HomeMy WebLinkAboutField Density Test 12-19-17Phone 954-784-2941
ederal
800-848-1919
a Fax 954-784-7875
& TESTING INC. l 7 lg www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 112, Creekside Date: November 24, 2017
Address: - 3112 Yellowstone Circle, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order #: 17-DR-1153
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #:
Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Rock Tech: SL
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
SE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
11.1
107.5
113.0
10.0
95.1 %
Yes
2
1NW Corner of Pad
12"
1 FL
9.9
1 108.2
113.0
10.0
95.8%
Yes
3
Center of Pad
12"
FL
9.4
108.6
113.0
10.0
96.1 %
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: f< ,
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: `vc-e�,,�
SL = Springline FL Final Lift Keitha eBlanc; P:E.=.
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testirig,"(hc_
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No: 59394 °
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade C&tif'icate of Authorization #5471,
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, ani aut ioriyation For publication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test detarmiges-the degree of compaction,of ttra tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify 6e,uriderlying`soil materlgls%below the oioposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required ta'rerllfy &-f the-underly ng •soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommerid,4hat spil borings\ perfdrmed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy raintstorms,'retesting.must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils Method D76938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
� -J � •':h .:11�
r
l�
1'
/S
r'rr--�rt
Page 2 of 2
Phone 954-784 2941
eFa800-848-1919 i,a x 954-784-7875
& TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed' Residence •Lot 112, Creekside, Date: November 24, 2017
Address: 3112 Yellowstone Circle, FortPierce, FL 34045 Order #:17=DR-1153
Area Tested: Building Pad Permitk
Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Rock Tech: SL
Client: 'DA. Hoiton, Inc.
Address: .1430 Culverbrive NE.. Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM 'D-1557 .
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
De th
p
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
SE Corner of Pad
1.2"
FL
11.1
107.5
113.0
10.0
95.1 %
Yes
2
NW -Corner of Pad , '
12"
FL
9.9
1. 1.08.2
11.3.0,
10.0
9,5.8%
Yes:
3
Center of Pad
12"
FL
9.4
108.6
113.0
10.0-
06.1 %
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
.
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This. is a Compaction Test only on the top 12 of the pad and is not a verification of Soil:,,Rearing
Legend for Elevation:
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 =1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift KeM LeBlanc; P.E.= 4
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineetigg� t?: Testing, inc.
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing ' Florida Reg. N8' 59394
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade `: Cddificate-of Authorization #5471
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property,of clients, and authorization forpubilkation of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compuctian'of the tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify; the underlying.soil rnatenafs 66lnw>11he proposed structure.
�.. ;:,
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required'to certify that t .eiunderly�ng soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed'to verify the underlying soils, we recommend ti:iat soil borings bye performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rainls'orms,%testing must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils Method ®-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test- at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the -underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis'of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95%'6f the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances 'due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future
Page 2 of 2