Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONUNIVERGINEERING SCIENCES PRELIMINARY SU SURFACE EXPLORATION .... Proposed Oaklan Lake Estates Subdivision . Oakl Id Lake Circle _ Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 lay 19, 2017 P EPARED FOR: Ryan Homes 2005 Vist Parkway, Suite.102 West Palm Beach, Florida 33411 PREPARED BY: Universal Engineering ineerin Sciences, Inc. 9 9 820IBrevard Avenue Rockledge, Florida. 32955 (121) 638-0808 _ FILE cor'V .-____ Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environrpental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing ' Threshold Inspection, Offices in: Orlando - Daytona Beach • Fort Myers • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Ocala • Palm Coast - Rockledge • Sarasota 4 Miami • Panama City • Pensacola • Fort Pierce • Tampa • West Palm Beach • Atlanta, GA • Tifton, GA L 0 .. - ll - . UHIE� GINIEE•R�I�i+G Coosuitants i6 Geoiechnical Engineer Geophysical Services - Construction N Building Inspection • Plan Review • Bu Ryan Homes 1450 Centrepark Boulevard, Suite 340 West Palm. Beach, Florida 33401 SAL nvironmental Sciences Is Testing • Threshold Inspection Code Administration May 19., 2017 Attention: Mr. Michael DeBock Reference: Preliminary Subsurface E ploration Proposed Oakland Lake. Es ates Subdivision Oakland Lake Circle Fort Pierce, Saint. Lucie Co nty, Florida Universal Project No. 0330. 700052.0000 Dear Mr DeBock• LOCATIONS: • Allanta • Daytona Beach • FadMyeis • Fort Pieroe i Jacleonville • Miami • Ocala Oriardo (Headquarters) Palm coast Panama My Pensacola Rockledge Sarasota ■. Tamp West Palm Beach ■ Atlanta, GA• Tlfion, GA - Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (Universal) has completed a preliminary . subsurface exploration at the above referenced sit6 in Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida. Our exploration was authorized by you and wias conducted as outlined 'in Universal's Proposal No. 0330.0417.00003. This exploration was performed in accordance with generally accepted soil .and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The following report presents the results, y f our field exploration with a geotechnical engineering interpretation of those'results with respell to the project characteristics as provided to us. We have included our .estimates of the typical wet season high groundwater levels at the boring locations and. general comments. concerl'Iing .anticipated soil support characteristics for typical low-rise residential buildings. We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this. project and look forward to .a. continued association. Please do_ not hesitate to contact us'if you should. have any questions; or if we may further assist you as your plan�•proceed. ow!�*Ir; -iz Sincerely yours; UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCID Certificate of:Authonzatian-No. 549 ..._ Jose R.. Benitez Jr., EJ., . Staff Engineer. 2 — Addressee UESDOCS #1450465 . INC. . i. - �:. NSF •;• J► � .: 923 Brad Fauceft, M.S. P.E: Regional Engineer Florida Professional Engineer No.. 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0803 Fax (321) 638-0978 I www. Universal Engineering. com 1.6 INTRODUCTION .... .................. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. 3.0 PURPOSE ........................... TABLE[OF CONTENTS ........................................ ........ I 4.1 SOIL SURVEY ................................... ... . .................................................................................. 2 4.2 TOPOGRAPHY.. 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................. .... . ....... ............. LIST OF TABLES I ................. ­ _"' . t. ....................................................................................... 2 .. ... 5.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES... .................... ... ........................................................................... 2 6.0 LIMITATIONS ...................... .................... ........ ................................ 3 7.0 FIELD METHODOLOGIES ................... ........... ....... .................. ...... ;;4 7.1 -STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS. . .4 .. 7.2 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TESTS .............. _.. ..... 7.3 PAVEMENT CORE SAMPLES ........... .......... 8.0 LABORATORY METHODOLOGIES .... 4 8.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS ......................... 9.0 SOIL ST'RATIGRAPHY .................... 9.1 PAVEMENT CORE RESULTS .............. ...... 10.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS......... ............... ............. 10.1 EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ... Ir ....... 10.2 TYPICAL WET SEASON HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVEL 6 11.0 LABORATORY RESULTS ........ ........... ....... 7 11.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS.......... 12.1 PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS.......,, ........ ...... 7 13.0 CLOSURE ........................................ Table 1: Saint Lucie County Soil SL Table 11: Generalized Soil Profile .... Table Ill., Pavement Core Results.... vey Designated Soil Types ....... 2 ......................................... ....... 5' ..................... 6 i 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge*, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 . I www.UniversalEngineering.com Table 1: Saint Lucie County Soil SL Table 11: Generalized Soil Profile .... Table Ill., Pavement Core Results.... vey Designated Soil Types ....... 2 ......................................... ....... 5' ..................... 6 i 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge*, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 . I www.UniversalEngineering.com RES Boring Location Plan...-.. .......... ................. .,Figure No. 1 Key to Boring Logs. Appendix A ........................ Boring Logs ... .. . ............. ...... Appendix A, GBADocument ...... 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, f i www-Un -.,.....Exhibit I I! ' 32965 (321) -'638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 Engineeiing.co' rh- Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida 1.0 INTRODUCTION Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (Ur exploration for the proposed Oakland Lai County, Florida. Our exploration was auth( was conducted as outlined in Universal's P performed in accordance with generally acc other warranty, • expressed or implied, is mac 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration ersal) has completed a preliminary subsurface Estates Subdivision in Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie zed by Mr. Michael DeBock of Ryan Homes and posal No. 0330:0417.00003. This exploration was )ted soil and foundation engineering practices. No It is Universal's understanding, based upon iinformation provided by the client, that the proposed project will consist of a residential subdivision in, Fort Pierce, Florida; currently envisioned as shown in Figure No. 1. The proposed subdivision is intended to have seventy-three (73) residential lots. We understand that the stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces to be developed at this site will be collected within an existing retention I basin located in the central sections of the project area. Please note that our subsurface explorati general subsurface information only. C structural and traffic loading information performed, 3.0 PURPOSE The purposes of this exploration were: • to explore the subsurface cond client and • to provide our estimates of the locations and • to provide general comments typical low-rise residential con 4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located within Section 1 County, Florida. More specifically, the sits Street Road and North Kings Highway, in vegetation consisted of mostly grass, aloe proposed subdivision. 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, f www. Un was,preliminarv, in nature and conducted to acquire e specified site configuration, building detail and available a final subsurface exploration should be at general locations and depths as requested by the wet season high groundwater levels at the boring ing the anticipated soil support characteristics for I, Township 34 South, Range 39 East in Saint Lucie is located on the northwest quadrant of Palomar Fort Pierce, Florida. At the time of drilling, the site ig with an existing paved circular road around the 1 a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 1638-0978 alEngineering.com Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration 4.1 SOIL SURVEY Two (2) .soil types are mapped within the general project area according to the Saint Lucie County Soil Survey (SLCSS)', dated 1980. 4, brief description of these soils is provided in the following Table I. ITABLE I c1 rcc n1=a1r_1NAT1=n -gnll TYPES (Map Symbol) Bnef�Descnptlon. Soil mated I that has been dug up from several areas with different Arents, 0 to 5. percent slopes (4) kinds of soi . It is used to fill up. areas such as low sloughs, marshes, shallow depressions, and swamps: Nearly poorly drained sandy soils in broad areas in the I, p y Wabasso sand (48) flatwoods. flatwls. 4.2 TOPOGRAPHY According to information obtained from the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) Oslo, Florida quadrangle map dated-1949, photo -revised 1970, ground surface elevation across the site area (pre -developmental) is approximately +20 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). 5.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The services conducted by Universal during our preliminary subsurface exploration program are as follows: Drill seven (7) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings within the project site area to a depth of 10 feet below existing land surface (bls). • Core through the existing pavement sections at.four (4) locations with a diamond tipped core drill to ascertain the approximate thickness of the asphaltic surfacing and base course. Perform Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). testing- within the upper portions of the selected SPT boreholes to help further determine soil consistencies. Secure samples of representative soils encountered in the soil borings. for review, laboratory analysis and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer. • Measure the existing site groundw season high groundwater levels. • Conduct soil gradation tests on sele their engineering properties. • Assess the existing soil conditions w i 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, I www. Un levels and provide an estimate of the typical wet soil samples obtained in the field to help determine respect to the proposed construction.- 2 rida 32b55 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 ;rsalEngineering.com a Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision' Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida Preliminary Subsurface Exploration Preparing a geotechnical engineering. report which docurnents the results of our preliminary subsurface exploration and laboratory testing program with analysis and general comments. &0 LIMITATIONS Please note that this report is based on a preliminary subsurface exploration program with the scope of services, general boring 'locations and depths as developed in conjunction with the client. The. information submitted in this report is based on data obtained from the soil borings performed at:the locations indicated on the_Boring Location Plan and from other information as This report has not been prepared red to meet the full needs of design professionals, contractors, or any other parties, and any use of.this reportby them without the guidance of the soil and foundation engineer who. prepare it constitutes improper usage which could lead to erroneous assumptions, faulty conclusions,�and other problems. This report does not reflect any variatior extent of such variations may not becor actual construction. If variations then bec the recommendations in this report'after p period and. noting the characteristics of a at any of our boring locations; however, i the entire property. Therefore, this report and fill quantities. which may occur across the site. The nature and evident until the course of future: explorations or ie evident, it will be necessary for re-evaluation of 'orming on-site.observations during the construction variations. Deleterious soils were not encountered. cannot completely: preclude their presence across could not be used for estimating such items as cut Our field exploration did not find. unsuitable or unexpected materials at the time of occurrence. However, borings for typical geotechnical report are widely spaced and generally not sufficient for reliably detecting the presence of isola ed, anomalous surface or subsurface conditions, or reliably estimating unsuitable.or.suitable material quantities. Accordingly, Universal does not recommend relying on our boring information to negate presence of anomalous materials, or for estimation of material quantities unless our contracted . services specifically include sufficient exploration for such purpose(s) and within the report we so state that the level of exploration provided should be sufficient to detect such anomalous conditions or estimate such quantities. Therefore, Universal will not be responsiblg for any extrapolation or use of our data by others beyond the purpose.(s) for which it is applicable or intended. All users of.this report are cautioned that locate any man-made buried objects or id may exist at the site during the course of Universal to locate or identify such concE man-made objects or environmental haze construction that are not discussed within requested. For a further.description of the scope and attached within Exhibit 1 "Important Inforr prepared by GBAIThe Geoprofessional Bu 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flo www. UnivE :re was no requirement for Universal.to attempt.to tify, any other potentially hazardous conditions that is exploration. Therefore no attempt was made by s. Universal cannot be responsible for any buried s ,which may be.; subsequently encountered during e text of this report. We can provide this service if imitations of this report please review the document ation About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" iness Association. 3 r 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax 1(321) 638-0978 IEngineering .com Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce,. Saint Lucie County, Florida 7.0 FIELD METHODOLOGIES 7.1 STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS The seven (7) SPT borings, designated B performed in general accordance with; the 1 Penetration Test and Split -Barrel Sampling a standard split-barrel.sampler into the soil number of. blows required to drive the gar designated the penetration resistance, or I The soil samples recovered from the split-b in general accordance with the guidelines. o Engineering Purposes [Unified Soil Classific Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration through B7 on the attached Figure No. 1, were rocedures of ASTM D 1586 (Standard Method for f Soils). The SPT drilling technique involves driving y a 140 pound hammer, free falling 30 inches. The pier 1 foot, after an initial seating of 6 inches, is -value, an index to soil strength and consistency: rrel sampler were visually inspected and classified ASTM'D 2487 (Standard Classification of Soils for tion System]). CME 45 ATV mounted drilling rig. Universal located The SPT soil borings.were performed with a the test borings in the. field by. using the provided. site plan and by plotting in the field with. a Garmin GPS receiver. No surrey control was provided on -site, and our boring locations should be considered only as accurate as implied . by the methods of measurement used. The approximate boring locations are shown on i�he attached Figure. No. 1. 7.2 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TE Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests selected SPT .boreholes to help further di performed at 1 foot intervals in general accc G. F. Sowers and Charles S. Hedges (ASCI follows: A standard 1.5 inch diameter conic hammer falling Winches. Following the se; of blows required to, drive the sampler an ; resistance, providing an index to soil strengi 7.3 PAVEMENT CORE SAMPLES Samples of the existing asphaltic pavemer (Cl through C4) with. a 4 inch nominal dial asphaltic pavement into the underlying bas backfilled and the surfacing patched with an returned#o our laboratory. for subsequent e) 8.0 LABORATORY METHODOLOG 8.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS We completed #200 sieve particle site These samples were tested according to 1 Method for Amount of Material in Soils Fii requires a thorough mixing the sample with of the particles smaller than the sieve size I were .performed within the upper portions of the termine soils consistencies. The DCP tests were dance with the procedures developed by Professor. 1966). The basic procedure for the DCP test is ag. al. point is driven into the soil by a 15-pound steel ting of the point to a depth of 2 inches, the number dditional 1.75 inches is designated the penetration i and density. sections were obtained at four (4) core locations Ater diamond bit core drill, advancing through the course materials. Afterwards the core. holes were sphaltic "cold patch" mixture and the core samples nination. lyses on seven (7) representative soil samples. ,procedures listed ASTM D 1.140 (Standard Test than the No. 200 Sieve). In part, ASTM D 1140 ater and flushing it through a No. 200 sieve until all ie the sample. 4 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flori a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 www.Unive6alEngineering.com Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida The percentage of the material finer than th of the soil sample and aids in evaluating materials passing the:#200 sieve is shown I 9.0 SOIL STRATIGRAPHY The results of our field exploration and lat obtained from .the SPT borings, such as. groundwater levels. are shown on the bori Logs, Soil Classification Chart is also inch from field logs after the recovered soil sami Universal Project No. 0330-1700052. 0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration. No. 200 sieve helps determines the textural nature z .engineering characteristics. The percentage of the attached boring logs. story analysis,. together with ' pertinent information it profiles, penetration resistance and stabilized logs included in Appendix A. The Key to Boring I in -Appendix A. The soil profiles were prepared were examined by a Geotechnical Engineer. The stratification lines shown on the boring ogs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and may not depict exact subsu ace soil conditions. The actual soil- boundaries may be more transitional than depicted. A gene alized profile of -the soils encountered at our boring locations is'presented in the following Table IL For more detailed soil profiles, please refer to the attached boring logs. TABLE II r.;FNFRALIZED SOIL PROFILE r...Depth Encountered. `(feet„b1s),- Approiiimater ,,1ThIdkness - ;, Soil Descri Lion` P Fill. soils consisting of fine sands with varying quantities of silt, clay, Surface 2to 9 gravel, broken shell, and clay lumps [SP, SP-SM, SC]; loose to I medium de se. Highly inter,ayered strata consisting of fine sands [SP], fine sands with silt [SP-SM],, and clayey fine sands [SC], with varying quantities of broken shell and occasional cemented rock layers; 2 to 9 1+ to 8+ . loose to dense. At boring location 132, the fine sand with silt [SP- SM] strata is partially cemented with iron oxide & organic salts and which is locally known as hardpan. NOTE: [ ] denotes Unified Soil Classification system + indicates strata encountered at boring tem 9.1 PAVEMENT CORE RESULTS The results of our examination and mess existing pavement sections are shown in :ion. total thickness undetermined, ,rent of the core samples taken in the field from the following Table III: 5 820 Brelvard Avenue, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0806 Fax (321) 638-0978 www.Univer�alEngineering.com Oakland, Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida P Universal,Pmject No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration TABLE III 4T CORE RESULTS Boring/Cor'e Approximate. Thidkness/Type - Approximate Thickness: Type of Base Course ; l:ocation�` of Asphaltic:Surfacmgi of Base,CouFse - Materials : (inchesy l i (inches) 0.7 S3 C1 1.0 S3 8%Z Coquina . 0.8 S31.1 C2 S3 8Y2 Coquina 1.1 S3 . C3 1.0 S3 8 Coquina 1.6 S3 0.8 S3 C4 1.0 S1 10 Coquina . or 2. Classification of r � asphalticlayer ngswasp iformed visually and .may not, represent actual FDOT mix parameters. 3. Subgrade soils consist mostly of fine sands with traces of gravel & broken shell [SP] (i.e. stabilized subgrade). 10.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 10.1 ExISTING GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS We measured the water levels in the bore�oles on May 8, 2017 after- the groundwater was allowed to stabilize. The groundwater levels are shown on the attached boring .logs. The groundwater level depths ranged from 4.3 feet'bls at boring location B6 to 5.7 feet bis at boring locations B2 and 87: Fluctuations in groundwater levels should be anticipated throughout the year, primarily due to seasonal variations' in rainfall, surface runoff; and other factors that may vary from the time the borings were conducted. 10.2 TYPICAL WET SEASON HIGH GROUP The typical wet season high groundwater sustained for a period of 2 to 4 weeks du conditions, in a year with average normal r season in Saint Lucie County, Florida is b estimate the wet season water level at 1 including the following: WATER LEVEL :vel is defined as the highest groundwater level ig the "wet" season. of -the year, -for existing site nfall amounts. Based on historical data, the rainy ween June and October of the year. In order to boring locations, many factors are examined, a, Measured groundwater level b, Drainage characteristics of existing .soil types G. Season of the year (wet/dry season) d. Current & historical rainfall-da�la (recent and year-to-date) e.. Natural relief points (such as lakes, rivers, swamp areas; etc.) f. Man-made drainage systems 4ditches, canals, etc.) g. Distances to relief points and man-made drainage systems 6' 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flori a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 www.Univer�alEngi.neering.com Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, .Saint Lucie County, Florida h.. On -site types of vegetation i. Area topography (ground sui Groundwater level readings were taken on P Regional Climate Center and the National month of April for Central Saint Lucie County for the month of April. Year-to=date rainfall inches, roughly 6 inches. below the normal le Based on this information and factors listed groundwater levels at the boring locations measured levels. Please note, however, various intense storm events, may be sorni levels. Due to the variable silt and clay content withi there may be occasional isolated pockets of particularly during periods of prolonged we levels may be higher than the estimated wet 11.0 LABORATORY RESULTS 11.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS The soil samples submitted for analysis wer soil sizes passing the #200 sieve size'are s sampled. 12.0 ANALYSIS -AND GENERAL 12.1 PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration elevations) ay 8, 2017. According to data from the Southeast Veather Service, the total rainfall in the previous was 2.2 inches, approximately at. -the' normal levels for 2017 through May 8th was approximately 6% 'el for this time period. e, we estimate that the typical wet season high be approximately 2Y2 feet ' above the existing peak stage elevations immediately following t higher than the estimated typical wet season the near surface soils at this site, we suspect that )erched" groundwater throughout the project area, weather. These temporary perched water table eason high groundwater levels indicated above. classified as fine sands [SP], The percentage of )wn on the boring. logs at the approximate depth The removal of site vegetation and roots, along with other construction activities, will further loosen surficial .soils to various depths. To: provide a homogeneous, compacted, .sandy soil system underneath the proposed foundations and floor slabs for the .proposed. residences, densificatioh of at least the upper 2 feet- of the existing surficial, loose soils and subsequent additional .fill soils will be necessary. This s ould create a soil mat capable: of dissipating' the building loads over any remaining loose strata at depth. We believe that. this can be effectively procedures including a comprehensive vegetation; root mats, debris and organic densificatioh program for the surficial soils procedures are properly performed, we a foundations may be used to support"WhVeri 8k Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Floi www.Unive nplished using conventional. site preparation raking and stripping procedure to remove oils; and then an extensive proof -rolling and subsequent structural fill. Assuming that such ate that conventional, shallow spread footing 7 32955 (321) 631-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978 IEngineering.com .9 0 Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie, County, Florida 13.0 CLOSURE We appreciate this opportunity to be of se the project and look forward to providing analyses as the project progresses thrc concerning this report or when we may be Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration ;e as your geotechnical consultant on this phase of low up explorations and geotechnical engineering h the design phase. If you have any questions any further service, please contact. us. 8 I 820 Brevard Avenue, Ro4edge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-096 www.Univers�lEngineering.com s FIGURE d i UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES ® Approximate SPT Note: Figure is based aerial Photograph. Location a Google Earth OAKLAND ESTATES SUBDIVISION HUMMINGBIRD WAY FORT PIERCE,` INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BORING LOCATION PLAN BY: C6 DATE May 161 2017 CHECKED 8Y: :BF::E.. _ DATE: ti pAOJECT NO: . RE[?ORT No: PAG@ No: V = 200' 0330.1700052.0000 ___ • F APPENDIX.A UNIVERSAL EtVGINI, BORM PROJECT: Oakland.Estates Subdivision Hummingbird Way Fort Pierce; Florida CLIENT: LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: =RANG SCIENCES ECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000 REPORT NO.: L LOG NDIX A BORING DESIGNATION: B1 SHEET: I Of 'I SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST G,S, ELEVATION (ft. DATE STARTED: 514/17 WATER TABLE (ft): 4.6 DATE FINISHED: 5/4117 DATE OF READING: 5/8/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W.S W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: SLOW ~ m wo zoo Mc K ORG.a a� PER DESCRIPTION lY) (%) (INJ CONT.. a INCREMENT wILA HR.) 0A)_s 0 -fine SAND -with traces of clay lumps (Fill), brown, [SP] 4.1 . �i•. It .. fy� '. fine SAND with gravel, broken shell, and clay lumps (Fill), {%+ brown, [SP] 2:7 10.6 5-6-12 18 ip, t • _ clayey fine SAND with traces of broken shell (Fill), brown, [SC]'. - 7-7-4 11 Clayey fine SAND with fraces of aigarilcs, dark brown, [SC] BORING TERMINATED AT 10' 15 PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG REPORT NO., APPENDIX A PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision Hummingbird Way Fort Pierce, Florida . ' CLIENT - LOCATION: • SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: BORING DESIGNATION: B2 SHEET: 1 Of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 514117 WATER TABLE (ft): 5.7 DATE FINISHED: 614117 DATE OF READING: 61812017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W.S.W.T_ (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING. x I BLOWS O. -1 -200 MC INJ CONT W � a PER 6+• DESCRIPTION !i) (IN n y INCREMENT y w s o (%a) fine SAND with tr ces' of claylurnps'(Fill), brown,-[SP]—" ?k± 3,0 5.0 5-6-15 6" '%tt s 5-22-26 22` fine SAND, grey; [Sp] 17-R R' 5 y fine SAND with silt, dark brown, (hardpan) [SP-SM] �t clayeyfine SAND, brown, [SC] 6-7-8 15 . F 611-4 8 ''Clayey fine SAND with occasional cemented rock layers, grey, ISCI BORING TERMINATED AT 10' * DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER. 15 ..... ....... r (, 911 UNIVERSAL ENGIIV BORIN PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision Hummingbird Way Fort Pierce, Florida CLIENT: LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: =RING SCIENCES LOG PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000 REPORT NO.; APPENDIX: A BORING DESIGNATION:. B3 , SHEET: I Of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 614117 WATER TABLE (ft): 6.3 DATE FINISHED: 514117 DATE OF READING: 518/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W.S,W.T: (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: a BLOWS j ¢ ~ O m �. w DESCRIPTION 200 MC K pN! ORG. CONT, w f 2 PERV, g 3 � 3 S HR.) M) o N INCREMENT Z m o 0 f fine SAND with silt and traces of clay lumps (Fill), brown,- ;' '• :, [SP-SM] 9-23-28 23• 5-18-20 18" ::tc •6 fine SANIa,.daik brow [SP]- -- 5 .......... ... ..... E';'•. °4 •... _..,..: 5-6-7 13 4.5 18.3 ., firie SAND'wiff slit, brown, [SP-SM] 6-7-9 16,' sy?- fine SAND, grey, [SP] 5-7-8 15 3.9 19.5 t9 " i ...... BORING TERMINATED IT 10' DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES 15 i ............ ... .. ... - � SCIENCES PROJECT NO.:_ 0330.1700052.0000 PROJECREPORT .NO UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING 91 BORING LAG APPENDIX: A PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision BORING DESIGNATION: B4 Hummingbird Way SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SHEET: SOUTH RANGE: Of EAST Fort Pierce, Florida CLIENT: G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 614117 LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): 6.1 DATE FINISHED: , 514117 REMARKS: DATE OF READING: 6/812017 DRILLED BY: TM; RP, MC EST. W.S.W_T. (ft): - TYPE OF SAMPLING: _ J ° BLOWS 7 ¢ '" O m J w DESCRIPTION •200 MC K (INJ PERK qRG�. o y INCREMENT Z ai o fine SAND with silt, gravel, brdEiertshelf, aril clay lumps (Filly, ' '• rt�' brown, [SP-SM] 3-18-29 18"- �} 11-21-25 21" 3=23-30 ' 23" fine SAND with silt, dark brown, [SP-SM] 8-12-14 26 yj5 . 14-12-15 27 fine SAND with slit and broken shell, brown, ESP-SM] 14-16-16 32 ? - --- - - -• 10 1412;10. .22 ...... ...... BORING TERMINATED AT 10' * DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES 15 ............ ... .. Im. UNIVERSAL ENGiNEE.RING SCIENCES BORING LOG PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision Hummingbird Way Fort Pierce, Florida CLIENT: LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: u PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000 REPORT NO.: APPENDIX: A BORING DESIGNATION: B5 SHEET: I Of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 614117 WATER TABLE (ft): 4.6 DATE FINISHED: 514/17 DATE OF READING: 5/8/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W.S,W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: x BLOWS p w DESCRIPTION .200 MC K (]NJ ORG. CONT, w PER6" f 3 (%) (%) HR.) (%) n INCREMENT = >- o • .: :,. fine SAND with trades of gravel, broken shell; aril clay lumps (Fill), brown, [SP) 'F 3.4 2:4 2-R R' 8-R R' 2-21-R 21' _;Yl... 10-15-15 30, 20-20-18 38 fine SAND with silt and traces of broken shell,. gray, [SP-SM] .;�;(•'{T' 10-M 15 'e O— 445 9. - -.......... ... ........ ORINGTEWINATED-AT1.'0.' ,. • •„ " DYNAMICCONEPENETROMETER..(DCP) VALUES R - DENOTES. E!IFaUSAL•ITO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC CC):NE AENf"fROMETEti. 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING BORING SCIENCES LOG PROJECT NO.: 0330.17110052.0000 REPORT NO.: - APPENDIX: A PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision Hummingbird Way Fort Pierce, Florida CLIENT: LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN REMARKS: BORING DESIGNATION: BB SHEET: I Of 1 SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 514117 WATER TABLE (ft): 4.3 DATE FINISHED: .514117 DATE OF READING: 518/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W:S,W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: x L BLOWS j p 200 MC K ORG. a a PER 6" ¢ ' m w 0 ; DESCRIPTION (IN.1 caNr, a y INCREMENT Z y fine SATJD"vtiritti'silt Add traces df clay Tumps (Fill); brown; [SP-SM] �r R R' 17-20-25 20• fine SAND, gfdy, [SP] 5-19-21 19• i 5':-..- ...... ... .. -i�i\.• �y'. . .1. . a ....... ..... .... .w. ....... 6-7-7 14 clayey fine SAND, grey, [SG] 4-8-6 14 6-6-6 12 .r BORING TERMINATEDAT 10' "DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES R - DENOTES; REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER. 15 — .... ....... ....... ....... ti c1 0 PROJECTNO.: 03301700052.0000 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG REPORT NO.: APPENDIX: A PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision BORING DESIGNATION: B7 SHEET: 1 Of 1 Hummingbird Way SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST Fort Pierce, Florida CLIENT. G.S. ELEVATION (it): DATE STARTED: 514117 LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): 5.7 DATE FINISHED: 514117 REMARKS: DATE OF READING: 5/812017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC EST. W.S,W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: „•, .a BLOWS J F, m J -200 MC K ORG. w M PER6" 3 Y ¢ DESCRIPTION (y) (�) (IN.1 CONT;, w INCREMENT Z U a HR) (%) fine SAND W th siltann -clay lumps (FIII),'brown, [SP-SM] 21-R R` �'l:S• fine SAND, grey, [SP] 10-24 26 24` ' } ` ' 1.6 3,4 14-R R` F ` tirA: cJ'af: ......... 7-7-7 14 clayey fine SAND, grey, [SC] 3-5-6 11 5-5-5 10 10 7.9:10 19:. - - I - - . _ . BORING TERMINATED AT 10' "DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER. I I 15 ....... ....... KEY TO SOIL CLA 0 � ........... . �a`' or Gravel [SP,SW,GP,GW] 5 ......... Sand or 6ravel With Silt or ClayESP-Smsp-scj 12 ... ....... ... �_ ­.1.­.i_..,..-",..­ . .................. loreli'a GCI or 0 0 z so ............... .. z co Sand or GjjVb1I or _ . � Silt" C 0) .� I IML, L-ML,%,M CH-0 70 ...................... ................ Slit i1jr.. C .1aiil� t 1MI.4cLM_;iC!4MH4;H;Wp V 85 Silt or .61av [ML;ipIrML-,CI_,MH,CH,OLOH] 100 ................... ; ......... I ....................... 0 1 RING LOGS IFICATION CHART* UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. Go 50 M 1 .1 1 fHIOH I I a 46 z Vi 30 Lo 20 Z7. :7 JO .4 0. 10 20 30 40 50 •60 70 90 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY CHART t] GROUP NAME AND SYMBOL COARSE GRAINED SOILS FINE GRAINED SOILS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS WELL GRADED SANDSISWI L .6 •IMLI WELL GRADED GRAVELS [GW] INORGANIC SILTS SLIGHT PLASTICITY ORGANIC SILTSICLAY$. LOW PLASTICITY IOLI'- POORLY -GRADED SANDSISPI POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS IGPI INORGANIC SILTY CLAY LOW PLASTICITY ECL_ MLI t� ORGANICSILTSICLAYS MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY [OH] POORLY -GRADED SANDS WITH SILT [SP-SM] POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS WITH SILT IGP-GM] INORGANIC CLAYS LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY ICLI PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS I P TI POORLY -GRADED SANDS WITH CLAY ISP-SC] SILTY SANDS ISM] CLAYEY SANDS. [SC] 0 0 POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS WITH CLAY IGP-GC] SILTY GRAVELS IGMI CLAYEY GRAVELS IGCI INORGANIC SILTS HIGH PLASTICITY[MH] INORGANIC CLAYS HIGH PLASTICITY[CH]- RELATIVE DENSITY (SAND AND GRAVEL) VERYLOOSE 0to481owslft. LOOSE -5 to 10 Blowsift. MEDIUM DENSE - I I to 3013lowsift DENSE - 31 to 59 Blawslit VERY DENSE - more than 60 Blowstft. IN ACCORDANCE SILTY CLAYEY SANDS ISC-SM] 'CLASSIFICATION LOCALLY NOTES: W - DENOTES DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUE R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION P - DENOTES PENETRATION WITH ONLY WEIGHT OF DRIVE HAMMER NIE - DENOTES GROUNDWATER TABLE NOT ENCOUNTERED WITH ASTM D 2437 - UNIFIED SOIL I SYSTEM. MAY BE KNOWN AS MUCK. CONSISTENCY I (SILT AND CLAY) VERY SOFT- 0 to 2 Slowsift. SOFT. 3 to4 Slowslft. FIRM - 5 to 8 Blowsift. STIFF -,9 to 16 Blowsift. VERY STIFF - 17 to 30 Blows/ft. HARD - more than 30 Blowsift.' NOTE: DUAL tVm�6.Lr� ARE USED TO INDICATE 13ORDERLI E SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS APPENDIXA'."I -L (.4 v EXHIBIT 1