The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORTSCECNN ED Lude Count/ Subsoil Investigation Report prepared by: ti vora ENGINEERING TESTING INC 6fvw.fe Client: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. Contact; Mack Mattos Address: 10967 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach,, FL 34957 Project. Proposed Single Family Home Address: 10701 S.. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Date. Monday, October 05, 2015 6hnical Materials Testing I Inspections I Environinental • of Phone 954-78a 2941 ederal800-846-1919 4& TESTING INC. Fax 954-7841-7875 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 fed-eng.Com Table of Contents Client Information -- ---------- —---- --------------------------------------pg. l Project Information ---------- ---- ----------------------------------_-------- pg. 1 General Soil Descriptions — ----_�_____�-. pg 1 Foundation Recommendations------------------------------------________pg 2 Excavations----------------------------------------------=----------- --_---------pg. 3 Grading-----------------------------------------------------pg. 3 Appendices 7 pg.5 Soil Boring Log(s) Laboratory Test(s) Project Location Soil Boring Location(s) Soil Classifications Sampling Procedures Limitations of Liability For Your Information findings in this report are based on soil conditions encountered in the test bore locations only, proposed structure to Wit, (if available at this stage), Florida Building Code requirements and standard engineering practices. If your rt is preliminary (i.e. vacant land or building to be demolished) additional borings are required within the foot print e proposed structure once the location & layout of the proposed structure is known. Pl 'lase read this report in its entirety and follow all recommendations. Failure to do so may result in the permitting ag'ncy (Building Department, etc.) withholding the Certificate of Occupancy. This will cause delays and additional co 4s. The Permitting Agency will require a final certification or signing off of the project prior to issuing the Certificate of Dccupancy. All of our recommendations need to be followed to receive a final certification from F.E.T., including der `s ities on each lift, demucking verification, piling inspection, etc., whichever recommendation applies to your pr ect. I Pie' se schedule us at least 24 hours in advance for all tests and inspections. If you choose to use another Engineering F' , you must verify they will provide you with the proper certification in writing, as outlined in our report. Our firm Will' only provide a certification letter if it has verified all work as recommended in our report. j f. uction Material American Concrete aering Council Institute Mt DADS Miami Dade Florida Department, County of Transportation 1 IWIr & TESTING INC. 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 October 05, 2015 Ry Construction, Inc. 7 S. Ocean Drive n Beach, FL 34957 Mack Mattos Subsoil Investigation Proposed Single Family Home 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Sirs: I Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 fed-enti.com Job Order Number 15-SB-336 at to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. has completed a subsoil investigation on 10/01/2015 at the referenced site. The purpose of our investigation was to verify subsoil conditions relative to foundation ition and design. A t ltal of two (2) SPT borings were performed according to ASTM D-1586 drilled down to a depth of thirty feet (30) and ��ifteen feet (15) below the existing ground surface. (See attached field sketch for locations)_ The following is a gen Ilrral description of soil stratas for the subject site: Depth From To Description of Soils 0" 6" Topsoil & Vegetation 6" 3' Light Brown Sand with Some Shell 3' 5' Dark Brown Sand with Organics 5' 8' Muck (31.9% Organics) 8' 14' Gray Sand with Traces of Shell 14' 30' Coarse Gray Sand with Shell Grou dwater table elevation was measured immediately at the completion of each boring and was found at an average dept ' of four (4) feet below existing ground surface. Fluctuation in water level should be anticipated due to seasonal varia 'ons and run off as well as varying ground elevation, construction dewatering and pumping activities in the area. Site ontractor must familiarize himself with site conditions in the event groundwater controls and dewatering is needed. Surfa�� a flooding may result under hurricane conditions and should be taken into consideration in the design of the proje fit. The contractor shall make sure that groundwater levels on adjacent properties are not affected by the contractors dewa a ring activities. Specialty groundwater contractors shall be consulted for all work below the groundwater level. lay. October 05, 2015 1 S. Occan Drive, Lot 740 L 4 n Beach, FL 34957 2 boring log(s) attached present a detailed description of the soils encountered at each location. The soil stratification in on the boring log(s) is based on the examination of the recovered soil samples and interpretation of the driller's log. It indicates only -the approximate boundaries between soil types. The actual transitions between adjacent soil may be gradual. ed on our understanding of the proposed structure and the information obtained from our field boring logs; it is lent that deep foundation systems are needed to support the proposed new structure without detrimental settlement to structure. the Florida Building. Code FBC 2010, Table 1824; deep foundation systems shall consist of one of the following Approximate Depth PP eP Allowable Allowable Tension Allowable Lateral j Alternatives Driven Size Compression Pile Pile Capacity in �I Capacity in Tons Tons Capacity In Tons !I Pin Piles 25' or Refusal 4 Inch 5 Tons 1 Ton N/A Piles 25' or Refusal 3 Inch 12 Tons 6 Tons N/A jHj'�Jelical er Cast Piles 25' BELS 12 Inch 25 Tons 12 Tons 1 Ton er Cast Piles 25' BELS 14 Inch 35 Tons 17 Tons 2 Tons *BELS - Below Existing Land Surface* i Lateral Load for a Pile Top Deflection of % inch. Proposed pile length based on the existing ground s at the time of drilling. Pile length may vary depending on proposed gradebeam elevations and inconsistent les. In the case of pin, helical and precast piles a minimum of four (4) test piles shall be driven to determine ,n pile length. All work shall be in accordance with the local Building Code and Coastal Zone Construction tents (if required). Hel'pal pile bearing capacity is dependent on helix numbers, size and spacing. The foundation contractor will be able to pro'0i de the most cost effective combination of helix designs. The above depths are the minimum depths required to ache ve design capacities. Predrilling might be required to achieve design depths. I All labs for the subject structure shall be designed as structural slabs spanning between supports and designed by a Flo da Registered Structural Engineer and placed under the supervision of a Geotechnieal Engineer. All work shall be con ucted by an experienced Florida Licensed Specialty Piling Contractor. All piles shall be designed by a professional engi eer and shall be placed under the supervision of our Geotechnical Engineer to verify compliance with bur reco endations. If the pile is not reinforced over the entire length, we recommend a single #7 reinforcingsteel bar be plac the full Iength of the pile to verify pile continuity. Inc 'ge of existing structures in the vicinity of the pile driving operation, care shall be taken not to create excessive vibra pion. Vibration Ievels shall be monitored to verify compliance with county regulations. Steps must be taken to preve,nt excessive vibrations. In the event excessive vibrations are experienced during construction, alternative driving meth ds shall be implemented (i.e.: predrilling, jetting, hydraulic push, etc...). Jay, October 05, 2015 1 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 n Beach. FL 34957 3 ENGINEEIit11G minimum center to center spacing of piles or adjacent foundations shall be not less than twice the average diameter round piles or 1-3/4 times the diagonal dimensions of rectangular piles, but in no case less than 30 inches. The illation of adjacent piles (located within 4 feet of each other) on the same working day is not recommended. We immend that adjacent piles not be installed until the initial grouted pile has set overnight. grout used in the pile installation shall develop a minimum compressive strength of 4000 PSI at 28 days. underground structures such as grease traps, septic systems, etc. must be supported on pile foundations, unless the erious material (i.e.: silt, muck, peat, etc...) is excavated in its entirety and replaced with compacted washed gravel as pea rock or #57 stone below the water table elevations and clean granular materials above the water table. shall not extend within one (1) foot of the angle of repose next to existing footings or structures unless Trenching shall be in compliance with the Florida Building Code, OSHA and Trench Safety Act Shorings shall be designed and inspected by a Florida licensed professional engineer. isions shall be made by the architect, engineer of record and contractor to address differential settlements when in new to existing structures. Mixing of different foundation types shall , not be used unless provided with nsion joints to address differential settlement. utside ground surfaces must be sloped away from the structure to avoid water accumulation and ponding. All rain -s shall be discharged away from all building foundations. Verify all water, sewer, plumbing, sprinkler and drainage are properly functioning with no Ieaks in the vicinity of the foundation. Re ardless of the thoroughness of a geotechnical exploration, there is always the possibility that conditions may be di 'rent from those of the test locations; therefore, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc, does not guarantee any subsoil con P ition between the bore test holes. A site plan showing the location of the proposed structure was not provided at the tim the soil borings were performed. For a more accurate portrayal of subsurface conditions, the site contractor should per orm test pits. If different conditions are encountered, Federal Engineering & Testing Inc., shall be noted to review the rndings and make any recommendations as needed. In accepting this report the client understands that all data from the '� oil borings is intended for foundation analysis only and is not to be used for excavating, backfilling or pricing esti ates. The site contractor must familiarize themselves with the job site conditions. En onmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is requ ed, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. For Environmental due iligence, a Phase I and/or Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is recommended. As a mutual protection to clients, the public .and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clien s, and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pen4pn our written approval. y. October 05, 2015 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Beach, FL 34957 t=NGINEERING I Engineering & Testing, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you at this phase of your project. feel free to contact us if we may be of further service to you. it IIII!Iz \ N f Inc, neering'�& Test g,,No?T-9': : �ti�: & ONAt.1��1��` II ederal & TESTING IPIC. A� 25 '',SW 131h Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 SPT Test Boring Report Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. Proposed Single Family Home 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Phone 954-784 2941 800-848-191:9 Fax 954-784-7875 fed-en-mcom Date of Test: October 1, 2015 Hole No.: B-1 Location: See Attached Drawing Depth (FT) Soil Descriptions Hammer Blows "N" 1 0" - 6" Topsoil & Vegetation 3 5 2 6" - 3' Light Brown Sand with Some Shell 3'- 5' Dark Brown Sand with Organics 2 3 7 3 1 2 4 4 2 0 5 1 2 6 5' - 8' Muck (31.9% Organics) 0 1 2 7 0 1 8 1 2 2 9 2 4 10 8'- 14' Gray Sand with Traces of Shell' 5 6 9 11 A A 12 A A A 13. A A 14 A A A 15 11 9 16 10 11 19 17 A A 18 A A A 19 A A 20 A A A 21 14 I3 22 14'- 30' Coarse Gray Sand with Shell 14 15 27 23 A A 24 A A A 25 A A 26 A A A 27 10 15 28 10 12 25 29 `kk A 30 `' .��$��0 je r Water Level: 417" Below Land Surface Ka lanaS14}FE OF �It A = Auger Florit ` LAWZii §'ATE-5539 ``��® Certificat 5471 V i I 4&ederal TESTING INC. 250'SW 13th Ave Pom ano Beach, FL 33069 SPT Test Boring Report Mel-RyConstruction, Inc. Proposed Single Family Home 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 fed-eff9CR coo Date of Test: October I, 2015 Hole No.: B-2 Location: See Attached Drawing Depth (FT) Soil Descriptions Hammer Blows "N" 1 0" - 6" Topsoil & Vegetation 3 2 2 6" - 5'6" Dark Brown Sand with Roots & Organics 3 2 5 3 2 1 4 5'6" - 6'6" Muck (34.4 o Organics) T 1 2 5 0 0 6 1 0 1 7 I 1 8 2 3 3 9 7 4 10 6'6" -15' Gray Sand with Traces of Shell 5 5 9 11 A A 12 A A A 13 A A 14 A A A 15 13 II 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 , 27 t�lilQ/j// 28 ��`� SOH 29 30 At Water Level: 4'6" Below Land Surface t `nesting, Inc. A = Auger Certificate of Authorization # 5471 250 $W 13th Ave TESTING INC. no Beach, FL33069 Report of Organic Content ASTM-D 2974 Friday, October 02, 2015 y Construction, Inc. S. Ocean Drive Beach, FL 34957 Mack Matzos Proposed Geotechnical Services Proposed Single Family Home 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Phone 954 784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 fete-en-mcom Job Order Number 15-SB-336 Results of Test Sampled by: Si Reported To: Client Sample Location: See Location on. Subsoil Drawing Material Description: Muck Sample Location and Depth . - Organic Content Percentage B 1 5' - &' 31.9% B2 516" - 616" 34.4% B3 N/A N/A B4 N/A N/A B5 N/A N/A r Tested By: Si Checked By: KL Respect il itbnl Dek;r,j`�;P ked, 0,, e. �(93a ; Y Keith LEES PEE "F of �t' �W, ,r Federal Elt lhK� ng,.ib .4 Florida Regtstj�53(;��.`. �p �, Certificate of Auttid'Agwgt5"A ®r"", t 6 MIAMFnt4Dl: yy struclion Material ineering Council American Concrete Institute Miami Dade County Florida Department of Transportation � •. s T.' ._ • •' .._ t - �.dV�N,��JZ�y1OFs4�' � 3„ t •� .... .Y -+�.. -.. Pal d XEV 2, r*�`;��+ SigtUY1 Mx ++4A J+ � �. �.h�ti1,�''7,.�''�x`a' rrr..rra;:.._ xw7:T.,�i.,,1!•. � �` .. .r• - __ ". ";Y�-:-?� F Y �rYf` �. �l iTil 11 '- _,: � • .�•.. j .,, .^ ' �;��"i411�w�� $tl'1��'�.� ►S:ifi:�3r!'J�3`�''K�.�,:�.' '� c�.� :!''� 4� IRrr.w,f.�— ,� iif ram« .�s,." •� 't +.�, `"� �,�',�. • ,^ r - r 1w !k r - Soil Boring Location Map Iederal Engineering & 'Vesting Inc. 250 SW 13th AVE Pompano Beach, FL 33069 (954) 784-2941 lient: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. Project: Proposed Single Family Home Test: Subsoil Investigation Project Address: 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 (site map is not to scale) I Jensen'Beach, FL 34957 Soil Boring Location Map Iederal Engineering & 'Vesting Inc. 250 SW 13th AVE Pompano Beach, FL 33069 (954) 784-2941 lient: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. Project: Proposed Single Family Home Test: Subsoil Investigation Project Address: 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 (site map is not to scale) I Jensen'Beach, FL 34957 Soil Classifications Correlation of Penetration Resistance with Relative Density and Consistency Sands Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Penetrometer Resistance Standard Penetration Hamner Blows Relative Density 0 - 10 0-4 Very Loose 11 - 25 5 -10 Loose 26 - 45 11 - 20 Firm 45 - 75 21 - 30 Very Firm 76 -120 31 - 50 L Dense > 120 > 50 Very Dense Silts& Clay Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Penetrometer Resistance Standard Penetration Hammer Blows Relative Density 0-6 0-2 Very Soft 7-15 3-5 Soft 16 - 30 6 - 10 Firm 31 - 45 1 l -1.5 Stiff 46 - 90 16 - 30 Very Stiff 91 -150 31 - 50 Hard Rock Hardness Description, Soft Rock core crumbles when handled Medium Can break -core -Adth your hands Moderately Hard Thin edges of rock core can be broken with fingers Hard Thin edges of rock core cannot be broken with fingers Very Hard Rock core rings when struck with a hammer Sand Quantity Modifiers . Very Slight Trace 0 - 2 % Slight Trace .2 - 5 % Trace 5 - I0 % Little Trace 10 -15 % Some 15 - 30 % With > 30 Silt - Clay Quantity Modifiers Slightly Silty /Clayey 0 - 5 % Silty / Clayey 5 - 30 % Very Silty / Clayey 30 - 50 % Particle Size Boulder > 12 in Cobble 3 - 12 in Gravel 4.76 nun - 3 in Sand 0.074 mm - 4.76 mm Silt 0.005 mm - 0.074 mm Clay < 0.005 min EttG�NEEitIHG EHGINEERI�G Drilling & Sampling Procedures soil borings were installed in accordance with Standard Penetration Tests procedures as set forth in ASTM D-1586. .-esentative samples were collected utilizing spilt -barrel techniques in accordance with the procedures set forth in etration Tests and Spilt -Barrel Sampling of Soil in ASTM D-1586. The following field tests, measurements and ratory analysis were performed/collected during the installation of each soil boring. Du, g the sampling procedures, Standard Penetration Tests were performed at five (5) foot intervals to obtain the s dard penetration value (N) of the subsurface soil. The standard penetration value (N) is identified as the number of blows of a 140 pound hammer falling thirty (30) inches, required to advance the spilt -barrel sampler one (1) foot into the sub�� urface soil. The sampler was lower into the bottom of the previously cleaned drill hole and advanced by blows from the (hammer. The number of blows was recorded for each of the three (3) successive increments of six (6) inches pen, i tration. The °N" value is obtained by adding the second and third incremental numbers. Wa''er Level depths were obtained during the test boring operations. In relatively pervious soils, such as sandy soils, the indi ated depths are usually reliable groundwater levels. Seasonal variations, tidal conditions, temperature, Iand-use and rec '� t rainfall conditions may influence the depths to groundwater levels. All$amples collected were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System criteria to determined soil i terial properties and compared with published literature of the USDA Soil Conservation Survey. Grod surface elevations have not been provided for the proposed boring locations. Therefore, all references to depth of th various strata and materials encountered were from existing grade at the time of the drilling operations. We we Inc. (F care of under made. design quality * other n building ourselves, regarding not intend ENGINEER-iHG' Limitations of Liability [VarralIty it that the services performed by Federal Engineering and Testing, 7.) are conducted in a marmer consistent with the level, of skits and arily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing ilar conditions. No other warranties, expressed or implied, are ile the services of F.E.T. are an integral and valuable part of the I construction process, we do not warrant; guarantee, or insure the completeness of services or satisfactory performance provided by hers of the construction process and/or the construction plans and ms which we have not prepared', nor the ultimate performance of ite materials. As mutual protection to clients, the public and 1611 reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and on for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or our reports is reserved pending our written approval. Reports are dfor 3rd party use. Subsurface Exploration Subsurfac I exploration is normally accomplished by test borings. The soil boring to includes sampling information, description of the materials recovered, pproximate depths of boundaries between soil and rock strata and groundwat data. The log represents conditions specifically at the location and time d e boring was made. The boundaries between different soil strata are indicat d at specific depths; however, these depths are in fact approximate and depen ent upon the frequency of sampling. The transitions between soil stratum ar often gradual. Water level readings are made at the time the boring was,Performed and can change with time, precipitation, canal levels, local well rawdown, and other factors. Regardless of the thoroughness of a Geotechnic 'I1 exploration there is always a possibility that conditions may be different fr in those of the test locations; therefore F.E.T. does not guarantee any subsoil Icondition surrounding the bore test holes. For a more accurate portrayal o iI subsurface conditions, the site contractor should perform tests pits. If di ff rent conditions are encountered, F.E.T. shall be notified to review the findings and make any recommendations as needed - Laboratory and Field Tests Tests are p rformed in accordance with specific ASTM Standards unless otherwise in icated. All criteria included in a given ASTM Standard are not always requi d and performed. Each test report indicates the measurements and determin ltions actually made. Ownership ofTests /Reports All test resul"s and/or reports prepared by F.E.T. pursuant to this agreement and/or Addei�dum(s) thereto, shalt remain the property of F.E.T. until all monies due T d owing to F.E.T. under this Agreement and/or Addendum(s) thereto; are p''id in full. Analysis and Recommendations The Geotechn cal report is prepared primarily to aid in the design of site work and structural foundations. Although the information in the report is expected to be sufficie11,11 for these purposes, it is not intended to determine the cost of construction to stand alone as construction specifications. Analysis and Recommendations cont. In accepting this report the client understands that all data from the soil boring is intended for foundation analysis only and is not to be used for excavating, backfilling or pricing estimates. In accepting this report the client understands that all data from the soil boring is intended for foundation analysis only and is not to be used for excavating, backfilling or pricing estimates. The site contractor must familiarize themselves with the job. site conditions. Soil boring(s) on unmarked vacant property or existing structure(s) to be demolished is considered preliminary with further boring(s) to be performed after proposed building pad is staked out. Report recommendations are based primarily on data from test borings made at the Iocations shown on the test boring reports. Soil variations may exist between borings and may not become evident until construction. If variations are then noted, F.E.T. must be contacted so that field conditions can be examined and recommendations revised if necessary. The Geotechnical report states our understanding as to the Iocation, dimensions, and structural features proposed of the site. Any significant changes in the nature, design, or location of the site improvements must be communicated to F.E.T. so that the Geotechnical analysis, conclusions, and recommendations can be appropriately adjusted Construction Observations Construction observation and testing is an important element of Geotechnical services. The Geotechnical Engineer's Field Representative (Field Rep.) is the "owner's representative" observing the work of the contractor, performing tests, and reporting data from such tests and observations. The Geotechnical Engineer's Field Representative does not direct the contractor's construction means, methods, operations, or personnel. The Field Rep. does not interfere with the relationship between the owner and the contractor, and except as an observer, does not become a substitute owner on site. The Field Rep. is only collecting data for our Engineer to review. The Field Rep. is responsible for Ids/her safety only, but has no responsibility -for the safetyof other personnel and/or the general public at the. site. If the Field Rep. does not feel that the site is offering a safe environment for him/her, the Field Rep, will stop his/her observation/ testing until he/she deems the site is safe. The Field Rep. is an importantmember of a team whose responsibility is to observe the test and work being done and report to the client whether that work is being carried out in general conformance with the plans and specifications. Limitations ofReport j Federal Engineering &'Testing, Inc. shall have no liability, in contract; tort or otherwise, for any inaccuracy, defect, or omission in interpreting this report and shall not in any event have any liability far lost profits or any other indirect, special, incidental, consequential, exemplary or punitive damages. In the event of future conflict between owners and contractors the following applies: F.E.T.(s) legal and/or company representation and preparation for representation fees'will be billed on an hourly rate, i.e. deposition, expert witness, etc. F.E.T. has no obligation to amend its conclusions or recommendations after the date of this report. Any alterations or changes in the location of the project should be brought to our attention at the earliest convenience for review and applicability of this report. Y & TESTING INC. ipano Beach, FL 33069 Soil /' ggregate Tests Soil B T nngs Densit' Compaction Tests Grain l ize Analysis Moistu a Contents Soil CI ssifications Limero'ok Bearing Ratios Florida !Bearing Values Specifi " Gravity Carbon to Analysis Hydrau is Conductivity Organi 'I Contents L.A. Ab,asion FDOT QC Mt Earthwdrik Inspections QC Conbrete Inspections QC Asphalt Inspections Partial List of Services Geotechnical Engineering Services Field Inspection Services Fill & Quality Control inspections Demucking Inspections Building Inspections Pile Driving Inspections Pile Load. Tests Steel Inspection Threshold Inspection Bolt Inspection Weld Inspection Vibration Monitoring Geotechnical Engineering Foundation Engineering Foundation Design & Recommendation Subsoil Investigation Pile Load Calculations Piling, Installation Monitoring Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 fed-enu.com Asphalt Services Backscatter Density Tests Extractions & Gradations Marshall Limits Bulk Specific Gravity Cores for Thickness Determination Asphalt Pavement Monitoring Asphalt Assessment Concrete Tests Concrete Strength Testing Slump Tests Windsor Probe Testing Schmidt Hammer Testing Core Testing Air Content Concrete Unit Weight Flexual Strength Testing Environmental Engineering Services Phase I Site Assessments Phase 11 Site Assessments Lead Base Paint Surveys Site Insp' ctions Phase I Follow up on Contaminated Sites Report and Analysis Researc of Property Records Installation of Monitoring Wells Air Monitoring Soil Borings Soil and Ground Water Analysis Roof Testing & Inspection Services TAS 105 ,field Fastener Withdrawal Test TAS 106 Tile Uplift Test TAS 124 Bell Chamber / Bonded Pull Test TAS 126 oisture Survey Windload alculation Drainage alculations Lightweigh Concrete placement Inspection Roof Asse sment / Evaluation Cap Sheet inspection Fastener S'l acing Inspection Tile/ Shingl / Standing Seam Inspection Base Shee'tnstallation. inspection Insurance itigation Retrofit Miti ° ation/ Certification Roof Drainage Calculations Material Council (OD American Concrete Institute MIMIOADB OM Miami Dade County 1•v Florida Department of Transportation Phone 954-784-2941 Aederal pe v t 6 a 3- 800-848-1919 Q J qax 954-784-7875 S TESTING 250 5W 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 www.fed-eng.com III CLIENT CLIE PROJ PROJ CONTRACTOR: Field Inspection Report NAME: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. DATE: 03/29/16 T ADDRESS: 10967 S. Ocean Drive, ORDER NO.: 16-1030 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 PERMIT N_O_.;_ '� - 5 CT NAME: Proposed Single Family Home I ADDRESS: 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 ARRIVAL TIME: 9:30 AM i Jensen Beach, FL 34957 DEPARTURE TIME: 4.15 PM TOTAL TIME ON SITE: 6.75 Hours TRAVEL TIME: 3.75 Hours DAY: WEAT HUMI TEMPERATURE DAILY CONDITIONS I Mon Tue X Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun ER: Sunny Clear Cloudy X Rain :ITY: Low Med High X WIND: Low X Med High Freezing Cold Mild Warm X Hot I' AREAS INSPECTED Location Description of Area Inspected Type of Work Performed by Contractor it Pad Demuckin / Backfillin I� Notes: DAILY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES �I,Contractor began excavating at west end of pad. Due to the area constraints contractor will excavate a quarter of the pad and backfill tor each four 4 areas. The west quarter of the pad was completely demucked and subsequently backfilled with crushed concret '. up to the water table. Once out of the water table, clean fill was used in 12 inch lifts. The contractor then moved to the next quarter which was the east half of the west end of the pad. Contractor removed all muck. Placed crushed concrete and compacted IYYV G III W. I I Did you fill out any field data reports? Yes X No (If Yes, please attach to this report) Was all II ork performed to job specifications? Yes X No If No, please explain: i I Who was notified about any deficiencies? Were the deficiencies corrected by the contractor? Yes No At what Time? How wer i the deficiencies corrected? Misc. Inspected by: DAS Respectfully Submitted'By: zl�� - Zly, Keith LeBlanc, -N.E. FEDERAL ENGINEERING-& TESTING, INC. Florida Reg. No.: 59394 Aederal & TESTING INC. 250 SW 13t 6 Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 R E C E l `." D MAY 0 3 2006 ``�L,, IIt Phone 954-784-2941 Pe ��; * i6o 3 ` O,J-1 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client: 1 Mel-Ry Construction Date: March 29, 2016 Addres 3 : 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-1030 Project: Proposed Single Family Home Perms mt #I (�4' a5�y Addres : 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: DAS Area T ted: Demuck Excavation Backfill Compaction Req.: 95% Materia Type: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Section 3/4 (E. Side of W. Half) - At Ce�ttter of Excavation 12" 1 L 13.9 109.9 113.0 10.0 97.3% Yes 2 Se 6 tion 3/4 (E. Side of W. Half) - At Ce, ter of Excavation 12" 2L 17.2 109.3 113.0 10.0 96.7% Yes 3 4 5 6 7 8 I i 9 10 11 I 12 13 14 Remarks See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a -verification of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for Elevation: PR = Proof oil 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = SpringMine FL = Final Lift _ Keith LeBlanc, P.E. SG = Sub ade BG = Below Grade . g - Federal Engineering.& Testing, Inc. BC = Base urse BOF = Bottom of Footing _ Florida Reg. No. 59394 TOP =Top of Pipe FG =Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization #5471 As a mutual p otection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential prdperty of client;,, nano` authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test detegriiria's •6e, degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. A densityltloes not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the ;top 12" of added fill material:: FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing oflthe added fill material does not include an ana'lysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard !for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications -are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re- tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. F Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 875 II ederal Y�►t} 1603�'J�� Fax 800-848 1919 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13t�Pve Pompano Beach, FL 33069 I Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client: i Mel-Ry Construction Date: March 29, 2016 Addres 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-1030 Project: �I Proposed Single Family Home Permit #: Address., 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: DAS Area Te ,,,,ted: Section 4/4 (W. Section) Demuck Excavation Backfill Compaction Req.: 95% Material Type: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 " Test # I TEST LOCATION Probe Depth p Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 I At ,enter of W. Excavation 12" 1L 18.2 108.2 113.0 10.0 95.8% Yes 2 At tenter of W. Excavation 12" 21- 18.9 109.0 113.0 10.0 96.5% Yes 3 At 'enter of W. Excavation 12" 31- 12.2 112.4 113.0 10.0 99.5% Yes 4 At I Inter of W. Excavation 12" 4L 11.3 113.6 113.0 10.0 100.5% Yes 5 At Center of W. Excavation 12" 5L 13.7 110.1 113.0 10.0 97.4% Yes I�6 i 7 II 8 9 II 10 i 11 �I12 13 III 14 it Remarks: J$ee Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer Fn is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification ofsoil (Bearing Capacity. Legend for El: PR = Proofrol1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = SpringlinFL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. 3�9 n, SG = SubgraBG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. BC = BasecoBOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394 TOP = Top ofFG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorizatiom#5471 As a mutual protclients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions or exm or regarding our reports is reserved pending ourwritten approval. A density test determines the degree ofcompaction ofthe tested layerofmaterial only. A density doeplace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. 11 Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re- tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 RE L E 1'. .0 MAY U e aU16 �Phone 954-784-2941ederal xvw, t } d* isq/ 800-848-1919 �r Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 www.fed-eng.com Field Inspection Report I CLIENT CLIE NAME: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. DATE: 03/30/16 I T ADDRESS: 10967 S. Ocean Drive, ORDER NO.: 16-1047 1 Jensen Beach, FL 34957 PERMIT NO.: PRO ECT NAME: Proposed Single Family Home PRO ADDRESS: 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 ARRIVAL TIME: 9:30 AM CON �. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 DEPARTURE TIME: 3:30 PM RACTOR: TOTAL TIME ON SITE: 6 Hours it TRAVEL TIME: 4.5 Hours DAILY CONDITIONS I DAY: WEA Mon Tue Wed X Thu Fri Sat Sun HER: Sunny Clear Cloudy X Rain HUMI TEMP ITY: Low Med X High WIND: Low Med X High RATURE Freezing Cold Mild X Warm Hot AREAS INSPECTED II Location Description of Area Inspected Type of Work Performed by Contractor it I� Building Pad Demuckin / Backfillin 1I el I� DAILY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES . Notes: 10:15a i cuuprn. Compa -At my arrival the contractor was adding the third lift at 9:30am. Compacted third lift at 10:00am and tested. Added fourth lift at , . Fourth lift was compacted and tested at 11:00am. Added fifth lift at 11.40am Excavation of west side of east half started at The contractor removed muck from 3' to 8'. Poured crushed roof tile at 1230pm. Compacted and tested 1 st lift at 1:40 m. fed and tested 2nd lift at 1:OOpm. Compacted and tested 3rd lift at 2.10pm Compacted and tested 4th lift at 2.40pm Compacted and tested 5tn lift at 3:10pm. Job done at 3:30 m. �I res A No (If Yes, please Was all fork performed to job specifications? Yes XNo If No ttplease explain: report) plain: Who was;jnotified about any deficiencies? Were the ldeficiencies corrected by the contractor? Yes No At what Time? How wer ' the deficiencies corrected? Misc. Ren> "arks: Inspected Oy: TS Respectfully Submitted By: Keith LeBlanc, P.E. v y�i /` FEDERAL' ENGINEERING 8 TESTING, NC. Florida Reg. No.: 59394 R E C E I V T D MAY 0 3 2016 Phone 954-784-2941 Lmmjederal 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13 'Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client: _Mel-Ry Construction Date: March 30, 2016 AddresE 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-1047 Project: Proposed Single Family Home Permit #:1663-6,S4J1i Address! 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: TS Area Te11ted: Demuck Excavation Backfill Compaction Req.: 95% Material ype: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # I TEST LOCATION I Probe Elev. Moist Dry Density Proctor Value Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass Depth % PCF PCF Wei t Side of East Half - At Center of - 1 Ex vation 12" 1 L 10.0 112.6 113.0 10.0 99.6% Yes We't Side of East Half - At Center of 2 Ex avation 12" 2L 9.7 112.1 113.0 10.0 99.2% Yes Wet Side of East Half - At Center of 3 Exc° vation 12" 3L 10.0 109.0 113.0 10.0 96.5% Yes We 't Side of East Half - At Center of 4 Exco vation 12" 4L 8.8 111.3 113.0 10.0 98.5% Yes We 't Side of East Half - At Center of 5 Exc I'vation 12" 5L 9.5 108.9 113.0 10.0 96.4% Yes 6 7 el 8 9 6, 10 I 11 12 13 II 14 Remarks: I See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of SoilBearing Capacity. Legend for E 1 1evation: PR = Proofrc 11 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = Springll ie FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. SG = Subgra a BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering &-Testing, Inc. BC = Baseco'� rse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg,,,No. 59394 TOP = Top o Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization P6471_ ' As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and, authorisation for,pu�lication of statements, conclusions ore {racts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree o'r compaction of the tested layer of material only. A density d es not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms; retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 'I Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test mustlbe performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. 'FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications !are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re- tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 Phone 954-784-2941 ederal R E C E I V' D MAY 0 3 7 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 8 TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13t �IPve Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client: Mel-Ry Construction Date: March 30, 2016 Addres 1 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-1047 Project: !�' Proposed Single Family Home 1 Permit #: 1,- 05L/y Address 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: TS Area Te ted: Demuck Excavation Backfill Compaction Req.: 95% Material ,I ype: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 . Test # I TEST LOCATION Probe Elev. Moist Dry Density Proctor Value Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass Depth % PCF PCF % Eas Side of West Half - At Center of • 1 Ex vation 12" 2L 9.8 113.7 113.0 10.0 100.6% Yes Easo Side of West Half - At Center of 2 Exc vation 12" 4L 9.6 111.5 113.0 10.0 98.7% Yes Eas 'ISide of West Half - At Center of .vation 3 Exc 12" 5L 10.0 115.3 113.0 10.0 102.0% Yes i 4 l 5 6 li 7 !I ! 8 i 9 i 10 . 11 ,I 12 I 13 14 u Remarks: , ee Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer this is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verifi ation of Soil Bearirig-Capacity. Legend for Elel!ation: PR = Proofroll I 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = Springlln FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. SG = Subgrad BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering-4- Testing, Inc. - BC = Basecour' a BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida -Peg, No. 59394 TOP = Top of ipe FIG = Finished Grade Certificate, of Authorization #5471- As a mutual protec ion to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and -authorization fcr'publication of statements, conclusions or extra' is from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of co'rnpaction of the tested layer of material only. A density doe 1 not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. i I PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6936 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer, of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test musty be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the�top 12" of added fill material. ` FET was not contracted to perform, supervision of the, building pad preparation. This testing of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of suppormg the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re- tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 LA Phone 954-784-2941 ederal I RECEIVED M'AY 03 etr 800-848-1919 & TESTING 250 SW 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 3306Fax 954-784-78759 www.fed-eng.com IField Inspection Report CLIE II T NAME: Mel-Ry Construction, Inc. DATE: 03/28/16 CLIE T ADDRESS: 10967 S. Ocean Drive, ORDER NO.: 16-975 I Jensen Beach, FL 34957 PERMIT NO.: (� PRO ,ECT NAME: Proposed Single Family Home PRO 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740 ARRIVAL TIME: 10:00 AM IADDRESS-. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 DEPARTURE TIME: 2:00 PM CON CTOR: TOTAL TIME ON SITE: 4 Hours 1 TRAVEL TIME: 3 Hours DAILY CONDITIONS DAY: Mon X Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun WEAT ER: Sunny X Clear Cloudy Rain HUMID�iT : Low Med High X WIND: Low X Med High TEMPERATURE Freezing Cold Mild Warm X Hot DAILY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Notes: C ntractor removed slab, hit water main at 1:45 pm and ceased excavation Did you fill out any field data reports? Yes X No (If Yes, please attach to this report) Was all wo 'I performed to job specifications? Yes X No If No, please explain: Who was no 'tied about any deficiencies? Were the de ciencies corrected by the contractor? Yes No At what Time? How were th (deficiencies corrected? Misc. Inspected by: IJ DAS Respectfully Submitted By: Keith LeBlanc, P:E, 3 27�/6 FEDERAL ENGINEERING & TESTING Florida Reg. No.: 59394 aPhone 954-784-2941 eder J - Ase 800-848-1919 qc 8 TESTING INC.LL"ym iUL 2 � 7.� 16 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com 250 SW 13 Ave Pompano Beach, FL =69 I Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client:.! Mel-Ry Construction Date: July 11, 2016 ' Addre �, : 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-2062 Project, Proposed Single Family Home Permit #: Addres : 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: TS Area T Ilsted: Building Pad Compaction Req.: 95% Material Type: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth- Elev. . .. Moist .% Dry Density "PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass'_ 1 N i Corner of Pad 12" FL- 8.3 113.3 113.0 10.0 100.3% Yes, 2 lI Ce,'I ter of Building Pad 12" FL 1 8.8 108.0 113.0 10.0 95.6% Yes 3 SEI6rner of Pad 12" FL 7.1 115.4 113.0 10.0 102.1 % Yes 4 5 6 �I i 7 I 8 9 � 110 � 11 12 �I 13 l 14 t Remarks: III See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the footings and is not a verification.of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend for evation: PR = Proofrid�11' 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:, SL = Springe FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc,-P.E. , ' SG = Subgrade BG =Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. 71 A/ 16 BC = Base urse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. N6. 56394 TOP = Top o Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate -of Authorization #.5471 As a mutual pro t fiction to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients; and authorization for publication of statements, conclusions ore racts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. A ensity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or, after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on thi ',I ork. PAGE 1 of 2 r Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer 'of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing,of the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable�of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure Ito verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils, is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. I Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions'on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility, or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be! � re - compacted and re -tested prior to construction. ' As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 250 Area Phone 954-784 2941 e Al - ' 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 $ TESTING INc. www.fed-eng.com 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Mel-Ry Construction Date: June 15, 20116 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order M 16-1778 Proposed Single Family Home Permit #: /&09 — bS-" 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: TS Footings Compaction Req.: Type: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock 95% Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # I I TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum . Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 �II I, W Corner of Pad 12" BOF 9.8 107.8 113.0 10.0 95.4% Yes 2 11E Corner of Pad 12" BOF 9.3 108.0 113.0 10.0 95.6% Yes 3 �IW Corner of Pad 12" BOF 8.7 108.6 113.0 10.0 - 96.1 % Yes 4 4,E Corner of Pad 12" BOF 10.0 108.2 113.0 10.0 95.8% Yes 5 II 6 i f 7 I 8 it 9 I 10 I i 11 I ' 12 j 13 i 14 i KemarKp: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer lThis is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the footings and is not a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity. Legend f r Elevation: PR = Pro �froll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = Spn ghne FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. SG = Subgrade BG = Below Grade Federal, Engineering & testing, Inc. BC = Bas course BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida -Reg. No. 59394 TOP = To of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of'Authorizaiion #5471 As a mutual I rotection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, arid. authorization for publication of statements, conclusions r extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determin6s,the degree of'corripa on of the tested layer of material onl 'I A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After laying dormant for a period of 90 day's'ur,after heavy �alnlstortns, retesting must be performed or this work. i I I PAGE 1 of 2 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of I material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be' performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing ofl the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil, materials to determine if they are capable of. supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil' materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location oof the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure t101 verify the underlying soil conditions. j li Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services.. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.' Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundation, s and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications alre required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility Ili or footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re - compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 LI i dl Phone 954-784-2941 -- cffq44 800-848.1919 Fax 954-784-7875 ' & TESTING INC. www.fed-ong.com 250 1, 13th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33M Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Client: Mel-Ry Construction Date: June 15, 2016 Adi ress: 10967 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Order #: 16-1778 Pr j ect: Proposed Single Family Home Permit #: Ad4 ress: 10701 S. Ocean Drive, Lot 740, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Tech: TS ArE it Tested: Footings Compaction Req.: 95% Ma real Type: Coarse Beach Sand with Some Rock Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Te #,i 1J t TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density Proctor Value Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass PCF PCF % 1 ! NW Corner of Pad 12" BOF 9.8 107.8 113.0 10.0 95.4% Yes 2 i NE Corner of Pad 12" BOF 9.3 108.0 113.0 10.0 95.6% Yes 3 1SW Corner of Pad 12" BOF 8.7 108.6 113.0 10.0 96.1 % Yes l 4 SE Corner of Pad ; 12" BOF 1 10.0 108.2 113.0 10.0 95.8% Yes 5e i 6f 81 i i 9 10 '' 11 12 13 14, I Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Disclaimer �`�►►�I I I rt��,�� This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the footings and is not a ver' rib f3a acity. tl for Elevation: Lege PR = roofroll 1,2,3 =1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = pringline FL = Final Lift Keith=W&6c, P.E. ; .. SG = ubgrade BG = Below Grade Feder, c`neeh1r_dkT tlng, IryC BC = TOP asecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Floridiat — 4.1 9394 Top of Pipe FG =Finished Grade Certifici�````. As 'tual a m conclustins protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of cl(ertts,tiJ�i YI1��ti or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the p ` on of statements, of the tested layer material perform �� of only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. After Iayin9 dormant for a period of 90 days or after frtfstarms, retesting must be d on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 'I Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Purs' ant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced proje t on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of mate vial only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be perfo 'med by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" o , added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the a ded fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supp rting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil matey++als or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the p Iloposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is requirid, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for det, rmination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job prllject specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results;'jare based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98°6 of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are require, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc, shall be notified. Our fin ings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other a 11eas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, utility or footing ;excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re - comp and re -tested prior to construction. As a m0tual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our client and autiorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending ,lour written approval. It has b�°en a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2