The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESPONSE TO PLAN EXAMINERJqUO03 Owl is ®INNVOS Cover Sheet for Response to ZP Plan Examiner Permit # 1806-0111 Includes Response to questions 1 and 3 Question 2 response previously submitted 4 RECEIVED JUL 10 2918 ST. Lucie County, Permitting i �� a P�� --, PROPERTY INFORMATION Address: 320 Se Naranja Ave City / State / Zip: Port St Lucie, FI 34983 Parcel #: 3419-530-0034-000/0 Zoning: RS-4 APPLICATION INFORMATION Permit Number: 1806-0111 Permit Type: DOCK CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor Name: Business Name: Business Addr: City / State / Zip: REVIEWS AND COMMENTS Review Type Status DOCUMENTS MISSING COMPLETE REVIEW COMMENTS Page 1 Owner(s): Barry Jeneway Jurisdiction: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY Lot#: 34 Block: 32 Stories: Automatic Sprinkler System? No Fax Number: Email: Reviewed By Date Started Date Completed Date Released Audrey Humphrey 6/612018 7/10/2018 7/10/2018 Comment: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMPLETE Lynn Swartzel 6/13/2018 6/13/2018 6M3/2018 Comment: FRONT COUNTER REVIEW COMPLETE - Audrey Humphrey 602018 6/612018 616/2018 Comment: PLANS EXAMINER REVIEW INCOMPLETE Jpi, Inc 6/28/2018 6/28/2018 Comment: 1) PLEASE PROVIDE CONNECTION DETAILS AT CANTILEVER JOISTS & WALKWAY. ([A] 107.2.1) 6/28/2018 Comment: 2) THE CUT SHEET FOR THE BOAT LIFT IS UNDER THE OLD 2004 FBC, PLEASE UPDATE AND SUBMIT TWO SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES. (FAC 61G20-1.001(1)) 6/28/2018 Comment: 3) PLEASE CLARIFY- DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY FDPEP SHOW APPROVAL OF A 50' SEAWALL AND EXIST. DOCK. PROPOSED DESIGN DOES NOT MATCH THIS DESCRIPTION. ([A] 107.2.1) ZONING REVIEW COMPLETE Lydia Galbraith 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 Comment: r-I LJ ol@d dia Galbraith < state.fl.us> Sovacool, Monica Monica.Sovacoep. From: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 11:36 AM Sent: Lydia Galbraith Noncompliantjrf.pdf, permitt 18 To: RE: Report_FL_Review Comments_ Subject: Hi Lydia the ro ect design section of the exemption letter should be this the Department and the statutes and rules in effect when the Information was Under the Regulatoryised on the conditions I e �ntineted without furthe This exemption verification is wb 1 expire after one yation y P Ite rolect destg - on need ear, and will not be valid at a other time if site conditions matenal? rovade : ) P submitted. This verification the exem t activityear amended. rat on:gf thts f Gat t F n Y the event t�chan e aitment after the ode y �eW anvltcatton and verification fee will be is modified, or the statutes or ruff d°e D p f; , ��r nhanHesOrthe statutes ox•rules avexmn the eire faetivt In the even y to re -verily -- required. has not changed then it remains exempt, If the activity and location Thanks, Monica Sovacool acvnarM pro,, EnvfronmentalManager Environmental Resourceing Protection aP o ' ° Florida Department or Environmental Palm Beach Southeast District -West 3301 Gun Club Road, MSC 7210 1 33406 West Palm Beach, FL Monica SOy"ICOOi I Flnridac e{2 EOv rvsai 0 iice:5�618 F,,_5CIIEDULEY4 I h[mailto:galbraithl@stlucieco.orgl From: Lydia Galbrait Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 a - So AM state.fl.us> ort_FL_Review_Comments_NoncoMpiiant_jrf.pdf, permit 1806 0111 To: Sovacool, Monica <Monica.Sovacool@dep. subject: RE: Rep Hi Monica, o However, I didn't realize that the exemption permit has an expiration date of one permit before and thought we were all good to g • I including all adjustment or do the online We have discussed this p 7 or oin to eliminate the permit, should he reapply fired. year. This permit has expired 6/ / t Are we totally g g permit had already P What is required now? Since the project is exert permit? Sorry, for not asking the question in my or email. Did not realize at that time the p Please advise. Thank you, Lydia Gatfraitfi, Zoning Specialist Building and Code Regulation (772)462-1555 hraith s zp,a gS1 • .Dl-Mid From: Sovacool, Monica201814:15 PM a.Sovacool de state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, June ,�lestlucieco.or > To: Lydia Galbraith < alb' Iiantjrf.pdf, permit 1806-0111 subject: RE: Report_FL_Review Comments_Noncomp exemption, they would just apply for another an existing artment. We would only permit. There is no way to modify t from needing a p ro erty owner get an exemption letter from the Dep Hi Lydia- require that any p P The dock and boatlift activities would also be exempt wired o actual permit. verification for the a �� it if t was ational tneactivity that requirs; however, we alsoed do not actual require they get a p Thanks, 7/10/2018 Permit # 1806-0111 Response Letter to Plan Examiner Response to item #3 (3) Please Clarify -Documents approved by FDP,EP show approval of a 50'seawall and Existing dock. Proposed design does not match this description. As I worked with the FDEP, it was my understanding that they provided an exemption for jurisdiction in this canal and were only interested in the overall general concept. They are leaving the detail of the project for the county permit process. With the assistance of the FDEP agent and some primitive drawings and sketches, I worked through the process of achieving the exemption permit. (Permit #56- 0351797-001.002-EE) After receiving the exemption permit, I began to pursue getting all the proper documentation together for my county permit. At this time, I learned I needed more detailed information and I have been working with a local engineering firm to achieve this. (Paul Welch Inc.) The overall concept of my project is basically the same. I am installing approx. 50' of new seawall and modifying the existing dock to accommodate the width of the area between the seawall and the back side of the existing dock. Hopefully I will not be required to go back through the process with FDEP and you will be able to move forward with the county permitting process. If it helps, when I submitted my application to the county, this question was brought up at the counter review. We contacted Stacy Cecil with FDEP and she gave us the go ahead with the project as our modifications had no additional impact/or caused no environmental concerns. There is also an e-mail from Monica Sovocol that gives us the approval. I believe my counter review specialist was Andrea. I apologize in advance if I have miss -stated her name. Thank you for your consideration, lb ov� (,Wily Barry Janeway 7/10/2018 Permit # 1806-0111 Response Letter to Plan Examiner Response to item #3 (3) Please Clarify -Documents approved by FDPEP show approval of a 50'seawall and Existing dock. Proposed design does not match this description. As I worked with the FDEP, it was my understanding that they provided an exemption for jurisdiction in this canal and were only interested in the overall general concept. They are leaving the detail of the project for the county permit process. With the assistance of the FDEP agent and some primitive drawings and sketches, I worked through the process of achieving the exemption permit. (Permit #56- 0351797-001.002-EE) After receiving the exemption permit, I began to pursue getting all the proper documentation together for my county permit. At this time, I learned,l needed more detailed information and I have been working with a local engineering firm to achieve this. (Paul Welch Inc.) The overall concept of my project is basically the same. I am installing approx. 50' of new seawall and modifying the existing dock to accommodate the width of the area between the seawall and the back side of the existing dock. j I Hopefully I will not be required to go back through the process with FDEP and you will be able to move forward with the county permitting process. If it helps, when I submitted my application to the county, this question was brought up at the counter review. We contacted Stacy Cecil with FDEP and she gave us the go ahead with the project as our modifications had no additional impact/or caused no environmental concerns. There is also an e-mail from Monica Sovocol that gives us the approval. I believe my counter review specialist was Andrea. I apologize in advance if I have miss -stated her name. Thank you for your consideration, F I tr Cf% r.