Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutKSM Engineering & TestingHeadquarters 11345 U.S. Highway 1IVIO lk At ENGINEERING Mailing P.O. Box 7 8-1377 Sebastian, FL. 32958 Orlando � IJ AVL AND TESTING Sebastian, FL. 32978 Phone: 772-589-0712 723 Progress Way C.A. # 5693 Sanford, FL. 32771 KSMengineering.net May 18, 2021 Donald Myers 973 SW Abingdon Avenue Port St. Lucie, FL 34953 Re: 2115 Keen Road Fort Pierce, Florida KSM Project #: 213468-b Dear Mr. Myers: As requested, KSM Engineering & Testing has performed a subsurface investigation at the referenced site. Presentation of the data gathered during the investigation, together with our geotechnical related opinions, are included in this report. Site Description: At the time of drilling, the 30± acre site had a 12± acre pond and was found to be fairly flat. Generally, the site had dense underbrush and was heavily wooded with oak and pepper trees. However, the areas of proposed construction were cleared. The corners of the single- family residence and the mother-in-law suite were staked prior to our arrival. Project Description: A partial two-story, single-family residence and a detached mother-in-law suite are planned to be constructed on the site. As the mother -in -law -suite is planned to be constructed at a later date, the parameters for the mother-in-law suite are unknown at the time of this report. Loads from the structures will be transferred to the ground by conventional shallow footings. For our analysis, we estimate the maximum loads will be less than 3,000 pounds per linear foot along the wall foundation of the single-family residence. Due to the current site conditions, some additional site fill may be required to reach the desired grades. Page 1 of 4 In #tp\ 2115 Keen Road IV ENGINEERING Fort Pierce, Florida A%OWL AND TESTING KSM Project#: 213468-b The scope of our study consisted of the following: Performed Standard Penetration Test borings in the proposed construction area to estimate the subsoil relative density. 2. Measured the observed groundwater level at each boring. 3. Evaluated the existing soil conditions with respect to the proposed construction and provided recommendations for site preparation and foundation design. 4. Prepared this report to document our findings. Site Investigation: The site investigation program consisted of performing four (4) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings, in the proposed single-family residence, and one (1) SPT boring in the location of the proposed mother-in-law suite. The SPT borings were terminated at depths of approximately 10 to 14 feet below grade and their locations are indicated on the attached location plan. The SPT borings were completed in accordance with procedures described in ASTM D-1586. A standard 1.5 inch I.D., 2 inch O.D. split -spoon sampler is driven into the soil by successive blows of a 140 pound hammer freely failing 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 1 foot, after seating 6 in., is designated the Penetration Resistance, or "N" value. At regular intervals the sampler is extracted from the ground and opened to allow visual examination and classification of the retained soil sample. Also, the groundwater table was allowed to stabilize and the depth of the groundwater elevation recorded from existing grade. The records of the soils encountered, the penetration resistances and observed groundwater level are shown on the attached logs. Engineering Evaluation and Conclusions: Based on the information obtained from this site investigation, we are pleased to offer the following evaluation: The boring logs indicate the subsurface soils consist mostly of fine-grained sand, fine-grained clayed sand, and slightly silty fine-grained sand. "N" values recorded during the boring operation indicate the soil density is generally firm at the surface and becomes medium dense below. Please refer to the soil boring logs for specific information relative to the soil description. Based on the existing soil conditions, the proposed single-family residence can be supported on a shallow foundation system provided that the site is properly prepared. Page 2 of 4 2115 Keen Road Fort Pierce, Florida KSM Project #: 213468-b UP OIL 9 ENGINEERING X%IJJJV1 AND TESTING Provided that the existing site conditions in the area of the mother-in-law suite are not altered between the time of issuing of this report and the beginning of construction, it is our professional opinion that the subsurface soils in this location is suitable to support the proposed mother-in-law suite. Please note that the recommendations listed in this report are subject to change once the parameters of the mother-in-law suite are known. Please contact our office once this information becomes available. The following sections provide recommendations for the site preparation and foundation design. Typical Site Preparation. - The proposed building areas and areas to be paved, plus a minimum margin of five feet beyond the proposed construction shall be stripped and grubbed of surface debris, including vegetation, roots and organic matter. Stumps shall be removed entirely. The building areas should be graded level and proofrolled. Any soft yielding areas shall be excavated and replaced with clean compacted fill. Sufficient passes should be made during compaction operations to produce a density no less than 95 percent of its modified dry Proctor value (ASTM D 1557) to a depth of two feet. After the exposed surface has been proofrolled, the building and pavement areas may be filled to the desired grades. The fill material shall consist of clean granular sand containing less than 10% material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 mesh sieve. Place structural fill in loose layers of 12 inches in thickness and compact each lift to at least 95 percent of its modified dry Proctor value. After excavating for the footings, the disturbed footing subgrade should be recompacted to 95 percent (minimum) of its modified dry Proctor value. This can be best achieved by making several passes with a relatively light -weight walk -behind vibratory sled or roller. Foundation for the Two -Story Residence: Provided that our recommendations for site preparation are followed, the proposed structure may be supported on a conventional concrete monolithic foundation, with steel reinforced footings designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot, or less. With the foundation properly designed and the site properly prepared, we anticipate total settlements less than % of an inch and differential settlement of less than % of an inch. The majority of the settlement should occur during construction. This is based on the assumed loading as shown on the front page of this report and a minimum continuous stemwall footer width of 18 inches with a minimum embedment of 16 inches. If the loading or footer is to vary from these parameters, please contact our office for additional settlement calculations. Page 3 of 4 NOTICE OF RIGHTS A party whose substantial interest is affected by this order may petition for an administrative hearing pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Such proceedings are governed by Rule 28-106, Florida Administrative Code. A petition for administrative hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Agency Clerk for the Department, within twenty-one (21) days from the receipt of this order. The address of the Agency Clerk is 4052 Bald Cypress Way, BIN A 02, Tallahassee, Florida 32399. The Agency Clerk's facsimile number is 850-413-8743. Mediation is not available as an alternative remedy. Your failure to submit a petition for hearing within 21 days from receipt of this order will constitute a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing, and this order shall become a'final order'. Should this order become a final order, a party who is adversely affected by it is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings may be commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Department of Health and a second copy, accompanied by the filing fees required by law, with the Court of Appeal in the appropriate District Court. The notice must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the final order. 2115 Keen Road VP 01 ANENGINEERING Fort Pierce, Florida AND TESTING KSM Project* 213468-b Foundation for Mother -In -Law Suite: Due to the preliminary nature of this structure, we recommend the structural engineer contact our office once the exact loading and foundation dimensions for the mother-in-law suite are known so that we may provide foundation recommendations and perform settlement calculations. Floor Slabs: A conventional slab -on -grade can be used in the "at grade" portion of the buildings. We recommend the disturbed subgrade below the floor slab be re -compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) prior to placement of the concrete. We recommend that control joints be incorporated in the slab at frequent intervals to control shrinkage cracks. A moisture barrier is recommended beneath the floor slab to prevent moisture migration from the underlying soil resulting in dampness of the slab. Closure: Based upon our subsurface investigation at the above -mentioned project location, the reliance of the recommendations presented within this signed and sealed report is predicated on KSM representative's involvement to verify that not only have the soils been prepared following the indicated recommendations, but the foundations are installed in compliance within the parameters indicated. The Structural Engineer of Record is responsible for confirming that the estimated capacities provided are adequate for the anticipated loading. If additional capacity is required, KSM is to be notified so that our recommendations can be amended as required. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices based on the results of the test borings and the assumed loading conditions. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur between the borings. If variations appear evident during the course of construction, it would be necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this project. Environmental conditions, wetland delineation, water quality, and municipal requirements are not a part of this report. We are pleased to be of assistance to you on this phase of your project. When we may be of further service to you or should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the office. Respectfully, Digitally signed \O%%111K� This item has been electronically signed and \�` • , .... , , sealed bylulie Keller, P.E. FL Lic. 6831. on by Julie Keller \\ �J �GENSn F the data stated directly to the right using a \ ` • digital signature. j Julie E. Keller, P.E. #68366 Printed copies of this document are not Date: _� No. 68366 considered signed and sealed and the President signature must be verified on any electronic 202 1 1.05.21 1 1 copies. 7C 09:55:02-04'00' JEK/cv/mm Q '• STATE OF Email to: dmyers@accare.biz; sldesigngroup@yahoo.com Page 4 of 4 '��Sis*ONAt KSMKSM Engineering & Testing P.O. Box 78-1377 Sebastian, FL 32978 Tel: (772)-589-0712 BORING NUMBER 13_1 Fax: (772)-589-6469 CLIENT Donald M ers PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NUMBER 213468-b PROJECT NAME 2115 Keen Road DATE STARTED 5/14/21 DRILLING CONTRACTOR COMPLETED 5/14/21 PROJECT LOCATION Fort Pierce Florida GROUND ELEVATION DRILLING METHOD S lit S oon Sam le HOLE SIZE inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: LOGGED BY SH/JP CHECKED -VAT TIME OF DRILLING NOTES BY JEK See Attached Location Plan 3.75 ft AT END OF DRILLING AFTER DRILLING = U w� a 0 -� MATERIAL D ESCRIPTION w o- A SPT N V W } z F ALUE O 0 60 J w o Z J a 20 40 80 > C3 O ] Q w Z PL MC LL QZ C) mpZ U" a 20 40 d•:` Gray Sand with Traces of Root 60 80 U) � a p ❑FINES CONTENT (%) p ugnt Brown Sand Grayish Brown Clayed Sand Gray Sand, Slightly Silty with Traces of Shell Bottom of borehole at 14.0 feet. SS 3-4 4 (8) SS 6-7-6 (13) SS 4-5-5 N7-8-9 SS SS SS S KSM Engineering &TestingP.O. BORING NUMBER B-2 Box 8-1377 KSMS bassti n7 FL 32978 PAGE 1 OF 1 Tel: (772)-589-0712 Fax:(772)-589-6469 CLIENT Donald Myers PROJECT NAME 2115 Keen Road PROJECT NUMBER 213468-b PROJECT LOCATION Fort Pierce, Florida DATE STARTED 5/14/21 COMPLETED 5/14/21 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sample -K-KAT TIME OF DRILLING 3.67 ft LOGGED BY SH/JP CHECKED BY JEK AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING — a o z F A SPT N VALUE A ^ _ w � . j a ~" 20 40 60 80 PL MC ILL (L W" O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Wm w� > (� 0z-j JO � Q H� w z 0 0 ,80 O Z Co O z U" }" 20 40 60 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ a 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 Gray Sand with Traces of Root ....................................... SS 3-3-4 Light Brown Sand (7) SS Grayish Brown Clayed Sand 5 (12) - "' ' SS 555 ................................... ( ) c� SS 6-6-7 (13) z 10 SS 6-6-6 :... � Gray Sand, Slightly Silty with Traces of Shell (12) ....... ..............:. ..:...... SS 7-7-6 :....... :....... (13) .... ..: ....... :...... . ° SS 8-7-8 ....... :....... ....... ....... :...... . (15) Bottom of borehole at 14.0 feet. w w m i m Y_ m U O Lu W J LL U) m Y_ Y n N G N m F ❑ L7 m 3 m D ❑ to to z z to 0 J IL x m x U W H O w C7 KSM Engineering & Testing BORING NUMBER B-3 �/j KS �l S basti n78 L 32978 PAGE 1 OF 1 Tel: (772)-589-0712 Fax:(772)-589-6469 CLIENT Donald Myers PROJECT NAME 2115 Keen Road PROJECT NUMBER 213468-b PROJECT LOCATION Fort Pierce. Florida DATE STARTED 5/14/21 COMPLETED 5/14/21 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sample 2 AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.17 ft LOGGED BY SH/JP CHECKED BY JEK AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING -- W o ♦ SPT N VALUE A = ~ar U of m } _ w� U w �z� d � �q 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL W EL o MATERIAL DESCRIPTION C% O Q �-w W'4 Z '80 o a.z 00� mOZ v4— }� 20 40 60 El FINES CONTENT (%) El < L d Of 0 20 40 60 80 Gray Sand with Roots 2-3-3 SS:.......:........ Light Brown Sand (6) :..... :....... SS 3-4-4 X. :....... :....... Brown Clayed Sand 5 (8) .....: ....... :...... SS 4-5-5 a (10) ............... m.......................... m Gray Clayed Sand '•; 5-6-6 .' SS (12)...................................... i ;.... 0 a 10 SS 7-7-8 (15) W Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. W z J_ 0 m 0 V t7 N_ W W > W W 19 2 m Y_ m O O ❑ m W J LL m _Y Y n N 0 N m N H 0 m g ❑ m H Z W F- O J a x in m U W 0 O w c7 KSM Engineering & Testing BORING NUMBER B-4 P.O. Box 78-1377 KSM Sebastian, FL 32978 PAGE 1 OF 1 Tel: (772)-589-0712 Fax: (772)-589-6469 CLIENT Donald Myers PROJECT NAME 2115 Keen Road PROJECT NUMBER 213468-b PROJECT LOCATION Fort Pierce, Florida DATE STARTED 5/14/21 COMPLETED 5/14/21 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sample Q AT TIME OF DRILLING 3.67 ft LOGGED BY SH/JP CHECKED BY JEK AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING — W o z A SPT N VALUE A ~^ a0 o ~m r_ w� U) w 0zj W 3r ~w 20 40 60 80 PL MC LL W O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION U' O Q m F-w W .m. " z a I—�—I o EL z O0 - O z } 20 40 60 80 ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ < W d (If 0 20 40 60 80 Gray Sand with Traces of Root Light Brown Sand 3-4-5 ..,.. SS (9) ... _ ' SS 5-6-6 Grayish Brown Clayed Sand 5 (12) •:: • • SS 7-8-7 mao ::.,::• :.. .. SS 6-6-6 ...................................... (12) ....... ...... ........ :....... SS 5-6-6 ....................................... 10 :• (12) r- Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. m W z J_ 0 m M N_ W W K W m U) N Y_ U, 0 O N m W J LL 2 m Y_ ]L A N O N N F 0 m Q J m F m r z 0 J a x m x U W 0 O w (7 KSM Engineering & Testing BORING NUMBER B-5 KSM S basti an, FL 32978 PAGE 1 OF 1 Tel: (772)-589-0712 Fax:(772)-589-6469 CLIENT Donald Myers PROJECT NAME 2115 Keen Road PROJECT NUMBER 213468-b PROJECT LOCATION Fort Pierce, Florida DATE STARTED 5/14/21 COMPLETED 5/14/21 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sample AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.17 ft LOGGED BY SHMP CHECKED BY JEK AT END OF DRILLING — NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING — W o A SPT N VALUE A U U w W 20 40 60 80 a x O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -i g j p Z) Q W Y z Q C LL P 0 o 00 of m 0> v" M B 20 40 60 80 (L z ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ < u a 0 20 40 60 80 Gray Sand with Root ....................................... Fss 2-3-4 Brown Sand (7) .... ....... :....... ....... :....... SS 5-6-8 Gray Clayed Sand 5-6-5 ...................................... SS SS-6-8 m N :: (14) .... ..: ....... :....... :....... :...... . 10 SS 4-5-6 � (11) ....... :....... :....... ........ ....... . U) > Gray Sand, Slightly Silty with Shell Fragments 7-8 10 J SS (18) :..............:....... 0 SS 10-8-11 ...... :....... :....... :....... :...... . (19) N Bottom of borehole at 14.0 feet. Lu w w m 2 m Y_ m U O ❑ N 6 W J LL U) fA Y_ Y n N 0 N e`° F- O C7 Q J • F.. H Z m H J a x m x U W F W E DESCRIPTOR TABLES SHEET 3 OF 3 EAST L©m 7701 5+" 4i7p1 9 136!!:f49 I?5; I- 5fi7.!150 V �'I _52 °va't13 N2415:6 16_7r�. "'+�._ ip1 IJ•t5 423 lS7i s 135• �x 11354 !355 1700 �b •,}Yn Ir27 43.25q? lJ 'TF!�So 1 144a a x.437 t faa9 � • fa39 j 145G Ii3'2 asz Q1541 y .(�146G jj9 f c 1 ��"�•] NLAW Q151'2 461l1454 bI. 6 Q!SaJ ox;Q5l3y5aQ• apx5\J5I Q% I5�Y5IJ A�4*, Q2x75a>9 4 I<7t4G 14,,yt5LLLLb7 69 1 75 Illn VV-`Cc 1447 �i8+.('��ICSrna -:l - n__x—�.a-.�.. •.��+s /Y rr1i483 .¢t'•�_�', �+s .- ✓ I 1436 Qx i162 1437 f� n' 5°d lam' YT '"I5i5r �505 'S0a \ 1493 tag. SOD 1511 CJ.`(( � xQi525(XD1525 a536 Qx 52a 1 1523 QI634 Q153&532 1500150!15!g �:C/•572 .516 I3 + 0521 11 4�5f7 1502 ry �Ij19 j Oi27 ..529 f ix� 529 I � ��523 `537 &.531 I o tQx 1531 Qx:59! I_�0 0 �,9 I �e • I e Ist6 I a 7`.553.I sj9 �7 i575 � I I �!!56 1556 I �:563�11'�`•6 I ^� B-3 NRENEN B-� I I �1566 tS6d x 57a ,533 �1537 Qx Ij85 I SaG a 75ft B-2 B-4, �1526 ,58S6J 1 ex SG9 p �592 x 1.,'."11 '^ I well drain field �I �151� �I573 between -x 1.59'.3 1 ' well point and drain field I /a9,p� xplstl Ox 159a 1 4i•h. / 0616. x�.dh7 I °;G03 Qx 1601 (xD1595 t 1 --LOCATION OF SOIL BORINGS PROJECT: 2115 Keen Road, Fort Pierce, Florida SHEET 10F 1CA Sk AN ENGINEERING DRAWN BY: C.V. PERMIT #: DESIGNED BY: J.K. PROJECT #: 21341i8-bJ W-L AND TESTING DATE: 20210518 SCALE: NONE -42) _Yw "R 50 Min "M A l" ng r'Ir Z� vv Slaw OAS Tw-,'� UM. - NOT A— 41 "P", MY, - Th Q-6U. p"y" M-W t -It A` sign 01 a A a, to 1 Y. q -69 fun &&a" j lot T cl� TIM jw A 2 v W.- j1jj, 1, J. W!" Wo Owt W=3 ap y Q pq �P off t's Y Qp;, :,a e4 y� -son Hil 'j -,4 V-, J;h Am 4 - Yw" Q 05 wn M nosy 0 ft4, Ov MMOMP RIM, Him ., i Mw mop, VOWI 1J,. 'Woo M OnS 0. 0 -%vow WX wn lot A xv. Qfj coot "A' � MAMMON ............ . . . . . . . . . . 4 Custom Soil Resource Report St. Lucie County, Florida 4—Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 1jptx Elevation: 0 to 30 feet Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period. 350 to 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Arents and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Arents Setting Landform: Rises on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Altered marine deposits Typical profile C1 - 0 to 10 inches: sand C2 - 10 to 51 inches: sand A/Eb - 51 to 80 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Runoff class. High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity.• Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity: Very low (about 3.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Forage suitability group: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Hydric soil rating: No 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Sanitary landfill Percent of map unit. 5 percent Hydric soil rating: Unranked Canaveral Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Dunes on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Hydric soil rating: No 31—Pepper and EauGallie sands Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 1jpvs Elevation: 0 to 30 feet Mean annual precipitation: 49 to 58 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period. 350 to 365 days Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance Map Unit Composition Pepper and similar soils: 46 percent Eaugallie and similar soils: 44 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Pepper Setting Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: sand E - 6 to 23 inches: sand Bh1- 23 to 33 inches: sand Bh2 - 33 to 57 inches: sand Btg - 57 to 80 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Depth to restrictive feature: 16 to 31 inches to ortstein Drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity. Very low (about 1.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: D Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141 FL) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Eaugallie Setting Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: sand E - 5 to 26 inches. sand Bh - 26 to 47 inches: sand Btg - 47 to 62 inches. sandy loam Cg - 62 to 80 inches. sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to high (0.06 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Lawnwood Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Marine terraces on flatwoods Landfonn position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Pineda Percent of map unit. 2 percent Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G156BC241FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Nettles Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Wabasso Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Tantile Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G156BC141FL) Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report 38—Riviera fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2tzw2 Elevation: 0 to 80 feet Mean annual precipitation: 44 to 59 inches Mean annual air temperature: 68 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period. 350 to 365 days Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance Map Unit Composition Riviera and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components. 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Riviera Setting Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, dip, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, concave Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sand E - 6 to 28 inches: fine sand BME - 28 to 32 inches: fine sandy loam Btg - 32 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam C - 42 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class. Poorly drained Runoff class: Very high Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 3 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity. Moderate (about 6.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Forage suitability group: Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G155XB241 FL) Other vegetative classification: Slough (R155XY011 FL), Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G155XB241 FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Wabasso Percent of map unit: 8 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down -slope shape: Linear, convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) Hydric soil rating: No Pinellas Percent of map unit. 4 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down -slope shape: Convex, linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Cabbage Palm Flatwoods (R155XY005FL), Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G155XB241 FL) Hydric soil rating: No Hallandale Percent of map unit: 4 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Floridana Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, dip Down -slope shape: Concave, linear Across -slope shape: Concave, linear Other vegetative classification: Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (RI 55XY010FL), Sandy over loamy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB245FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Oldsmar Percent of map unit. 2 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear, convex Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No 48—Wabasso sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2svyr Elevation: 0 to 70 feet Mean annual precipitation: 46 to 55 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period. 355 to 365 days Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance Map Unit Composition Wabasso and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Wabasso Setting Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: sand E - 6 to 25 inches: sand Bh - 25 to 30 inches: sand Btg - 30 to 58 inches: sandy clay loam Cg - 58 to 80 inches. loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 9 to 50 inches to strongly contrasting textural stratification Drainage class: Poorly drained Runoff class: Very high Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding. None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0 Available water capacity.- Very low (about 1.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Hallandale Percent of map unit. 6 percent Landform: Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141 FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Boca Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, dip, talf Down -slope shape: Linear, convex Across -slope shape: Linear, concave Ecological site: R155XY003FL -South Florida Flatwoods Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods.(R155XY003FL), Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G155XB241 FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Pineda Percent of map unit 4 percent Landform: Drainageways on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, dip, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, concave Other vegetative classification: Slough (R155XY011 FL), Sandy over loamy soils on flats of hydric or mesic lowlands (G155XB241 FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes 99—Water Map Unit Composition Water.' 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Water Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Custom Soil Resource Report Forage suitability group: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156BC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Unranked 18