Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD DENSITY TESTRECEIVED MAY Q ��,$ Phone 954-784-2941 L edef-a 800-848-1919 ST. Lucie County, Permitting Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 5W 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 3300. Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 19, Creekside Date: April 10, 2018 Address: 3055 Woodswalk Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR298 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: `71 Z— ©qSL/ Material Type: Pale Gray Sand with Traces of Rock & Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.. - Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.0 106.3 110.3 13.1 96.4% Yes 2 ISW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 10.3 108.1 1 110.3 13.1 98.0% Yes 3 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 10.0 106.9 110.3 13.1 96.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side 2 of 21 for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the toD 12" of the pad and is not -a verification of Soil. Bearina Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1 st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keitf%LeBI4nc, P.E. -` , edY/ f/e, J* SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade ;Feral Engineering,& Testing, Inc. T BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No:.59394 - TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate,of Authorization 4547.1_ As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property -of clients, and authorization for.publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test deteimlr es.the degree of compactic i cf'the Tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying*il materials-below'the pL(f:64d structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is required to certifyihat the underlying'3oils,w!I,support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be perfodne��tp_e%Wuate vie suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be per Gn i on•this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Pursuant to your request, Federal Engine project on the reverse side. The purpose material only: In no way shall a compactic performed by the client prior to constructioi 12" of added fill material" FET was not cor added fill material does not include an anal the proposed structure without settlement. conditions below the tested top 12 inches c structure, we recommend performing soil bi soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil mat( required, we can provide a proposal for for determination of the degree of comp Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer -ing & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced )f our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of i test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top racted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the sis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed •ings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is rming an .environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due- to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to. clients, the public and. ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 ;calm tray,.VIL J1yu(.. ... :. :::. .. Proctor. Method::. ' :A5.I.M Um l55L :. Test Probe Moist DrY Proctor O. ptimum: # TEST LOCATION. :.. Depth. Elev. /o Density Value Moisture -Compaction , --.Pass :... .. . . PCF ,. .` PCF . J. 1- Genter of Buildin Pad 12. " - :FL 6.0.. 106:3 : ,, 11. 0:3 : 13:�1_• .' •:'.. 96:4 2 :.SW.Comet of: Buildim Pad::: . '., ..: 12" . FL-- :10,3 108.1' 1:10.3: .;..13.,1 ::- ::.98:0% Yes-- 3 : NE_Corner.:of.Buildin -Pad. _ ' : ' .12" :.FL. -1um .106.9. .110.3: :.13-A . :96:9% : .Yes . 5.. 7 8: ' 9. :. . 10.... _ Remarks: See Reverse Side (Pace 2 of $) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This.1s a Cotnpaction,Test only:on the'top.12".of.the pad and its not a vdrifids"96 i mf a 11 Bearing Capacity: Legend for Elevation'. ' • .' :. PR = Proofroll 1 i2;3 =1st; 2nd, 3rd.Lift Submitted by '00. SC. ='Springline : = FL= Final Lift : Keith SG = Subgrade BG = Belowf. Grade Federal Engineering &^Testing; Inc.-- BC ='Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing . File C©py Florida Rcg. No. 59394 TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade • ' T!'11' TIAL ��� ��� Cer`ifica>e of Authorizatlori #5471 As a mutual protection to clients the publlc•arid ourselves, all reports, are'submitted as the. confidential property of clients, and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval: A density t9st.determinas the degr-.e of compaction of the tested layerof material only. A density does not replacea soil.bearing capacity.determination. These density tests do: not certify tFe underlying. soil materials below the proposed'structure. The results . do not preclude or guarantee that:future settlementand cracking will not occur. A soil boring .test is. requited.to'cert fy that.ihe-unde * s6its will support the.proposed structure without settlement: If.no soil borings have b'een.performed:to verify the underlying soils, we recommend.that soli b'cr: gs iiej:meri to'evaluate. the suitabilitybf:the underlying soil to supportthe proposed structure:. After laying dormantfor a period of 90 days or after'heavy rain/storms; retesting must,tfo• performed on this•work. 'PAGE 1 ®f,2 ��4 RECEIVED Phone 954.784-2941 848-1919 -Aeder APR 1..6 7018 Fax 954.784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Permitting Department Cf- I urio r'nnn v Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 19, Creekside Date: April 10, 2018 Address:. 3055 Woodswalk Drive, Fort Pierce,. FL Order #: 18DR298 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: 12 fZ ` Material Type: Pale Gray Sand with Traces of Rock & Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth p Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.0 106.3 110.3 13.1 96.4% Yes 2 SW Corner of Buildin Pad 12" 1 FL 10.3 1 108.1 110.3 13.1 98.0% Yes 3 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 10.0 106.9 110.3 13.1 96,9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 \`��11161 I Z Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Adl This is a Compaction Test only on the Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1 st, 2nd, 3rd Lift SL = Springline FL = Final Lift for Disclaimer ty. 99394 SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering $sting, Inc. WW ; BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394. `•�CQRip,P;•' \ TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of AuthorizatitSf�.&'J��� As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization fl)ld Nimta�t nts, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the't 6d 1,erial only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy raintstones; retesting must be performed on this work. of the Pad and is not a verification of Submitted by: 41�a Zfl* ." Keith LeBlanc, P.E:. 4. PAGE 1 of 2