HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOC', Phone 954.784-2941
d- 1 800-848-1919
ede,
i ` ' Fax 954-784-7875
& TESTING INC. > o�- Fax
www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, Fl. 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 81, Creekside
Date:
June 22i 2017
Address: 8461 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945
Order #:
'17-Dk-615
Area Tested: Building'Pad ..
Permit #:
Material Type: Light Brown Sand
Tech:
BK
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE
Compaction Req.:
95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907
Proctor Method:
ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
p
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
% _
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Pad
12"
FL
2.1
1 104.6
105.6.
14.0
1 99.1 %.
Yes
2
SE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
2.7
103.9'
105.6
14.0
98.4%
Yes
3
NE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
3.2
1b4.1
105.6
14.0
98.6%
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
• Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification,of Sorl Bearing Capacity,
Legend for Elevation: H-1
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: .A4
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E.` ,
SG = Subgrade BG Below Grade Federal Etigint erir,.g F: Testi�ig, inc.
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. Nc;,59394 ;
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Ceriificat%,oT AtJwhorization #,r-A7
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property -of clients, and authorization,for.pubf:�ation of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test dot miines=the degree_ of.compacrors of the tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not ceruiji e�dnderlyln 'soil mate ials SQiow the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is fequired to ceriify tfiat the;undE ying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recoininen�d 4W soil bonngp,be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavyiiainG,to�rnsj retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted
oils Method D-6936 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the ,reverse side. The purpose of ou test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test�eplace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted, to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions. 1
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part, of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturba ces will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all r1 ports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval. 1
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
Phone 954-784-2941
ede
p��� 800-848-1919
Fax 954-784-7875 mI
& TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 81, Creekside Date: June 22, 2017
Address: 8461 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order #: 17-DR-615
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #:
Material Type: Light Brown Sand Tech: BK
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95%
Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Pad
12"
FL
2.1
104.6
105.6
14.0
99.1 %
Yes
2
ISE Corner of Pad
12"
1 FL
2.7
1 103.9
105.6
14.0
98.4%
Yes
3
NE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
3.2
104.1
105.6
14.0
98.6%
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Seil Rearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation: '
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:� A;/ 6
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift :'Keith LeBlanc, P.E.
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering,& Testing,,_ Inc.
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade C:ertificata of Authorization5471 1
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorizationrf . oliiilication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines,the degree'ef compaction of the tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not card th�,underiying soil materials`belcw the proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required, -to certify that tiie underlying soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend Uratlsoil b8rin3s be performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/stcros,"retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
i
«:
Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineeri g & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction t st replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction t+erify.subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an a i alysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12linches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is �ot part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis. of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performi g an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of�the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at tf'e time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail'compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. sha�l be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas o' our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and otfIer disturbances will void this test -and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and o
and authorization for use, publication of statemE
pending written. approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we
�C )
yes, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
forward to doing so in -the near future.
2of2
Phone 954-784 2941
le d e,
L 800-848-1919
Fax 954-784-7875
& TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069'
- Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Pro
Address: 8461
Date: June 30, 2017
Order #: DR-635
Area Tested: ,Building Pad Permit #:
Material Type: Dark Brown Sand Tech: BK
Residence
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE
Palm Bay, FL 32907
Lot 81, Creekside
Fort
FL
Compaction Req.: 95%
Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION.
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density,
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Pad
12"
FL
3.3
105.9
106.3
1 12.7
99.6%
Yes
2
SW Corner of Pad
12"
FL
6.9
1 105.2
106.3
12.7
99.0%
Yes
3
NE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
7.0
105.3
106.3
12.7
99.1 %
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a vei
Legend for Elevation:
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith .LeBlanc,' P:E.
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering -&-Testing iris. f
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No.`699394'
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate ofAuth'orization #547 i
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publlcatton of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test daterin!nes thq, degree of compacti�rrof�ihe tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify tfie um�erlylndsoii matgriais bel%U;ihs proposed structure.
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is regii?fea,to,certifyr,that,the" uao,;-yfrig soils will support the
proposed structure without settlement. if no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommentl•+liaj"soil_t�orings ge performed to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy �asnlstp, . retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering)
project on the reverse side. The purpose of oii
material only. In no way shall a compaction tes
performed by the client prior to construction to v,
12" of added fill material. FET was not contra(
the added fill material does not include an an,
supporting the proposed structure without settle
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 i
the proposed structure, we recommend perfon
verify the underlying soil conditions.
®i9s.Method ®-693S ®iscisimer
; Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
r test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
rify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
ted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
lysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
vent. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
fiches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
ping soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
Environmental analysis of the soil materials, is npt part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of t e tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at th time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and o rselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statemerjts, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval. I
It has been a pleasure working with you and we lool�- forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
-e e. d
.1
& TESTING INC.
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Field' Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 81, Creekside Date:
Address: 8461 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Order #:
Area Tested:. Building Pad Permit #:
Material Type: Dark Brown Sand Tech:
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address:
1430 Culver Drive. NE .Compaction Req.:
Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Phone 954-784-2941
800-848-1919
Fax 954-784-7875
www.fed-eng.com
Palm Bay, FL 32907
June 30, 2017
DR-635
BK
95%
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Pad
12"
FL
3.3
105.9
106.3
12.7
99.6%
Yes
2
1 SW Corner of Pad
12"
FL
1 6.9
105.2
106.3
1 12.7
99.0%
Yes
3
NE Corner of Pad
12"
FL
7.0
105.3
106.3
12.7
99.1 %
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verificat1on-of?So'1 Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1 st, 2nd,, 3rd Lift Submitted by., t/
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift ;' ; -Keith. LeBlanc,''P.E._
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade `" Federal Engineering'0-Usting, Inc.
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing _ -,Florida Reg. No. 59394
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade ? Certificate;& Authorizati6n .5471
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidentia�,property of clients, and authorization fgrppublication of statements,
it conclusions or or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density16f ,t determines the degree of ,Uompaction of the tested layer of
material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not ceFti `;the•undeid in 'soil rratdtbis'below the proposed structure.
Y tY P 9 P tY tY fY .� Y y �� R, P P
The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring testls.raqu red to certify. t "at Pt' soils will support the
'4 ..; `'
proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we: reco rmerttl+that soilshcsings be performed .to evaluate the
suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or afleroheavyirain- F s, retesting must be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineerinc
project on the reverse side. The purpose of c
material only. In no way shall a compaction to
performed by the client prior to construction to
12" of added fill material. FET was not contrz
the added fill material does not include an ar
supporting the proposed structure without settl
materials or conditions below the tested top 12
the proposed structure, we recommend perfoi
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Is Method D-6938 Disclaimer
& Testing, Inc, (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
it test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
t replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
:rift' subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
ted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
ilysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
ment. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
fiches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
ling soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performs g an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction ofIthe tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for payed areas,such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas bf our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities,
excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and
re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and
and authorization for use, publication of stater
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we
ves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2