The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TESTedet�Al RECFiV - & TESTING INC. - (� 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests D-6938 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com Project: Proposed Residence Lot 130, Creekside Date: July 10, 2018 Address: 8420 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #:• 18DR616 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: j7rz— 0466 ( Material Type: Clayey Orangish Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: TS Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req Palm Bay, -FL 32907 Proctor Method 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 SE Corner of Building Pad. 12" FG 10.1 108.9 108.0 11.5 100.8% Yes 2 NW Corner of Building Pad' 12" FG 9.2 1 105.7 108.0 11.5 97.9% Yes 3 Center of Building Pad 12" FG 10.2 103.5 108.0 11.5 95.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks_: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the Pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearlinq Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR = Pmofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted.by: /f SL = Springline FL = Final Lift ®�® Keith L®glanc, P.E. SG = Subgrade BG =Below Grade AP® v �® Feder2l`Engineering & 7�sting, Ina BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg: No. 59394-- TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization #5471 - As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of cli®nts,;arid authorization for publioati2n of"statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the,degree of compaction oft ' he tasted lager of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials. be!ow the" propoed s6ucture. The result. do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the 66clarlying'soils will.sunport tlie:proposed structy, without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed,to-e-o lbate tha suitability of the under) soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on tnls work. I PAGE 1 of 2 CO Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineei project on the reverse side. The purpose i material only. In no. way shall a compactior performed by -the client prior -to construction 12"_ of added fill material. FET was not cont added fill material does not include an analy the proposed structure -without settlement. conditions below the tested top 12 inches of structure, we recommend performing soil boi soil conditions. Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer 0 rig` & Testing,' Ind. (FETY. has performed a compaction test at the referenced our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be D verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top acted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the s of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting 'his density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or naterial. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed igs below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying Environmental -analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required-, we -can- provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the.soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the -degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are -based on -current -common industry, requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots'. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbs , ces due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, - overgrown, vegetation., traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As -a mutual protection to .clients, the public and authorization for use, publication of s- pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients cents, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 RECEIVED 800.848.1919 j edera ®1.018 Fax 954-784-7875 )U( 8 TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.cOm Permitting Departmenr 250 sw 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 18 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 130,.Creekside Address: 8420 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Area Tested: B Material Type: C with7races of Shell Date: July 10, 20 Order #: 18DR616 Permit #: Tech: TS Client: D.R. Horton, Inc..!; 95% Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Palm Bay, FL 32907 roctor Optimum Test TEST LOCATION Probe Elev. Moist % DValue n Moisture Compaction ass # i Depth PCF % 1 SE Corner of Buildin Pad 12" FIG10,1 108.9 108.0 11.5 100.8% Yes 2 NW Corner of Buildino Pad 12" FG 9.2 105.7 108.0 11.5 97.9% Yes 3 Center of Building Pad 12" FIG10.2 103.5 108.0 11.5 95.8% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is B Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not.a verification of Soil Bear Legend for Elevation: s PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: , Keith LeBlanc, P.E. SL = Springline FL Fin, Lift i• t( � r, o _. Federal Engineering ifs ti(tg, Inc. SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade STATE OF o �� Florida Reg. No. 5930 a 0` BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Certificate of Authori�? TOP =Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade As a mutual protection to clients, ;the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as theA onfidenttest stdetennines roperty of Ithe.degree o co compaction ll m� ort�ate conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports Is reserved pending our written approva density only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests boringdo no s required to -certify that the underlying soils wt certify the underlying soil materials below ill supp�rtthe ptO�ds� tructtu� do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A so without settlement. If no soil bodngs have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlyin soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rainstorms, retesting must be performed on this work. D wN_G d of 9