HomeMy WebLinkAboutCompaction Test RECEII.'�D '1
` JUL 0 2017
ECS Flora LLC ��� y — ��
2000 Avenue"P"Suite 3
1
West Palm Beach, F� 33404 Ef!9FIELD REPORT
(561)840-3667[Phone] Project No. 25:3196
(561)840-3668[Fax]
Ta Report No. 4
Project Peterson Residence Day&Date Wednesday 06/21/2017
Location Fort Pierce,FL Weather 900/Sunny
Client Cooper Enterprises 4.0,LLC-Stewart Cooper On-Site Time 2.25
Lab Time 0.00
Travel Time* 0.00
Total 2.25
Re Obs.Time 0.00
Remarks
Trip Charges* Tolls/Parking* Mileage* Time of Arrival Departure
Chargeable Items 12:45P 03:OOP
*Travel time and mileage will be billed in accordance with the contract.
Summary of Services Performed (field test data,locations,elevations&depths are estimates)&Individuals Contacted.
The undersigned arrived on site, as requested,to test the compaction of soils fir the exterior
footings. Please see attached sketch.
Utilizing the Nuclear Test Method (ASTM D 6938)to check the compaction of soils;test
results indicated that the compacted material, at the areas and elevations tested,met or
exceeded the project requirements of 95%of the maximum dry density as obtained in our
laboratory using the ASTM D 1557-12 Method C Modified. 1
I
Locations and elevations of all tests are based on stakeout provided by others. We cannot be
responsible for structures located off of the observed engineered pad,misaligned utilities or
stakeout errors causing uncontrolled fill to be placed in structural areas.
i
COPY
XN
� 0
low
711 F
By Joshua A Moore, — Field Technician �,« g�al,)`I���®,,, 1800
634259
I
Page 1
Field Compaction Summary, ASTM D 6938
Project No: 3196 Project Name:Peterson Residence Date:06/21/17
Client:.Cooper Enterprises 4.0, LLC Test Method ASTM D 6938
ECS FLORIDA, LLC Nuclear Gauge No.19626
Contractor: None Listed Make Troxler Density Std 2186
Model 3440 Moisture Std 657
Technician:Joshua A Moore Ser. No.
Sample No. Description Proctor Method Uncorrected Max.Densi4 Uncorrected Opt.MC•
D4S-1 Brown fine sand with trace organics ASTM D 1557-12 Method C Modified 106.40 15.10
Corrected Corrected Test Data
Probe Maximum Optimum Wet Dry Moisture Percent
Test Test Depth Station/ Lift/ % Dry Moisture Density Density Content Comp. P/F Comments
No. Lot No. Mode (in.) Location Elev Sample No. Oversize Density Content (pco (poi
(peg (/o)
1 DT 6 Exterior Footings SG-2' D4S-1 0.00 106.40 15.10 117.4 101.6 15.6 95.5 P
2 DT 6 Exterior Footings SG-2' D4S-1 0.00 106.40 15.10 117.1 102.7 14.0 96.5 P
3 DT 6 Exterior Footings SG-2' D4S-1 0.00 106.40 15.10 117.3 101.4 15.7 95.3 P
4 DT 6 Exterior Footings SG-2' D4S-1 1 0.00 106.40 15.10 117.6 101.6 15.7 95.5 P
'.'mot Cc Af j Z 0 'dam
N 54815 `
Ar
I �° STATE OF ,
Test Mode: DT= Direct Transmission BS= Back Scatter WO:36323
•
ATTACHMENTS
rfn.
i
w -
i
Attachment No. 1
Sketch
i
j _
A.
J v T
� 1
03 . �
1 ►
i
i
118.5
a
1
117
115.5
b.
T 1
1
0
114
l
I
112.5
1
111
7.5 9 10.5 12 13.5 15 16.5
Water content, %
Test specification: ASTM D 1557-12 Method C Modified
Elev/ Classification Nat. S G. LL PI %> %
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. P f 314 in. No.200
0.00-2.00 SP SP
TEST RESULTS " MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Maximum dry density— 116.6 pcf Dark brown foie to medium slightly silty sand
with trace rock
Optimum moisture= 11.6% I;
Project No. 3196 Client: Cooper Enterp`vAk 0/®� Remarks:
Project: Peterson Residence N200
�0
�QC E
Source of Sample:Imported Stockpile S ®0VV�u er: 4S-2
ECS FLORIDA, LLC *; -
2000 Avenue P,Suite 3 PhonM5r%))P40.3667
West Palm Beach,FL 33404 Fax:(=1); tt♦:366$S.T ' Figure
Te ted By: PB ��j/�iA�,�® RID �N��