The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TESTe �a F RECEIVED & TESTING INC. 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 J U L 2 4, 12018 . Field Density Tests 01 Q,9rmaq% tt$9#Ai D-6938 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com __ Project: __ Proposed Residence I Lot 9; Creeksi a Date: July 12, 2018 Address: 3134 Tidewater Circle, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR634 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: 17/Z—O Material Type: Light Yellowish Brown Sand with Traces of Shell. Tech: TS Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430_.Culver.Drive NE Compaction Req Palm Bay, -FL 32907 95% Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth p Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 9.8 108.2 112.5 11.0 96.2% . Yes 2 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 109.7 112.5 11.0 97.5% Yes 3 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 11.0 108.3 112.5 11.0 96.3% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test.only on the top 12" of the Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1 st, 2nd, 3rd Lift )ad and is nova verification of Soil Submitted by: W� SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc,-P.E. SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing �PPR V FloridwReg. No. 59394 TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade i Certificate of Authorization #5471 As amutual,protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submittedas e iLoperty of clients, --and authorization for publication o`-,statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the';degr, a of compaction of the tosted.fa;er of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil rnafkWs bAwkhe proposed gii6die. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the urid9/1yi"i3 ,oils -will sunpsrtthe,.proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be perforhi dao e�aluaie the sui,sliility of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this tvOri't. PAGE 1 of 2 Com Pursuant to your request, Federal E project on the reverse side. The -pr material only. In no way shall a con performed ,by the -client prior to cons 12" of added"fill material: FET was) added fill material does not include a the proposed structure without settle conditions below the tested top 12 in structure, we recommend performing soil conditions. d Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer ineering &-Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced )se of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of ction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be ,tion to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the inalysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting nt. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or m of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed it borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying Environmental analysis of the soil rrf aterials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required,--we-can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The .scope of services is for determineition_,of the'degree. of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not. abailable at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current- common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 sta , dard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and of er disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, thie-public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts' from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look -forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 RECEIVEQ Phone 954-784-2941 J U L 1$ 2018 800-848-1919 edera.1- Fax 954.784-7875 L 48 TESTING mc. $TD woe county, Permitting www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density.Tests of .Compacted Solis Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 9, Creekside Date: July 12, 2018 Address: 3134 Tidewater Circle, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR634 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #:�� Material Type: Light Yellowish Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: TS Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth, -Elev. Moist '�o Dry Density PCF Proctor Value, PCF , Optimum Moisture % Compaction . Pass 1 NE Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 9.8 108.2 112.5 11.0 96.2% Yes 2 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 109.7 112.5 11.0 97.5% Yes 3 SW Corner of Buildin "Pad 12" FL 11.0 108,3 112.5 11.0 96.3% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ��®®1CF!!V. f �7�✓ Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer �``'��• COG E�'�� /% This is a Com action Test onlyon the to 12" of the ad and is not a verification of Soil ft arj . Legend for Elevation: a PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: r ; SL = Springiine FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.R ;� STATES ,yg SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering,84etJIn��l® t� �� 4\ BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of: Footing Florida Reg. No: 593&' �r R TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorize ildliu, AL`��v�� As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential:property, of clients, and authorization forUbP"igq 41�,�it ;;nt% conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the=tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring lest is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement if no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2