HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONUNIVERGINEERING SCIENCES
PRELIMINARY SU SURFACE EXPLORATION
.... Proposed Oaklan Lake Estates Subdivision .
Oakl Id Lake Circle _
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
lay 19, 2017
P EPARED FOR:
Ryan Homes
2005 Vist Parkway, Suite.102
West Palm Beach, Florida 33411
PREPARED BY:
Universal Engineering ineerin Sciences, Inc.
9 9
820IBrevard Avenue
Rockledge, Florida. 32955
(121) 638-0808
_
FILE
cor'V
.-____
Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering • Environrpental Sciences • Construction Materials Testing ' Threshold Inspection,
Offices in: Orlando - Daytona Beach • Fort Myers • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Ocala • Palm Coast - Rockledge • Sarasota 4
Miami • Panama City • Pensacola • Fort Pierce • Tampa • West Palm Beach • Atlanta, GA • Tifton, GA
L
0
.. - ll - . UHIE�
GINIEE•R�I�i+G
Coosuitants i6 Geoiechnical Engineer
Geophysical Services - Construction N
Building Inspection • Plan Review • Bu
Ryan Homes
1450 Centrepark Boulevard, Suite 340
West Palm. Beach, Florida 33401
SAL
nvironmental Sciences
Is Testing • Threshold Inspection
Code Administration
May 19., 2017
Attention: Mr. Michael DeBock
Reference: Preliminary Subsurface E ploration
Proposed Oakland Lake. Es ates Subdivision
Oakland Lake Circle
Fort Pierce, Saint. Lucie Co nty, Florida
Universal Project No. 0330. 700052.0000
Dear Mr DeBock•
LOCATIONS:
• Allanta
• Daytona Beach
• FadMyeis
• Fort Pieroe
i Jacleonville
• Miami
• Ocala
Oriardo (Headquarters)
Palm coast
Panama My
Pensacola
Rockledge
Sarasota
■. Tamp
West Palm Beach
■ Atlanta, GA•
Tlfion, GA -
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (Universal) has completed a preliminary . subsurface
exploration at the above referenced sit6 in Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida. Our
exploration was authorized by you and wias conducted as outlined 'in Universal's Proposal No.
0330.0417.00003. This exploration was performed in accordance with generally accepted soil
.and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The following report presents the results, y f our field exploration with a geotechnical engineering
interpretation of those'results with respell to the project characteristics as provided to us. We
have included our .estimates of the typical wet season high groundwater levels at the boring
locations and. general comments. concerl'Iing .anticipated soil support characteristics for typical
low-rise residential buildings.
We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this. project and look forward to .a.
continued association. Please do_ not hesitate to contact us'if you should. have any questions; or
if we may further assist you as your plan�•proceed. ow!�*Ir; -iz
Sincerely yours;
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCID
Certificate of:Authonzatian-No. 549
..._
Jose R.. Benitez Jr., EJ., .
Staff Engineer.
2 — Addressee
UESDOCS #1450465
. INC.
. i. - �:. NSF •;• J► � .:
923
Brad Fauceft, M.S. P.E:
Regional Engineer
Florida Professional Engineer No..
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0803 Fax (321) 638-0978 I
www. Universal Engineering. com
1.6 INTRODUCTION .... ..................
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
3.0 PURPOSE ...........................
TABLE[OF CONTENTS
........................................
........
I
4.1 SOIL SURVEY ................................... ... . .................................................................................. 2
4.2 TOPOGRAPHY..
4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................. .... . ....... .............
LIST OF TABLES
I ................. _"' . t. ....................................................................................... 2
.. ...
5.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES... .................... ...
........................................................................... 2
6.0 LIMITATIONS ...................... .................... ........ ................................ 3
7.0 FIELD METHODOLOGIES ................... ........... ....... .................. ...... ;;4
7.1 -STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS. . .4
..
7.2 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TESTS .............. _.. .....
7.3 PAVEMENT CORE SAMPLES ........... ..........
8.0 LABORATORY METHODOLOGIES .... 4
8.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS .........................
9.0 SOIL ST'RATIGRAPHY ....................
9.1 PAVEMENT CORE RESULTS .............. ......
10.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS......... ...............
.............
10.1 EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ... Ir .......
10.2 TYPICAL WET SEASON HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVEL 6
11.0 LABORATORY RESULTS ........ ........... ....... 7
11.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS..........
12.1 PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS.......,, ........ ...... 7
13.0 CLOSURE ........................................
Table 1: Saint Lucie County Soil SL
Table 11: Generalized Soil Profile ....
Table Ill., Pavement Core Results....
vey Designated Soil Types ....... 2
......................................... ....... 5'
..................... 6
i
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge*, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
. I
www.UniversalEngineering.com
Table 1: Saint Lucie County Soil SL
Table 11: Generalized Soil Profile ....
Table Ill., Pavement Core Results....
vey Designated Soil Types ....... 2
......................................... ....... 5'
..................... 6
i
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge*, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
. I
www.UniversalEngineering.com
RES
Boring Location Plan...-.. .......... ................. .,Figure No. 1
Key to Boring Logs. Appendix A
........................
Boring Logs ... .. . ............. ...... Appendix A,
GBADocument ......
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, f
i www-Un
-.,.....Exhibit I
I! '
32965 (321) -'638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
Engineeiing.co' rh-
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (Ur
exploration for the proposed Oakland Lai
County, Florida. Our exploration was auth(
was conducted as outlined in Universal's P
performed in accordance with generally acc
other warranty, • expressed or implied, is mac
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
ersal) has completed a preliminary subsurface
Estates Subdivision in Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie
zed by Mr. Michael DeBock of Ryan Homes and
posal No. 0330:0417.00003. This exploration was
)ted soil and foundation engineering practices. No
It is Universal's understanding, based upon iinformation provided by the client, that the proposed
project will consist of a residential subdivision in, Fort Pierce, Florida; currently envisioned as
shown in Figure No. 1. The proposed subdivision is intended to have seventy-three (73)
residential lots.
We understand that the stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces to be developed at this site
will be collected within an existing retention
I basin located in the central sections of the project
area.
Please note that our subsurface explorati
general subsurface information only. C
structural and traffic loading information
performed,
3.0 PURPOSE
The purposes of this exploration were:
• to explore the subsurface cond
client and
• to provide our estimates of the
locations and
• to provide general comments
typical low-rise residential con
4.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located within Section 1
County, Florida. More specifically, the sits
Street Road and North Kings Highway, in
vegetation consisted of mostly grass, aloe
proposed subdivision.
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, f
www. Un
was,preliminarv, in nature and conducted to acquire
e specified site configuration, building detail and
available a final subsurface exploration should be
at general locations and depths as requested by the
wet season high groundwater levels at the boring
ing the anticipated soil support characteristics for
I, Township 34 South, Range 39 East in Saint Lucie
is located on the northwest quadrant of Palomar
Fort Pierce, Florida. At the time of drilling, the site
ig with an existing paved circular road around the
1
a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 1638-0978
alEngineering.com
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
4.1 SOIL SURVEY
Two (2) .soil types are mapped within the general project area according to the Saint Lucie
County Soil Survey (SLCSS)', dated 1980. 4, brief description of these soils is provided in the
following Table I.
ITABLE I
c1 rcc n1=a1r_1NAT1=n -gnll TYPES
(Map Symbol)
Bnef�Descnptlon.
Soil mated
I that has been dug up from several areas with different
Arents, 0 to 5. percent slopes (4)
kinds of soi
. It is used to fill up. areas such as low sloughs, marshes,
shallow depressions,
and swamps:
Nearly
poorly drained sandy soils in broad areas in the
I, p y
Wabasso sand (48)
flatwoods.
flatwls.
4.2 TOPOGRAPHY
According to information obtained from the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) Oslo, Florida
quadrangle map dated-1949, photo -revised 1970, ground surface elevation across the site area
(pre -developmental) is approximately +20 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD).
5.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The services conducted by Universal during our preliminary subsurface exploration program are
as follows:
Drill seven (7) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings within the project site area to a
depth of 10 feet below existing land surface (bls).
• Core through the existing pavement sections at.four (4) locations with a diamond tipped core
drill to ascertain the approximate thickness of the asphaltic surfacing and base course.
Perform Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). testing- within the upper portions of the
selected SPT boreholes to help further determine soil consistencies.
Secure samples of representative soils encountered in the soil borings. for review, laboratory
analysis and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer.
• Measure the existing site groundw
season high groundwater levels.
• Conduct soil gradation tests on sele
their engineering properties.
• Assess the existing soil conditions w
i 820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, I
www. Un
levels and provide an estimate of the typical wet
soil samples obtained in the field to help determine
respect to the proposed construction.-
2
rida 32b55 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
;rsalEngineering.com
a
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision' Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
Preparing a geotechnical engineering. report which docurnents the results of our preliminary
subsurface exploration and laboratory testing program with analysis and general comments.
&0 LIMITATIONS
Please note that this report is based on a preliminary subsurface exploration program with the
scope of services, general boring 'locations and depths as developed in conjunction with the
client. The. information submitted in this report is based on data obtained from the soil borings
performed at:the locations indicated on the_Boring Location Plan and from other information as
This report has not been prepared red to meet the full needs of design professionals,
contractors, or any other parties, and any use of.this reportby them without the guidance of the
soil and foundation engineer who. prepare it constitutes improper usage which could lead to
erroneous assumptions, faulty conclusions,�and other problems.
This report does not reflect any variatior
extent of such variations may not becor
actual construction. If variations then bec
the recommendations in this report'after p
period and. noting the characteristics of a
at any of our boring locations; however, i
the entire property. Therefore, this report
and fill quantities.
which may occur across the site. The nature and
evident until the course of future: explorations or
ie evident, it will be necessary for re-evaluation of
'orming on-site.observations during the construction
variations. Deleterious soils were not encountered.
cannot completely: preclude their presence across
could not be used for estimating such items as cut
Our field exploration did not find. unsuitable or unexpected materials at the time of occurrence.
However, borings for typical geotechnical report are widely spaced and generally not sufficient
for reliably detecting the presence of isola ed, anomalous surface or subsurface conditions, or
reliably estimating unsuitable.or.suitable material quantities. Accordingly, Universal does not
recommend relying on our boring information to negate presence of anomalous materials, or for
estimation of material quantities unless our contracted . services specifically include sufficient
exploration for such purpose(s) and within the report we so state that the level of exploration
provided should be sufficient to detect such anomalous conditions or estimate such quantities.
Therefore, Universal will not be responsiblg for any extrapolation or use of our data by others
beyond the purpose.(s) for which it is applicable or intended.
All users of.this report are cautioned that
locate any man-made buried objects or id
may exist at the site during the course of
Universal to locate or identify such concE
man-made objects or environmental haze
construction that are not discussed within
requested.
For a further.description of the scope and
attached within Exhibit 1 "Important Inforr
prepared by GBAIThe Geoprofessional Bu
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flo
www. UnivE
:re was no requirement for Universal.to attempt.to
tify, any other potentially hazardous conditions that
is exploration. Therefore no attempt was made by
s. Universal cannot be responsible for any buried
s ,which may be.; subsequently encountered during
e text of this report. We can provide this service if
imitations of this report please review the document
ation About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report"
iness Association.
3
r 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax 1(321) 638-0978
IEngineering .com
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce,. Saint Lucie County, Florida
7.0 FIELD METHODOLOGIES
7.1 STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS
The seven (7) SPT borings, designated B
performed in general accordance with; the 1
Penetration Test and Split -Barrel Sampling
a standard split-barrel.sampler into the soil
number of. blows required to drive the gar
designated the penetration resistance, or I
The soil samples recovered from the split-b
in general accordance with the guidelines. o
Engineering Purposes [Unified Soil Classific
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
through B7 on the attached Figure No. 1, were
rocedures of ASTM D 1586 (Standard Method for
f Soils). The SPT drilling technique involves driving
y a 140 pound hammer, free falling 30 inches. The
pier 1 foot, after an initial seating of 6 inches, is
-value, an index to soil strength and consistency:
rrel sampler were visually inspected and classified
ASTM'D 2487 (Standard Classification of Soils for
tion System]).
CME 45 ATV mounted drilling rig. Universal located
The SPT soil borings.were performed with a
the test borings in the. field by. using the provided. site plan and by plotting in the field with. a
Garmin GPS receiver. No surrey control was provided on -site, and our boring locations should
be considered only as accurate as implied . by the methods of measurement used. The
approximate boring locations are shown on i�he attached Figure. No. 1.
7.2 DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER TE
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests
selected SPT .boreholes to help further di
performed at 1 foot intervals in general accc
G. F. Sowers and Charles S. Hedges (ASCI
follows: A standard 1.5 inch diameter conic
hammer falling Winches. Following the se;
of blows required to, drive the sampler an ;
resistance, providing an index to soil strengi
7.3 PAVEMENT CORE SAMPLES
Samples of the existing asphaltic pavemer
(Cl through C4) with. a 4 inch nominal dial
asphaltic pavement into the underlying bas
backfilled and the surfacing patched with an
returned#o our laboratory. for subsequent e)
8.0 LABORATORY METHODOLOG
8.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
We completed #200 sieve particle site
These samples were tested according to 1
Method for Amount of Material in Soils Fii
requires a thorough mixing the sample with
of the particles smaller than the sieve size I
were .performed within the upper portions of the
termine soils consistencies. The DCP tests were
dance with the procedures developed by Professor.
1966). The basic procedure for the DCP test is ag.
al. point is driven into the soil by a 15-pound steel
ting of the point to a depth of 2 inches, the number
dditional 1.75 inches is designated the penetration
i and density.
sections were obtained at four (4) core locations
Ater diamond bit core drill, advancing through the
course materials. Afterwards the core. holes were
sphaltic "cold patch" mixture and the core samples
nination.
lyses on seven (7) representative soil samples.
,procedures listed ASTM D 1.140 (Standard Test
than the No. 200 Sieve). In part, ASTM D 1140
ater and flushing it through a No. 200 sieve until all
ie the sample.
4
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flori a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
www.Unive6alEngineering.com
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida
The percentage of the material finer than th
of the soil sample and aids in evaluating
materials passing the:#200 sieve is shown I
9.0 SOIL STRATIGRAPHY
The results of our field exploration and lat
obtained from .the SPT borings, such as.
groundwater levels. are shown on the bori
Logs, Soil Classification Chart is also inch
from field logs after the recovered soil sami
Universal Project No. 0330-1700052. 0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration.
No. 200 sieve helps determines the textural nature
z .engineering characteristics. The percentage of
the attached boring logs.
story analysis,. together with ' pertinent information
it profiles, penetration resistance and stabilized
logs included in Appendix A. The Key to Boring
I in -Appendix A. The soil profiles were prepared
were examined by a Geotechnical Engineer.
The stratification lines shown on the boring ogs represent the approximate boundaries between
soil types, and may not depict exact subsu ace soil conditions. The actual soil- boundaries may
be more transitional than depicted. A gene alized profile of -the soils encountered at our boring
locations is'presented in the following Table IL For more detailed soil profiles, please refer to the
attached boring logs.
TABLE II
r.;FNFRALIZED SOIL PROFILE
r...Depth
Encountered.
`(feet„b1s),-
Approiiimater
,,1ThIdkness
-
;,
Soil Descri Lion`
P
Fill. soils consisting of fine sands with varying quantities of silt, clay,
Surface
2to 9
gravel, broken shell, and clay lumps [SP, SP-SM, SC]; loose to
I
medium de se.
Highly inter,ayered strata consisting of fine sands [SP], fine sands
with silt [SP-SM],, and clayey fine sands [SC], with varying
quantities of broken shell and occasional cemented rock layers;
2 to 9
1+ to 8+ .
loose to dense. At boring location 132, the fine sand with silt [SP-
SM] strata is partially cemented with iron oxide & organic salts and
which is locally known as hardpan.
NOTE: [ ] denotes Unified Soil Classification system
+ indicates strata encountered at boring tem
9.1 PAVEMENT CORE RESULTS
The results of our examination and mess
existing pavement sections are shown in
:ion.
total thickness undetermined,
,rent of the core samples taken in the field from the
following Table III:
5
820 Brelvard Avenue, Rockledge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0806 Fax (321) 638-0978
www.Univer�alEngineering.com
Oakland, Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie County, Florida
P
Universal,Pmject No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
TABLE III
4T CORE RESULTS
Boring/Cor'e
Approximate. Thidkness/Type
-
Approximate Thickness:
Type of Base Course ;
l:ocation�`
of Asphaltic:Surfacmgi
of Base,CouFse
-
Materials
: (inchesy l
i (inches)
0.7 S3
C1
1.0 S3
8%Z
Coquina
.
0.8 S31.1
C2
S3
8Y2
Coquina
1.1 S3
.
C3
1.0 S3
8
Coquina
1.6 S3
0.8 S3
C4
1.0 S1
10
Coquina .
or
2. Classification of r �
asphalticlayer ngswasp iformed visually and .may not, represent actual FDOT mix
parameters.
3. Subgrade soils consist mostly of fine sands with traces of gravel & broken shell [SP] (i.e. stabilized
subgrade).
10.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
10.1 ExISTING GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
We measured the water levels in the bore�oles on May 8, 2017 after- the groundwater was
allowed to stabilize. The groundwater levels are shown on the attached boring .logs. The
groundwater level depths ranged from 4.3 feet'bls at boring location B6 to 5.7 feet bis at boring
locations B2 and 87: Fluctuations in groundwater levels should be anticipated throughout the
year, primarily due to seasonal variations' in rainfall, surface runoff; and other factors that may
vary from the time the borings were conducted.
10.2 TYPICAL WET SEASON HIGH GROUP
The typical wet season high groundwater
sustained for a period of 2 to 4 weeks du
conditions, in a year with average normal r
season in Saint Lucie County, Florida is b
estimate the wet season water level at 1
including the following:
WATER LEVEL
:vel is defined as the highest groundwater level
ig the "wet" season. of -the year, -for existing site
nfall amounts. Based on historical data, the rainy
ween June and October of the year. In order to
boring locations, many factors are examined,
a, Measured groundwater level
b, Drainage characteristics of existing
.soil types
G. Season of the year (wet/dry season)
d. Current & historical rainfall-da�la (recent and year-to-date)
e.. Natural relief points (such as lakes, rivers, swamp areas; etc.)
f. Man-made drainage systems 4ditches, canals, etc.)
g. Distances to relief points and man-made drainage systems
6'
820 Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Flori a 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
www.Univer�alEngi.neering.com
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, .Saint Lucie County, Florida
h.. On -site types of vegetation
i. Area topography (ground sui
Groundwater level readings were taken on P
Regional Climate Center and the National
month of April for Central Saint Lucie County
for the month of April. Year-to=date rainfall
inches, roughly 6 inches. below the normal le
Based on this information and factors listed
groundwater levels at the boring locations
measured levels. Please note, however,
various intense storm events, may be sorni
levels.
Due to the variable silt and clay content withi
there may be occasional isolated pockets of
particularly during periods of prolonged we
levels may be higher than the estimated wet
11.0 LABORATORY RESULTS
11.1 PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
The soil samples submitted for analysis wer
soil sizes passing the #200 sieve size'are s
sampled.
12.0 ANALYSIS -AND GENERAL
12.1 PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
elevations)
ay 8, 2017. According to data from the Southeast
Veather Service, the total rainfall in the previous
was 2.2 inches, approximately at. -the' normal levels
for 2017 through May 8th was approximately 6%
'el for this time period.
e, we estimate that the typical wet season high
be approximately 2Y2 feet ' above the existing
peak stage elevations immediately following
t higher than the estimated typical wet season
the near surface soils at this site, we suspect that
)erched" groundwater throughout the project area,
weather. These temporary perched water table
eason high groundwater levels indicated above.
classified as fine sands [SP], The percentage of
)wn on the boring. logs at the approximate depth
The removal of site vegetation and roots, along with other construction activities, will further
loosen surficial .soils to various depths. To: provide a homogeneous, compacted, .sandy soil
system underneath the proposed foundations and floor slabs for the .proposed. residences,
densificatioh of at least the upper 2 feet- of the existing surficial, loose soils and subsequent
additional .fill soils will be necessary. This s ould create a soil mat capable: of dissipating' the
building loads over any remaining loose strata at depth.
We believe that. this can be effectively
procedures including a comprehensive
vegetation; root mats, debris and organic
densificatioh program for the surficial soils
procedures are properly performed, we a
foundations may be used to support"WhVeri
8k Brevard Avenue, Rockledge, Floi
www.Unive
nplished using conventional. site preparation
raking and stripping procedure to remove
oils; and then an extensive proof -rolling and
subsequent structural fill. Assuming that such
ate that conventional, shallow spread footing
7
32955 (321) 631-0808 Fax (321) 638-0978
IEngineering.com
.9 0
Oakland Lake Estates Subdivision
Fort Pierce, Saint Lucie, County, Florida
13.0 CLOSURE
We appreciate this opportunity to be of se
the project and look forward to providing
analyses as the project progresses thrc
concerning this report or when we may be
Universal Project No. 0330.1700052.0000
Preliminary Subsurface Exploration
;e as your geotechnical consultant on this phase of
low up explorations and geotechnical engineering
h the design phase. If you have any questions
any further service, please contact. us.
8 I
820 Brevard Avenue, Ro4edge, Florida 32955 (321) 638-0808 Fax (321) 638-096
www.Univers�lEngineering.com
s
FIGURE
d
i
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
® Approximate SPT
Note: Figure is based
aerial Photograph.
Location
a Google Earth
OAKLAND ESTATES SUBDIVISION
HUMMINGBIRD WAY
FORT PIERCE,` INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BORING LOCATION PLAN
BY: C6 DATE May 161 2017 CHECKED 8Y: :BF::E.. _ DATE: ti
pAOJECT NO: .
RE[?ORT No: PAG@ No:
V = 200' 0330.1700052.0000 ___ • F
APPENDIX.A
UNIVERSAL EtVGINI,
BORM
PROJECT: Oakland.Estates Subdivision
Hummingbird Way
Fort Pierce; Florida
CLIENT:
LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN
REMARKS:
=RANG SCIENCES
ECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000
REPORT NO.:
L
LOG
NDIX A
BORING DESIGNATION: B1
SHEET:
I Of 'I
SECTION: TOWNSHIP:
SOUTH RANGE:
EAST
G,S, ELEVATION (ft.
DATE STARTED:
514/17
WATER TABLE (ft): 4.6
DATE FINISHED:
5/4117
DATE OF READING: 5/8/2017
DRILLED BY:
TM, RP, MC
EST. W.S W.T. (ft):
TYPE OF SAMPLING:
SLOW
~
m
wo
zoo
Mc
K
ORG.a
a�
PER
DESCRIPTION
lY)
(%)
(INJ
CONT..
a
INCREMENT
wILA
HR.)
0A)_s
0
-fine SAND -with traces of clay lumps (Fill), brown, [SP]
4.1
.
�i•. It
..
fy�
'.
fine SAND with gravel, broken shell, and clay lumps (Fill),
{%+
brown, [SP]
2:7
10.6
5-6-12
18
ip, t •
_
clayey fine SAND with traces of broken shell (Fill), brown, [SC]'. -
7-7-4
11
Clayey fine SAND with fraces of aigarilcs, dark brown, [SC]
BORING TERMINATED AT 10'
15
PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
BORING LOG REPORT NO.,
APPENDIX A
PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision
Hummingbird Way
Fort Pierce, Florida . '
CLIENT -
LOCATION: • SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN
REMARKS:
BORING DESIGNATION: B2 SHEET: 1 Of 1
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 514117
WATER TABLE (ft): 5.7 DATE FINISHED: 614117
DATE OF READING: 61812017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC
EST. W.S.W.T_ (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING.
x
I
BLOWS
O.
-1
-200
MC
INJ
CONT
W �
a
PER 6+•
DESCRIPTION
!i)
(IN
n
y
INCREMENT
y
w
s
o
(%a)
fine SAND with tr ces' of claylurnps'(Fill), brown,-[SP]—"
?k±
3,0
5.0
5-6-15
6"
'%tt
s
5-22-26
22`
fine SAND, grey; [Sp]
17-R
R'
5
y
fine SAND with silt, dark brown, (hardpan) [SP-SM]
�t
clayeyfine SAND, brown, [SC]
6-7-8
15
. F
611-4
8
''Clayey fine SAND with occasional cemented rock layers, grey,
ISCI
BORING TERMINATED AT 10'
* DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES
R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC
CONE PENETROMETER.
15
.....
.......
r (,
911 UNIVERSAL ENGIIV
BORIN
PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision
Hummingbird Way
Fort Pierce, Florida
CLIENT:
LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN
REMARKS:
=RING SCIENCES
LOG
PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000
REPORT NO.;
APPENDIX: A
BORING DESIGNATION:. B3 , SHEET: I Of 1
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 614117
WATER TABLE (ft): 6.3 DATE FINISHED: 514117
DATE OF READING: 518/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC
EST. W.S,W.T: (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING:
a
BLOWS
j
¢
~
O
m
�.
w
DESCRIPTION
200
MC
K
pN!
ORG.
CONT,
w
f
2
PERV,
g
3
�
3 S
HR.)
M)
o
N
INCREMENT
Z
m
o
0
f
fine SAND with silt and traces of clay lumps (Fill), brown,-
;'
'• :,
[SP-SM]
9-23-28
23•
5-18-20
18"
::tc •6
fine SANIa,.daik brow [SP]- --
5
..........
...
.....
E';'•. °4
•...
_..,..:
5-6-7
13
4.5
18.3
.,
firie SAND'wiff slit, brown, [SP-SM]
6-7-9
16,'
sy?-
fine SAND, grey, [SP]
5-7-8
15
3.9
19.5
t9
" i
......
BORING TERMINATED IT 10'
DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES
15
i
............
...
..
...
-
�
SCIENCES
PROJECT NO.:_ 0330.1700052.0000
PROJECREPORT .NO
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING
91
BORING LAG
APPENDIX: A
PROJECT:
Oakland Estates Subdivision BORING DESIGNATION: B4
Hummingbird Way SECTION: TOWNSHIP:
SHEET:
SOUTH RANGE:
Of
EAST
Fort Pierce, Florida
CLIENT:
G.S. ELEVATION (ft):
DATE STARTED:
614117
LOCATION:
SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): 6.1
DATE FINISHED: ,
514117
REMARKS:
DATE OF READING: 6/812017
DRILLED BY:
TM; RP, MC
EST. W.S.W_T. (ft): -
TYPE OF SAMPLING:
_
J
°
BLOWS
7
¢
'"
O
m
J
w
DESCRIPTION
•200
MC
K
(INJ
PERK
qRG�.
o
y
INCREMENT
Z
ai
o
fine SAND with silt, gravel, brdEiertshelf, aril clay lumps (Filly, '
'• rt�'
brown, [SP-SM]
3-18-29
18"-
�}
11-21-25
21"
3=23-30 '
23"
fine SAND with silt, dark brown, [SP-SM]
8-12-14
26
yj5
.
14-12-15
27
fine SAND with slit and broken shell, brown, ESP-SM]
14-16-16
32
?
- --- - - -•
10
1412;10.
.22
......
......
BORING TERMINATED AT 10'
* DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES
15
............
...
..
Im. UNIVERSAL ENGiNEE.RING SCIENCES
BORING LOG
PROJECT:
Oakland Estates Subdivision
Hummingbird Way
Fort Pierce, Florida
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN
REMARKS:
u
PROJECT NO.: 0330.1700052.0000
REPORT NO.:
APPENDIX: A
BORING DESIGNATION: B5
SHEET:
I Of 1
SECTION: TOWNSHIP:
SOUTH RANGE:
EAST
G.S. ELEVATION (ft):
DATE STARTED:
614117
WATER TABLE (ft): 4.6
DATE FINISHED:
514/17
DATE OF READING: 5/8/2017
DRILLED BY:
TM, RP, MC
EST. W.S,W.T. (ft):
TYPE OF SAMPLING:
x
BLOWS
p
w
DESCRIPTION
.200
MC
K
(]NJ
ORG.
CONT,
w
PER6"
f
3
(%)
(%)
HR.)
(%)
n
INCREMENT
=
>-
o
• .:
:,.
fine SAND with trades of gravel, broken shell; aril clay lumps
(Fill), brown, [SP)
'F
3.4
2:4
2-R
R'
8-R
R'
2-21-R
21'
_;Yl...
10-15-15
30,
20-20-18
38
fine SAND with silt and traces of broken shell,. gray, [SP-SM]
.;�;(•'{T'
10-M
15
'e
O—
445
9.
- -..........
... ........
ORINGTEWINATED-AT1.'0.'
,. • •„
" DYNAMICCONEPENETROMETER..(DCP) VALUES
R - DENOTES. E!IFaUSAL•ITO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC
CC):NE AENf"fROMETEti.
1
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING
BORING
SCIENCES
LOG
PROJECT NO.: 0330.17110052.0000
REPORT NO.:
-
APPENDIX: A
PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision
Hummingbird Way
Fort Pierce, Florida
CLIENT:
LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN
REMARKS:
BORING DESIGNATION: BB SHEET: I Of 1
SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): DATE STARTED: 514117
WATER TABLE (ft): 4.3 DATE FINISHED: .514117
DATE OF READING: 518/2017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC
EST. W:S,W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING:
x
L
BLOWS
j
p
200
MC
K
ORG.
a
a
PER 6"
¢
'
m
w 0 ;
DESCRIPTION
(IN.1
caNr,
a
y
INCREMENT
Z
y
fine SATJD"vtiritti'silt
Add traces df clay Tumps (Fill); brown;
[SP-SM]
�r
R
R'
17-20-25
20•
fine SAND, gfdy,
[SP]
5-19-21
19•
i
5':-..-
...... ...
..
-i�i\.•
�y'.
. .1.
.
a
.......
.....
.... .w.
.......
6-7-7
14
clayey fine SAND,
grey, [SG]
4-8-6
14
6-6-6
12
.r
BORING TERMINATEDAT 10'
"DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES
R - DENOTES; REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC
CONE PENETROMETER.
15 —
....
.......
.......
.......
ti c1 0
PROJECTNO.: 03301700052.0000
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
BORING LOG REPORT NO.:
APPENDIX: A
PROJECT: Oakland Estates Subdivision BORING DESIGNATION: B7 SHEET: 1 Of 1
Hummingbird Way SECTION: TOWNSHIP: SOUTH RANGE: EAST
Fort Pierce, Florida
CLIENT. G.S. ELEVATION (it): DATE STARTED: 514117
LOCATION: SEE BORING LOCATION PLAN WATER TABLE (ft): 5.7 DATE FINISHED: 514117
REMARKS: DATE OF READING: 5/812017 DRILLED BY: TM, RP, MC
EST. W.S,W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING:
„•,
.a
BLOWS
J
F,
m
J
-200
MC
K
ORG.
w
M
PER6"
3
Y
¢
DESCRIPTION
(y)
(�)
(IN.1
CONT;,
w
INCREMENT
Z
U
a
HR)
(%)
fine SAND W th siltann -clay lumps (FIII),'brown, [SP-SM]
21-R
R`
�'l:S•
fine SAND, grey, [SP]
10-24 26
24`
'
} ` '
1.6
3,4
14-R
R`
F `
tirA:
cJ'af:
.........
7-7-7
14
clayey fine SAND, grey, [SC]
3-5-6
11
5-5-5
10
10
7.9:10
19:.
- - I - -
.
_ .
BORING TERMINATED AT 10'
"DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUES
R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION WITH DYNAMIC
CONE PENETROMETER.
I
I
15
.......
.......
KEY TO
SOIL CLA
0 � ........... .
�a`' or Gravel [SP,SW,GP,GW]
5 .........
Sand or 6ravel With Silt
or ClayESP-Smsp-scj
12 ... ....... ... �_
.1..i_..,..-",.. . ..................
loreli'a GCI
or
0
0
z so
............... ..
z
co
Sand or GjjVb1I or
_ . � Silt" C
0)
.�
I
IML, L-ML,%,M CH-0
70
...................... ................
Slit i1jr.. C .1aiil�
t
1MI.4cLM_;iC!4MH4;H;Wp V
85
Silt or .61av
[ML;ipIrML-,CI_,MH,CH,OLOH]
100
................... ; ......... I .......................
0 1
RING LOGS
IFICATION CHART*
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING
SCIENCES, INC.
Go
50
M 1 .1 1 fHIOH I I
a 46
z Vi
30
Lo 20 Z7.
:7 JO
.4
0. 10 20 30 40 50 •60 70 90 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTICITY CHART
t]
GROUP NAME
AND SYMBOL
COARSE GRAINED SOILS
FINE GRAINED SOILS
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
WELL GRADED
SANDSISWI
L
.6 •IMLI
WELL GRADED
GRAVELS [GW]
INORGANIC SILTS
SLIGHT PLASTICITY
ORGANIC SILTSICLAY$.
LOW PLASTICITY IOLI'-
POORLY -GRADED
SANDSISPI
POORLY -GRADED
GRAVELS IGPI
INORGANIC SILTY CLAY
LOW PLASTICITY
ECL_ MLI
t� ORGANICSILTSICLAYS
MEDIUM TO HIGH
PLASTICITY [OH]
POORLY -GRADED
SANDS WITH SILT
[SP-SM]
POORLY -GRADED
GRAVELS WITH SILT
IGP-GM]
INORGANIC CLAYS
LOW TO MEDIUM
PLASTICITY ICLI
PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS
WITH HIGH ORGANIC
CONTENTS I P TI
POORLY -GRADED
SANDS WITH CLAY
ISP-SC]
SILTY SANDS
ISM]
CLAYEY SANDS.
[SC]
0
0
POORLY -GRADED
GRAVELS WITH CLAY
IGP-GC]
SILTY GRAVELS
IGMI
CLAYEY GRAVELS
IGCI
INORGANIC SILTS HIGH
PLASTICITY[MH]
INORGANIC CLAYS HIGH
PLASTICITY[CH]-
RELATIVE DENSITY
(SAND AND GRAVEL)
VERYLOOSE 0to481owslft.
LOOSE -5 to 10 Blowsift.
MEDIUM DENSE - I I to 3013lowsift
DENSE - 31 to 59 Blawslit
VERY DENSE - more than 60 Blowstft.
IN ACCORDANCE
SILTY CLAYEY SANDS
ISC-SM] 'CLASSIFICATION
LOCALLY
NOTES:
W - DENOTES DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER (DCP) VALUE
R - DENOTES REFUSAL TO PENETRATION
P - DENOTES PENETRATION WITH ONLY WEIGHT OF DRIVE HAMMER
NIE - DENOTES GROUNDWATER TABLE NOT ENCOUNTERED
WITH ASTM D 2437 - UNIFIED SOIL
I
SYSTEM.
MAY BE KNOWN AS MUCK.
CONSISTENCY
I (SILT AND CLAY)
VERY SOFT- 0 to 2 Slowsift.
SOFT. 3 to4 Slowslft.
FIRM - 5 to 8 Blowsift.
STIFF -,9 to 16 Blowsift.
VERY STIFF - 17 to 30 Blows/ft.
HARD - more than 30 Blowsift.'
NOTE: DUAL tVm�6.Lr� ARE USED TO INDICATE 13ORDERLI
E SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
APPENDIXA'."I
-L (.4 v
EXHIBIT 1