The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TEST} e e v�a & TESTING INC. 250 SIN 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 RECEIVED MAY 2 5 201E Field Density Tests of Compacte&SWFIO 'od D-6938 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com Project: Proposed Residence Lot 132, Creekside Date: May 7, 2018 Address: 8412 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR379 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: % Z l z- - Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor value PCF Optimum moisture /o Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 7.1 106.1 106.8 14.0 99.3% Yes 2 1 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" 1 FL 13.7 106.0 106.8 14.0 99.3% Yes 3 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 10.2 104.9 106.8 14.0 98.2% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Spit Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: �( PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Subrhitted'by:., .v1 -Cd SL = Springline FL = Final Lift - Keith LeBlanc; •?.E.. S/ b t S SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal•Engineerin & Testing, Inc. BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59:394 TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization #5471 As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports Is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of cgmpaction of the tested layer of material only.'A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certifyihA. underlying soii.materlal's balow the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required t certify that the 4nderlyirig soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that-soil'berings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retestingimust be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Com Pursuant to your request, Federal Eng ! ne project on the reverse side. The purpose material only. In no way shall a co performed by the client prior to constructs 12" of added fill material. FET was not co added fill material does not include an ana the proposed structure without settlement. conditions below the tested top 12 inches structure, we recommend performing soil C soil conditions. .d Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer ring ", '-& Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of i test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top tracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the Fsis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed rings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying Environmental analysis of the soil materials'is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for perfo7ing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for pied areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. J Page 2 of 2 V Phone 954-784-2941 eder'�dl' `` 800.848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 131h Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6930 Project: Proposed -Residence Lot 132, Creekside Date: May 7, 2018 Address: 8412 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR379 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: 1712-- 0�5 Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1.557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth p Elev. Moist % Dry Density. PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % ..- Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 7.1 106.1 106.8 14.0 99.3% Yes 2 NE Corner of Building Pad. 12" FL 13.7 106.0 106.8 14.0 99.3% Yes 3 SW'Corner of Buildin 'Pad 12" FL 10.2 104.9 106.8 14-.0 98.2% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 VA V 9 per Jci 2018 10 ' epartme t 11 L 12 13 14 111 I I l l/K Remarks: See Reverse Side Page 2 of 2 for Additional Information.for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12"-of the pad and is not a verification of S rang a aci . '•• i Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, EA , STATE 01/ y; SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engine `.Testing, Inc. BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. W '•'cCOii1DP••'�!� mow' TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authort�1it 11 T�i6 NG As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorizat�c� )9,'1r Blk�tiQQ�q~ �a%tements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction offt!61144 �d Ityer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after -heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2