Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD EVALUATION REPORTNemko North America, Inc. I Nem ko 2210 Faraday Ave., Sdite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 Contender Boats FIELD EVALUATION REPO RT EQUIPMENT DMS Glacier 5 Axis CNC Machine., REPORT NUMBER NEX # 467317 DATE ISSUED ,June 2, 2022 3 Rev 2021-06-30 CNcemko Nemko North America, Inc. 2210 Farad Iy Ave., Suite 150; Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 Equipment covered: DMS Glacier 5 Axis CNC Machine Standard(s) NFPA 79, & N PA 70 Applicant: Contender Boats 5701 Environment Dr. 34981 Ft. Pierce FLUSA Applicant Contact: Robert Desan.E 305-242-7401I Phone: Email: robertcontehderboats.com Date of Inspection: June 6, 2022 Evaluation Site: 5701 Environment Dr. Ft. Pierce, FLU 34981 USA On -Site Contact: Chris Becker Office: 5701 Environment Dr. Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 Mobile: 516-426-6030 Email: chriscontenderboats.com Authority Having: Jurisdiction (AHJ) Reference # Issued by: No Inforrnationl provided at this time Christopher Caserta! - Chris.casertAo-nemko:com (904) 753-3420 (Remote Office: Jacksonville FL) Nemko North America, Inc. 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150 Carlsbad, CA 92008 USA Report:.(NEX # 467317) Pdge 2 of 10 Nemko North America, Inc. CN,emko 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150; Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 SUMMARY June 2, 2022 The DMS Glacier 5 Axis CNC Machine model: 506-10-5-8E(x is located at Contender. Boats, and will be used for the parts fabrication of boats. Key inspection points or other special circumstances to be noted. Grounding Incoming phase conductor segregation Wire sizing Wire Insulation Circuit protection Conclusion (Installation Field Evaluation must be completed for a final comclusion) Report: (NEX # 467317) Page 3 of 10 CNIeE-mko PURPOSE OF EVALUATION: Nemko North America, Inc. 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 The Authority Having Jurisdiction over aij electrical equipment installation may rely on independent testing laboratories that are qualified and equipped to perform safety evaluations. Typically, equipment installed in the U:S. or Canada has been investigated, Listed, and Labeled by a Nationally Recdgnized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) in the U.S and by a. Standards Council of Canada (SCC� accredited Certification. Body in Canada. In the absence of such approval(s), judgment as to the suitability and compliance of equipment can be a burden to the Authority Having �burisdiction (AHJ). As such, a qualified laboratory may be utilized to evaluate such equipment for purposes of assessing compliance with applicable standards and requirements. CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTABILITY: Procedures used to approve the gquipment described in this report comply with International Accreditation Service (IAS) accreditation criteria AC354 and are based on the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards 790 and 791: "Standard for Competency of Third -Party Field Evaluation Bodies" and "Recommended Practice and Procedures for Unlabeled Electrical Equipment Evaluation". Additionally, requirements per the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) are followed for Canada. 2. -For equipment that has not been) evaluated at the final installation site, there may be additional site installation requirements mandated by local authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs) and are the responsibility of the customer. 3. The equipment has been evaluated for electrical safety only, for installation and use in ordinary (non -hazardous) loc tions in accordance with national and local electrical codes; requirements other than electrical safety may be mandated by local authorities having jurisdiction (AJs) and are the responsibility of the customer. 4. The equipment or system shall be used in a manner consistent with the manufacturers design and instrt Ictions. Instructions shall be available in an accessible location for maintenance and reference by the end user. 5. The area surrounding the equipment or system shall be kept free and clear from, combustible material. Adequate clearances shall be maintained for proper safety, operation and servicing. 6. A maintenance and servicing schedule shall be followed to keep the equipment or system operating as designed. he final responsibility for establishing a maintenance program will rest the end user. 7. As parts deteriorate or cease to' function properly, they shall be replaced or repaired with the same part, or the equipment shall be removed from service. No changes to the design, construction or use Ishall be made without the written acknowledgment and approval of Nemko. Additional evaluation and testing may be required to determine acceptability of any changes made. Report: (NEX # 467317) Page 4 of 10 Cernko EVALUATION PROCEDURE: Nemko North America, Inc. 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 Objective. The objective of Nemko's third -party Field Evaluation program is to verify that the design, construction, and installation of the identified equipment or system was in essential compliance with applicable portions of the referenced Standards. The Field Evaluation service is,intended for one-of-a=kind, limited -production, used or modified products and unlisted electrical equipment, where the final installation location is known and the requirements of the local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) have been addressed. The process is completed at the point of manufacturing, interim points of distribution, in the evaluating company's facilities, at the final installation site, or a combination of the above, as requested by the customer. Procedure for Evaluation. The equipment or system is evaluated for the following elements: Visual Inspection: A visual inspection of the equipment was conducted, comparing product construction to requirements of the applicable standard. The evaluation included directly connected loads to the equipment identified in the report. Complete inspection records are on file at Nemko. Suitability for Use and Location: The equipment was found to be suitable for the indoor location. There were no adverse environmental conditions found that would impair the proper operation and use of the equipment. The equipment was suitably protected from physical damage. Condition of the equipment: The equipment was in good condition. No components were found to be damaged in a manner that impacted performance and operation. Metallic parts of the equipment had suitable corrosion protection. Nonmetallic parts were not likely to suffer deterioration or create a fire hazard. Access and Workspace clearances: Access was provided about all electrical equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of the equipment. The workspace clearances for electrical enclosures likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized were provided in compliance with applicable standard. Exposed Parts: Adequate spacings, creepages, and clearances were provided between live parts of opposite polarity and noncurrent -carrying metallic parts, or suitable barriers were provided. Where live parts were exposed, suitable guards or barriers were provided. Separation: Electrical conductor insulation of different voltage systems were found to be either rated for the highest voltage or were separated by suitable barriers. Electrical wiring was separated from other utilities such as oil and water by suitable barriers. Grounding and Bonding: All required non -current -carrying metallic parts of the equipment have been determined to be suitably bonded to the supply equipment grounding conductor. The equipment grounding conductors and bonding jumpers were terminated properly. Equipment grounding conductors and bonding jumpers served no other function. Report: (NEX # 467317) Page 5 of 10 Nemko North America, Inc. C'Nleimko 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (76I) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 Overcurrent.Protection: The type and ra�ings of the overcurrent protection provided within the equipment were suitable for the conductors and loads served. Motor Overload Protection: All Motor ( with NEC Article 430 Part III or CEC 2 Conductors: All equipment wiring was fo verified as acceptable. Conductors were temperature ratings. Conductor sizes we given in the standards identified in this n rload protection was verified to be in compliance !00 for Canadian Special Inspection. and to be certified for use, accepted by testing, or used within the applicable voltage and. re in accordance with the allowable ampacities port. Wiring Methods: The equipment wiring ethods were properly secured, supported, and routed away from physical damage. The wiring methods utilized in and one the equipment provided the required separation and protection from live parts as required by the standards noted in this report. Field Wirinq Terminations: All field wiring terminals were identified and were suitable for the conductor.type, stranding, and ampacity of conductors being terminated. Terminals suitable for more than one conductor were marked. Guarding of Equipment: The evaluated i provided.with suitable covers, enclosure for the evaluation. Fastenings used for ( Hinged doors are able to open at least f least 110°. Labels were applied on the E apprising the users of the physical haza juipment identified in this report has been. , and guards as required by the.standards used vers were in accordance with the standard. °. Swing -out panels if used were able to open at uipment where required by the standard Is associated with the equipment. . Markings: Where applicable the require Caution, Warning, and Danger markings were provided on the equipment. Complete nameplates were provided as required by the standard. General Engineering Practices: The equipment was constructed to meet the requirements of the standards identified in this report. The equipment was constructed in a workmanlike fashion. Cleanability: All surfaces and parts were inspected and determined that areas that are likely to become dirty can be cleaned as needed. (Sanitation Evaluation Only) Materials: All materials used were of SS or of NSF approved types. Surfaces are smooth and cleanable. (Sanitation Evaluation Only) Conclusion. Once the equipment or system has been evaluated'for the above elements, any discrepancies are noted in the Non-compliance issues section for correction by the customer. Once discrepancies (if any) are addressed, Testing is then performed. ' Report: (NEX # 467317) Pade 6 of 10 Nemko North America, Inc. Ne m k� 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 9200.8, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 LIST OF CRITICIAL COMPONENTS: Critical. components list, schematics, and other supporting documents on file in Nemko project folder. See schematic: Multiple drawing in file: Supporting Documents NON -COMPLIANCES: Non -Compliance Approved Resolution No Issues TEST RESULTS: The equipment was subjected to the following tests with acceptable results. Insulation'Resistance Test —A test potential of 500 V do is applied between each phase power circuit conductor to ground at the machine supply terminals and the contactor load terminals of the motor and heater loads. The measured insulation resistance_ is at least 1 megohm at any point tested. Grounding Continuity Test— Ground continuity verified between ground terminal and to all accessible dead metal surfaces of equipment assembly. All metal parts found to .be continuous to ground connection. Torque (Customer Equipment) — Main terminals were torque down to manufacturer specification guide. N/A Refer to SPE 1000-13 for following test: N/A r Leakage r Hi -Pot r Strain Relief r flame r temperature r input rating other (refer to following data) TEST RESULTS: The equipment was subjected to the following tests with acceptable results. All Models: Insulation test- Pass > 1 meg Ohm Ground continuity — Passed, < .1 Ohm Dielectric test — Passed, 1500 Vac Report: (NEX # 467317) Page 7 of 10 CmkoNer 2210 F Phone North America, Inc. y Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3006 Model 913.89 Multi Fluke 116 18320052 7-16-2021 7-16-2022 meter ncrmal SI390 RMS Multi Fluke 87111 78946137 7-16-2.021 7-16-2022- meter S1391 Multi Fluke.. 77111 77470272 7-16-2021 7-1672022. meter S1392 RMS Multi. Fluke 189 80260372 7-16-2021 7-16-2022 . meter S1393 Power Fluke 39 D17900090 .7-16-2021 .7-16.2022 Analyzer S1394 Insulation Biddle BM.122 6311- 7-16-2021 7-16.2022 Tester 055/0201021367 6 S1395 100 Mhz Fluke. FLK-196 9444 001 96003 7-14-2021: 7-14-2022.- Sca meter S1396 ' Caliper Electronic Di ital 00400835 7-14-2021 .7-14-2022 S1397 Infrared Raytek MT41) 1.2072 7-15-2.021 7-15-2022 Thermomet er S1398 AC/DCAR/ V.irtek V74 026163. 7=1&2021 7-16-2022' GB Tester S1399 AC Current Fluke 801-500S 63913404 746-2021 7=16-2022 Clamp S1431 I Torque Nemko own 6PAF7 19020,01725 7.27-2021 7-27-2022: Wrench. Westward 8. of 10 Nemko North America, Inc. N Ee m k o 2210 Faraday Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (760) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 IF — Owl. - - At IM - p y ouoppn e parooc � q � pn duo■ A G7 Ip 4 A n ni LaaomtC _ ; �: � ''O.4 COP r.� � tl•! /�.M l 0 ,, Y ' {tf •�� - "`f Nip Report: (NEX # 467317) Page 9 of 10 Nemko CONCLUSION: Nern !o North America, Inc.. . 2210 Fara ay Ave., Suite 150, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Phone (76;0) 444-3500 Fax (760) 444-3005 The equipment covered by this: field eva uation report was evaluated to comply with NFPA 70 and essential compliance to nationall recognized standards. This evaluation is not equivalent to product certification. Folio ing the evaluation and testing, and any corrective action(s) that were deemed necessary, tie unit(s) were labeled with the serialized Nemko field evaluation label(s),' as specified below: Manufacturers �Motlel Ratings ' Label DMS 506-10-5- 460 V� c, 40 A, 3 Ph, 60 Hz, 3003 110042 8E/x rSCCR1OkA The Nemko field evaluation label appliel to this device indicates that the evaluation was performed with.the intent of meeting app opriate nationally recognized standards and is intended to assist code., enforcing authorities and others (AHJ) involved in judging acceptance of the device for use in their urea of jurisdiction. This report shall apply only to the products tested and generally only toy; one location or installation. If there are any questions regarding the �1esults contained in this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or your dedicated Project Manager. Issued by: Chris Caserta Sr.Machinery Engineer Chris.casertaCcD-nemko.com Nemko USA, Inc. Reviewed by: /4L Michael Anthony Sr FE Engineer Michael.Anthony(&-nemko.com Nemko USA, Inc. Report: (NEX # 467317) Pago 10 of 1.0