The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TESTj RECEMD Phone 954-784-2941 edei-al 954-784-7875 MAY 2.5 ?O18 Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. Permitting Department wwWfed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 St. Lucie County Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 13, Creekside Date: May 7, 2018 Address: 8405 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR377 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: ' 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Palm Bay, FL 32907 95% Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 7.3 106.1 107.0 14.0 99.2% Yes 2 NW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 13.9 106.8 107.0 1 14.0 99.8% Yes 3 SE Corner of Buildin Pad 12" FL 6.3 .104.3 107.0 ' 14.'0 97.5% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted,by, " SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith Ublaric; P.E. SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade r Federal. Engineering i3,Testing, Inc. BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg `-No. 59394, TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authoriz6±ion #5471 As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential propeit d clients 'and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density?est determines the degree of c6mp5ction of the tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil material -s below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underiying coils will support the proposed structure Ac.Y without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted-Soilsr Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & project on the reverse side. The purpose of our material only. In no way shall a compaction test i performed by the client prior to construction to ver 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted added fill material 'does not include an analysis of I the proposed structure without settlement. This d conditions below the tested top 12 inches of mater structure, we recommend performing soil borings b soil conditions. esting, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced .st was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of place a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting isity compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or . If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed ow all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not (part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the Itested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved lareas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances ue to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. I It has been a pleasure working with you and we look foi to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 1919 ed.erlti�l 954-784-7875 Fax 954-784-7875 S TESTING INC. www.fod-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 13, Creekside Date: May 7, 2018 Address: 8405:Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR377 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: I`[[Z" Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe De th p Elev. Moist % Dry Density. PCF Proctor Value : PCF. Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1. Center of Building Pad 12" FL 7.3 106.1 107.0 14.0 99.2% Yes 2 NW Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 13.9 106.8 107.0 14.0 99.8% Yes 3 SE Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 6.3 104.3 107.0 14.0 97.5% Yes 4 5 6 7 V1 8 MA . 10 9ermittin I De 10 ci County, L 11 12 13 14 Remarks: This is a Comaaction Test Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift SL = Springline FL = Final Lift SG = Subgrade BG =.Below Grade BC Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing z- ORIDk-%��`�� TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization �iyy,4 ,Q p- As a mutual protection to clients, the. public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for .i6 -027 t conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the Ceste ay�r o�erial only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. for Additional Information .for Disclaimer owthe top 12" of the pad and is not a verification- of So'I Be F ac Submitted -by: Keith LeBlanc, P.E. = 70 - Federal Engineering.& FB90it ,_Ing Florida Reg. No. 59394 s� PAGE 1 of 2