HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD DENSITY TESTRECEIVED Phone 954-784.2941
800-848-1919
eder" 1111 yp�Q Fax 954-784-7875
& TESTING INC. ;wmitting Department www.fed-eng.com
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 i_ude County
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 23, Creekside Date:
Address: 3039 Woodswalk Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #:
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #:
Material Type: Pale Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech:
Client: D;R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE
Palm Bay, FL 32907
June 21, 2018
18DR544
BK
Compaction Req.: 95%
Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
/o
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Building Pad
12"
FL
7.0
105.9
107.2
14.0
98.8%
Yes
2
SW .Corner of Building Pad
12"
FL
6.5
107.0
107.2
14.0
99.8%
Yes
3
NE Corner of Building Pad
12"
FL
6.1,
106.3
107.2-
14.0
99.2% .
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
pj)v
14
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page, 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of _Sgjl !Bearing Capacity.
Legend for Elevation:i
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd LiftBep
Elm-Ell
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith:LeBlafic P.E.
SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Pede/ 1 Engineering A;Testin!; Imc.
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing JUL 0 9 2018 j .
.�lorida Reg. No..59394'
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of.Authorization #54,71.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, aare i as en I p; peiry ofclients, and authorization for publication of statements,
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserveg o approval. A ensity test determines;the degree of compactiomof the tested layer ofmaterial
only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determ Q0 T AP ripm4fogf, arlying scili,matenals bblow"the proposed structure. The results
do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occ oring test is required to certify that the,underlying soils,will support the proposed structure
without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings bd1parformed ko 'evaluate the suitability of the underlying
soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils'.Method' D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client, prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material., FET was not con racted to'perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the
added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting
the proposed structure without settlement. I This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or
conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed
structure, we recommend performing soil b Irings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying
soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements. of.. 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, loc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other
areas or. dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations,
overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior
to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the pubic and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you
we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2
ederal
& TESTING INC.
250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069
Field Density Tests. of Compacted Soils M
Phone 954-784-2941
800.848-191.9
Fax 954-784-7875.
y�fvvw.fed-eng.com
Project: Proposed Residence Lot 23, Creekside �bdtte: June 21, 2018
Address:. 3039 Woodswalk-Drive,. Fort Pierce, FL Order#: 18DR544
Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: 1 Z 6 Ld 5�
Material Type: Pale Brown Sand -with Traces of Shell Tech: BK
Client: D.R. Horton, Inc.
Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE
Palm Bay, FL 32907
Compaction. Req.:. 95%
Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe.:
Depth
Elev.
Moist.
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor.
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
/o
Compaction
Pass
1
Center of Building Pad
12" :
FL
7.0 ..
105.9
107.2
14.0
98.8%
Yes
2
SW Corner of Building Pad
12"
FL
6.5
107.0
107.2
14.0
99.8%
Yes
3
NE Corner. of Buildin Pad
12"
FL
6.1
106.3
107.2
14.0
99:2%
Yes
4
5
6
7
8
In
9
, tow
10
11
12
13
14
\��►11!lii�
���
Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information -for Disclaimer
This Is a Compaction Test oniv on the top 12"-of the pad and is not a verification of S911 acity �'•,
Legend for Elevation: "' N o9394 `0
PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd.Lift Submitted by:
SL = Springline FL = Final Lift APPRO
Vith LeBlanc, P,E r �, SG = Subgrade BG Below Grade ederal-Engineedr;g.i gting n .` �� vj
BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida. Reg. No. 56 4� -.�`.ORIO�;;
TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authoriz9flo 1--- A
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential propertyW clients, and authorization -(otIl fi'�n o t@fn�ents.
conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A densily test determines the degree of compaction o thl {esteti i) material
only. A density does not replace'a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results
do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soll boring testis required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure
without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the undedying.soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying
soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work.
PAGE 1 of 2