The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TESTPhone 954-784-2941 eder� REcENED 804-784-7875 JUL 0-5 2019 Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 permitting Department Field Density Tests of Compacted oils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot,22, Creekside Date: June 21, 2018 Address: 3043 Woodswalk Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR543 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: Material Type: Pale Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: , 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist ,/o Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture '/o Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6A 107.8 108.1 12.0 99.7% Yes 2 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 6.0 106.3 108.1 12.0 98.3% Yes 3 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 6.0 107.2 , 108.1 12.0 99.2% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 r 9 10 11 ` 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2 s imer This is a Compaction Test onl n d an n a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift JUL 0 9 201&ub ed SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E.. 9/1 y SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Vol _Federal Ehg' ineerind & Testing; Inc. ` BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing tt�� FI aiate 'Reg. No: 59394 TOP =Top of Pipe FG =Finished Grade BY• of Authorization,#5471 As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reportsare su a e al ro erifis;'and authorization fo'r_publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our wn en approval. A density test detamiines the degree of compaction of the'tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil-inaterials below the proposed structure. The results do not -preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to cer y�that-tfie underlorid soils wilrsupport the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings 1:4'performed to evuluAe the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting mist bepe formed iin this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our;, test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing 'the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted, to. perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have.been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of theiscopeof services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved 6reas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. . Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas- or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances 'will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for. use, publication of statements conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. R It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. 1 1.. Page 2 of 2 ' SUNU'9620, Phone 954-784-2941 2�1edera-1 800-848-1919 @ Fax 954.784.7875 8. TESTING INC. mrvivir.fed 260 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach,FL 33069 n Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 22, Creekside Date: June 21, 2018 Address: 3043 Woodswalk.Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR543 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit* Q q�-6 Material Type: Pale Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton; Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth p Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture Compaction. Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.1- 107.8 108.1 12.0 99 % Yes 2 SW Corner,of Building, Pad 12" FL 1 6.0 106.3 1 108.1 12.0 98.3% Yes 3 NE Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 6.0 107.2 108.1 12.0 99.2% Yes 4 5 6 7 E LIVEm. 8 UN It 9 10 11 12 13 14 ,CH lot /lf Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 21 for Additional Information for Disclaimer �•e`� `� •' etc E Ns�'.,�, s�i This Is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the ad and is not.a verification of Soil Be, r1n Cap .r Legend for Elevation: _ PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 =1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: ' SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. •'70 6 rAT SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testii. alr� �/ aj BC = Basecourse BOF-= Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No..59394 `ss ��F�4--'•G`�`e�� TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization #54s��11►f�:.\a`�� As a mutual protection,to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publi Itl6fildf sfatdments, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do, not certify the underlying soil materlals'below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur.'A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. if no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate.the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on�Is work. P PAGE 1 of 2 APR0� ^r� 1-