Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD DENSITY TEST 6-11-18Ph one, hone' 954-784-294'I ' .>>r:. .: . ... • •.RECEIVED ...::, .. . 800448 Ni 2. min Fax.954-784 7875.: 8 TESTING'INC. - o : (� :WWW.fed-eng.COI11.: . .9De a ;• 113th Ave'Pompado Beach, FL 33068 P rtinenh: SO t.1a, S .. :.... F Cony . .. 11 M . field: Density Tests of. pacte. ; o' ethod .D-6938. . Project:::: Pao osed Sin le Tamil. Home ' June 8,.2018 Address: 2044. Nettles Blvd:; Jensen Beach,. FL 3495 Order #: � 18CMT1573:. -Address: ... ... .'Area.Tested:-. ..Building Pad : .: I: :Perrriit Material.Type::. Light: Brown Sand with. Traces of Rock & Shell:. : : Tech::: : BI< Client:. Mel-R -Construction; Inc. ...� Address: 10967, S.• OOcean. Drive : :: � :.:: Compaction .Req.: 95•%.. Jensen: Beach, FL:34957 Proctor Method::: ' ASTM.•D-1557. = Test : • ' :.' .. : ' :.' Probe Moist ..'Dry: Proctor.' Optimum -TEST: LOCATION : Elev. Density: Value. - Moisture'. Compaction :. Pass # Depth' % . u . . PCF PCF ' .NO .. : . 1 : Center.of:Buildin Pad::: :.: 12" FL. : 9:1: ..1:03.2: 1.08..E : 8;9 95.0% Yes : 2 : 'NE.Cornier of Buildin • Pad.: :. : 12"�; FL. 13.4 .:103,8 108:6.'• '' : 8:9..: :.95:6% .. Yes 3 ' SW Corner.of• Buildin 'Pad :12" . FL ..6;9.. 104.8. .108.6. '. 8.9 96.5%. - : Yes. 4 StCorner.of Buildin.. Pad:-` 12': FL I . 8.4. ' 104.1 . 108.6 8 9 95.9% Yes. . 7. .10: 13: 1.4 .:Remarks:.-.'See.Reverse Side '(Page•2:of.2) for Additional Infotrnaltion for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test ohl � on the -top 12:' of they pad and is not a Verification o Soil ar9ti ;Capaei Legend for Elevation:: APR.= Proofroll .. 1,2,3 1st 2nd:3rd Lift:.. Subniitted•by: SL:=Springlirie FL = Final Lift : .: Keith L'eBlanc,. RE" SG = Subgrade. BG Below.Grade : Federal Enginedrtng:� Testing, Ir�c.'. . BG=.Basecourse; . BOF = Bottom :of Footing ; • . Florida Reg:: Na 590394'. "•=Top of Pipe FG.. Finished.Grade ':: ::: Certificate�of Auhorizat'ion"#5471' .`� utual protection to:clients,. the public and ourselves;.all: reports are submitted s the confidential, property of clients; and authonzation for ublication of statements, e INI P colic uMons or extracts from:or regarding'our reports is reserved. pending our Written approval A density.testdetermines the:degree.of ccrppaction of the;3e tEo�Iayei4ftiatenal . only. A"density:does not replace a soil bearirig capacity determination: These density t6s�s:do'not certify the underlying soil materials below, th6 proposed sructure- he.results do riot preclude or guarantee that future• settlement,'and cracking will not occur. A. soil boring testis requiredto cer ify'that the underlying soils v,tll s�ppwrt(t�ie orofiosed s>ructure v✓ithoutsettlement. If no soil borings Have been performed to verify the,undedying soils; ui% recommend that soil'borings be performed to evaluate tfie soitability,o1.f the underlying .. soil to:suppprt: the proposed 'structure. After:laying dornianf for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be porormed'on this work. 0 C olrnpacte.d:Soils`Meth�od:.D-693$. Disclaimer: Pursuant to :your request, . Federal ' Er gineecing `& Testing, . Inc:.' (FET) .has:. performed, a compaction test at: the _ referenced: . project on: the reverse side. The purpose iof our. test 'w s to determine.'the degree of compaction. of the: tested layer" of: Ma terial only. In.no.way,shall.a.compaction test,replace:.a soil bearing capacity. deter mini tion..A•soil borindlest must be performed by the client' prior to "construction to.verify.'subsoil conditions. Our -scope :of servicesonly: included testing.the top 12" of added fill material. FET was -not contracted to perform superviision.of the'building pad: preparation:. This: testing of the• added.-fillmaterial-does n'-include,ananalysis of"the underlying' soil materials-to•determineif they are capable'of supporting the proposed structure virithout settlement.•:- .This density-compa. n test does not:warranty-any'underly,,ing soil. materials or ;conditions below tfie.testedtop.12 inches of:material. If no�soil•borings have been performed in the•location of the proposed structure; we recommend: performing soil borings below all: foundation: areas of. the proposed structure; to verify:the und&lying:: : :soil conditions., .: a. . Environmental' analysis of the.' soil,mate.rials is'not :part: of -the :scope of services. If -environmental :analysis 'the soils:is: required; we can proyide a.proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. "The scope.of serviaes.is for determination of the degree of.compacti�on:of the tested layer of material only. -No other analysis, is implied oe warranted.' • -Job-project specifications were not: availab a at the: time, _•the :work was', performed.. Determination. of thep.ass/fail , compaction. results: are .based .on current common industry :requirements of.95%' of the ASTM. D=1557'standard for building'foundations. and: 98% of the: AASHTO T=180 standard*... . rpave.. ,areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different. specifications are . required -federal Engineering & Testing, Inc: shall be'notifed . Outfindings are'relative to the date and areas of our.site.work and should not be-reli. upon" to. represent:conditions :ori other areas- or dates. Any subsequent site. disturbad6es:dlue to .water erosion; .rain waters; construction activities, utility or. footing excavations- overgrown vegetation; traffic•and• other disturbances. will. void`Ahis; test -and the site'must be re -compacted 'and. re- tested prior to construction: • . As a:mutual protection to.clients, the publi and-ourselves,'all reports are submitted as the:confdential property of.our ciient and : authorization .for use',; -publicatior} of.' statements,' condusions::or: extracts. from., or" regarding : our . reports . is : reserved bb pending: our:written approval.: :. . 9 ...y If has been,a: leasure:workin with: ou and.we look`forward to doing so in the:near future:. . -, ,.` Ltd: .�-'✓ ^3.:.. • i ilr;`S �T V ' :page 2 of 2. ,