
70
1.9
0.4
50
60
100
2.6
0.6
70
90
140
0.9
0.8
90
100
180
1.1
1.0
60
75
120
1.1
1.2
50
60
100
1.6
1.4
5
38
50
76
1.0
1.6
52
58
104
1.3
1.8
50
60
100
1.1
2.0
55
63
110
1.8
2.2
65
80
130
1.8
2.4
62
80
124
1.6
2.6
52
67
104
0.9
2.8
35
42
70
3.8
3.0
10
50
70
100
1.3
3.2
70
80
140
0.9
3.4
100
110
200
0.7
3.6
90
100
180
1.5
3.8
80
100
160
1.7
4.0
80
100
160
1.7
4.2
70
90
140
1.4
4.4
65
80
130
1.0
4.6
15
80
90
160
0.8
4.8
90
100
180
0.7
5.0
40
50
80
1.7
5.2
80
90
160
0.8
5.4
100
110
200
0.7
5.6
+
120
130
240
L1
5.8
140
160
280
0.9
6.0
20
200
220
400
6.2
m
C
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects12013113-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(PhoenLr Realty Homes)IGeoWppendicesl4pp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuciE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING
(ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PM/RL
Rig ID:
OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 36 Front N27.504981 W80.305841
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data
_ qc
FR
Depth
P
; P+S
(tsf)
(meters)
9
18
7.3
0.2
40
50
80
1.3
0.4
52
60
104
1.9
0.6
55
70
110
1.8
0.8
65
80
130
1.0
1.0
60
70
120
1.1
1.2
60
70
120
1.1
1.4
50
60
100
1.3
1.6
70
80
140
1.4
1.8
65
80
130
1.2
2.0
53
65
106
1.0
2.2
62
70
124
1.1
2.4
45
55
90
1.6
2.6
27
38
54
4.9
2.8
70
90
140
0.9
3.0
70
80
140
1.1
3.2
68
80
136
1.9
3.4
70
90
140
1.9
3.6
110
130
220
1.2
3.8
100
120
200
1.3
4.0
100
120
200
1.3
4.2
90
110
180
0.7
4.4
70
80
140
0.9
4.6
50
60
100
0.9
4.8
45
52
90
2.9
5.0
70
90
140
1.9
5.2
90
110
180
1.5
5.4
80
100
160
0.8
5.6
110
120
220
1.2
5.8
100
120
200
1.3
6.0
110
130
220
6.2
Cone Searing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0
15
25
30
35
40
P:IProjects120130-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County(Phoenix Realty Homes) IGeoWppendicesUpp E - CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. LuCIE, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Date: 12/31/2013
Project No.: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL Field Crew: PM/RL
Rig ID: OshKosh
Location: CPT - Lot 37 Center N27.50497° W80.305521 Page: 1 of 1
Elevation: Existing Grade
Field Data
qc
Depth
P�
P+S
(tsf)
FR
(meters)
5
10
6.6
0.2
25
30
50
2.6
0.4
50
60
100
2.6
0.6
70
90
140
0.9
0.8
60
70
120
1.1
1.0
45
55
90
1.0
1.2
36
43
72
1.5
1.4
32
40
64
2.1
1.6
32
42
64
1.9
1.8
33
42
66
1.0
2.0
39
44
78
1.7
2.2
40
50
80
1.7
2.4
60
70
120
0.9
2.6
62
70
124
0.7
2.8
55
62
110
0.6
3.0
65
70
130
0.8
3.2
65
73
130
2.0
3.4
80
100
160
1.7
3.6
100
120
200
1.3
3.8
110
130
220
1.2
4.0
110
130
220
1.2
4.2
80
100
160
0.8
4.4
110
120
220
1.2
4.6
100
120
200
1.3
4.8
70
90
140
0.9
5.0
35
45
70
3.8
5.2
110
130
220
1.2
5.4
120
140
240
1.1
5.6
150
170
300
0.9
5.8
170
190
340
0.8
6.0
180
200
360
6.2
C
Cone Bearing, qc (tsf) Friction Ratio, FR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 0 2 4 6 8
0 I. I I i I, 1 6 1 rI M. I, i
5
10
15
25
30
35
40
P:1Projects120l31l3-2092.0l Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenix Realty Honzes)IGeoWppendicesWpp E- CPT (38)
GFA INTERNATIONAL
521 N.W. ENTERPRISE DRIVE, PORT ST. Luciu, FLORIDA 34986
PHONE: (772) 924-3575 - FAX: (772) 924-3580
f
CONE PENETRATION SOUNDING (ASTM D 3441)
Client:
Phoenix Realty Homes
Date:
12/31/2013
Project No.:
13-2092.01
Project:
Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No.:
St. Lucie County, FL
Field Crew:
PIMIRL
Rig ID:
OshKosb
Location:
CPT - Lot 38 Back N27.504881 W80.305330
Page:
1 of 1
Elevation:
Existing Grade
�t Cone Bearing, qc (tsf)
yc� Depth
Friction
Ratio, FR
Field Data
F R
E! 0 40 80 l20 160 200 240 280 320
0 2
4 6 8
P I P+S
t (t.fl
E (matnrcl
0
8
16
4.1
0.2
30
35
60
2.2
0.4
30
40
60
2.0
0.6
35
44
70
2.5
0.8
45
58
90
1.5
1.0
50
60
100
1.3
1.2
45
55
90
1.5
1.4
5
35
45
70
2.5
1.6
42
55
84
1.6
1.8
60
70
120
1.1
2.0
55
65
110
0.7
2.2
32
38
64
1.0
2.4
40
45
80
1.7
2.6
25
35
50
2.6
2.8
70
80
140
0.9
3.0
10
110
120
220
1.2
3.2
80
100
160
1.0
3.4
68
80
136
1.9
3.6
100
120
200
1.3
3.8
100
120
200
1.3
4.0
100
120
200
0.7
4.2
100
110
200
1.3
4.4
110
130
220
1.2
4.6
15
120
140
240
1.1
4.8
150
170
300
0.9
5.0
150
170
300
0.4
5.2
130
140
260
1.0
5.4
100
120
200
0.7
5.6
y
160
170
320
#####
5.8
w
250
REF
500
6.0
20
CL
a�
G
25
30
35
40
P:IProjectsU013V3-2092.01 Tarpon Flats, St. Lucie County (Phoenic Realty Homes)IGeoUppendicesL4pp E- CPT (38)
FF NAT%Ok
AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No:
St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12/31/2013 &
1 /2/2014
Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: PM/RL
TEST LOCATION:
AB@
CPT— Lot 1
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1
Brown fine sand SP
1 — 1
%2
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
1'/2 —
3
Gray fine sand, little shell SP
3-4
Brown fine sand, trace roots SP
4-5
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
5-6
Gray fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 5%2 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 4
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-2
Brown fine sand SP
2-3
Light brown fine sand, trace clay and shell SP
3 —
4'/2
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
4'/2
— 5'/2
Light brown fine sand, some shell SP
5'/2
— 6
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 5'/2 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 7
Depth feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-2
Brown fine sand SP
2 — 2%2
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
2'/2 — 4
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
4 — 4'/2
Dark gray fine sand. trace shell SP
4'/2 - 10
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 5%< feet below ground surface
0010- Since 1988
. FnN ATIO""
AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes Project No: 13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38 Lab No:
St. Lucie County, FL Test Date: 12/31/2013 &
1 /2/2014
Elevation: Existing Grade Technician: PM/RL
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT- Lot 10
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1
Brown to gray fine sand SP
1 —
1%2
Reddish brown to gray fine sand SP
1%2
— 2
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
2-3
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
3-4
Dark gray fine sand, trace shell SP
4-5
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
5-6
Grayish brown fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 5'/z feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT- Lot 11
Depth feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1
Brown fine sand SP
1 — 1%2
Light brown fine sand SP
1'/2 — 3%2
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
3'/2 — 5
Dark gray fine sand, some roots and pieces of wood (highly organic) SP,PT
5-6
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 5 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION:
AB@
CPT- Lot 14
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-2
Brown fine sand, trace shell SP
2-3
Gray fine sand, trace clay, little shell SP
3 —
4%2
Dark grayish brown fine sand SP
4'/2
— 5
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
5-6
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 5 feet below ground surface
00-
_Since 1988
AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Project No:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No:
St. Lucie County, FL
Test Date:
12/31/2013 &
1 /2/2014
Elevation: Existing Grade
Technician:
PM/RL
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 17
Depth feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1
Brown fine sand, trace shell SP
1 — 3'/2
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
3%2 — 4'/z
Light brown fine sand SP
4'/2 — 6
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 5 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION:
AB@
CPT— Lot 21
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-2
Brownish gray fine sand, trace shell SP
2-3
Gray fine sand, trace shell SP
3 —
3'/z
Brown fine sand, trace tree root debris SP
3'/z
— 6
Gray fine sand SP
Water table at 5'/ feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 22
Depth feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-3
Grayish brown fine sand SP
3-4
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
4-6
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 4'/2 feet below ground surface
Te~4y
NATko
AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452)
Leading Engineefing Source
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Project No:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No:
St. Lucie County, FL
Test Date:
12/31/2013 &
1/2/2014
Elevation: Existing Grade
Technician:
PM/RL
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 25
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0 —'/2
Brown fine sand, trace shell SP
%2 —
11/2
Gray fine sand, little shell SP
1'/2
— 3
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
3-6
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 41/ feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 27
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1
Brown fine sand SP
1 —
2
Light gray fine sand, trace shell SP
2-5
Light brown fine sand SP
5-6
Light brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 5 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB@
CPT— Lot 29
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-1/2
Dark brown fine sand SP
1/2-4
Light brown fine sand SP
4-5
Brown fine sand, trace shell SP
5-6
Brown fine sand, little shell SP
Water table at 5%2 feet below ground surface
00- Since 1988
AUGER BORING LOGS (ASTM D-1452)
Client: Phoenix Realty Homes
Project No:
13-2092.01
Project: Proposed Tarpon Flats Subdivision - Lots 1-38
Lab No:
St. Lucie County, FL
Test Date:
12/31/2013 &
1 /2/2014
Elevation: Existing Grade
Technician:
PM/RL
TEST LOCATION:
AB@
CPT— Lot 33
Depth
feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-3
Brown fine sand SP
3-4
Light brown fine sand SP
4-6
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 5 feet below ground surface
TEST LOCATION: AB
@ CPT— Lot 36
Depth feet
Description color, texture, consistency, remarks
0-2
Brown fine sand SP
2-5
Light brown fine sand SP
5-6
Light brown fine sand, trace shell SP
Water table at 43/4 feet below ground surface
Appendix F - Discussion of Soil Groups
60
DISCUSSION OF SOIL GROUPS
COARSE GRAINED SOILS
GW and SW GROUPS. These groups comprise well -graded gravelly and sandy
soils having little or no plastic fines (less than percent passing the No. 200 sieve).
The presence of the fines must not noticeably change the strength characteristics
of the coarse -grained friction and must not interface with it's free -draining
characteristics.
GP and SP GROUPS. Poorly graded gravels and sands containing little of no
plastic fines (less than 5 percent passing the No. 200 sieve) are classed in GP
and SP groups. The materials may be called uniform gravels, uniform sands or
non -uniform mixtures of very coarse materials and very fine sand, with
intermediate sizes lacking (sometimes called skip -graded, gap graded or step -
graded). This last group often results from borrow pit excavation in which gravel
and sand layers are mixed.
GM and SM GROUPS. In general, the GM and SM groups comprise gravels or
sands with fines (more than 12 percent the No. 200 sieve) having low or no
plasticity. The plasticity index and liquid limit of soils in the group should plot
below the "A" line on the plasticity chart. The gradation of the material is not
considered significant and both well and poorly graded materials are included.
GC and SC GROUPS. In general, the GC and SC groups comprise gravelly or
sandy soils with fines (more than 12 percent passing the No, 200 sieve) which
have a fairly high plasticity. The liquid limit and plasticity index should plat above
the "A" line on the plasticity chart.
FINE GRAINED SOILS
ML and MH GROUPS. In these groups, the symbol M has been used to
designate predominantly silty material. The symbols L and H represent low and
high liquid limits, respectively, and an arbitrary dividing line between the two set
at a liquid limit of 50. The soils in the MIL and MH groups are sandy silts, clayey
silts or inorganic silts with relatively low plasticity. Also included are loose type
soils and rock flours.
CL and CH GROUPS. In these groups the symbol C stands for clay, with L and
H denoting low or high liquid limits, with the dividing line again set at a liquid of
50. The soils are primarily organic clays. Low plasticity clays are classified as
CL and are usually lean clays, sandy clays or silty clays. The medium and high
plasticity clays are classified as CH. These include the fat clays, gumbo clays
and some volcanic clays.
OL and OH GROUPS. The soil in the OL and OH groups are characterized by
the presence of organic odor or color, hence the symbol O. Organic silts and
clays are classified in these groups. The materials have a plasticity range that
corresponds with the ML and MH groups.
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
The highly organic soils are usually very soft and compressible and have
undesirable construction characteristics. Particles of leaves, grasses, branches,
or other fibrous vegetable matter are common components of these soils. They
are not subdivided and are classified into one group with the symbol PT. Peat
humus and swamp soils with a highly organic texture are typical soils of the
group.
19