Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD DENSITY TESTe d e r'd" 1,,., & TESTING INC. BY 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069, Project: Props Address: 8629 Area Tested: Material Type: Field Density Tests of Co Residence- . -Lot 31. Creekside Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Buildino Pad Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Palm Bay, FL 32907 J RECEIVED Phone 954-784-2941 r! 0 C T 0 4 ['u 10 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 ST. Lucia county, Permitting www.fed-eng.com Soils Method D-6938 Date: September 21, 2018 Order #: 18DR843 Permit #:' o'�,q Tech: BK Compaction Req.: Proctor Method: 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth 1 Elev. Moist %. Dry Density PC Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" /1FL 8.1 105.7 107.1 12.0 98.7% Yes 2 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" 1 FL 6.3 105.1 107.1 12.0 98.1% Yes 3 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" 1 FL 6.9 106.3 107.1 12.0 99.3% Yes 4 I 5 I 6 I� 7 f - 8 1 9 10 11 1 12 ' 13 1 i 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification, of S F3ear' g Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift I Submitted by: SL = Springline FL = Final Lift J Keith,LeBlanc; P.E. = r 9/Z �/� SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing+ .Florida Reg. No.,59394 TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate Qf Authorization #501'_ As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential propeY.y of clients, grid authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines -the degree of co m-action_of, the tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacN determination. These density tests do not certify the underlyingI -oil materials below the pro'esed' structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is required to certify thzt the,under:ying soils wilt support the proposed structure x. c without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils; we recommend that soil borings be oerfdrmer� t4ev_aluate tJts"suitability of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must'be pdrferm d o,a.tiiis work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method`D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side..The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting -the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil b `rings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of,the'tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry., requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. _J , Page 2 of 2 4ederal S TESTING INC. 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 RECEIVED SEP I ST. Lucie County, PLi rml Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784.7875 www.fed-eng.com Project: Proposed Residence Lot 31, Creekside Date: September 21, 2018 Address: 8629 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 18DR843 Area Tested: Building Pad I Permit #: —(3779 Material Type: Brown Sand with Traces of Shell I I Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. I Address: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 18.1 105.7 107.1 12.0 98.7% Yes 2 NE Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 16.3 105.1 107.1 12.0 98.1 % Yes 3 SW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 106.3 107.1 12.0 99.3% Yes 4 5 6 I j .7 I 8 I 9 I 10 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 � .; ".►,�OIf ��4a3t9dlf�f�`� memarKS: _See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of S 10da in Capacity. " 71 Legend for Elevation: PR = Proofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift j Submitted by: j6a-- , SL = Springline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. jrAT= SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering,& Testing Inc. r BC = Basecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 562FW-�"'JI'iC1�`.•��,:� TOP = Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade i Certificate of Authorfz ion";#5,471„ �'�,•,��`, As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authori, zation. for pubjicatiori' of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying its, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underling soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for period of 90 days YI 9 p or after heavy raintstorns, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 I I